Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 21:48:17 GMT
Will the cross rail share existing rails or do need ones need to be laid. Having travelled to Liverpool st many times there isn't a lot of room to lay new ones down.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 7, 2012 21:56:23 GMT
I think the plan is for the new service to take over the local line to Shenfield. This will form a convenient time to withdraw the class 315 trains I expect. Not sure what will happen to the class 165/166s out of Paddington- (Chiltern?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2012 22:30:59 GMT
Shenfield trains from Liverpool Street will indeed be taken over by Crossrail, although peak-time Gidea Park terminators will still run out of LS and mix with Crossrail traffic.
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 8, 2012 1:02:24 GMT
Not sure what will happen to the class 165/166s out of Paddington- (Chiltern?) You mean singular This is a parliamentary service and runs once a day - I am sure the connections will be left intact for it to run into a terminus platform at Paddington even if it has to be a different time of day or only once a week - this route would be too useful for route knowledge purposes to give up
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 8, 2012 3:44:11 GMT
Is it the case that all Shenfield trains will be crossrail (bar Gidea Park as noted)? I'm sure the requirements of the line meant a few extra per hour would terminate at LS in addition to those through the tube? This might be very outdated though!
As for the Chiltern train to Paddington, I'm not sure the route south east of Greenford will be retained post HS2. Asking an engineer on the project at the roadshow last year, he said they hadn't been asked to allow for a NR track alongside so hadn't planned for one. However the route has been tinkered with since so that, too, might be out of date.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2012 6:33:01 GMT
Not sure what will happen to the class 165/166s out of Paddington- (Chiltern?) You mean singular This is a parliamentary service and runs once a day - I am sure the connections will be left intact for it to run into a terminus platform at Paddington even if it has to be a different time of day or only once a week - this route would be too useful for route knowledge purposes to give up Actually I was talking about the local services out of Paddington to Maidenhead etc.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 8, 2012 9:05:29 GMT
You mean singular This is a parliamentary service and runs once a day - I am sure the connections will be left intact for it to run into a terminus platform at Paddington even if it has to be a different time of day or only once a week - this route would be too useful for route knowledge purposes to give up Actually I was talking about the local services out of Paddington to Maidenhead etc.. ;D Shows how much I know about the classes operating out of Paddington
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2012 9:28:30 GMT
Oh you're not alone! Those are the two I remember, there must be all sorts these days!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 8, 2012 9:40:28 GMT
You mean singular This is a parliamentary service and runs once a day - I am sure the connections will be left intact for it to run into a terminus platform at Paddington even if it has to be a different time of day or only once a week - this route would be too useful for route knowledge purposes to give up Actually I was talking about the local services out of Paddington to Maidenhead etc.. ;D I assumed you meant to ask what whether the 165s and 166s operating out of Paddington that will be made redundant by Crossrail (and the proposed electrification to Oxford) will be transferred to the Chiltern franchise. Chiltern may have need of more stock for the Evergreen project (Oxford - Milton Keynes etc) so this is certainly possible. As they were built to the more generous loading gauges bequeathed to GW and Chiltern by Brunel and Watkin, they would not fit on most other lines without some clearance work (as I think was done for the Reading - Gatwick route)
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 8, 2012 14:16:16 GMT
My spies in the current data room for the next GW franchise say that the spec assumes that there will be a cascade of 165s to the West Country branches after CrossRail, presumably with the necessary clearance works being done pretty soon! This is supposed to trigger a cascade of 15xs northwards to replace some Pacers and allow other services to be strengthened. Some 165s will need to remain based at Reading for the Thames Valley branches.
At the other end of CrossRail, it is certainly the current plan for CrossRail to take over all the Shenfield stoppers once the tunnel is open - there has been some suggestion that the new CrossRail stock will oust the 315s before the tunnel opens. As to the Parliamentary Train from Paddington to the Chiltern, on the evidence of its sister service to Wadnsworth Town, it will probably become a much-cancelled bus, or even that extremely rare thing, a statutory rail replacement bus.
Like all DfT meddling in rolling stock matters, I dare say all of this will turn out not to happen.
