Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 10:12:35 GMT
Does anyone have any info in the transfer trip that used to run between Acton and Kensington in the 1960s? I was wondering if the loco used would have been kept at Acton for the purpose or would it have run from Lillie Bridge to start the diagram (and, of course, back at the end of the trip). I am also guessing by the angle of the sun in the pictures I have seen that this was a morning working.
Also, was this the only such working in the 1960s? There is a picture of the MET Centenary train arriving at Amersham in 1963 behind No5 'John Hampden' and in the sidings in the background is one of the old MET brake vans B554. It appears to be marshalled next to some ordinary BR wagons. Was there a similar transfer freight between Neasen and BR at this time or was the brake van there as part of an engineering train? Thanks in advance.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 27, 2011 10:18:35 GMT
I recall seeing a Pannier headed WB at Hammersmith in the late 1960s. I gathered many years late that this was probably rhe Saturday morning run to Acton Works from Lillie Bridge.
I never saw them but there were workings by the Panniers to the BR sidings the other side of the WLL. The locos used the connection from the Olympia branch to the WLL and then ran back into the sidings.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 27, 2011 13:23:49 GMT
When in the 1960s - did I promise to look in the WTT for you and forget?
Name a rough date and I'll have a look later if the house moving/decorating/fol-de-rol allows.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 13:26:24 GMT
Are we talking about the LT trains, which were hauled by Panniers (L30/31 also did them before their demise), or are we talking about the BR freights to West Kensington and Kensington High Street? If the latter BR locos were used.
Edit - I should have added that I went on several of these (LT) trips, which all started from Lillie Bridge and went to Acton and back. If I was lucky, the trains sometimes went on to Northfields. My memory recalls late-morning/midday runs.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 27, 2011 14:11:55 GMT
The Ken trips were from the LMR I think...with ex-Midland tanks fitted with tripcocks that went via the NLL to Gunnersbury, round the top part of the triangle that was extant then, then up through the underpass under the Picc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 14:41:08 GMT
Yep. These were BR and started and returned to Brent LMR. Underground News for March 2011 reveals all (or some of it, anyway!).
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jul 27, 2011 16:03:13 GMT
I can never remember seeing any steam loco being kept at Acton. I thought all these workings only ever were worked by Lillie Bridge based locos. Similarly, I can never remember any workings on the now lifted northern arc of the Gunnersbury triangle. All the workings I remember seeing for Hammersmith Coal (in Chiswick High Road, through South Acton), had come off the Southern at Richmond via the link that then existed there - always worked by Midland and not by Southern numbered steam locos if my memory is correct.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 27, 2011 16:25:19 GMT
There's certainly a few paths to Brent in the WTTs, IIRC.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 18:17:15 GMT
The late John Gillham took an excellent photo on the now disused arm of the Gunnersbury triangle of one of the LMR workings from Brent to West Kensington. The photo is dated 27/7/55 and shows loco 47435 and wagons behind it on the non-electrified section of track, which the northern 'arm' was.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jul 27, 2011 18:29:01 GMT
Ah reanorak, I've never seen that pic. Again, a Midland and not a Southern engine. In the early 60's, steam was not uncommon Turnham Green-Barons Court, using the special ling W. of Turnham Green I think so that these workings would always use Piccadilly track. And even though these had come up from Richmond, always a Midland engine at the front.
I assume all the HAmmersmith & Chiswick coal workings always ran via S.Acton to get the facing junction to get into the coal yard, even though this required a much longer routing??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 18:41:31 GMT
Hammersmith & Chiswick coal trains never came over Underground-owned metals.
The LMR trains came onto the EB Picc west of Turnham Green and then onto the EB District by the loop just east of Turnham Green station.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jul 27, 2011 20:08:12 GMT
Thank you reganorak. You have brought it all back to me now and of course, you are 100% correct. The steamers just used the Picc through Turnham Green, then I think there was a short holding loop just east of Turnham Green station that had a very short (12?) maximum wagon length that then continued on to join the e/b District.
