Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 3:50:06 GMT
Hi all,
I was wondering the other day, if the ELL hadn't been transferred to LO, would we be seeing the S7,S8 and the S4 stock or do you think something would have been done such as extending all of the platforms to cope with S7 trains.
Thanks ELL
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on Sept 2, 2012 5:01:09 GMT
Interesting question, I myself am quite interested.
If platforms were extended to take 7 car trains would they have been shared with the rest of the S7s? We can guarantee that they'd no longer share trains with the Metropolitan Line.
I can't help but feel that we can expect a 5 car project on the ELL in the near future.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Sept 2, 2012 9:10:54 GMT
the platforms at Canada Water are only 4 car length and can't be extended for the possible 5th car. Selective door opening will be used.
Some of the old platforms could probably take an S7 in the same way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 9:45:01 GMT
The S stock wouldn't be able to run to West Croydon or Crystal Palace as tube drivers can't drive on proper network rail main lines.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 2, 2012 9:55:00 GMT
The S stock wouldn't be able to run to West Croydon or Crystal Palace as tube drivers can't drive on proper network rail main lines. But if the ELL hadn't been transferred to LO, it would still only run from Shoreditch to New Cross / New Cross Gate.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 2, 2012 10:53:01 GMT
notatraindriver--why cant "tube" drivers drive on "Proper" NR lines? They do Gunnersbury /Richmond and QP to Harrow & Wealdstone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 11:27:24 GMT
I think those are special cases and only shared with Lorol trains - not heavy freight for example.
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Sept 2, 2012 12:38:38 GMT
Heavy freight used to run on the East london Line between underground trains. I remember as a boy they would shake Wapping station as they passed through.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 2, 2012 12:38:47 GMT
this could go on forever
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 2, 2012 12:43:52 GMT
just one other---- Wimbledon/E Putney although under U/G day to day management is used by NR for all sorts of diversions not just lorol (to notatraindriver)
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 2, 2012 12:54:43 GMT
I think those are special cases and only shared with Lorol trains - not heavy freight for example. And on the Wimbledon branch, when owned by British Rail, they shared with all sorts of mainline train, including express passenger and loco-hauled trains. Indeed, they still do, but the track has been owned by TfL since BR privatisation in 1994.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 2, 2012 13:43:27 GMT
Just a case of underground drivers having additional training for running on NR sections - which District and Bakerloo drivers routinely get.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 14:11:40 GMT
the platforms at Canada Water are only 4 car length and can't be extended for the possible 5th car. Selective door opening will be used. But come on, 3 whole cars would be going a bit too far with SDO, so an S4 stock may have been a logical idea or just transfer it to LO where it could run 4 cars (correct me if i'm wrong) as standard....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 14:15:14 GMT
With this whole LU drivers not being able to go on 'proper' NR Lines, does this work the other way as in NR drivers can't go on LU lines because I go to college in Putney and when I am at East Putney station at about 4:45, a SWT train passes by out of passenger service (presumably going to Clapham Junction)
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Sept 2, 2012 14:20:11 GMT
Heavy freight used to run on the East london Line between underground trains. I remember as a boy they would shake Wapping station as they passed through. Personally,I think NR should investigate the possibilities for adding a few connections North and South to enable the ELL (now in their possession) to be used as a very handy Night Freight route. I know that the new build section North of Whitechapel is too steep/curved for such a use (a wasted opportunity),but a freight curve leading to the East on the GE would make this a valuable connection outside passenger hours.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Sept 2, 2012 14:24:07 GMT
when I am at East Putney station at about 4:45, a SWT train passes by out of passenger service (presumably going to Clapham Junction) This is an empty stock working to get trains to Waterloo ready for the peak. From Wimbledon Depot,I believe.Many years ago I went to school in Putney and would often see this train (8VEP and later 8CEP) sitting on the Up curve at Point Pleasant as I caught the train home to Clapham Jct.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 14:41:20 GMT
Metropolitan Line trains share NR lines between Harrow-on-the Hill and Amersham, well able to take freight although there isn't much (if any, other than infrastructure) these days. Freight also once ran regularly on the Hammersmith and City between Paddington and Farringdon (to Smithfield Market).
