Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2005 17:09:28 GMT
Overcoming the constraints of steam traction has long been the desire of some railway engineers. Thus, in 1834, at the dawn of the railway age, an American inventor, Thomas Davenport, presented a model of the first electric locomotive, while another American, Mose Farmer carried two people on an electric train on a 457 mm (18 inch) rail in 1847
The Drawbacks in Steam Traction
Apart from the smoke, the dirt and the bits of soot in passengers' eyes there are several more serious disadvantages to the steam locomotive:
-Low effiency (less than 10%) due to high heat loss;
- Tiresome maintenance work,particularly in terms of descaling and cleaning the boiler and tubes.
- A long steam-raising process lasting several hours before departure;
- A very high consumption of coal and water (for example, a 5-tonne coal tender and a 30 tonne water tender was emptied in two hours by a Pacific from the 1930s over a journey of 200km [125 miles]);
- Low utilisation, given that at the end of a 2-4 hour journey (depending on the locomotives' fuel and water capacity) it was necessary to return to the depot in order to take on water and fuel, and carry out light maintenance such as lubrication.
Finally, the tender of a 1930s Pacific represented a dead weight of up to 85 tonnes (83.6 tons) to be towed: the electric locomotive does not need to carry this heavy 'rucksack' of provisions, since it's energy directly from the catenary, energy which is produced at a lower cost in a fixed power station.
The three solutions in terms of electric traction
The first is low volatge direct current, less or equal to 600 V, used until around 1905, and reserved for urban transport, trams, undergrounds, the suburbs or mountain lines with steep inclines, or even certain lines through tunnels. Power is often supplied by a lateral third rail.
The second, which is still used, is that of alternating current, which is transformed into a higher voltage direct current of between 1.2 and 3 kV mainly 1.5kV in France for example, and converted into traction on the main lines. The catenary for the power supply is heavy and complex. This second solution also allows engines to use alternating current directly, but it has to be produced and transmitted by a special system: this is the case with the Swiss, German,Scandinavian and American electrification systems. With this special system the catenary for the power supply is light and simple.
The third solution, which first appeared towards the end of the 1930s and was developed particularly after the Second World War, uses static rectifiers which allow direct use of the industrial 50Hz current, transformed on the locomotive thanks to the development of electronics: it is, therfore possible to use a direct current motor. The catenary for the power supply is still light and simple.
The main traction current systems
1) Direct current - France (old electrifications), Netherlands, the Maghreb, South Africa, Italy, Belgium, Russia
2)Direct 600/750 V 3rd rail - Undergrounds, United Kingdom southern network, United states (suburban)
My fingers hurt, I'm off for a coffee
The Drawbacks in Steam Traction
Apart from the smoke, the dirt and the bits of soot in passengers' eyes there are several more serious disadvantages to the steam locomotive:
-Low effiency (less than 10%) due to high heat loss;
- Tiresome maintenance work,particularly in terms of descaling and cleaning the boiler and tubes.
- A long steam-raising process lasting several hours before departure;
- A very high consumption of coal and water (for example, a 5-tonne coal tender and a 30 tonne water tender was emptied in two hours by a Pacific from the 1930s over a journey of 200km [125 miles]);
- Low utilisation, given that at the end of a 2-4 hour journey (depending on the locomotives' fuel and water capacity) it was necessary to return to the depot in order to take on water and fuel, and carry out light maintenance such as lubrication.
Finally, the tender of a 1930s Pacific represented a dead weight of up to 85 tonnes (83.6 tons) to be towed: the electric locomotive does not need to carry this heavy 'rucksack' of provisions, since it's energy directly from the catenary, energy which is produced at a lower cost in a fixed power station.
The three solutions in terms of electric traction
The first is low volatge direct current, less or equal to 600 V, used until around 1905, and reserved for urban transport, trams, undergrounds, the suburbs or mountain lines with steep inclines, or even certain lines through tunnels. Power is often supplied by a lateral third rail.
The second, which is still used, is that of alternating current, which is transformed into a higher voltage direct current of between 1.2 and 3 kV mainly 1.5kV in France for example, and converted into traction on the main lines. The catenary for the power supply is heavy and complex. This second solution also allows engines to use alternating current directly, but it has to be produced and transmitted by a special system: this is the case with the Swiss, German,Scandinavian and American electrification systems. With this special system the catenary for the power supply is light and simple.
The third solution, which first appeared towards the end of the 1930s and was developed particularly after the Second World War, uses static rectifiers which allow direct use of the industrial 50Hz current, transformed on the locomotive thanks to the development of electronics: it is, therfore possible to use a direct current motor. The catenary for the power supply is still light and simple.
The main traction current systems
1) Direct current - France (old electrifications), Netherlands, the Maghreb, South Africa, Italy, Belgium, Russia
2)Direct 600/750 V 3rd rail - Undergrounds, United Kingdom southern network, United states (suburban)
My fingers hurt, I'm off for a coffee