towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jun 28, 2013 15:05:15 GMT
I saw on another thread that S7s will stable at Wembley Pk.Have they changed the layout there?When I worked on the Met in the 70's you could only stable in WPS via the SB fast & plat 6.Will the ex Cicle & H & C trains have to reverse N to S via Harrow on the Hill?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 28, 2013 15:12:53 GMT
Yes that's exactly what is done, S7 passenger into Baker Street pfm2 - change drivers, empty to Harrow siding, empty to Wembley Park pfm6, reverse into sidings.
|
|
|
Post by tjw on Jun 28, 2013 15:29:54 GMT
I am sure I saw an S7 in Wembley Park sidings with "Wembley Park All Staions" on the LED destination indicators... How did that work?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 28, 2013 15:47:24 GMT
Well it would certainly be possible to have run the train in passenger service from Harrow to Wembley if the need had arisen (I'm guessing they normally run it empty to avoid the need to tip out at Wembley).
My understanding is that all the all the S stocks will have all the possible SSR destinations available for the LED indicators, etc.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Jun 28, 2013 18:01:41 GMT
Are there specific H&C T/Ops who are trained for the junction and platforms 2/3, or is it just drive, obeying speed limits and signals?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2013 18:32:08 GMT
An absolutely bonkers and short-sighted decision yet again with regards to these S stocks.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 28, 2013 19:32:31 GMT
An absolutely bonkers and short-sighted decision yet again with regards to these S stocks. With 9 sidings currently unavailable at Ealing Common depot and with Hammersmith depot having sidings too short for 3 S7 to be stabled together, it is necessary to use other available sidings.
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Jun 28, 2013 19:41:22 GMT
... My understanding is that all the all the S stocks will have all the possible SSR destinations available for the LED indicators, etc. Well, a couple of mornings ago, when I passed through, there was an S8 in Baker street P4 claiming to be a Circle line train via (I think it was) Victoria!
|
|
|
Post by causton on Jun 28, 2013 20:00:41 GMT
An absolutely bonkers and short-sighted decision yet again with regards to these S stocks. Isn't there an issue with the Wembley Park sidings being too short for anything else?
|
|
|
Post by motorman on Jun 28, 2013 21:34:08 GMT
If I recall several years ago Neasden and Baker St Met Line crews also covered Circle Line duties and also maybe H & C. Would that not be helpful and cost effective to reintrocuce now that there is a unifrom fleet of trains. Do the early morning Wembley Park starters run emptly to Baker St or do they run in service to Moorgate/Barking from Wembley Pk and Finchley Rd?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 28, 2013 22:54:20 GMT
From what I remember (although I can't remember whether it was on here or at a meet) there are (or at least were) no plans to increase the route knowledge of train operators beyond training east end District crews on the HSK to Edgware Road section. Even just small and obviously (to a lay person) useful links like training all District and Circle/H&C drivers on all sides of the HSK-Gloucester Road-Earl's Court triangle, were not planned last I knew. My guess is that if the funding situation were different and TfL didn't have to cut every corner that can safely be cut then I suspect it might be different.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2013 6:25:24 GMT
An absolutely bonkers and short-sighted decision yet again with regards to these S stocks. With 9 sidings currently unavailable at Ealing Common depot and with Hammersmith depot having sidings too short for 3 S7 to be stabled together, it is necessary to use other available sidings. Which is why it's short-sighted. Edgware Road sidings are too short, resulting in a loss of one road after the new siding is complete. Farringdon sidings are too short, and are going altogether. A road lost at Uxbridge too. Buy a train, and then spend millions upon millions on the rest of the railway to accommodate them. Untold signalling modifications (Edgware Road is a fantastic example, double the amount of signalling equipment as before, overlaid over the old, all so there are high and low speed overlaps, which will be superfluous when the C stocks are gone), immunisation, platform extensions, the list goes on. I remember the S stock as being labelled as having a "bespoke" internal design, well the whole train should have been bespoke, and chop off 12 inches from the end of each car. It's not like anyone really cared about losing seats anyway, that's quite evident. I'd be interested to know if anyone has taken in to consideration the affect of shortening engineering hours every night so these trains can be shoehorned here there and everywhere, add to that the constant access problems because of trains stabled in platforms. When does it end? When they finally decide to spend the money and turn what's left of the Widened Lines into sidings and rebuild depots and sheds. Staggering amount of money, and we're led to believe this is cheaper than a shorter train.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 29, 2013 6:41:56 GMT
If more passengers are travelling they need space. The longer trains are essential.
C stock used to stable at Wembley Park.
The District line used to run with a mix of 6 and 8 car trains in the peak.