Rotherhithe and Wapping would be extremely difficult if not impossible to lengthen without total rebuilding, which might be difficult to cost-justify. If the ELL had been retained as part of London Underground, it would either have needed a special build of S4 stock, or a retained fleet such as D78s.
As an aside, the decision to build Canada Water ELL only 4-car length must rank as one of the crassest short-sighted decisions ever made, along with Cutty Sark.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 2, 2012 14:59:11 GMT
the platforms at Canada Water are only 4 car length and can't be extended for the possible 5th car. Selective door opening will be used. But come on, 3 whole cars would be going a bit too far with SDO, so an S4 stock may have been a logical idea or just transfer it to LO where it could run 4 cars (correct me if i'm wrong) as standard.... It is worth remembering that the S-stock cars are shorter than the class 378, so a 5-car S-stock unit (2 x 17.4m DM and 3 x 15.4m UDM = 81m) is about the same length as the 4-car class 378 (4 x 20.4m = 81.6m) used currently. An S7 unit would only need around 2 cars worth of doors kept closed at Canada Water and a 5-car class 378 would only need the front and rear passenger doors kept shut (allowing for the the driver's cab being in the tunnel).
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 2, 2012 15:10:36 GMT
Metropolitan Line trains share NR lines between Harrow-on-the Hill and Amersham, well able to take freight although there isn't much (if any, other than infrastructure) these days. Freight also once ran regularly on the Hammersmith and City between Paddington and Farringdon (to Smithfield Market). Harrow to Amersham has always been Metropolitan line / TfL owned and it has always been the National Rail trains running over 'foreign' track that is currently owned by TfL. Rotherhithe could quite possibly have been rebuilt an alternative entrance / exit for the Canada Water platforms, if the later station had long enough platforms. After all, the platforms are very close together. However, I think the problem with building longer Canada Water ELL platforms was down to the space available for adding the platforms in a rather restricted site.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 15:26:18 GMT
But come on, 3 whole cars would be going a bit too far with SDO, so an S4 stock may have been a logical idea or just transfer it to LO where it could run 4 cars (correct me if i'm wrong) as standard.... It is worth remembering that the S-stock cars are shorter than the class 378, so a 5-car S-stock unit (2 x 17.4m DM and 3 x 15.4m UDM = 81m) is about the same length as the 4-car class 378 (4 x 20.4m = 81.6m) used currently. An S7 unit would only need around 2 cars worth of doors kept closed at Canada Water and a 5-car class 378 would only need the front and rear passenger doors kept shut (allowing for the the driver's cab being in the tunnel). Well even then, 2 cars worth of doors is still a lot, and you would have the presiding argument that the 7 car capacity isn't actually needed as it handled 4 car A60/62 throughout its time as LU (apart from when they went for OPO conversion), so you would have 2-3 cars potentially wasted as IIRC, the ELL wasn't even that busy when running the A60/62
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 2, 2012 15:36:19 GMT
With this whole LU drivers not being able to go on 'proper' NR Lines, does this work the other way as in NR drivers can't go on LU lines because I go to college in Putney and when I am at East Putney station at about 4:45, a SWT train passes by out of passenger service (presumably going to Clapham Junction) This is one of two remaining cases where NR trains run on LU tracks - there used to be many more, especially when the "Widened Lines" between Kings Cross and Moorgate were owned by the Metropolitan, as was the East London Line. The Wimbledon branch is unusual because it was owned by NR until c1994(?), and is still signalled to their standards. NR can still use it for empty stock workings, diversions, and the odd scheduled passenger service (primarily done for route learning purposes). The other TfL route on which NR trains run in normal service is between Harrow on the Hill and Amersham. This line is signalled to LU statndards, and trains on this route have to be fitted with tripcocks.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 2, 2012 16:18:04 GMT
