|
Post by jardine01 on Mar 12, 2011 13:15:51 GMT
Has anybody been on a crowed central line train when people lean on the doors and the train stops? It seems to happen quite frequently a few weeks ago at Liverpool street the train departed then coasted then accelerated then stopped! the driver said on the PA " Please do not lean on the doors or this train will be going nowhere then made a annoument if this is a fault with the train this train will be taken out of service at the next station" The driver put the train in coded manual and drove the train to the next station. Does the train only stop when people lean on the doors in ATO or coded manual?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
Member is Online
|
Post by Chris M on Mar 12, 2011 16:45:56 GMT
If people lean on the doors, the train can lose the detection that all the doors are closed. Without proof that all doors are closed the train will not start, or will apply the emergency brake if moving. This applies in ATO and protected manual. I presume it normally applies in restricted manual as well, but can be overridden if there is a fault with a door or the door proving circuit. Passengers obviously cannot be carried if the door proving circuit is overridden.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2011 18:22:59 GMT
AFAIK the emergency brake doesn't come on when doors visual is lost- it rolls to a halt, but that's how I understand it.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Mar 12, 2011 19:28:25 GMT
Motoring is lost when door closed visual is lost
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2011 19:37:25 GMT
Loss of Doors Closed Visual = Loss of motoring.
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Mar 12, 2011 20:23:52 GMT
It's a very common problem, and in my opinion it's what's doing the damage to the motors. Variable loading makes the motors pull full power when it's heavy. Loss of door proving on ATO acceleration makes some trains jolt violently - whump, whump, whump......... one can almost feel the damage being done. But as I said that's a personal opinion. A good way to stop it is what the driver did. Tell the punters that if they don't stop leaning against the doors "You'll all be getting off at the next stop" Tell em nicely though, unless Olly, the *Prof* or Sheena Easton are on board. Tell em "Silly little hats, Glas-merican accents and extreme posing in front of the universe are not allowed on this train thank you very much" It's an ATO interuption BTW and the driver done good - into CM to next station. He'll go far on the job I can tell - Like Epping, Hainalut via Noobry Parkalot, and West Broadwaylip. Put it in the boy's PD file....................next...........
|
|
|
Post by ianvisits on Mar 13, 2011 11:35:59 GMT
A good way to stop it is what the driver did. Tell the punters that if they don't stop leaning against the doors "You'll all be getting off at the next stop" It's hardly the customer's fault that the door sensors are too sensitive to cope with the average rush hour crush though - so telling lies is hardly a sensible approach. We get the same on the Jubilee Line, and I hear drivers claim at times that they have a 3-strikes and train removed from service policy - which I can assure you gets dark mutterings about stupid H&S policies in the carriages, not an eagerness to defy the laws of physics by having two people occupying the same spot in space and time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 12:42:18 GMT
The Central line stock are also a bit of a sod when it comes to getting grab-rail room in the doorwells, so it doesn't surprise me that people end up leaning on the doors, especially if they're short. The Jubilee stock are a bit better. Naturally, there are just stupid punters: I had to tell someone that their bag was stuck in a door the other day!
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Mar 13, 2011 12:58:07 GMT
Tell the punters that if they don't stop leaning against the doors "You'll all be getting off at the next stop" Sorry, but do you think passengers are rammed up against the doors just to be awkward? They are most likely doing so owing because the train is jam packed and there's nowhere else to stand.
