Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 3:45:38 GMT
Greetings all, long time watcher, first time poster.
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the Metropolitan line could be extended to take over District (and possibly H&C) services to Upminster and the District (and possibly H&C) would terminate at Aldgate but it wouldn't be done until all of the S7+S8 trains are in service. Does anyone else have any knowledge about this.
Thanks ELL
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Sept 2, 2012 9:16:12 GMT
the idea was to turn to Circle and H&C into a double loop with trains starting at Hammersmith and doing a loop of the Circle and then to Barking and also extend the Met to Barking.
Too many people from Upminster line travel to destinations on the District to loose the links
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Sept 2, 2012 10:02:59 GMT
Also because of the District depot is at Upminster it would result in an enormous amount of dead mileage.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Sept 2, 2012 10:19:29 GMT
phillw48 is correct
The logical place for Upminster starting journeys to finish is > > Upminster!!
Run alternate trains around the "Circle" like a lassoo alternating clockwise/anticlockwise. Possibly ditto Ealing and/or Richmond services back to Ealing/Richmond.
You actually wouldn't need a "Circle Line" at all then.
Too logical for many TfL/LU suits to grasp though.
|
|
|
Post by madandy on Sept 2, 2012 11:59:53 GMT
Once again the issue of the circle line is at the root of this.
The problem with the Circle line and the "Edgware Road fiasco is the imbalance of lines feeding into it clockwise and out anti-clockwise from Hammersmith and then the Metropolitan.
I read somewhere else a suggestion that instead of withdrawing the Olympia service some of the Hammersmith trains should be diverted there thus solving congestion near Hammersmith and the Edgware Road change.
In fact the the issue as I see it with Olympia is that trains from there also feed into the Circle Line clockwise from Earls Court thus worsening the situation.
Surely a lot of problems could be solved by having a Circle Line consisting of two basic services; Barking to Barking (or thereabouts) round the Circle and and the Wimbledon Wimbledon-Edgware Road service extended round the Circle to Olympia.
Whatever else fits in with that is bye the bye but essentially this would maintain the Circle service without any break and relieve the clockwise bottle neck from three more lines than anti-clockwise feeding in to two.
CORRECTION
SHOULD READ:-
"Whatever else fits in with that is bye the bye but essentially this would maintain the Circle service without any break and relieve the clockwise bottle neck from three more lines than anti-clockwise feeding in to ONE."
And yes, it would mean Earls Court being served twice by the same train which makes one ponder over whether the line diagrams would be linear or in the shape of a loop.
|
|
|
Post by madandy on Sept 2, 2012 12:12:58 GMT
....the essential element of my above posting is using Olympia to relieve pressure by feeding into the Inner Circle and out of the Outer Circle.
Also, given the "long way round" nature of the journey from Olympia to Edgware Road it makes far more sense for it to be directly accessed from the South of the Circle Line if at all.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Sept 2, 2012 13:49:17 GMT
All I have heard and read about in the past 5 years has been a proposal to extend the Met Main to Barking (primarily Uxbridge branch trains), in essence allowing the H&C to terminate @ Aldgate. When first proposed, the kicker was that this could not be effected until the A stock was replaced.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 2, 2012 13:53:52 GMT
All I have heard and read about in the past 5 years has been a proposal to extend the Met Main to Barking (primarily Uxbridge branch trains), in essence allowing the H&C to terminate @ Aldgate. When first proposed, the kicker was that this could not be effected until the A stock was replaced. How many of the platforms from Aldgate East to Barking could accomodate S8's?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 14:18:26 GMT
All I have heard and read about in the past 5 years has been a proposal to extend the Met Main to Barking (primarily Uxbridge branch trains), in essence allowing the H&C to terminate @ Aldgate. When first proposed, the kicker was that this could not be effected until the A stock was replaced. I knew I was close, just 8 stations out. Does anyone know why it couldn't be done until all of the A stock was gone?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Sept 2, 2012 14:24:55 GMT
How many of the platforms from Aldgate East to Barking could accomodate S8's? Thinking about it, probably most except Whitechapel, West Ham then Plaistow & Barking bays. Most platforms would require moving of signal equipment.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Sept 2, 2012 16:07:07 GMT
All I have heard and read about in the past 5 years has been a proposal to extend the Met Main to Barking (primarily Uxbridge branch trains), in essence allowing the H&C to terminate @ Aldgate. When first proposed, the kicker was that this could not be effected until the A stock was replaced. I knew I was close, just 8 stations out. Does anyone know why it couldn't be done until all of the A stock was gone? They are exceptionally wide, and there are a handful of gauge infringements
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2012 20:20:31 GMT
I knew I was close, just 8 stations out. Does anyone know why it couldn't be done until all of the A stock was gone? They are exceptionally wide, and there are a handful of gauge infringements Which leads to the question, why did LU (as then was) build out-of-gauge stock?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 2, 2012 20:55:44 GMT
It wasn't out of gauge for the service it was built for. It was built that big so they could fit 3+2 seating.
