|
Post by dmncf on Feb 12, 2011 15:13:54 GMT
London Overground has a number of closures during February: www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/15405.aspxI would like to know what signalling work is being undertaken. Why is the North London Line closed west of Camden Road (to Richmond and Clapham Junction), but still able to open east of Camden Road? Why must the Watford - South Hampstead - Euston service be diverted away from Euston on Sat 19 Feb and Mon 21 - Sat 26 Feb, and routed via Camden Road to serve Stratford instead? Why couldn't there be a Willesden Junction low level - South Hampstead - Camden Road - Stratford shuttle service instead? I am interested in why the Watford - South Hampstead - Euston service had to be diverted, and could not just be supplemented by a separate service to Stratford.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Feb 12, 2011 18:36:15 GMT
Why couldn't there be a Willesden Junction low level - South Hampstead - Camden Road - Stratford shuttle service instead? I am interested in why the Watford - South Hampstead - Euston service had to be diverted, and could not just be supplemented by a separate service to Stratford. Maybe because there isn't enough capacity on the line to run two Overground services and the Bakerloo? Although that doesn't explain why they couldn't run Watford to Euston and Queens Park - Stratford.
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 12, 2011 19:38:22 GMT
The TfL website is confusing me by showing Sunday's information on Monday for the overground - so... is the Queens Park - Camden Road service running on Monday 21st?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 0:29:49 GMT
First, we cannot reverse LO trains at Queens Park. Second, the bay platform at Willesden Junction LL is not able to sustain a regular service of over 2 tph because of depot access issues and frequency of Bakerloo Line services and LO services into Euston, etc., etc., so overlaying an additional shuttle to Stratford is out. The NLR west of Camden Road is blockaded for mainly for signalling work to be completed and for control to be transferred to Upminster. Therefore, the only alternative is to operate an end to end service from Watford Junction to Stratford.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 1:15:44 GMT
First, we cannot reverse LO trains at Queens Park. Second, the bay platform at Willesden Junction LL is not able to sustain a regular service of over 2 tph because of depot access issues and frequency of Bakerloo Line services and LO services into Euston, etc., etc., so overlaying an additional shuttle to Stratford is out. The NLR west of Camden Road is blockaded for mainly for signalling work to be completed and for control to be transferred to Upminster. Therefore, the only alternative is to operate an end to end service from Watford Junction to Stratford. Actually you could reverse LOROL services at Queens Park! Also if it is like the previous occasion the first two services run empty from Euston to South Hampstead and the last from South Hampstead to Euston. Well done LOROL!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 12:30:44 GMT
First, we cannot reverse LO trains at Queens Park. Second, the bay platform at Willesden Junction LL is not able to sustain a regular service of over 2 tph because of depot access issues and frequency of Bakerloo Line services and LO services into Euston, etc., etc., so overlaying an additional shuttle to Stratford is out. The NLR west of Camden Road is blockaded for mainly for signalling work to be completed and for control to be transferred to Upminster. Therefore, the only alternative is to operate an end to end service from Watford Junction to Stratford. Actually you could reverse LOROL services at Queens Park! Also if it is like the previous occasion the first two services run empty from Euston to South Hampstead and the last from South Hampstead to Euston. Well done LOROL! Correct me if I am wrong as I don't this this route but am I right in thinking you can only reverse in the down direction at Queens Park. To reverse in the up direction you would have to go to Kilburn High Road? This would probably complicate things further.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 16:31:52 GMT
Actually you could reverse LOROL services at Queens Park! Also if it is like the previous occasion the first two services run empty from Euston to South Hampstead and the last from South Hampstead to Euston. Well done LOROL! Correct me if I am wrong as I don't this this route but am I right in thinking you can only reverse in the down direction at Queens Park. To reverse in the up direction you would have to go to Kilburn High Road? This would probably complicate things further. Down trains reverse off the down platform at Queens Park and up trains reverse off the up platform at Kilburn High Road.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 17:31:57 GMT
As I said before we don't/can't reverse at Queen's Park! To do so would mean a very restricted NLR service and would disrupt LO services into Euston. Going end to end Watford Junction to Stratford means we can provide an adequate service over two lines whilst Camden Road West Junction to Gunnersbury Junction is blockaded. Passengers for Euston can change at Watford Junction, Bushey or Harrow & Wealdstone.
