|
Post by grahamhewett on May 5, 2012 16:51:52 GMT
I recall watching a Standard 4MT make several attempts to rush the bank up the siding in Eastcote with a (very) short train of coal wagons - probably around 1962. I understood at the time that this was coal for one of the rotary substations there. The working was around midday and I saw it on other occasions recessing at Rayners Lane. I assume that the loco came from Cricklewood (it was certainly in poor enough nick!).
Can anyone shed any light on the practice, when it ceased and what other points were served?
Graham Hewett
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 5, 2012 17:22:20 GMT
I understood at the time that this was coal for one of the rotary substations there. Why would a substation (where merely switches electricity and steps the voltage up and down) need coal? More likely there was a coal merchant's depot there.
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 5, 2012 17:50:49 GMT
Well, that was one of the several things that puzzled me about the operation, but not being an electrician by training or inclination I hestitated to challenge what I was told at an impressionable age.... If it was domestic house coal, that would have been a(nother) reason for the service's demise as the domestic coal trade collapsed after the Clean Air Act 1956 - in fact, I'm surprised it lasted long enough at Eastcote for me to remember it.
GH
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on May 5, 2012 17:52:40 GMT
Yes - there were booked steam hauled freight then on the Met. I have a 1962 WTT, but very buried in a house move - if/when I find it I'll web it up for you if you would like.
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 5, 2012 18:14:07 GMT
Thank you mrfs42! In your own time! (Spending this weekend decorating, which has involved moving 20 years of timetables, you have my sympathy).
Graham H
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 5, 2012 18:15:00 GMT
Wikipedia, citing Brian Hardy's ""How it used to be - freight on The Underground 50 years ago" gives the date of closure of eastcote's goods yard as 10/8/64.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on May 5, 2012 19:03:26 GMT
Thank you mrfs42! In your own time! (Spending this weekend decorating, which has involved moving 20 years of timetables, you have my sympathy).Graham H Depends how many that is! I've got over a thousand UndergrounD WTTs <gulp> Will look into it, as I have to search out some District stuff and the 4 District boxes are next to the 6 Met. boxes.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on May 6, 2012 10:06:46 GMT
Are you the Graham Hewett who went to Drayton Manor, Hanwell and was in Rick Wakeman's year?? If so, you still owe me 2/6d
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 6, 2012 12:21:29 GMT
Nice try, Castlebar! You don't know how close you were - by one of those extraordinary coincidences that usually arise, I was at Manor House School, Hanwell, only two streets away from Drayton Manor, between 1955 and 1959. What are the chances of having a doppelganger so close?
But look, if you really short of 2/6, I reckon that, discounted forward, that's worth all of £2 today; I could probably spare that ...
Graham Hewett
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 6, 2012 12:33:51 GMT
Mrfs42 - and I thought I had problems with the storage of "vital historical records" as they are described to the household authorities here. My selection of tube WTTs is measly by comparison and dates from the days when the surplus were sold off in the shop at St James's Park. I don't think I go back beyond about 1971.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on May 6, 2012 13:49:34 GMT
@ grahamhewett
Well, if you ever meet the other one, could you remind him that you said that you reckon it's £2 now.
I was at Drayton Manor 1959/64
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on May 6, 2012 14:30:08 GMT
Mrfs42 - and I thought I had problems with the storage of "vital historical records" as they are described to the household authorities here. My selection of tube WTTs is measly by comparison and dates from the days when the surplus were sold off in the shop at St James's Park. I don't think I go back beyond about 1971. <Off Topic> A-ha. It does help when the other half is also interested in railways: mine's angelislington of this parish. The oldest WTT I can lay my hands on is 1906. </off topic>
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 6, 2012 21:49:31 GMT
I had an extremely interesting discussion with a friend at the weekend about the document archive that used to exist under Waterloo station, and its ultimate destruction. Apparently it was refused point blank to even microfilm/fische the papers before they were skipped, all of them being only of historic curiosity if anything. Subsequently, a query was received about a road overbridge that had formerly carried tramtracks. Residual powers, all that. Time to dig deep into the archi... oh b*gger.
A different angle; the oft-cited case of the BBC Doomsday project, a proprietry multimedia software database-application stored on laserdisk written for the BBC Master computer. That was in danger of being lost perminantly within 20 years of being created, whereas the original Doomsday book is still going strong 926 years later.
So, the moral is, always keep a paper copy, and any paper copies keep!