Graham Hewett
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 8, 2012 21:42:32 GMT
I'll be disappointed if Chiltern do not get some of the 165s for their services. I heard the plan regarding the pacers. There are many 150s in the SW so they will be welcome up north. Chiltern need some 166s for their faster diagrams too. They don't want to be lumbered with more 172s that can't operate via Amersham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2012 20:52:59 GMT
I wonder if they will order the same trains as Crossrail for the peak time Gidea Park services. With the intensity of service, wouldn't they want all trains to perform to the same characteristics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2012 22:17:54 GMT
Also with regards to the class 315's displaced by Crossrail it is expected that these could be refurbished for use on the Cardiff Valley lines network if/when it is electrified.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Jun 3, 2012 22:30:58 GMT
he said they hadn't been asked to allow for a NR track alongside so hadn't planned for one. However the route has been tinkered with since so that, too, might be out of date. Will the Greenford Branch Line connect at the northern end to HS2, where it currently connects to the NNML (where HS2 is replacing the NNML)? Will HS2 connect to the GWML at Old Oak? If so, there is no reason the Gerrard's Cross to Paddington service shouldn't continue. It's in Chiltern's best interests to ensure all drivers know the route, as it's invaluable for when the approach to Marylebone is blocked
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 3, 2012 23:00:44 GMT
Also with regards to the class 315's displaced by Crossrail it is expected that these could be refurbished for use on the Cardiff Valley lines network if/when it is electrified. I expect the 315s to be scrapped to be honest
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2012 10:54:38 GMT
Perhaps Metman but I expected the same to happen to some of the class 319's and look what is planned for them.
Besides I am sure if they are completly overhauled & refurbished a bit like the SWT class 455's I am sure they could last to say 2028 by which time new emu's could be ordered.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2012 18:46:25 GMT
Also with regards to the class 315's displaced by Crossrail it is expected that these could be refurbished for use on the Cardiff Valley lines network if/when it is electrified. Have you a source for this information Anthony? Rich
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2012 20:32:25 GMT
It was in Rail magazine a while back and from talking to people I know in the Welsh government who are pushing the case for the Cardiff Valley lines to be wired and this option was put on the table as a means of keeping the costs down.
It also helps that my local AM is the first ministor who have spoken to a few times particulary about the GW electrification scheme
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 4, 2012 23:32:38 GMT
I'm not sure this scheme will be completed (but you never know) as the GW scheme is on hold and the 315s are nearly life expired!
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Jun 5, 2012 0:56:39 GMT
I'm not sure this scheme will be completed (but you never know) as the GW scheme is on hold and the 315s are nearly life expired! Where did you hear that the GW scheme is on hold? The contract to undertake the works was awarded, to Amey, in March this year. The class 315s would be quite suitable for the Valley Lines, and wouldn't be much older than the class 308 units (built 1959) which were cascaded to Leeds when the lines to Bradford and Skipton were electrified in the mid-1990s and replaced another 5-6 years later. After all, there are no plans for replacing the class 313s (either the units with FCC or cascaded to Southern from LO) and these are four years older.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2012 8:15:46 GMT
I expect the 315s to be scrapped to be honest Much as I dislike travelling on 315's, from a mechanical perspective they still seem ok from this passenger's point of view; they're just really tatty inside. As long as they get a good wash down, a decent lick of paint and the seats replaced, they'd probably be good for another decade at least. I'm sure the Welsh would prefer a 315 to a Pacer any day!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jun 5, 2012 9:22:34 GMT
I heard about it last year but I'm glad to hear it's going ahead. I used to commute into Stratford on the 315s in the early 2000s and I really like them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2012 11:35:32 GMT
I expect the 315s to be scrapped to be honest Much as I dislike travelling on 315's, from a mechanical perspective they still seem ok from this passenger's point of view; they're just really tatty inside. As long as they get a good wash down, a decent lick of paint and the seats replaced, they'd probably be good for another decade at least. I'm sure the Welsh would prefer a 315 to a Pacer any day! I think the class 315's would get a complete re-build with them being gutted and then have new interiors a bit like SWT did with their class 455's. A number of the class 315's would be getting reduced to 3 carriage units particulary to work services from Cardiff to Rhymney/Treherbert. As for the GW electrification it is going ahead although a final decision hasnt been made yet to extend the wires beyond Cardiff to Swansea. An annoucement about the government signing a contract with Hitachi is supposed to be happening today although it has come yet
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jun 28, 2012 9:25:05 GMT
Shenfield trains from Liverpool Street will indeed be taken over by Crossrail, although peak-time Gidea Park terminators will still run out of LS and mix with Crossrail traffic. They won't mix with Crossrail traffic but be Crossrail traffic. Plan is for peak Crossrail 345 to actually reach Liverpool Street High Level, I think, about 8tph terminating there in addition to the 12tph through to Paddingdon. This is because 12tph, even at 10 car length, aren't expected to be enough to cope in peak going forward.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Jun 28, 2012 11:18:07 GMT
As a user of the 1980 built class 315s on a daily basis into Liverpool Street, they we tarted up internally (doorways were repanelled from original yellow to pink) some 5+ years ago. Those that a similarly aquainted with them will probably agree that the ride is jolty, legroom is very very tight (if not uncomfortable) and the seats both hard and occasionally broken, with the bottom/back have dislodged from the frame.
