class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Sept 4, 2012 7:59:58 GMT
I've been using the District Line to get from Hammersmith to Victoria for over twenty years now and in all that time the eastbound train describer has always been next to useless.
The cycle is usually something like this: (Obviously, on occasion I get there part way through the cycle.)
On arrival it reads: "Upminster 1 min"
After a two or three minutes it changes to "Upminster"
After another two or three minutes it changes to "No smoking on the Underground"
A few minutes later it changes to "Next Tower Hill/Upminster train within x mins"
Usually the train arrives going to the stated destination and within the last stated time (but without a normal countdown).
What I can't understand is why, for over two decades, they have kept whatever system is in use running in an almost useless state. All they need to do is remove the spurious "Upminster 1 min >> Upminster" part of the cycle.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Sept 4, 2012 11:41:34 GMT
Ah but it isn't spurious! When the dot matrix indicates a train as 1 minute away that is correct, well that is to say that it would be no more than that far away if it was moving and continued to do so! Dot matrix is pretty much just a new front on an old system on the District and works on track circuits. Thus once an approaching train 'lands' on the track which in the quoted time at normal line speed for that section would put it in the platform it can 'sit down' at a signal all day long and still only 1 minute away unless a signal operator intervenes to modify what is displayed. Until there is GPS realtime tracking of every train on the system, times given against train descriptions must be taken as little more than a rough guide at best. I had exactly that explanation from a friend of mine who's a Central Line driver. But after I had mulled it over I realised it didn't really answer the question. Whilst I understand that the system is not particularly sophisticated and I've always told people that there are ordinary minutes and 'London Underground' minutes, this doesn't explain several aspects of what is happening, here. 1) Why does the indicator always initially say it is an Upminster train when it is frequently not? 2) Why does the time disappear first before the whole message vanishes. (In the same way as it does at most other station directly before the train appears.) 3) How does the phantom train manage to completely vanish from the system. i.e. the train that eventually arrives has a different destination and appears to be 4/5 minutes further back down the line. 4) As there seems to be a 'reporting point' that yields a 'within 4 minutes' message, why does the phantom train never trigger this? 5) Why does the 'real' train - the one that arrives roughly within the specified time - never trigger the "1 Min" message. It always goes directly from "within the next x mins" to "train approaching". 6) Why have LU never done anything about this recurring fault that persistently gives passengers entirely spurious information. (It's particularly annoying if you are unaware of the problem because it can mean that you don't catch a Piccadilly Line train and change at South Ken because you expect a train that will get you directly to Victoria within a minute.)
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 4, 2012 11:58:06 GMT
Lucky to have a train indicator. For nearly 70 years Elm Park to Upminster have waited for a next train indicator and now some of them have indicators they do not work. Staff there used to wait for a phone call to tell them where the last train was. Up here passengers receive no information as to how long you have to wait.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2012 15:09:21 GMT
Lucky to have a train indicator. For nearly 70 years Elm Park to Upminster have waited for a next train indicator and now some of them have indicators they do not work. Staff there used to wait for a phone call to tell them where the last train was. Up here passengers receive no information as to how long you have to wait. Everyone else knows that you lot are too busy getting up to rumpty-pumpty to need or want a train anytime soon.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Sept 5, 2012 6:00:49 GMT
Although when you are tired of rumpty-pumpty, or would like to engage in some aboard a train, the various mobile phone applications that display London Underground train describer information from Trackernet are reasonably accurate, even at Elm Park. I think, although am not certain, that this is due to their ability to "detect" trains in any block, not just the one supposedly one minute before a station
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Sept 5, 2012 8:57:53 GMT
I wouldn't rely on GPS, either - here in SWT territory, for some weeks, we were told that the Portsmouth train in which we were sitting was for Goring-on-sea...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2012 13:52:56 GMT
Ah but it isn't spurious! When the dot matrix indicates a train as 1 minute away that is correct, well that is to say that it would be no more than that far away if it was moving and continued to do so! Dot matrix is pretty much just a new front on an old system on the District and works on track circuits. Thus once an approaching train 'lands' on the track which in the quoted time at normal line speed for that section would put it in the platform it can 'sit down' at a signal all day long and still only 1 minute away unless a signal operator intervenes to modify what is displayed. Until there is GPS realtime tracking of every train on the system, times given against train descriptions must be taken as little more than a rough guide at best. I had exactly that explanation from a friend of mine who's a Central Line driver. But after I had mulled it over I realised it didn't really answer the question. Whilst I understand that the system is not particularly sophisticated and I've always told people that there are ordinary minutes and 'London Underground' minutes, this doesn't explain several aspects of what is happening, here. 1) Why does the indicator always initially say it is an Upminster train when it is frequently not? 2) Why does the time disappear first before the whole message vanishes. (In the same way as it does at most other station directly before the train appears.) 3) How does the phantom train manage to completely vanish from the system. i.e. the train that eventually arrives has a different destination and appears to be 4/5 minutes further back down the line. 4) As there seems to be a 'reporting point' that yields a 'within 4 minutes' message, why does the phantom train never trigger this? 5) Why does the 'real' train - the one that arrives roughly within the specified time - never trigger the "1 Min" message. It always goes directly from "within the next x mins" to "train approaching". 