Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 13:02:26 GMT
For those who are interested in the history of the London Overground, TfL have released a rather interesting documentary which can be viewed here:
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Feb 28, 2011 14:13:46 GMT
Pretty awful propagander. And the music is nausiating.
Having said that, good arial shot of the route of the ELL around Shoreditch near the end.
Thanks for the link.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 15:03:08 GMT
Has anyone been shaken by the hand by a member of staff when entering an LO station, thats the bit that made me laugh the most.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 16:37:33 GMT
Pretty awful propagander. And the music is nausiating. Having said that, good arial shot of the route of the ELL around Shoreditch near the end. Thanks for the link. Propaganda. From the Latin feminine gerund of propagare “to propagate”. Unless you cite the Cockney; "Proper gander", an intensive inspection. Semantics, noun?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 19:14:26 GMT
Existing rolling stock cleaned up?!!! LMAO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 19:23:59 GMT
Hmm, Wandsworth Road to Clapham Junction... in 2012. So does that mean the one train a day cum bus currently operating, allegedly... will be replaced with something more in keeping with Metro style services as shown elsewhere? Getting a handshake off a member of staff at a LO station might be asking too much. Even getting a hello or good morning is asking a lot, normally just get a grunt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 19:24:06 GMT
Also whats with the 1996ts motor noise at 5:35
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Feb 28, 2011 19:36:55 GMT
Has anyone been shaken by the hand by a member of staff when entering an LO station, thats the bit that made me laugh the most. No, but I have regularly been addressed with a lack of any emotion or courtesy and the minimum of acknowledgement as a fellow human being whilst going through the motions of a missing a train AGAIN because the ticket machine is STILL broken (unless you want a paper ticket - yeah great!) and there is an EPIC, I say again EPIC queue as a result, which is of course being dealt with extremely slowly. Does that count?? To be fair to LO, they provided the service for my first ever stint of regular rail commuting (on the DC line) and over the course of that time I can barely fault the service. I did also have a very good customer service experience (at the other end of my commute clearly!) although it should be pointed out that whilst the staff were helpful in this case, the root cause was once again a ticket machine - this time one which ate your coins. The station in question has two ticket machines - the other one had the coin slot taped over, oh dear.... Back on topic, this video is sadly interminably dull PR. Since I have lived in LO territory I don't think there has been a single weekend without significant disruption to alot of the network (excluding the ELL), if they hadn't made alot of progress in the circumstances something would be very wrong! Edit: As I watched this video sometime previously and looking back on other comments I do recall something they mentioned which made me think; have frequencies had THAT much of an increase? I can't watch that dirge again but I seem to recall something along the lines of a 'significant' or 'dramatic' increase being mentioned? I'm only really familiar with the frequencies in the LO era, certainly in terms of the NLL/WLL so I'm mostly going on discussion on here regarding timetables etc... My more distant memories of the odd journey here or there certainly feature alot of waiting around in apparent desolation!
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 28, 2011 20:48:11 GMT
Hmm, Wandsworth Road to Clapham Junction... in 2012. So does that mean the one train a day cum bus currently operating, allegedly... will be replaced with something more in keeping with Metro style services as shown elsewhere? The "Parliamentary" service operated by Southern to which you refer runs between Wandsworth Road and Olympia, and exists to keep the Factory Junction - Latchmere Junction route officially open. This will not be replaced by the LO service as it will not cover that route. Is there yet any news of the Ealing Broadway extension? Or will the planned one-off Hastings to Quainton Road special scheduled for May, and mentioned on another thread recently, which Hastings Diesels' site indicates will use the links in question (Mitre Bridge - Acton Wells - Acton ML) suffice to keep the lawyers happy?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 21:00:47 GMT