Do you know if there was ever any record of Southern steam rather than LMS using the Richmond - Gunnersbury B.R./L.T. shared line?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 20:34:45 GMT
I have no idea unfortunately.
Another bit of trivia -
01.12.53 - Ravenscourt Park eastbound local starting signal A585 converted to semi-automatic and renumbered WD2. Freight train load restrictions withdrawn and trains may be made up to the previous maximum of 26 wagons. WD2 signal not to be cleared for freight trains unless the line is clear as far as Hammersmith EB advance starter A591. In the event of a freight being routed via the EB Piccadilly Line, train to be held until the line is clear to Hammersmith EB advance starter WD12.
I am not sure when this arrangement ended - probably with the end of freight I suppose! I will have a look through the archives tomorrow and update if I find anything.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 27, 2011 20:35:29 GMT
The SR 'owned' the section of the NLL up to I think Bollo Lane...connection was via the unelectrified siding that ran between the WB District/Down NLL and the Up Windsor Line just east of Richmond. If the same applied as the Putney Bridge/Point Pleasant Junction-Wimbledon North Junction section (which was also SR-owned) then SR locos would have been at least used on p/way trains. I featured photos of a U1, Q1 and 700 Class (probably all based at Feltham) on p/way trains at East Putney circa 1961 in an issue of UndergrounD. I know inter-regional trains ran via the Hounslow Loop and Kew Junctions to the north but I cannot imagine that there were any trains via Richmond as this would have required reversal in the platforms. I photographed Class 33-hauled spoil trains that ran via the connection in 1981ish when the Richmond-Gunnersbury section was resignalled. They all ran via the Up Windsor towards CLJ and not towards South Acton.
Thanks for the number on 47435: it was a a Fowler 3F based at Cricklewood apparently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 21:02:26 GMT
Thanks for the info so far. In answer to the above question I was after info on the LT workings, not the BR ones. From about 1960 or so should cover it. There is an excellent picture in Kevin McKormacks book of L31 leaving Acton Town on one of these workings in 1961. I have to say that the picture showing B554 at Amersham is a real curiosity. Us modellers are always looking for an excuse to run something we shouldn't.......
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jul 28, 2011 10:12:19 GMT
@ Oracle "..............but I cannot imagine that there were any trains via Richmond as this would have required reversal in the platforms".
My memory is failing, but l still do believe that until the late 1950s, there was a connection from B.R. to L.T. at Richmond that did not require reversal. I understand from memory that there was a facing junction there then allowing through running from the Twickenham direction through Richmond to Gunnersbury junc. Please correct me if l'm wrong if such a connection never existed.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Jul 28, 2011 13:20:15 GMT
connection was there until 1970's-ish. used by the 4cor Nl tour and by another tour which i,ve forgotton the name of using SR electric stock. Shoes had to be paddled up to gain the NL live rail(train pulled across by EDL) , but ran back the other way by gravity as there were suitable gaps in the SR live rail. The shoes just fell of the side of the NL live rail.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Jul 28, 2011 14:19:53 GMT
Re: LT-BR trip workings « Reply #16 Today at 2:20pm » connection was there until 1970's-ish.
THank you bassmike - l was fairly sure l was remembering things correctly. These workings did come up > Twickenham > Richmond > Gunnersbury for l can remember the northern chord of the Gunnersbury triangle being well rusted and unused even then. I also seem to remember that these had a LMS engine with a Cricklewood shed code.
The current layout at Richmond with a trailing juction into LUL territory is nothing like it was when l remember seeing it as a kid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 14:46:40 GMT
Further to my post yesterday at 21.34 -
When Hammersmith D&P cabin closed, signal WD2 became an automatic 'X' signal and was renumbered WDX585. For the benefit of keeping freight trains a safe distance from LT trains, an electric train detector was provided on the approach to Ravenscourt Park EB. An EB District train operating this caused WDX585 to clear (provided the section ahead was clear, of course!). For a freight train, not operating the detector, the area of protection went right through to WD3 (Hammersmith EB inner home).