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on May 6, 2012 22:24:28 GMT
Mrfs42 - and I thought I had problems with the storage of "vital historical records" as they are described to the household authorities here. My selection of tube WTTs is measly by comparison and dates from the days when the surplus were sold off in the shop at St James's Park. I don't think I go back beyond about 1971. <Off Topic> A-ha. It does help when the other half is also interested in railways: mine's angelislington of this parish. The oldest WTT I can lay my hands on is 1906. </off topic> After only a little digging: Behold! What the good tube fan's boudoir should look like. Though I fear with the perils of internet transience, the link to the picture may no longer work.
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on May 7, 2012 14:46:11 GMT
Dragging this thread back in the general direction of the original subject, a quick glance at some timetables shows the following. In 1950 there were up to three freight services on the Uxbridge Branch. The nominal timings from timetable No 130 were as follows: | Train 8 | Train 6 | Train 8 | Harrow Yard (dep) | 09:45 | 10:47 | 13:30 | Rayners Lane (arr) | 09:56 | | 13:46 | (dep) | 10:32 | 10/59 | 14:16 | Gasworks Sidings (arr) | 10:38 | | 14:24 | (dep) | 11:42 | | | Eastcote (arr) | | 11:05 | | (dep) | | 12:02 | | Ruislip (arr) | | | | (dep) | | | | Hillingdon (arr) | | 12:13 | | (dep) | | 13:25 | | Uxbridge (arr) | | 13:32 | | (dep) | | 13:46 | | Ruislip (arr) | | 13:55 | | (dep) | | 15:23 | | Rayners Lane (arr) | 11:48 | | 15:02 | (dep) | 12:31 | 15/33 | 15:46 | Harrow Yard (arr) | 12:42 | 15:44 | 15:57 |
The second trip of train 8 was 'Run as Required', thus if all traffic to Rayners Lane and the gasworks could be conveyed on a single train then the second trip would be cancelled. The locomotives for these trains came from Neasden Loco (Western Region) arriving at Harrow Yard light engine. That for train 8 departed Neasden Loco(WR) at 08:20, arriving at Harrow Yard at 08:34. The loco for train 6 departed Neasden Loco(WR) at 09:50, arriving at Harrow Yard at 10:07. After completing their trips on the Branch the locos would return to Neasden Loco(WR) as follows: If the second trip of train 8 was not required then the locomotive of this train would depart Harrow Yard at 13:00 arriving at Neasden Loco(WR) at 13:18, otherwise after returning from its second trip down the branch it would couple to the locomotive from Train 5, the 04:46 Quainton Road to Harrow Yard (due 14:04) and the two locos would run together, departing Harrow Yard at 16:25 and arriving back at Neasden Loco(WR) at 16:39. (since arriving at Harrow at 14:04, the loco from train 5 was available for shunting the yard until 16:00). The locomotive from Train 6, would on arrival back at Harrow Yard, take over from the loco of train 5, being available for shunting the yard from 16:00 to 19:09. It would then depart light engine to Neasden Loco(WR) arriving at 19:28. By 1964, only one freight service survived on the branch, Harrow Gasworks Sidings having closed. The surviving train was the erstwhile Train 6, now known as 9T03, and slightly retimed to take account of the extra call at Rayners Lane and the fact it now originates at Neasden Sidings (LMR). The following timings come from TTN 19/64: | 9T03 | Neasden Sidings (LMR) (dep) | 09:53 | Harrow on the Hill | 10/08 | Rayners Lane (arr) | 10:17 | (dep) | 10:56 | Eastcote (arr) | 11:06 | (dep) | 12:01 | Ruislip (arr) | | (dep) | | Hillingdon (arr) | 12:13 | (dep) | 12:51 | Uxbridge (arr) | 13:01 | (dep) | 13:17 | Ruislip (arr) | 13:30 | (dep) | 14:24 | Harrow Yard (arr) | 14:45 | (dep) | 15:12 | Neasden Sidings (LMR) (arr) | 15:27 |
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on May 7, 2012 17:15:51 GMT
Harsig - thank you very much for the WTT detail, which I will file away electronically! Interesting to see that Rayners Lane and the gasworks could require up to 2 daily trains, although my recollection is that train lengths were inevitably quite short, given the available siding lengths and the steep bank at Eastcote which triggered this thread.