If you really want a go-anywhere stock it would have to be tube gauge and only four cars long.
Even on NR, the 165s for example are confined to GW and Chiltern lines - whilst only 313s fit down the line to Moorgate.
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Sept 2, 2012 22:07:06 GMT
It wasn't out of gauge for the service it was built for. It was built that big so they could fit 3+2 seating. If you really want a go-anywhere stock it would have to be tube gauge and only four cars long. Even on NR, the 165s for example are confined to GW and Chiltern lines - whilst only 313s fit down the line to Moorgate. Plus, 319s were built specially to comply with the Kings Cross tunnels limitations. The operator has virtually all 319s because of the loading gauge/dual voltage restrictions. Before service patterns can be reviewed the S Stock must be approved to run on all lines, and so far from what I know they are only approved up to Aldgate in the east. Then you have the signalling to rebuild so that frequencies can increase.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Sept 2, 2012 22:20:28 GMT
The version of the plan that seemed to be spoken of the most was, as indicated, a straight swap of Met and H&C eastern terminii, and it may or may not have been tied-up at one point with the Tea-cup proposal, which subsequently came to pass.
With regards to the platform lengths physically, before rebuild Whitechapel 24 road had a 435' berth, and West Ham was up at 440'. Plaistow, Barking, and Dagenham East bays don't look long enough. I assume that West Hams new loop isn't big enough? As Dstock7080 says though signalling equipment would need moving at most, and the unused bits of platform would need refurbishment.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Sept 3, 2012 0:09:15 GMT
It wasn't out of gauge for the service it was built for. It was built that big so they could fit 3+2 seating. If you really want a go-anywhere stock it would have to be tube gauge and only four cars long. Even on NR, the 165s for example are confined to GW and Chiltern lines - whilst only 313s fit down the line to Moorgate. Plus, 319s were built specially to comply with the Kings Cross tunnels limitations. The operator has virtually all 319s because of the loading gauge/dual voltage restrictions. Actually, there's nothing particularly special about the class 319s, except for the dual voltage capability. The only real major difference with the class 321s, built at the same time, was the end doors. Remember that the route to Moorgate (through King's Cross) was operated by class 317s after electrification and there are now class 377/2 and 377/5 units used on the cross London route as well. How much longer will it be before the S7 stock can run east of Algate?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 3, 2012 20:00:18 GMT
Plus, 319s were built specially to comply with the Kings Cross tunnels limitations. The operator has virtually all 319s because of the loading gauge/dual voltage restrictions. Actually, there's nothing particularly special about the class 319s, except for the dual voltage capability. The only real major difference with the class 321s, built at the same time, was the end doors. Remember that the route to Moorgate (through King's Cross) was operated by class 317s after electrification and there are now class 377/2 and 377/5 units used on the cross London route as well. How much longer will it be before the S7 stock can run east of Algate? Sometime this month I believe.
|
|
|
Post by madandy on Sept 3, 2012 21:54:42 GMT
If the Metropolitan Line were to be extended to Barking or Upminster would it be renamed the Bow And Harrow line?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Sept 3, 2012 22:50:34 GMT
Sometime this month I believe. I think you might need to wait a few more months before seeing passenger workings beyond Aldgate
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Sept 23, 2012 16:54:10 GMT
If the Metropolitan Line were to be extended to Barking or Upminster would it be renamed the Bow And Harrow line? Very good. ;D
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 23, 2012 18:55:57 GMT
The Uxbridge-Barking line would be a disaster! ;D
|
|