Has anyone been shaken by the hand by a member of staff when entering an LO station, thats the bit that made me laugh the most. No, but I have regularly been addressed with a lack of any emotion or courtesy and the minimum of acknowledgement as a fellow human being whilst going through the motions of a missing a train AGAIN because the ticket machine is STILL broken (unless you want a paper ticket - yeah great!) and there is an EPIC, I say again EPIC queue as a result, which is of course being dealt with extremely slowly. Does that count?? To be fair to LO, they provided the service for my first ever stint of regular rail commuting (on the DC line) and over the course of that time I can barely fault the service. I did also have a very good customer service experience (at the other end of my commute clearly!) although it should be pointed out that whilst the staff were helpful in this case, the root cause was once again a ticket machine - this time one which ate your coins. The station in question has two ticket machines - the other one had the coin slot taped over, oh dear.... Back on topic, this video is sadly interminably dull PR. Since I have lived in LO territory I don't think there has been a single weekend without significant disruption to alot of the network (excluding the ELL), if they hadn't made alot of progress in the circumstances something would be very wrong! Edit: As I watched this video sometime previously and looking back on other comments I do recall something they mentioned which made me think; have frequencies had THAT much of an increase? I can't watch that dirge again but I seem to recall something along the lines of a 'significant' or 'dramatic' increase being mentioned? I'm only really familiar with the frequencies in the LO era, certainly in terms of the NLL/WLL so I'm mostly going on discussion on here regarding timetables etc... My more distant memories of the odd journey here or there certainly feature alot of waiting around in apparent desolation! The first and last train times are what need improving, i mean a last train leaving Dalston Junction at 0015, and poor times on the NLL and GOBLIN the first train on the GOB is around 9am on Sundays. Hopefully we will see an improvment after the engineering work in the next timetable change, but i doubt it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 21:06:17 GMT
The video is pretty unsurprising predictable stuff that you tend to get from large organizations like this. I'd not go so far as to call it propaganda as that would imply a greater thought process than the final edit displays. I would agree that the music is terrible though! ;D
Aside from this:
Trains more frequent? Yes. Trains longer? Yes Trains cooler? Yes Stations cleaner? Yes Security better? Yes Fare dodging down? Yes
Whether or not they cleaned up the 313s and 150s is indeed open to question although quite irrelevant now as they're all history and won't be back thank God. Come to think of it, I can't think of any current downsides to LO by comparison to it's forebears myself although I'd be interested to hear contrary views.
So, as depressingly corporate and dull the video is, I still maintain that the end result, the railway that is, not the film which doesn't matter one jot, is a great asset to Tfl.
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Feb 28, 2011 21:40:32 GMT
I should stress despite my tone that I would generally speaking agree Whistlekiller. Clearly though slightly higher standards in a few areas and in particular some work on timetabling would make it an even better asset still. First/last trains on all the routes, frequency on others have room for improvement. As I said though, whilst commuting regularly the punctuality was almost impeccable, as good as I could have expected
|
|
|
Post by flippyff on Feb 28, 2011 22:55:22 GMT
The video is pretty unsurprising predictable stuff that you tend to get from large organizations like this. I'd not go so far as to call it propaganda as that would imply a greater thought process than the final edit displays. I would agree that the music is terrible though! ;D Aside from this: Trains more frequent? Yes. Trains longer? Yes Trains cooler? Yes Stations cleaner? Yes Security better? Yes Fare dodging down? Yes Whether or not they cleaned up the 313s and 150s is indeed open to question although quite irrelevant now as they're all history and won't be back thank God. Come to think of it, I can't think of any current downsides to LO by comparison to it's forebears myself although I'd be interested to hear contrary views. So, as depressingly corporate and dull the video is, I still maintain that the end result, the railway that is, not the film which doesn't matter one jot, is a great asset to Tfl. "Trains more frequent? Yes." Err, No. Not on the New Cross branch anyway. Down from 5tph to 4tph. Simon
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 23:04:42 GMT
"Trains more frequent? Yes." Err, No. Not on the New Cross branch anyway. Down from 5tph to 4tph. Simon New Cross has always been 4 tph
|
|
|
Post by flippyff on Feb 28, 2011 23:07:43 GMT
"Trains more frequent? Yes." Err, No. Not on the New Cross branch anyway. Down from 5tph to 4tph. Simon New Cross has always been 4 tph LUL ELL was 5tph* to each of New Cross and New Cross Gate. *I think it was actually a train every 11 1/2 minutes..... Simon
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2011 23:17:00 GMT
New Cross has always been 4 tph LUL ELL was 5tph* to each of New Cross and New Cross Gate. *I think it was actually a train every 11 1/2 minutes..... Simon Well wasn't that because the only terminuses south of the river were New Cross and New Cross Gate under LUL? Now there are 3 terminuses with the Clapham Jct to follow.