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 13, 2011 18:30:11 GMT
...or go via the Victoria line at H&I, and catch some new 2009 stock I think it's sensible to restrict it to one service - as making lots of awkward movements in that area would be disastrous if something went wrong (as it did when I quickly modelled potential timetables in SimSig*) - and if timdunning is saying anything even if it runs as good as it can that might still delay everything. *DISCLAIMER: SimSig is NOT 100% accurate - neither were my timetables I provided (although taking real examples from the Journey Planner) - please do not disregard this post because of that. Especially as I'm sure real signallers are better than me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2011 20:28:35 GMT
'control to be transferred to Upminster.' If so, what going to happen to the signalbox at Willesden?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2011 0:02:40 GMT
As I said before we don't/can't reverse at Queen's Park! To do so would mean a very restricted NLR service and would disrupt LO services into Euston. Going end to end Watford Junction to Stratford means we can provide an adequate service over two lines whilst Camden Road West Junction to Gunnersbury Junction is blockaded. Passengers for Euston can change at Watford Junction, Bushey or Harrow & Wealdstone. Thanks Tim, South Hampstead to Euston via Harrow & Wealdstone, certainly value for money.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2011 8:35:08 GMT
As I said before we don't/can't reverse at Queen's Park! To do so would mean a very restricted NLR service and would disrupt LO services into Euston. Going end to end Watford Junction to Stratford means we can provide an adequate service over two lines whilst Camden Road West Junction to Gunnersbury Junction is blockaded. Passengers for Euston can change at Watford Junction, Bushey or Harrow & Wealdstone. Thanks Tim, South Hampstead to Euston via Harrow & Wealdstone, certainly value for money. ... even better value via Watford Junction ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2011 11:46:18 GMT
Does all this mean that the future aspiration of running LO trains via Primrose Hill could never possibly be anything more than 2tph? Or is there something that could/would be changed in the future to enable this to be a more frequent service?
(Or alternatively, would this simply replace the Euston service altogether, permanently?)
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Feb 15, 2011 13:23:26 GMT
Does all this mean that the future aspiration of running LO trains via Primrose Hill could never possibly be anything more than 2tph? Or is there something that could/would be changed in the future to enable this to be a more frequent service? The line would need resignaling to allow more trains to run through. The last resignaling took out many of the intermediate signals, between stations, meaning that a higher frequency than at present isn't really possible. An alternative would be to cut back the number of Bakerloo trains running to / from Stonebridge Park to release their paths between there and Queens Park for LO services. This would allow such services to reverse at Willesden Junction. That was one of the plans, especially with the works needed at Euston for High Speed 2.
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Feb 15, 2011 17:06:36 GMT
That was one of the plans, especially with the works needed at Euston for High Speed 2. ...as I've said elsewhere before, I suspect there are interesting times ahead in the fallout from HS2. The rebuild will remove LO trains from Euston, and HS2's link to HS1 is currently going to obliterate the LO lines through Primrose Hill. The only option I see from that is to extend the Bakerloo to Watford, and abandon Kilburn High Street and South Hampstead. If the Primrose Hill link is preserved, then there are no problems
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Feb 20, 2011 16:25:09 GMT
I have to say, travelling as I did between South Hampstead and Camden Road yesterday (in both directions) was of course a nice novelty, but also quite useful and being enlightened as I was, quite amusing! Despite the trains of course being advertised as Stratford/Watford Junction, the DVAs repeating this along with showing the next stop, all the posters on the stations etc etc etc more than a few people were clearly somewhat surprised to end up where they ended up in both directions! Of course, despite all the aforementioned, there is no indication from the maps inside the train as to quite how it can route between these two stations, which clearly was confusing and bewildering many. 'How can on earth can this train be at Camden Road?!', many confused glances and anxious double takes, people standing up apparently anticipating Kentish Town West when the train paused for the pan down at Primrose Hill and so on. Most amusing! I wondered to myself if all LO drivers can do both NLL and the DC?
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 20, 2011 17:05:38 GMT
Haha, now I can't wait to experience that for myself - and the pan up/down is I guess why it takes 10 minutes from Camden Rd to SOH
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2011 17:24:34 GMT
Did the trip yesterday to look at the remains of Primrose Hill - a lot of people left at Camden Road when they realized that train is not going to Euston. I don't think there was any publicity about the diversion at South Hampstead station!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2011 17:53:11 GMT
My experience of travelling between Camden Road and South Hampstead was very similar to "metrolander" with a significant number of fellow passengers being quite confused. No fault of the train drivers who explained quite clearly what the next station was going to be and detailing where to get the rail replacement buses for other stations on the Richmond line. A lot of lengthy staring at the in-car route maps when the train reached South Hampstead instead of Kentish Town West (and Camden Road instead of Euston on the return journey). This, of course, confused people more as no direct route is shown. Assuming there will be occasions in the future when LO will want to divert Richmond trains to Watford Junction, perhaps consideration should be given to including the route between Camden Road and Kentish Town West as a dotted "Special Journeys Only" link. I assume the route maps will be changed soon anyway to show the ELL proceeding beyond Dalston Junction, through Canonbury to Highbury & Islington. Finally, I found the Stratford to Watford Junction route a very convienient way to get from Canonbury to Queens Park. If there was ever any money to replace the road bridges and track work at Camden Road I am sure making this route permanenet (in addition to and not replacing Richmond/Clapham Junction routes) would be profitable for LO/TFL. Perhaps 2 trains ph by extending the Stratford/Camden Road shuttles to Watford Junction, and running all day not just peaks? However, this posting is now straying into the "Railway Proposals" forum space!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2011 17:58:27 GMT
Sorry - I meant including the route between Camden Road and South Hampstead (not Kentish Town West) as a dotted "Special Journeys Only"link on the in-car route maps.
