|
Post by jamesb on Feb 8, 2011 12:47:22 GMT
Poor Boris is going to give himself a coronary at this rate! I think this is payback time for suggesting underground trains could be driver-less?
Does a failure of this scale mean something went wrong in the control centre?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2011 12:50:34 GMT
The annoucement at West Ham station says the signalling system has failed. Something is wrong with c2c today too.
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Feb 8, 2011 13:45:16 GMT
Signal systems failure. As I mentioned in the TBTC Thread in the Jubilee section, this term would be used more widely.
I was hoping to go home for my lunch hour so I could put a permit on my courtesy car which got delivered at 1pm. Now it has a parking fine. =(
Hope they fix it soon, not too fussed, jubilee provides a good alternative and it gives me a chance to finally see how their TBTC/ATO works...whatever the train is running on.
Back on topic...hoodies stealing cables in the Loughton area again?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2011 14:32:31 GMT
Hope they fix it soon, not too fussed, jubilee provides a good alternative and it gives me a chance to finally see how their TBTC/ATO works...whatever the train is running on. I guess you were luckier than me. c2c was suspended due to a one under at Shadwell, Jubilee was suspended between North Greenwich and Waterloo due to a defective train. Back on topic, service seems to have resumed on the Central. It gives "a signal systems failure at White City" as the reason for delay.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2011 18:40:34 GMT
Why were both the C2C and DLR both suspended due to the one under at Shadwell? Wouldn't it be one or the other?
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Feb 8, 2011 19:02:19 GMT
It was a train radio failure that caused the Central Line line wide suspension today.
I know what was put out about signals systems failure - but is incorrect, that was an amended message of a previous event :
There was a local signals system failure at White City late this morning that caused local suspension.
Before that was resolved there was an apparent line wide train radio failure not long after mid-day. It was this event that caused the line wide service suspension, for about one and a half hours.
The two events were not related.
As it happened the White City signals failure was fixed not long after midday, but the train radio event had already started, so it went un-noticed.
D7666
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2011 22:14:57 GMT
How did we manage before radios? Why does a line have to be shut down and is it overkill or H&S gone mad?
|
|
|
Post by dazzmcguinness on Feb 8, 2011 23:27:26 GMT
Back on topic...hoodies stealing cables in the Loughton area again? Do they know why the cables were stolen? Reports were that it was less than £200 worth of material, which surely is just petty and annoying rather than beneficial in any way? 'McGuinness
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 9, 2011 0:02:58 GMT
How did we manage before radios? Why does a line have to be shut down and is it overkill or H&S gone mad? We had Guards on trains. And I thought Boris, or was it Ken (?), said they wanted to bring them back.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Feb 9, 2011 0:53:37 GMT
Why does a line have to be shut down and is it overkill or H&S gone mad? 7/7 basically. The importance of maintaining communications underground was recognised as something that is essential at all times.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Feb 9, 2011 2:38:19 GMT
Why does a line have to be shut down and is it overkill or H&S gone mad? 7/7 basically. The importance of maintaining communications underground was recognised as something that is essential at all times. Yes, but loss of train radio is not loss of communications underground, they are not impossible just a little more difficult! As in many things these days there is always a convenient excuse for not doing something and very little in the way of 'Can Do' attitude and that is the great difference between LT and LUL. These days if train radio fails cabs have to be double manned in order to run trains but of course there are seldom enough suitable staff on duty and available and in the right places to be able to do that without causing further disruption. OPO has had a greater and greater knock on effect in H&S terms and many of todays issues surrounding the running of services might be obviated by a return to properly crewed trains and fully staffed stations. In the old days there were not only guards on trains but also 'spare crews' available enabling line controllers more flexibility in keeping services running. Technology is a wonderful thing but in so many ways it cannot replace people and believe it or not it would be cheaper to invest in people than technology which has changed proper railwaymen/railwaywomen into something less since the 20th century.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Feb 9, 2011 3:09:45 GMT
Sorry railtechnician, but you are wrong to say we double man during train radio failure - there is absolutely no requirement to have two drivers in the same cab in this situation. A second person in the cab is required only where a train fails a trip cock test (ie, to act as the trip cock system) or if the deadman is cut out (on stocks where this is possible of course). There may well be a requirement for a second person on "tube" lines where the OPO alarm system is used, but being a "sub surface" driver, I'm not fully conversant with the procedures for such equipment. I have a suspicion however that in the case of an OPO alarm failure trains are simply "monitored" by service control. Getting back to the specific subject of train radio failure; if we're going to be pedantic about it, we go out of service if it affects three or more stations in succession because the rule book says so. I don't have the rule book to hand and I'm not going to spend an hour reading through it, but I believe the rule book also says that platforms have to be manned and that if messages need to be passed, they are to be passed via the member of staff manning the platform. If platforms cannot be manned, only one train is permitted in the section at a time. The LT way wasn't always the best way. In any case LT is now outdated and times have changed. There was a lot of fall out and supposed expert opinion with regard to 7/7; indeed it's still ongoing. Some of that opinion is equally outdated but there are one or two things we can take from that event and use to improve our resilience/response in the future - train radio is one such item and being a current driver, I do place a value on having the facility available at my disposal. I wonder what the inquest would make of us having no train radio at all.... Oh and times haven't changed that much - we do still have spares you know!!
