|
Post by jardine01 on May 2, 2011 18:48:08 GMT
Should the 1972 mk2 stock get a refubishment? i know they had one in the 90's but i think they are looking a bit run down. I Dont know how many years the 1972 stock is going to be in use for? I think they should make the 1972 stock look more like the 1973 stock with dot matrix infomation displays better seats and a repaint has anybody got other sugestions?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 2, 2011 19:15:56 GMT
Should the 1972 mk2 stock get a refubishment? i know they had one in the 90's but i think they are looking a bit run down. I Dont know how many years the 1972 stock is going to be in use for? I think they should make the 1972 stock look more like the 1973 stock with dot matrix infomation displays better seats and a repaint has anybody got other sugestions? A refurb of a refurb - interesting idea!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 2, 2011 19:16:01 GMT
They had a deep clean a couple of years ago, which updated the door runners and gave the motors a good refresh. I doubt they will get a further refurb especially as there is a shortage of funding so they'll have to soldier on. They have a DVA!
|
|
|
Post by retep on May 2, 2011 20:27:58 GMT
they don't look too bad and the 73ts seems more dated than the 1996 and 1995 ts, 73's interior doesn't look bad or anything though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2011 21:33:08 GMT
I'd say the opposite retep, 95's and 96's look worse than the 73's at the moment
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 2, 2011 23:10:33 GMT
I don't think there's that much in it! Except I went on a 73ts yesterday and all the seat coverings were baggy and loose and inflated with air below them when the train accelerated and they all deflated again when the train stopped!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 3, 2011 7:54:54 GMT
Probably air rushing in through the gaps in the chasis. Who needs aircon!
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 3, 2011 20:12:19 GMT
Probably air rushing in through the gaps in the chasis. Who needs aircon! The 73 stock has always bee prone to this if I recall correctly. More so than other stocks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 12:32:02 GMT
They'll be gone by completely by 2020 as far as I know, so not really required in my eyes
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jul 28, 2011 15:56:06 GMT
Should the 1972 mk2 stock get a refubishment? i know they had one in the 90's but i think they are looking a bit run down. I Dont know how many years the 1972 stock is going to be in use for? I think they should make the 1972 stock look more like the 1973 stock with dot matrix infomation displays better seats and a repaint has anybody got other sugestions? Don't see the need. They're comfortable and more than fit for purpose. In a climate where money is not to be wasted, the most these trains need is a deep clean. Only thing missing is armrests, but these went a few years ago due to constant vandalism.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 18:22:54 GMT
LUL should just focus on giving them a clean and repairing little bits as and when they need repairing, instead of letting it build up into a mess then spending alot of money on a complete redo because things are in such a bad state (i.e. those early 90's toasters on the central line) Right now I can see something need adressing, a couple of cars given a lick of paint, that would do the fleet the world of good and keep then in good nick cosmetically.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 21:34:39 GMT
Yes, the 1972ts is in very bad condition internally, but whilst looking at some of the 'damage' they are very easy fixes. Mainly sorted with a damp cloth, some detergent, maybe some paint here or there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 21:35:56 GMT
Yes, the 1972ts is in very bad condition internally, but whilst looking at some of the 'damage' they are very easy fixes. Mainly sorted with a damp cloth, some detergent, maybe some paint here or there. And removal of the causes...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 21:41:27 GMT
What I meant by the 'easy fixes' was that, the causes of the dirt and lack of paint in some areas is because of lazyness to be honest. Compare the state of the 67ts and 72ts' a couple of months ago, the 67ts was in much better internal condition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 21:42:39 GMT
The 72ts is noticeably clapped out compared to what the 67s were, 100% agreement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2011 22:22:44 GMT
Yeah, so it is down to laziness
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jul 28, 2011 23:08:10 GMT
Remember the 67s were stored in one location or underground!
There has been some work on the 72s, the doors are being repaired with new seals etc. They just need some love ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2011 14:10:45 GMT
A full refurbishment of rolling stock is often intended to make the trains fit for purpose for a prolonged period of time (I.E. 15-20 years) over which time, the cost of the refurbishment is recouped. Surely with the 1972TS, such a refurbishment is unjustified and not cost effective as they are set to be dispensed with within the next 10 or so years. As has been mentioned, all that is required is a good clean and a lick of paint to make them look better and feel better from a passenger point of view, besides the fact I am a huge fan of the Tickford/Rosyth refurbishment and think it looks great on both the 67 and 72TS.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jul 30, 2011 11:50:54 GMT
Yet they refurbished the D stock with the knowledge that the trains would be ecrapped within 10 years!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2011 21:43:57 GMT
I assume thats why the seating layout was unchanged, also many original fittings are still in place such as draft screens etc. I also heard that nothing was refurbished underframe wise.
|
|
|
Post by younglulnerd on Aug 6, 2011 11:11:40 GMT
Off topic I know, but which stock should be replaced first, 72ts or 73ts??
My vote is for 72ts, with a walkthrough version of the 09ts.
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Aug 6, 2011 12:40:46 GMT
Hmm walkthrough carriages would have to mean air-conditioning or perhaps the best invention of all time...windows that you can open!
|
|
|
Post by retep on Aug 16, 2011 21:11:59 GMT
Should the 1972 mk2 stock get a refubishment? i know they had one in the 90's but i think they are looking a bit run down Although they look old their interiors really don't look bad.
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Aug 16, 2011 21:36:14 GMT
Although they look old their interiors really don't look bad. I second that. They have a retro feel but are in pretty good condition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2011 13:38:25 GMT
I think the brown does it, the 67ts looked newer inside because of the light blue.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2011 15:22:29 GMT
The colour mixture of ivory and brown is very soft and together makes the interiors look more welcoming in my opinion. I thought the blue on the 67's looked fairly modern but made the interior look slightly more stark than the 72's, not helped by the completely underground journeys however. Today I did notice a couple of blue ventilator switches on the 72's aswell so it looks like they have pooled some spares from the 67's.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 27, 2011 8:47:53 GMT
The 1972 stock is probably my favourate tube stock and it simply needs a good clean. There are now plenty of spare parts from the 67 stock so keeping them going should not be a problem. The colour scheme is welcoming, and after all brown is the line colour. In a few years it will be yellow or something else horrid to meet regulations!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 17:31:41 GMT
I wasnt saying the brown was a bad thing, I think its nice but made it look older than it actually is.
There are black Ventilator switches on some ex-MKI units, were these from some sort of Northern themed refurb? You can see the grab poles have been roughly painted brown on these units as you can see brush strokes with black underneath the brown coat.
I think the brown does meet regulations, as after all brown does contrast with ivory doesnt it?!
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Aug 28, 2011 17:35:02 GMT
I wasnt saying the brown was a bad thing, I think its nice but made it look older than it actually is. There are black Ventilator switches on some ex-MKI units, were these from some sort of Northern themed refurb? You can see the grab poles have been roughly painted brown on these units as you can see brush strokes with black underneath the brown coat. I think the brown does meet regulations, as after all brown does contrast with ivory doesnt it?! They refurbished a couple of 1972 Mk I trains in the early 90's, but stopped doing any more when it was decided that the line would get entirely new stock (1995 stock). They also did a trial refresh on a 1959 stock train.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2011 17:40:02 GMT
Ahh, my theory was correct. Thank you
|
|