Today they are functional as a suburban/short journey stock, however travelling on them day-in, day-out, is certainly not a pleasurable experience. Perhaps NXEA and now Greater Anglia (sounds like Greater Angrier when announced in Liverpool Street over the station tannoy) acknowledged this in maintaining prices with annual Goldcards for the past couple of years, although its going up by almost £100 when I renew in a few months !!!!
The late 1980s class 321s and more recent 360s, are a huge step-forward in both comfort and ride. So depending on how long anticipated journeys may take, should they be reused in Wales, I'd suggest that the 315s be completely rebuilt internally and improved suspension installed...
If, as suggested already, they are otherwise mechanically sound, they should then indeed last until 2030ish...
They'll never be perfect, but they could improve on the current 2/10 for day-to-day experience of the average commuter to an 8/10 if the job is done properly.
Personally, as long as the replacement 345s are as comfortable as the 321/360s, I can't wait for the replacements to arrive....
|
|
|
Post by Jerome H on Jun 28, 2012 14:43:51 GMT
Just a couple of questions...not sure why this is confusing me. Is the track to Shenfield 2 track or 4? What platforms at Stratford will Crossrail use, and will they be dedicated? Aren't there Greater Anglia services that go past Shenfield, will they continue to stop along the way?
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Jun 28, 2012 15:33:52 GMT
I believe they will come up between the slow tracks (southern pair) west of Stratford use the interchange platforms with the central line and then use the slow lines to Shenfield which with the fly overs at Ilford become the northern tracks. East Anglia expresses should not be interfered with although there are connecting crossovers if needed such as for freight movements from Forest Gate junction.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 28, 2012 18:46:16 GMT
Much as I dislike travelling on 315's, from a mechanical perspective they still seem ok from this passenger's point of view; they're just really tatty inside. As long as they get a good wash down, a decent lick of paint and the seats replaced, they'd probably be good for another decade at least. I'm sure the Welsh would prefer a 315 to a Pacer any day! I think the class 315's would get a complete re-build with them being gutted and then have new interiors a bit like SWT did with their class 455's. A number of the class 315's would be getting reduced to 3 carriage units particulary to work services from Cardiff to Rhymney/Treherbert. As for the GW electrification it is going ahead although a final decision hasnt been made yet to extend the wires beyond Cardiff to Swansea. An annoucement about the government signing a contract with Hitachi is supposed to be happening today although it has come yet reading in Rail today what is proposed for a 317 makeover could equally apply to the 315s. New AC motors and new interiors and they could run for another 20 years
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2012 12:05:32 GMT
Funnily enough, I find the suspension of the 315 rather outstanding. It feels far more forgiving that the Class 317 (and the 455 in the Southern Region). The acceleration of the 315 is far smoother than FCC's 313s which does the "jerky" movements we find on old DC stock (C-stock being very pronounced).
That said, the 315s can definitely do with a deep clean and new, higher seats. Thank goodness the fairly new panelling makes the interior far more appealing than FCC's. They're also slow off the mark for a Metro stock and the performance across the fleet is noticeably inconsistent. It's easy to find yourself on a "Rocket", "Fairly Average" and a "Dog!" which raises the question of how healthy they are mechanically.
Let's just hope the new 345s will combine the performance of the 378s with the initial acceleration of the Desiros!
|
|
|
Post by oe on Jul 3, 2012 14:23:23 GMT
My feeling on the 315's is that if the 3rd seat is removed throughout the carriage (or as a minimum in 2 of the 3 partitions) then considerably more standing room would be available during peak hours and passengers might be persuaded/educated to move inside. The down side is a loss of seats in the off peaks. Could a 5th unit be added to ease congestion?
|
|