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Mar 13, 2011 15:39:41 GMT
Tell the punters that if they don't stop leaning against the doors "You'll all be getting off at the next stop" Sorry, but do you think passengers are rammed up against the doors just to be awkward? They are most likely doing so owing because the train is jam packed and there's nowhere else to stand. Whilst I've done this a few times (I don't weigh much so I can get away with it), people shouldn't ram on a busy train to the point where they would have to lean on the doors. *Currently* the Central Line operates more TPH than any other line, 30 TPH or a train every 2 minutes. That means by time a train has left the platform the next one should only be 1 minute away. The reason you see gaps is because the train has been delayed by people ramming in the train. If we could feed the 30TPH fact into every persons brain then people would just simply wait for the next train. The Central Line runs well and the service is only ever trashed by numerous Passenger Emergency Alarms and people leaning heavily against the doors. Some people seem to forget that the Underground isn't National Rail...the next train isn't a 15 minute wait. I had some work colleagues come down from Manchester during the week and they said the Underground is fantastic in every aspect and were most impressed with the frequency of the trains. Even Jason Manford made a joke how Londoners are always so desperate to board a train and go berserk when they miss one not realising that there is one right behind.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 17:05:09 GMT
I totally blame the passengers who get on the train when it's already full. People don't give a toss about those around them and making 20 people feel more crushed by getting on is ridiculous behaviour.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 17:46:24 GMT
~ I hear drivers claim at times that they have a 3-strikes and train removed from service ~... Well, thats my policy too! When you tell the punters that there are trains every 60-75 seconds or so, they just respond with "Well, we want to get on *THIS* train, then they stand there, hurrumphing about, waiting for departure. People really need to slow down and stop being so focused on one thing. Getting there a minute or so later, really isn't going to make much difference is it? Just slow down! If the train is full, calmly step off the door tread and simply wait. there's no need to ram and push your way on.... Makes life a lot easier, both for you, and the poor fellows you're pushing! Then there's no risk of a confrontation.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Mar 13, 2011 18:01:07 GMT
is it me or does this just happen on Central and victoria lines? i have never seen other lines trains stop because people are leaning on the the doors!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 18:13:11 GMT
is it me or does this just happen on Central and victoria lines? i have never seen other lines trains stop because people are leaning on the the doors! Would happen on any tube line if the crowding was severe enough, and I would guess on any train anywhere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 18:17:03 GMT
is it me or does this just happen on Central and victoria lines? i have never seen other lines trains stop because people are leaning on the the doors! Happens on the 95ts [Northern] too! I've found the C67/77 to be hyper sensitive to this issue! its not my fault if people want to pile on one particular train. I could understand it if there was wasn't another train for a week, but here we have a far more intense service, so please folks, just take a step back... and wait.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Mar 13, 2011 18:36:24 GMT
Does this happen on the 1996 stock aswell?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 18:58:47 GMT
I've not noticed it as much as on the 92ts or the 95ts. I would say all stocks would be affected, but all depends on loading and time of day etc.
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Mar 13, 2011 20:29:56 GMT
I've not noticed it as much as on the 92ts or the 95ts. I would say all stocks would be affected, but all depends on loading and time of day etc. On 92ts, the effect is quite noticeable. A former member of this forum (now banned) used to delight in showing off by forcing the doors open two or three times on departure, just to prove it! Prat!
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Mar 13, 2011 20:53:37 GMT
I've never noticed it occur on suface stock, perhaps its the heads and shoulders pushing on the doors that causes the problems. At least its not like Tokyo were they have platform staff to push people in!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 20:59:44 GMT
Surface stocks have relatively square sides compared to the duck-your-head-in on the DLL stock, that is probably why.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 21:08:38 GMT
A former member of this forum (now banned) used to delight in showing off by forcing the doors open two or three times on departure, just to prove it! Prat! Now, that did happen to me on a couple of occasions, no sooner had I got the visual and started off, that I lost it, and then carried on, only a few second slater to lose visual again. I made a suitably worded PA to that effect. Surface stocks have relatively square sides compared to the duck-your-head-in on the DLL stock, that is probably why. I know about that problem all too well!!!
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Mar 13, 2011 21:25:22 GMT
Slightly OT, but on the same theme, I was on the Picc yesterday at Gloucester Road, beep beep beep, doors start closing followed by something I can only describe as a scene out of "Supergran" as this 60+ lady dived (yes really) through the doors jamming them, she then pulled herself through but ripping her coat which remained stuck in the door, before the driver re-opened the doors, and her mate got on.
"Blimey, that was a close one" she cheerily pipes up to everyone. My daughter (who is 7) pointed out that the DMI said the next train was only 1 minute away, and that she could have killed herself. "Oh well, at least WE made this one" she chirped up with, then plonked herself down on a seat. Honestly, you'd have to have been there to believe it!