The signalling system needs to be upgraded and redundant assets can be removed afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Jun 29, 2013 7:38:58 GMT
At no point was doing all of this work "cheaper", indeed as crusty54 says, it is about "future-proofing". When these trains retire around 2050, there will almost certainly be more people using the system, so doing this work now and having it ready for when the loads are hugely higher is going to be better than having to supplement or replace the fleet halfway through their life.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2013 10:33:46 GMT
With 9 sidings currently unavailable at Ealing Common depot and with Hammersmith depot having sidings too short for 3 S7 to be stabled together, it is necessary to use other available sidings. Which is why it's short-sighted. Edgware Road sidings are too short, resulting in a loss of one road after the new siding is complete. Farringdon sidings are too short, and are going altogether. A road lost at Uxbridge too. Buy a train, and then spend millions upon millions on the rest of the railway to accommodate them. Untold signalling modifications (Edgware Road is a fantastic example, double the amount of signalling equipment as before, overlaid over the old, all so there are high and low speed overlaps, which will be superfluous when the C stocks are gone), immunisation, platform extensions, the list goes on. I remember the S stock as being labelled as having a "bespoke" internal design, well the whole train should have been bespoke, and chop off 12 inches from the end of each car. It's not like anyone really cared about losing seats anyway, that's quite evident. I'd be interested to know if anyone has taken in to consideration the affect of shortening engineering hours every night so these trains can be shoehorned here there and everywhere, add to that the constant access problems because of trains stabled in platforms. When does it end? When they finally decide to spend the money and turn what's left of the Widened Lines into sidings and rebuild depots and sheds. Staggering amount of money, and we're led to believe this is cheaper than a shorter train. I couldn't agree more its a disgrace to be honest and they not bothered with all these shortened engineering hours / cancelled engineering hours so they can run there shiny trains. But they still want the same amount of work to happen and nothing stops it unless its service affecting for the next morning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2013 10:49:52 GMT
What does seem - silly is the word I would choose - is that having decided to stable H&C/Circle S7s at Wembley Park, to have to use Met (rather than H&C/Circle) drivers to get them there. (Can it be any Met driver, or only those with special S7 training?)
Reading domh45's comment about 'future proofing' - yes, good idea, but a pity it wasn't taken to its logical conclusion by upgrading the whole of the SSL network to use S8s. Was this actually ever considered, or costed?
Probably the worst miss though was making the S8s slightly longer than 8 car A stock trains - sufficiently so to require a lot of work, but not enough to provide any great advantage...
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 29, 2013 11:24:46 GMT
What does seem - silly is the word I would choose - is that having decided to stable H&C/Circle S7s at Wembley Park, to have to use Met (rather than H&C/Circle) drivers to get them there. (Can it be any Met driver, or only those with special S7 training?) Reading domh45's comment about 'future proofing' - yes, good idea, but a pity it wasn't taken to its logical conclusion by upgrading the whole of the SSL network to use S8s. Was this actually ever considered, or costed? Probably the worst miss though was making the S8s slightly longer than 8 car A stock trains - sufficiently so to require a lot of work, but not enough to provide any great advantage... Impossible to fit S8s on the Circle and H&C. Selective door opening already required for 2 front doors at Baker Street and Bayswater etc. The early and late C stock journeys to/from Wembley Park used to run in service and call at the parallel Jubilee line platforms at stations like Neasden and Willesden Green. Time will tell if the training for all drivers is worthwhile.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Jun 29, 2013 12:53:03 GMT
Yeah, some of the platforms are physically impossible to lengthen without hugely disturbing those "up above" for example everywhere between Notting Hill Gate and Paddington, where already there is a huge amount of SDO. I think that to have made the H&C and Circle S8 wouldn't have been justified, but it is a shame that District can't get S8s, retaining S7s for the Wimblewares. But then again that opens up the issue of "Why not just have S8s for the Met/ District and S6s to directly replace the Cs, which was hotly debated earlier in the project, before the trains started to arrive
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2013 23:12:13 GMT
Yeah, some of the platforms are physically impossible to lengthen without hugely disturbing those "up above" for example everywhere between Notting Hill Gate and Paddington, where already there is a huge amount of SDO. I think that to have made the H&C and Circle S8 wouldn't have been justified, ... I agree, it wouldn't have cheap, or easy, but did anybody do the sums, to see if it was worth it? (A 14% capacity increase, S8 v S7, as well as the benefits of a standard fleet)
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 30, 2013 5:18:51 GMT
S7s only just fit into the extended platforms at Hammersmith.
Don't think they could get S8s into Edgware Road.
The line is only just below the surface. You would have to buy property above it to extend the platforms. Some of the most expensive areas in London.
Just not affordable.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 30, 2013 16:16:05 GMT
S7s only just fit into the extended platforms at Hammersmith. That's a reflection of them being extended for S7 rather than S8. Maybe - but just how unaffordable? It could be done for a price; and the benefits would have a value. Without knowing the price and the value - for any project - you can't say whether it's affordable, or worth it.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jun 30, 2013 18:40:30 GMT
If it's any consolation, we're struggling to get S7 mods commissioned because of S7 test trains running!
Regarding Wembley Park, it was already tight for an A stock and slightly too small for an S8. Their reuse for S7s does help, especially with the current shortages of depot roads.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jun 30, 2013 21:18:37 GMT
I have moved this thread from the Met' Line board to this one as it's one of those wibbly wobbly things that kinda crosses the boundaries between lines.
Also, can we please keep this thread to S7s at Wembley Park, the "Why not S8 on the District/H&C question has gone around a fair few times and really belongs on the RIPAS board if we're going to do it again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2013 20:12:57 GMT
Neasden night crews take S7's empty to and from Neasden depot to Baker Street. All met drivers have been re-trained in S7 movement to and from Wembley siddings. ;-)
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jul 1, 2013 20:45:08 GMT
All met drivers have been re-trained in S7 movement to and from Wembley siddings. ;-) Was there any specific S7 training, or was it just a case of you have one car less than normal?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2013 20:47:33 GMT
A few things had changed since A Stocks stabled there, minor differences.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jul 1, 2013 22:56:18 GMT
Sorry, I meant with regards train handling rather than route knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 2, 2013 8:06:48 GMT
Sorry, I meant with regards train handling rather than route knowledge. There would be little difference, just remembering to stop at the few S7 stop markers (Harrow siding) and one less M2 car.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jul 2, 2013 10:40:41 GMT
If an S7 did go up to the buffers in Harrow siding would there be any negative effects? Track circuits, sighting of the shunt signal etc...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2013 13:29:15 GMT
No negative effects and nothing new in terms of train handling. The driver ramps on the north end of Wembley siddings have been removed and there are new S stopping marks.
|
|