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Mar 1, 2011 0:01:46 GMT
New Cross has always been 4 tph LUL ELL was 5tph* to each of New Cross and New Cross Gate. *I think it was actually a train every 11 1/2 minutes..... Simon I thought it was 5tph to NX and 4tph to NXG? (With a 7 min wait between Surrey Quays and Whitechapel/Shoreditch) Incidentally I don't remember the New Cross branch service starting until after 9am on Sundays under LUL.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Mar 1, 2011 4:53:14 GMT
Pretty awful propagander. And the music is nausiating. Having said that, good arial shot of the route of the ELL around Shoreditch near the end. Thanks for the link. Propaganda. From the Latin feminine gerund of propagare “to propagate”. Unless you cite the Cockney; "Proper gander", an intensive inspection. Semantics, noun? 'Proper gander' ? You mean a 'goosey' as in "we'll give it a goosey" which is what I always use to describe a detailed inspection.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 7:09:11 GMT
"Trains more frequent? Yes." Err, No. Not on the New Cross branch anyway. Down from 5tph to 4tph. Simon Apologies, Trains more frequent? Yes, apart from 1 station out of 78. I stand corrected.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 9:14:19 GMT
'Proper gander' ? You mean a 'goosey' as in "we'll give it a goosey" which is what I always use to describe a detailed inspection. “Have a gander” was in general usage around 60s/70s Dagenham but I would imagine both derive from the same source. Regarding LO station staff it should be noted that they are paid less than their LU counterparts and when Silverlink Metro were running things it was rare to find anyone in the ticket offices at the best of times. My local, Leyton Midland Road along with most of the others on the “Goblin” were unmanned until Ken took over so back before LO while you’d have no one to complain to that you’d missed your train or that the ticket machine was out of service there was also no one checking that you had a ticket at all. Years ago a Silverlink driver told me that one day when there was no service on the Stratford-Richmond line they were advising the passengers to use the buses and one cheery chappy complained that if he used the buses he’d have to pay for his journey. I used to work at Stratford and for ages after the ticket barriers went active we’d get passengers asking to be let in without a ticket because they thought you didn’t need one for Sileverlink. Hardly any wonder they didn’t make any money.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 13:43:22 GMT
Re. frequencies on the old ELL, when I lived in New Cross in 2007 I seem to remember them being every 6-7 minutes on the core, giving every 12-14 minutes for each southern terminus. I don't know if there was the odd minute dropped in here and there to make a round 4tph, or whether the booked times were at 14-minute intervals throughout the day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 14:06:58 GMT
"Trains more frequent? Yes." Err, No. Not on the New Cross branch anyway. Down from 5tph to 4tph. Simon New Cross has always been 4 tph New Cross gets a bad service under LO. No trains before 9am on Sunday and trains every 30minutes in the evening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 14:42:07 GMT
New Cross has always been 4 tph New Cross gets a bad service under LO. No trains before 9am on Sunday and trains every 30minutes in the evening. There's a lot of Southeastern services that do stop at New Cross, do bear in mind. They run 4tph from 07:11 to 23:26 from New Cross all to Charing Cross, with alternating services stopping at St. Johns from 07:54. It's not the ideal situation for the users of the ELL but there are alternatives available. Also, you have to bear in mind New Cross is single-tracked into the terminus, leading to capacity restrictions (although nowhere near as bad as say the Chesham branch of the MET)
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Mar 1, 2011 20:47:10 GMT
New Cross gets a bad service under LO. No trains before 9am on Sunday and trains every 30minutes in the evening. There's a lot of Southeastern services that do stop at New Cross, do bear in mind. They run 4tph from 07:11 to 23:26 from New Cross all to Charing Cross, with alternating services stopping at St. Johns from 07:54. That's a lot of people potentially wanting connections to the ELL. yes, they can go via Lewisham and Shadwell, but that's another change and rather slower.
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Mar 1, 2011 20:50:08 GMT
New Cross gets a bad service under LO. No trains before 9am on Sunday and trains every 30minutes in the evening. There's a lot of Southeastern services that do stop at New Cross, do bear in mind. They run 4tph from 07:11 to 23:26 from New Cross all to Charing Cross, with alternating services stopping at St. Johns from 07:54. That's a lot of people potentially wanting connections to the ELL. yes, they can go via Lewisham and Shadwell, but that's another change and rather slower.[/quote] New Cross is also a short walk from Deptford Bridge DLR. However it doesn't excuse the reduced service during evenings and Sunday mornings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 21:03:07 GMT
Is there a reason for the reduced service during evenings and Sunday mornings.
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Mar 1, 2011 22:01:22 GMT
Is there a reason for the reduced service during evenings and Sunday mornings. The frequencies drop on all three branches late evenings. However between NXG and Sydenham there is 4tph although you can wait up to 20 mins between trains after 2200 on the core section for stations on that section of the ELL. The main gripe I still have with LO, is the last trains being so early. 2335 from H&I to Forest Hill compared to an hour later on Southern from London Bridge. Hardly tube style last trains we were promised down here.
|
|