It is worth remembering that the S-stock cars are shorter than the class 378, so a 5-car S-stock unit (2 x 17.4m DM and 3 x 15.4m UDM = 81m) is about the same length as the 4-car class 378 (4 x 20.4m = 81.6m) used currently. An S7 unit would only need around 2 cars worth of doors kept closed at Canada Water and a 5-car class 378 would only need the front and rear passenger doors kept shut (allowing for the the driver's cab being in the tunnel). Well even then, 2 cars worth of doors is still a lot, and you would have the presiding argument that the 7 car capacity isn't actually needed as it handled 4 car A60/62 throughout its time as LU (apart from when they went for OPO conversion), The line has also been operated by 1938 stock (replacing Q Stock), prior to the A stock being introduced. D78 stock being used during the A stock OPO conversion. The ELL is considerably busier now, than prior to the conversion to National Rail standards, due the extensions north and south, the increased frequencies and the much better connections available. The fleet of A60/62 stock used before the shutdown would struggle to even run the current Dalston - New Cross shuttle service at current frequencies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 17:37:30 GMT
The fleet of A60/62 stock used before the shutdown would struggle to even run the current Dalston - New Cross shuttle service at current frequencies. Of course, but the A60/62 stock weren't that busy when running the ELL from Shoreditch/Whitechapel - New Cross/New Cross Gate
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 2, 2012 22:47:40 GMT
The S stock wouldn't be able to run to West Croydon or Crystal Palace as tube drivers can't drive on proper network rail main lines. But if the ELL hadn't been transferred to LO, it would still only run from Shoreditch to New Cross / New Cross Gate. Not true. The northern and phase 2 southerm extension both predate as a scheme the plan of an opperating transfer to LOROL by many years. A Dalston-NX/NXG/Peckham line would have resulted, and presumably that would still be run by A stock, or rather what remained of it. The problem would probably have been what replaced it and when. An S7 at Canada Water would probably be considered as pushing it too far, both platforms are just shy of 80m, an S7 being roughly 118m. This would mean both front and rear cars would have all doors shut, though the middle 5 NDMs would be able to open all doors. However a small fleet of S6's wouldn't be ideal either. In the not too distant past 6 car trains ran, though with some doors cut out.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Sept 2, 2012 22:54:37 GMT
How many cars of S stock would fit in the Chalfont & Latimer bay? I think that that might have affected the choice taken, if LUL had retained the line and had to purchase short SSR trains
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Sept 3, 2012 11:26:02 GMT
There was going to be a eastwards connection and the line (now buried under infill) to the w/chapel hoist actually went as far as bethnal green bank. it wold have carried on under Mape street and surfaced in the Hackney area.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 3, 2012 19:34:44 GMT
But if the ELL hadn't been transferred to LO, it would still only run from Shoreditch to New Cross / New Cross Gate. Not true. The northern and phase 2 southerm extension both predate as a scheme the plan of an opperating transfer to LOROL by many years. A Dalston-NX/NXG/Peckham line would have resulted, and presumably that would still be run by A stock, or rather what remained of it. The problem would probably have been what replaced it and when. An S7 at Canada Water would probably be considered as pushing it too far, both platforms are just shy of 80m, an S7 being roughly 118m. This would mean both front and rear cars would have all doors shut, though the middle 5 NDMs would be able to open all doors. However a small fleet of S6's wouldn't be ideal either. In the not too distant past 6 car trains ran, though with some doors cut out. You are right. When the extension to Dalston was first proposed, I used to imagine A stock trains trundling along the Kingsland Viaduct, which actually hadn't long been closed at that time.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Sept 3, 2012 19:57:32 GMT
Is it odd that 378s i.e. NR stock run on the overground (a very metro-type railway) while S stock runs on the Met (a more suburban railway)?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 3, 2012 20:02:36 GMT
Is it odd that 378s i.e. NR stock run on the overground (a very metro-type railway) while S stock runs on the Met (a more suburban railway)? True, but the Met does run into Central London, so it is considered a metro service, and the S stock was designed more with this in mind than for its suburban credentials.
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Sept 5, 2012 0:54:10 GMT
The S stock wouldn't be able to run to West Croydon or Crystal Palace as tube drivers can't drive on proper network rail main lines. Simply not true. There's nothing to stop the units getting the stamp to run along side frieght. Hell they are about to let trams and freight trains mix in Sheffield so there is no basis in fact for your statement. I'd have loved to see S5's going to Wimbledon as part of the original ELLX plan.
|
|