Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 12:33:16 GMT
I suspect that the project to refurbish the 4 car Q stock train is on hiatus given current economic conditions but I did see a photo on Flickr recently of 3 of the cars at Whitechapel (not sure if I can post someone else's link so just search "q stock whitechapel").
It's on its way to Upminster Depot Open Day and appears to be running under its own power.
Does this mean it works and does anyone know if the project is ongoing?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 13, 2011 12:58:01 GMT
The Q35 trailer was exhibited at Upminster in 2009. The reason for it not being in service I have been told is that the electrical systems in the driving cabs of the Q38 stock does not meet current health and safety regulations. To maintain authenticity would require the isolation of the cab systems and the replacement by another system placed in an unobtrusive position. The cash for this or so I was told is not available at present and that is why the stock is not operating. The photo of the Q stock at Whitechapel dates from 1990 before much of the health and safety legislation was in place. H&S was probably why only the Q35 trailer appeared at Upminster.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 13, 2011 13:00:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 13, 2011 13:14:55 GMT
That is the photo taken in 1990. The asbestos removal was completed a couple of years ago when it was also discovered that a complete rewiring of the power cars would also be necessary as well as the upgrade mentioned above. This is the reason why only the trailer was exhibited at Upminster in 2009.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 13, 2011 13:26:26 GMT
I wonder if all the parts still work ok?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 13, 2011 13:39:24 GMT
Probably, but what was acceptable for 60 years no longer is. But I think the main reason is the cost of rewiring the two Q38 cars (I understand that the Q23 car will operate as a trailer) a figure of up to 10 thousand pounds or so I have been told.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 13:47:02 GMT
I really hope the Q Stock does ride again as they are great link the Undergrounds past.
Yesterday at Acton purchased a Q/R trailer body and bogies which I intend to add to the other Q stock cars I already have. So in model form at least Q Stock will run in the future.
Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 15:17:15 GMT
When it finally does run I hope that the powers that be run enough tours to cater for the demand.....
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Mar 13, 2011 20:38:08 GMT
Nice to see a bit of interest in the Q stock. What is all this fuss about H&S and cab equipment? what IS the problem?
The stock ran quite happily from 1923 to 1971 with no problems, why should it be any different now?
On the Southern we were running 4SUB and the old W&C stock with similar control equipment, including line volts in the cab under the current H&S regime. Remember too the vintage tram fleet at Crich has line volts control equipment in the cab! and saloon lights run in series from line volts, just like the Q stock. the Gothenberg tramway museum also runs a fleet of cars with loine volts everywhere.
I can understand the need to rewire the units, after all, cable insulation certainly will have been life-expired many years ago, and the last thing we want is the thing to catch fire due to dodgy insulation.
On Q stock, the guards control equipment, the EP brake and Loudaphone work from 110volts from a set of batteries which charge when the train goes one way, and the equipment is fed from the other end batteries when coming back.
The overload resets are line volts, the cab lights are fed in series with either the speedo light or the cab light via the marker lights.
Quite why the Q23 needs to run as a trailer is a mystery. It also has no usable coupling , jumpers or pipes on the west end! It was designed that way.
My last trip on a Q was a pair of Q38 pilot motors taking scrap R stock cars from UP the EC via EBway in about 1972, with motorman Rick Thomas from PG and an Acton m/m on the back pair. It was a lively journey with 4 Q38 motors!
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 13, 2011 21:04:32 GMT
This is what I was told by a member of the museum staff when I asked about the Q stock. Don't forget that most of the H&S regulations have only come into being in the last 10-15 years and many types of equipment were allowed to remain in service until they were replaced. The reason that the Q23 car will be used as a trailer is that it has no motors. They were removed when it was withdrawn and this particular car went back to its manufacturer (GC&W) for display.
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Mar 13, 2011 23:35:34 GMT
I suspect there's no such H&S problem, it's the usual catch-all when people are unsure.
H&S and EU regulations said at one time that ALL pipes carrying steam had to have x amount of insulation; this would have made every steam loco and every road steam loco unworkable, so an exemption for such things was made! Same as there's exemptions from the DDA for historic rolling stock and vinatge buses..
So if the Q23 has no motors, that makes it a driving trailer!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 13, 2011 23:43:47 GMT
Maybe? 14 were converted into trailers at the end of the 1950s, perhaps the same should be done with this. I wonder if the museum Q23 has motors still? It doesn't need them....
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 14, 2011 0:05:07 GMT
The motors on the Q23 were a lot newer than the cars themselves. They were delivered without motors and utilised the the motors from the 'B' stock motor cars that were converted trailers. These motors proved unsatisfactory however and new motors were fitted in the thirties. When they were converted to 'Q' stock they received new motors again and when the 'Q' stock was withdrawn the motors were removed and kept as spares for other stock that utilised the same motors. The car in Covent Garden is also motorless. I am not sure which stock used the same motors but if it is/was the A or C stock it should not be difficult to re-equip it with motors.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 14, 2011 0:18:18 GMT
If I remember rightly the B, C, D, E and G stock all had GE69 motors. These were replaced when the K stock started to be delivered in 1928 and the new motors were WT54Bs?