6) Why have LU never done anything about this recurring fault that persistently gives passengers entirely spurious information. (It's particularly annoying if you are unaware of the problem because it can mean that you don't catch a Piccadilly Line train and change at South Ken because you expect a train that will get you directly to Victoria within a minute.) Answers 1) The information what Hammersmith recieves is actually from Turnham Green for the District & Acton Town for the Piccadilly. Yes there has been a few issues recently but I'm sure these are now resolved. 2) Hammersmith has a different dot matrix system to the other sites and even other lines. When the station was refurbed in the 90's (I think) to get the lightboxes replaced this was a simple addon thus none of the indicators show a 2nd or 3rd train (but it does in some ways as it usually shows underneath the main description " Next High St Ken Within 2mins ". 3) Phantom Train ?? 4) Again read question 1 about Turnham Green & Acton Town. It will actually say 1min when the E/B train leaves Turnham Green (Dont know why it was done this way). It was proberly because the other sites dont have a indicator and its going on the last controlled track circuit at Turnham Green. 5) When it triggers the 1min it will just count down until 0. The next train approching comes on when a track circuit on the approach to Hammersmith is dropped by the train. 6) Until a full resignalling you are always going to get these spurious messages at some locations. The newer signs you see at some stations are awaiting the new system to come in and some stations have been wired up to trackernet for there information again not realible. If you think you have it bad at Hammersmith try the east end of the line its worse. Hope it helps!
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Sept 5, 2012 17:38:00 GMT
Well at long last Barking has got train indicators, which can show the next three trains on the eastbound, the signs are on both platforms as trains open doors on both sides (except for trains going into Barking sidings).
Not sure how many trains can be shown on the westbound platform.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 5, 2012 20:13:41 GMT
Not sure how may trains can be shown on the westbound platform. Three trains as well and with the destination which is a new because in the old days it was not until you got to Whitechapel that the indicators gave a destination. On the eastbound having three trains showing Terminates here is very depressing and a H&C going into the bay is the icing on the cake.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 5, 2012 21:16:12 GMT
Answers 1) The information what Hammersmith recieves is actually from Turnham Green for the District & Acton Town for the Piccadilly. 3) Phantom Train ?? 4) Again read question 1 about Turnham Green & Acton Town. It will actually say 1min when the E/B train leaves Turnham Green (Dont know why it was done this way). It was proberly because the other sites dont have a indicator and its going on the last controlled track circuit at Turnham Green. 5) When it triggers the 1min it will just count down until 0. The next train approching comes on when a track circuit on the approach to Hammersmith is dropped by the train. So if I understand you correctly the system is triggered when a train passes Turnham Green, but is set to tell hemmersmith the train is one minute away, and then times down to zero - although the train will proibably only be at Stamford Brook by then. But what if there is another train already between TG and Hammersmith? Is this lost to the system as soon as the next train kicks in at TG? Or does it pop up again nearer Hammersmith and overwrite the one that was triggered at TG?
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Sept 6, 2012 8:21:20 GMT
Thanks for the responses, but none of them explains this very frequent phantom train.
To recap the peculiarity:
1) The indicator shows an Upminster train in one minute. 2) The "1 Min" disappears 3) The train message is replaced by a "No Smoking on the underground" message. 4) There is a gap with a blank indicator that could last for many minutes 5) A "Next xxx train within 4 mins" message appears 6) Roughly 4 mins latter a train to the specified destination arrives.
I have observed this dozens, if not hundreds, of times over the last 22 years.
What I want to know is: What is the explanation for the Upminster train completely vanishing from the system and why was this such a very frequent occurrence?
I understand the limitations of any such system - even the most sophisticated cannot predict such things as passengers delaying things by blocking doors. This is quite different, though, as the system repeatedly reported a train that did not appear to exist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2012 15:14:42 GMT
The cable was replaced around 2003 / 2004 T/D drums still exsist we have at Earls Court for trains coming up from Parsons Green and another at Turnham Green for trains coming up from Gunnersbury. The only spares for these are coming from the Northern Line as they are getting some new system. The east end of the District has a new PLC system yet to work 100% whilst from Whitechapel its back onto the convential system with code holding sets recievers etc. The recievers a Hammersmith have the ability to hold 99 trains (from memory) and the dot matrix system just gets it info from the main train describer equipment as its basically over layed onto it. The way you have described your problems with the boards at Hammersmith is in such the way it is designed but there should not be any phantom train but the steps in which you have stated is correct. Other sites on the line except the newer boards or the east end of the line all use the same equipment to power and control the board hence they will show the next 3 trains and the actual minutes when triggered by various track circuits. The only fault on them signs recently was that the E/B Picc sign was showing a Earls Court (District T/D) instead of a Arnos Grove. With Hammersmith to reboot the system all 4 platforms power down and after approx 4 minutes spring back into life, only trouble is when this is happening you may find the boards will show phatom trains until it picks the right one up again. And if the T/D is wrong at Hammersmith for what ever reason its not the signaller who puts it right it will be the programme machine (automatic signaller) actually changing it. When these signs do failure / show wrong info station staff do report these and usually it just takes the reboot to kick it back into life again but if its more then that usually it will be fixed by the next day. Its very rare for signs to be not working for days but Mile End W/B was faulty for approx 3 months whilst aquiring a spare part remember the dot matrix system itself is over 25 years old in most places and things do break.