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 20, 2011 18:05:38 GMT
How many people will be late to work tomorrow morning as a result of having to go via Camden Road through not listening, or having the routine of getting the train to Euston so ingrained into them?
|
|
|
Post by metrolander on Feb 20, 2011 21:01:28 GMT
1956 - re the inclusion of this link on the map, I was thinking exactly the same, as so many people were staring incredulously at it. To be fair to pretty much any commuter who doesn't have any interest in this stuff (and who therefore is unaware of the link) you could imagine how misleading that must have been! I have also mentioned in the past how convenient this service was/would be for me - having a direct train to Camden was great - and there has been EPIC discussion on the matter of a regular service (or indeed, this route taking over from Euston entirely for LO).
Causton I don't think it seemed like 10 minutes even if that's the timetable - long, but not 10 minutes. You notice the lower speed when you diverge in the tunnels, then of course the long-ish pause followed by something of a trundle into Camden. One thing that did strike me on both trips I made was that the pan up and pan down were considerably louder than when I've experienced it on the WLL? Made quite a few people jump! Added an extra degree of bewilderment for those who looked utterly perplexed as we sat in the middle of nowhere for no apparent reason (it was dark when I travelled, so unless you know where to squint there is little evidence that you are sitting at a disused station).
As for there being no publicity at South Hampstead station - I don't know, but I can vouch that it was clearly advertised at Harlesden and Willesden Junction. Wouldn't entirely surprise me if it wasn't at SH though - I would wager it must be one of the line's least used stations??
Edit for ps: I was slightly disappointed by the view! You get a nice look at that floating Thai restaurant near the lock and a few other things on the canal, but what I had anticipated to be a commanding view over the market and High Street (from the bridge I had for years mistakenly thought was just the NLL) was in fact extremely brief and mostly obscured by the bridge's unusually high sides, d'oh!
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 20, 2011 21:42:57 GMT
I would have thought Primrose Hill station would have been ideal for the Camden Markets! And hmm... I was thinking about maybe trying to get the reverse view of the bridge with a LO train peeking over the top... but I guess the high sides mean I may need to elevate myself!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2011 23:19:55 GMT
I shall give the diverted service a try tomorrow - and will see how many puzzled passengers I can spot!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2011 9:42:41 GMT
I couldn't help but feel a little sorry for the bewildered people this morning as my train trundled into Camden Road from South Hampstead. There were a number of problems:
1) Screens at stations this morning were displaying a message apologising for the incorrect train information. I think some people thought that "Stratford" was an error.
2) I got on a train at Queens Park, and there was no announcement that the train would not call at Euston until we got to Camden Road.
3) The in-train display and announcements were both turned off at South Hampstead, and no manual announcements were made. "The next station is Camden Road" message never happened.
I know they should have read the posters, but I think that the people getting on at Queens Park / Kilburn HR / South Hampstead were reasonably justified in their annoyance on arrival at Camden Rd!
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 21, 2011 18:46:57 GMT
The driver on my train decided not to announce that the train was not going to Euston until the train arrived at Camden Road (and just announced that people should change at H&I for the Victoria line) ... a video is coming soon! Edit: Of course the DVA announced it, but lots of people just claimed it was an error Edit 2: Video uploaded! Sorry about the formatting issue making the widescreen not very widescreen...
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 21, 2011 20:00:48 GMT
TfL site's alterations page suggests there are a Watford - South Hampstead shuttle and another one Camden Road to Stratford. No suggestion that the two are connected in any way. So people will assume the only way from say Willesden Junction to Camden Road is to use the dreaded Rail Replacement Bus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2011 20:52:20 GMT
I had a travel around this afternoon. The station and on-train information seemed to be pretty OK - although not all of the passengers actually believed it!
There was a member of LO staff on 'rescue' duty at South Hampstead, to assist people who had arrived there unexpectedly. His opening line was: "You look a bit lost!!"
It was interesting to see ELL test trains running to and from H&I, too.
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 21, 2011 20:58:20 GMT
There was a member of LO staff at Camden Road - the poor woman though, there were only about 4 people on the platform heading towards Watford which she was on! There were about 30 waiting to head east though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2011 21:11:31 GMT
I noticed that, too! Quite a crowd on the Stratford platform, but only a few people boarding towards Watford. Also, I heard (for the first time on a 378) the 'immortal' line "This is coach one, of four", in true Electrostar style, coming over the PA system. I didn't pick up whether each coach got announced with its own number - but I did think that it was a pretty pointless announcement in a walk-through train!
|
|