GH
GH
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Aug 23, 2013 11:33:19 GMT
etr220 - looking back at the Uxbridge freight timetable raises the further question as to whether there was a BR freight depot at Ruislip or was the extension from Eastcote merely to enable the loco to run round?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2013 20:38:48 GMT
Having looked at more of my library, and checked further... The LPTB inherited from the Metropolitan Railway all its assets, powers, etc (except some relevant to the Surplus Lands Committee) (and similarly from the other predecessor railways), so did have the powers to provide the freight services that the Met did. Frank Goudie in "Metropolitan Steam Locomotives" gives some details of the LPTB-LNER 1937 agreement regarding steam workings - relvant to this thread is that the LNER did take over the 'working of freight traffic to and from LPTB stations between Baker Street, Harrow and Uxbridge' (question mark - was there a goods yard at Stanmore?) for which they received a sum per engine and per guard hour: my interpretation of this is that the trains remained (legally) LPTB ones, carrying LPTB traffic, just with LNER locos and crews (initially at least, these being ex LPTB staff, who retained LPTB conditions with the right to return to the LPTB when vacancies occured). They also took responsibility for goods working on the Joint Line, on a somewhat different basis. (Looking at the Freight on the Uxbridge branch thread, are the train numbers 6 & 8 quote for 1950 LT or BR ones?) And looking at the the 1956 Handbook of Stations the 'undertaking' for goods stations/traffic on the Met was BR (LMR), and similarly on other LTE lines - presumably this came out of the 1950 rearrangements sorting out ownership. But quite what this meant in practice, and whether BR owned, or merely had use of, the goods yards I've no idea. Stations on the Uxbridge branch with Goods facilities were Rayners Lane, Eastcote, Ruislip and Hillingdon (which had a private siding) - if I've got them all - on differing sides of the line (see Harsig's diagrams). But not Uxbridge (in 1956 - when did Uxbridge (Met) lose goods facilities? c1940 with the new station?). And South of Harrow at Willesden Green... So sorry, my mistake in thinking that theUxbridge branch goods remained (totally) LT workings to the end
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Aug 24, 2013 8:55:04 GMT
etr220 - thank you for making me re-read the 1933 Act! On reflexion, it's possible that we are both wrong: if the Uxbridge freight yards were with LPTB, then they would have transferred automatically to the BTC in 1948. There are then two possibilities: either BTC then transferred them to BRB control (which wouldn't have required any legislation, merely an internal administrative process, leaving the yards to transfer seamlessly to BRB in 1962) or they were left under LTE control until the Commission was dissolved in 1962, at which point they could then have been transferred to BRB ownership. Maybe it was the imminent prospect of such a transfer that led to the demise of the Uxbridge freights - a victim of tidying up? [Unfortunately, my copy of the 1962 Act is heavily amended so I can't tell whether it was at that point that LTE lost the powers vested in it from the Met in 1933].
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2013 9:35:36 GMT
etr220 - looking back at the Uxbridge freight timetable raises the further question as to whether there was a BR freight depot at Ruislip or was the extension from Eastcote merely to enable the loco to run round? There were sidings at Ruislip where the car park now is and they extended almost to Ruislip Manor station. There were also sidings at Hillingdon on the south side of the station.
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Aug 24, 2013 11:00:38 GMT
(question mark - was there a goods yard at Stanmore?) There was a goods yard at Stanmore when the branch opened in 1932, but it didn't last long having been replaced by stabling sidings by the time the Bakerloo line was extended to Stanmore in 1939. The goods yards at Wembley Park was also lost about the same time. Stations on the Uxbridge branch with Goods facilities were Rayners Lane, Eastcote, Ruislip and Hillingdon (which had a private siding) - if I've got them all - on differing sides of the line (see Harsig's diagrams). But not Uxbridge (in 1956 - when did Uxbridge (Met) lose goods facilities? c1940 with the new station?). The goods yard at Uxbridge closed at the end of April 1939, about four and a half months after opening of the new station, Work then began on converting the yard into stabling sidings which opened in 1942. Any freight traffic for Uxbridge was thereafter handled at one or other of the two Great Western stations. Freight trains continued running to Uxbridge only to run round after having called at Hillingdon. Harrow Gas works closed on 4th April 1954, which brought the trips from Rayners Lane to an end. The yards at Rayners Lane, Ruislip and Hillingdon closed on 10th August 1964. By that time virtually the only traffic using these yards was coal or coke for domestic consumption. As part of rationalisation of this sort of traffic BR stopped delivering to individual station yards but instead made deliveries to a single coal concentration depot that would serve the needs of a wide area. In this instance the nearest CCD was at West Drayton, which opened in December 1963.
|
|