|
|
|
Post by rdm on Sept 6, 2012 16:09:06 GMT
I can remember a time many moons ago (1950s) when the TD on the WB DR platform at Turnham Green was a moveable finger-board worked by the Platform Supervisor using the mark one eyeball to check the headlight codes on approaching trains... not foolproof by any means, but there was someone there to ask! I cannot recall whether there was a similar arrangement on the EB, but as the sightlines on that side were poor I suspect there was nothing except the observation of the destination plates on trains as they arrived.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Sept 6, 2012 17:15:16 GMT
@ rdm
Turnham Green w/b > I think that semaphore board was still there in 1965/6 at least. There were only 4 possible destinations on it (2 were obviously Richmond & E Bdy) and l cannot remember 2 of them but they might have been Northfields & Hounslow West. They were then worked by a very pretty young lady, new to the job, who, as you say, had to look for the headlight code as the train approached then pull the correct semaphore arm down accordingly. E/b was a lightbox, l feel certain
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2012 19:41:30 GMT
It's funny you mention Northfields - my g/f assures me that she recently saw a DMI displaying "Northfields via Victoria" on the District line (Westbound) at West Ham station. I assume that this error would be a relic of that system?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 6, 2012 20:01:00 GMT
It's funny you mention Northfields - my g/f assures me that she recently saw a DMI displaying "Northfields via Victoria" on the District line (Westbound) at West Ham station. I assume that this error would be a relic of that system? Yes, that's cropped up a few times. Always gets a few funny looks from the passengers!
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Sept 7, 2012 10:01:45 GMT
It's funny you mention Northfields - my g/f assures me that she recently saw a DMI displaying "Northfields via Victoria" on the District line (Westbound) at West Ham station. I assume that this error would be a relic of that system? I may be wrong in this particular instance, but the signallers sometimes use a different description on their side of things to highlight a particular train for whatever reason. This definitely occurs in the central area and so sometimes a train may be described on the platform as a "Putney Bridge" when it is in fact going somewhere else - this is the signaller setting himself a reminder. It may be that the offending train is going to be reformed at Earls Court, is actually going to Olympia (DMI's at least cannot show Olympia east of Earls Court), is to be held and run round at Earls Court.......there's all sorts of reasons that they may wish to make use of their reminder tool. This may or may not be the case at the east end of the District line, but I can at least confirm that I have seen it many times before - the Northfields description that is!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2012 11:20:19 GMT
The Northfields description is usually for a Richmond train it comes up as it has lost a code cant remember exactly which one but say a Richmond is AB then a Northfields is A hence lost the B code. What signallers used to do down the east end would be for a Circle which stated at Barking if it was going via Tower Hill it would be given a Putney Bridge or if it was going via Liverpool Street give it a Baker Street description. It would be the same as a Olympia train it would be given a Putney Bridge description because the system has never had a Olympia programmed into it but this could only be changed at Earls Court to Olympia it would of been given a Putney Bridge just so the programme machnes would route the train in FCFS (First Come First Serve) mode as this purely works off the trains description.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2012 15:55:04 GMT
The drums and other mechanical wizardry sound wonderful. What will happen when they are replaced? Is there a museum of LUL gadgetry somewhere?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2012 11:46:35 GMT
More then likely to be scrapped they weigh a fair bit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2012 23:33:43 GMT
From a drivers view, Hammersmith e/b seems to be pretty good at showing, upon arrival, the correct destination for the train you are driving and also correctly showing "next Tower Hill Train within 4 mins" (or wherever) showing it has left Turnham Green. Of course we wouldn't see any Phantom trains that appear and dissapear when there is no train there.
The east end signs have been playing up a lot! Mile End w/b invariably drops your train just as you arrive, thus showing the following train in position 1 (some minutes away) whilst you actually sit in the platform. Upton Park e/b seems to show everything as a "Metropolitan Line via King Cross" (!!). Whitechapel has frequent days when it shows everything as a "Hammersmith H&C" regardless.
I know a lot of effort has been expended upon the existing functional TDs at the east end stations and some now work more reliably, but the ones above seem to be rather stubbon!
What has happened with the arrows at Gloucester Road, they slowly stopped working about a year or so ago, one display at a time and now none of them work!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2012 12:02:12 GMT
The east end T/D has basially been de-commissioned due to a new system going in but not working 100% it has been currently been " ON TEST " for a few weeks while the contractors fault find on it. Re Gloucester Road untill a fault is raised no one will go out and have a look at it. I have been at Hammersmith for a few days last week and I have not seen these phantom trains the system is working correctly on all 4 platforms
|
|