|
Post by pauluni on Aug 8, 2013 20:08:41 GMT
Wembley Park to Amersham (steam hauled). Tickets: 353 £35, 4TC adult £30 & child £20. Amersham to Harrow-On-The-Hill (20 hauled) and return (steam hauled). - 11:32 Sunday only
- 13:32 Sunday only
- 15:32
Tickets: 353 £45, 4TC adult £40 & child £20. Amersham to Harrow-On-The-Hill (20 hauled). Tickets: 353 £15, 4TC adult £10 & child £5. Tickets have a 5% discount if booked in advance. More info on www.ltmuseum.co.uk/whats-on/events/vehicles-on-the-move
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2013 20:18:32 GMT
Great news.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2013 20:24:12 GMT
will it be possible to pay on the day for the 20 trip from Amersham - Harrow? I'm up for that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 16:54:35 GMT
Does anyone know if there is an 11.32 or 13.32 on Saturday that's maybe for VIP's or local schools? Seems odd to me to send the train to Amersham for 11am and then sit in a siding for 4 hours.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 17:48:45 GMT
Does anyone know if there is an 11.32 or 13.32 on Saturday that's maybe for VIP's or local schools? Seems odd to me to send the train to Amersham for 11am and then sit in a siding for 4 hours. Yes it works a V.I.P special
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2013 18:12:16 GMT
Ah excellent, many thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2013 7:00:50 GMT
Managed to take a video clip at Old Hanging Wood, where the train came to a gentle halt on the gradient. With a shove from the 20s, the train moved off with the steam engine making a smoky exit!
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 9, 2013 11:28:04 GMT
If it wasn't dragging the 20's it probably would have made it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2013 17:20:53 GMT
There's a comment saying it stopped for a signal check, so I edited the caption.
It was lucky it stopped just short of the bridge, as it was absolutely superb to watch it restarting, the bridge was engulfed in smoke :-)
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on Sept 10, 2013 13:39:46 GMT
There's a comment saying it stopped for a signal check, so I edited the caption. It was lucky it stopped just short of the bridge, as it was absolutely superb to watch it restarting, the bridge was engulfed in smoke :-) JT 82 would've been at danger, and the train tends to stop some distance away. It helps with signal sighting once the train is on the move again and the engine starts steaming. If it'll engulf a bridge in smoke, we don't want that at the critical time when we are passing signals! Always a nightmare stopping there as you say because of the gradient – even if A 970 (the signal previous to JT 82) is showing a caution aspect, they seem to keep going round until just before the fog repeater for JT 82, just to make it as far up as they can on the curve and the gradient, slow it down and then hopefully a check of the fog repeater will show it's clear and we can all push up the hill again, otherwise being in a braking motion, with the gradient and the weight, there's enough time to stop. (With 20227 on the south end on Sunday however, we struggled to pull away! Almost painfully!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2013 14:41:23 GMT
I wasn't able to be around for the steam on Saturday & Sunday as I was up in Manchester (and ran foul of the WCML farce on Sunday evening, but that's another story...) but I was able to get some shots of the "crew familiarisation" runs on Tuesday 3rd September, the only day of the week that they ran. There are a few shots on my site in the September 2013 gallery - here's a sample shot: Link to the September 2013 gallery: plumbloco.smugmug.com/Trains/September-2013Cheers, Geoff
|
|
|
Post by wattman on Sept 11, 2013 19:48:46 GMT
Some snapshots taken on sunday here
|
|
|
Post by motorman on Sept 11, 2013 19:57:53 GMT
Brilliant photos both dampflok nd wattman. Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Sept 12, 2013 14:57:32 GMT
Is there any reason why Sarah Siddons wasn't used this time round, and two Class 20s instead? Also I heard Met 1 failed again on the Saturday - any ideas why?
Jack
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on Sept 16, 2013 11:21:51 GMT
Is there any reason why Sarah Siddons wasn't used this time round, and two Class 20s instead? Also I heard Met 1 failed again on the Saturday - any ideas why? Sarah Siddons – broken springs. Met No. 1 - we were told simply to say it had failed that morning's inspection having developed a fault. There may be issues surrounding its recent repairs. (So 9466 is was!) Here's a picture of Met No. 1, 9466 and one of the Class 20s heading back up to Ruislip on the Saturday though: www.flickr.com/photos/kateeh/9694090245/
|
|