Anyhow, going back to the leaning on doors theme, are there any problems when trains pass at speed? There has to be a fair amount of air being shoved between the units which must create quite a bolt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 21:31:38 GMT
The doors rattle, but I have never noticed it to affect the visual or interlock on the 92ts... if it did, it would only be for like a micro second!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 21:32:23 GMT
Having been out to the extents of the line the doors really do jump when the trains cross, with something of a closing speed of about 100mph. Didn't feel any jolt in the motors though!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 21:43:47 GMT
Anyhow, going back to the leaning on doors theme, are there any problems when trains pass at speed? There has to be a fair amount of air being shoved between the units which must create quite a bolt. Northern line, South Kentish Town northbound, an inch and a half opened on double leaf doors. Didn't look too safe.
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Mar 13, 2011 22:59:31 GMT
Tell the punters that if they don't stop leaning against the doors "You'll all be getting off at the next stop" Sorry, but do you think passengers are rammed up against the doors just to be awkward? They are most likely doing so owing because the train is jam packed and there's nowhere else to stand. That's ok, no need to feel sorry oh *Global Moderator* one. I'm intrigued by your unwary assertion that those who make decisions are the victims of their own choices. Passengers *rammed* ( an unfortunate *choice* of word, but that was your decision to use it ) up against doors do so because that's the option they decide to take. Some make the *choice* not to *ram* themselves on but wait until something a little less crowded comes along. So the question. Who are the Victims, and who are the Players? There's only one way to find out...............................Fight!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 23:00:59 GMT
Sorry, but do you think passengers are rammed up against the doors just to be awkward? They are most likely doing so owing because the train is jam packed and there's nowhere else to stand. That's ok, no need to feel sorry oh *Global Moderator* one. I'm intrigued by your unwary assertion that those who make decisions are the victims of their own choices. Passengers *rammed* ( an unfortunate *choice* of word, but that was your decision to use it ) up against doors do so because that's the option they decide to take. Some make the *choice* not to *ram* themselves on but wait until something a little less crowded comes along. So the question. Who are the Victims, and who are the Players? There's only one way to find out...............................Fight! There isn't a chance for something less crowded when one is trying to get to work, especially on the Little Red!
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Mar 13, 2011 23:17:38 GMT
That's ok, no need to feel sorry oh *Global Moderator* one. I'm intrigued by your unwary assertion that those who make decisions are the victims of their own choices. Passengers *rammed* ( an unfortunate *choice* of word, but that was your decision to use it ) up against doors do so because that's the option they decide to take. Some make the *choice* not to *ram* themselves on but wait until something a little less crowded comes along. So the question. Who are the Victims, and who are the Players? There's only one way to find out...............................Fight! There isn't a chance for something less crowded when one is trying to get to work, especially on the Little Red! It's you and others who make the choice to all travel to work together. The system can only cope with so much. There are always alternative choices in everything, but that's not usually an option for most as it's easier to blame something like the Tube for the choices they as individuals make.......Suggestion. Go in earlier to beat the crowds, have a McPuffin n Coffee. No excuses, I practise what I preach .Some days I go in earlier, sometimes hours earlier to beat the traffic............Sometimes I have a McPuffin and Squirrel milkshake..........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2011 23:29:15 GMT
Working 9-5 is long enough without having to add in EXTRA travelling time. The system works at capacity, and generally peak hour punters are far better than those travelling to the shops!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Mar 13, 2011 23:49:07 GMT
It's you and others who make the choice to all travel to work together. Suggestion. Go in earlier to beat the crowds. No excuses, I practise what I preach .Some days I go in earlier, sometimes hours earlier to beat the traffic. Not everyone has that choice - many people work set hours, and are also constrained as to when they can set off for work/have to be wherever they are going in the evening. For example the time between the earliest you are allowed to knock off work, and the latest you can collect the kids from after school club (or vice versa in the morning) may be only slightly longer than the door-to-door journey between them. (Especially if there is a main line train involved, with their lower frequencies - missing a tube can result in a 30 minute wait for the next train home) And being persistently late collecting the kids can mean losing the childminder; without whom you can't go to work at all.
|
|