Ultimately both the H and Q stock all had the same electromagnetic equipment and motors, but differing brakes.
|
|
|
Post by elo10538 on Mar 14, 2011 0:24:17 GMT
I believe only three of the cars are now to be restored even to cosmetic condition. The official reason is the cost but, in truth one of Q38 DM's has so much missing it looks like a non -starter even for this level of refurbishment. That means they aren't going to run, especially with only one DM in anywhere like complete condition. The Q23 was never intended to be returned to running condition but kept in the 4 car rake as a trailer. I feel one of the remaining CO or CP cars in preservation elsewhere should be purchased as a donor vehicle. This is regularly done in steam loco preservation circles, but you need the manpower and more importantly the will and money to make this happen. Then ask where the original parts missing from the Q38 went to when taken off in Acton Works all those years ago before the Q stock ever reached the LT Museum site.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Mar 14, 2011 0:25:58 GMT
Any reason why some of the cars were painted in maroon and yellow?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2011 0:28:57 GMT
With the Q23 running as a trailer it will still be authentic. Let's face it, we should be grateful for having it at all. There is, after all, no prospect of the 4-SUB or 2-BIL ever recreating thier late 1980s exploits as the modern railway is strictly out of bounds to them. To run them would involve rebuilding them to such a degree as to make them not 'preserved' anymore. Can you imagine the Q stock with anti-override pads and buckeyes? The SEG is facing that with the 4-COR and I dread to think what the inner ends of the restored 'Brighton Belle' will look like next year. Wiring the Q stock to modern standards is a tiny price to pay compared to that.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Mar 14, 2011 4:52:44 GMT
I just don't get it. 20 years ago there was a working set of Q stock and a working set of standard stock, and now everything has bits missing and nobodies sure if it'll ever run again.
Did LUL really sabotage its heritage that much?
And as for the H&S laws, as is demonstrated by the platform convo raging elsewhere, its not the laws themselves that are seemingly the problem, its the people interpreting them in such an awkward way.
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Mar 14, 2011 8:19:51 GMT
The story from the people actually managing the project is a lot simpler: There isn't enough money to go for restoration to running condition. The plan is to do a largely cosmetic restoration so far, but with everything that would be rendered inaccessible underneath nice restored panelling etc also replaced (including rewiring / ducting for future wires etc)
Its worth noting that the Q38 that appears to be in appalling condition was in that state (apart from the graffiti) because the interior panels etc had been removed to allow for rewiring to take place, before that restoration project was aborted. All of the pieces are still there (I moved most of them to covered storage), so in the fullness of time they can all be put back.
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Mar 14, 2011 8:59:27 GMT
Ah, a bit of truth and common sense in the last 2 threads!
Re the comments about over-ride pads etc., the VSOE pullman set is as original, as are the Mk1 stes still running on the main line. Apart from the requirement for roller bearing bogies, air brakes aets some form of central locking, the main line stock seems fairly original!
The Q stock, as it may run only only on LT lines, ought to comply fairly easily! As for the 2BIL/4COR, they already have air brakes and compatible couplings! They'd need AWS/ATWP fitted, but this is now relatively easy as it can be fitted to steam locos.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Mar 14, 2011 9:48:50 GMT
they'd need OTM too, and that would be far from easy given the control systems involved.......
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 14, 2011 9:52:12 GMT
Any reason why some of the cars were painted in maroon and yellow? The two Q38 cars survived because they became 'Pilot Motors' used for moving stock between depots and/or workshops. The maroon and then yellow liveries were used to identify engineering stock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2011 11:07:00 GMT
Working in engineers use and working for passenger use are two totally different things. In engineers use the trains only have to go and stop safely (and not necessarily in that order!). Once passengers are introduced a whole new ball game begins. The trains have to have properly working doors (in engineers use they were probably hand-worked) with all interlocks in place and working. Safety systems for passenger use with modern signalling have to be fitted. Seats have to be provided and maintained to a clean and comfortable level. The Q and Standard sets may have looked nice on the outside when in engineers use but I'll bet the inside was a different story.
Should the Q stock or Standard stock ever run again it will be a fantastic achievement but don't let those photos of twenty-thirty years ago fool you into thinking that the trains were in pristine condition then. They were probably prime examples of what a coat of paint could hide! With this in mind the restoration that is ongoing should be applauded and recognised for what it is. It is the best that can be done with the resources available. We should be thankful for that!
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Mar 14, 2011 19:27:03 GMT
It won't be that many years before the signalling on the SSR is replaced with a 21st century ATP/ATC/ATO scheme and that will be the end of tripcock running. It's also planned to raise the line voltage to 750V. Sadly it may well not be possible to run preserved stock then as it will be so incompatible. I wonder whether any group will be able to work an electrified preservation line. Quite a challenge I suspect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2011 19:39:44 GMT
How about getting the trains compatible with the new signalling?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 14, 2011 19:42:34 GMT
I wonder whether any group will be able to work an electrified preservation line. Quite a challenge I suspect. I think thats highly unlikely. If the Bluebell is not allowed to install a third rail I doubt if anyone else will.
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Mar 14, 2011 22:51:54 GMT
True, it's highly unlikely that any preserved railway will be allowed to install third rail. However, the East Putney was upped to 700/750 volts when Q stock was still a daily occurrence.
The motors and compressors will happily run on 750v, the light bulbs will need to be replaced as they are wired to run in series from line volts! As for the main wiring, if that's being replaced, then there's no problem with that taking 750 volts.
4SUBs were only allowed to run past Brookwood on the main with the lights switched off for this reason!
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 14, 2011 23:21:30 GMT
Hasn't the Cravens 60TS unit been fitted with ATO equipment recently? If so there is no reason for the Q stock not to be fitted with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2011 23:25:00 GMT
Hasn't the Cravens 60TS unit been fitted with ATO equipment recently? If so there is no reason for the Q stock not to be fitted with it. I'd think ATP more likely ;D
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Mar 14, 2011 23:59:50 GMT
It had the ATO removed in the 70s I guess.
|
|