|
Post by jamesb on Mar 7, 2011 18:04:16 GMT
I was at Sydenham today, and the last set of doors would not shut. They were just fully open and made no attempt to close.
After about 10 minutes of trying to fix the fault, the train was taken out of service.
I was surprised that the train accelerated at normal speeds out of the station with the last set of doors fully open, with no barrier or member of staff to prevent someone jumping onto the train (if they were stupid enough to do so).
That is different to what would happen in a similar situation on the London Underground?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2011 18:47:19 GMT
I was at Sydenham today, and the last set of doors would not shut. They were just fully open and made no attempt to close. After about 10 minutes of trying to fix the fault, the train was taken out of service. I was surprised that the train accelerated at normal speeds out of the station with the last set of doors fully open, with no barrier or member of staff to prevent someone jumping onto the train (if they were stupid enough to do so). That is different to what would happen in a similar situation on the London Underground? It is likely that on LU during the peak the decision to run empty would be made within five minutes, off peak that may vary depending on what is wrong and if it could be fixed by the train operator and the location of the next train. Should a door fail to close, the train can continue at normal speed, but a member of staff must be present by said door when passing through or stopping at stations to prevent customers from attempting to or boarding the train.
|
|