After the end of freight, the electric train detector was removed in April 1967, when WDX585 (and the inner home WDX583B) became A585 and A583B respectively.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 15:01:32 GMT
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 8, 2011 21:00:08 GMT
Suprised that the connection wasn't electrified, or at least third rail gauged. What was the rationale behind that?
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Aug 8, 2011 22:38:43 GMT
Was it because the electricity supplies were at the time independent of each other? Of course it was subsequently electrified to enable transfers when SR stock was used on the NLL.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 8, 2011 23:35:09 GMT
Could be, Southern units had bus lines until far later than LT... but not even to have a gap in the third rail by the points?
Was the link finally electrified whilst it was still Gunnersbury - Richmond - SR, or upon becoming the reverse (as is currently)?
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Aug 9, 2011 9:03:23 GMT
From memory the previous siding was electrified, and then of course the layout was rebuilt to the present arangement. I recall the siding link from the early 1960s and it was always looking rusty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2011 10:46:16 GMT
AIUI the connection at Richmond was taken out in the early 1970s (as part of the Feltham resignalling), and then replaced c1985 with electrification for stock transfer when the the NLL service went from 501s to SR 2-EPBs.
Platform 3 was always part of the 'SR' side of the station - when the station was rebuilt in the 1930s there was provision for quadruple tracking of the 'SR' lines through it, with two island platforms (1+ and 2/3), and when I was little to go from 2 to 4-7 meant going up and over.
As to the previous link never being electrified, apart form the two ends having different systems (3R & 4R), once the Grove Road link went and LSW services via Gunnersbury ceased there was never any realistic possibility of through passenger services to require it.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Aug 9, 2011 12:14:44 GMT
I str that after the double-line link was removed in the early seventies, there was always a link through a reversing siding until the electric connection was re-instated via plat 3 in @ 1985. I remember staying overnight with friends who lived in a block of flats in sandycombe road and being kept awake by by a class 33 and track maintainence train running up and down on the southbound line near Kew gdns; It had accessed the site over this connection. This was about 1981.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Aug 9, 2011 12:44:46 GMT
@ Oracle, yes it always looked rusty, but less rusty from BR to LT than the other way. From "track rust", I assumed LMR engines got to Feltham via a different route (Kew Junction?), as I saw several heading north towards Gunnersbury until about 1960, but never one in the Kew > Richmond direction.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Aug 9, 2011 13:25:42 GMT
'1981' may have been the Easter? weekend closure that year that saw the semaphores replaced and other track work replaced south of Gunnersbury. 33s and 73s were used on p/way trains.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2011 13:40:02 GMT
AIUI the connection at Richmond was taken out in the early 1970s (as part of the Feltham resignalling), and then replaced c1985 with electrification for stock transfer when the the NLL service went from 501s to SR 2-EPBs. Platform 3 was always part of the 'SR' side of the station - when the station was rebuilt in the 1930s there was provision for quadruple tracking of the 'SR' lines through it, with two island platforms (1+ and 2/3), and when I was little to go from 2 to 4-7 meant going up and over. As to the previous link never being electrified, apart form the two ends having different systems (3R & 4R), once the Grove Road link went and LSW services via Gunnersbury ceased there was never any realistic possibility of through passenger services to require it. I think you will find that the link was not removed however it was electrified circa 1985 Xerces Fobe
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Aug 9, 2011 16:39:05 GMT
When I worked on the DR 1970-73, the double junction was there, but not often used. there was a weight limit on Kew Railway Bridge so only 73s (and lighter locos) could use it. 73s were not allowed to pick up on the NLL because the substations weren't powerful enough for them.
There used to be 2 electrified sidings in Richmond goods yard, though these were never used from the 70's onward. Remember Pioneer Coaches used to occupy the goods yard for a number of years. ISTR the link siding was electrified in the 80's as stated for EPB transfer. We used to do a parcels train from that platform to Waterloo using a 508 in the early 80's. Prior to that, parcels trains were usually 73 hauled. I can't remember when the double junction was taken out.
|
|