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Feb 9, 2011 5:19:59 GMT
Colin,
Since when did the Central cease to be a 'tube' line?
Double manning (not two drivers, I never said that, you choose to interpret rather than read) was the method on the Picc when it suffered complete train radio failure, it is the correct procedure. The second man was not required to be a driver.
This thread is about the Central Line shutdown through train radio failure and nowt to do with sub surface! OPO(T) is a system overlaid on the train radio to detect a driver dropping the handle through fatality and which allows the controller to talk to the passengers and offer reassurance. When train radio is totally shutdown so is OPO(T).
You know all the competence assessments in present day LUL practice are no guarantee of competent performance, they are more like car MOTs, vaid only at the time of the test. I think the 7/7 inquest has revealed some interesting lapses but that is OT here.
Platforms have to be manned for what used to be known as Station to Station working but which evolved to become Point to Point working and which allows a section to be greater than the track between two adjacent stations. The station manning requirement may therefore not apply to all stations within a section. Thus a combination of point to point working and use of signal phones would allow a service to run within the rules, albeit at much lower frequency and extra work for all involved.
I did say that staff would be required to obviate total train radio failure.
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Feb 9, 2011 8:56:35 GMT
7In the old days there were not only guards on trains but also 'spare crews' available enabling line controllers more flexibility in keeping services running. Technology is a wonderful thing but in so many ways it cannot replace people and believe it or not it would be cheaper to invest in people than technology which has changed proper railwaymen/railwaywomen into something less since the 20th century. What an excellent comment. There's another thread going on elsewhere where you should post this - you know - Gregg the Baker's thread.............. There were problems late last night with Maydays in the central area. You could make em, but could not get a reply.........Considering it was all shut down for quite awhile, the service resumed normally within a short space of time. Apparently White City is playing up again this morning - severe delays.......... www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12396342
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Feb 9, 2011 10:36:59 GMT
I have heard it said by LU on the news that you can't update a network that dates from Victorian times overnight...
That is true, but sometimes an excuse I feel.
The Central Line signaling and radio system doesn't date from Victorian times... It dates from the 90s onwards?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2011 11:11:30 GMT
I have heard it said by LU on the news that you can't update a network that dates from Victorian times overnight... That is true, but sometimes an excuse I feel. The Central Line signaling and radio system doesn't date from Victorian times... It dates from the 90s onwards? Perhaps they mean Victoria Beckham’s time? All that high tech equipment needs maintaining and if you don’t have enough staff to keep up with the workload then you are going to get a rise in failures. LUL is trying to keep the wage bill down by not filling vacancies and the passengers will suffer the consequences. The only people who are happy are the bean counters
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 9, 2011 11:15:52 GMT
I have heard it said by LU on the news that you can't update a network that dates from Victorian times overnight... That is true, but sometimes an excuse I feel. The Central Line signaling and radio system doesn't date from Victorian times... It dates from the 90s onwards? It is an excuse. The Connect radio system on the Central Line is only a few years old, and the TBTC issues on the Jubilee Line, particularly on the JLE section, hardly involve infrastructure dating back to Victorian times. Unfortunately the word "upgrade" is now so badly misused that everyone thinks this is the only way to maintain a railway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2011 11:18:54 GMT
I did say that staff would be required to obviate total train radio failure. The sad fact is very few stations would have the ability to staff platforms and even less chance of providing staff to allow for double staffing. Since Sunday, when LU have changed the ticket office hours and have "Staff who were previously behind under-used ticket office windows will be able to be deployed to places where they can better assist passengers" the station I work at has lost 9 full-time staff. During the peak hours I could realistically put a handsignalperson on about half of the available platforms and retain some sort of basic station control - this would mean all non safety crticial roles would be used i.e. ticket office closed etc. Come 1900 during the week or anytime at weekends then I couldn't even offer an assisted dispatch without having to close ticket offices. Some of you here will travel through the station I work at, some of you will drive a train through my station or control the railway through my station. I apologise to the controllers and drivers that assistance will not be as quick as you like and I apologise to the public for any delay or lack of information that you will receive. I can only do what I can do and I will do my best. And the problems are widespread - one colleague not on my line has said "no part time staff, having to pay overtime to cover mealbreaks or the station will close. The mobile supervisor has to be on a gateline for over 2 hours (hardly mobile and able to respond to problems) and no staff to carry out security checks!!!! Prior to 7/7 weren't trains double staffed when the OPO alarm (deadmans alarm springs to mind) was defective.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2011 11:52:03 GMT
Without fully understanding - if the radios don't work, can you still drive the train? I suspect yes and I also suspect some sort of service could be given, but rules are rules!!. I have no idea why you would need a message to be passed to you, but if the system is so reliant on radios, I'd have the trains up with the suppliers and operators. Does it run on Windows FFS?
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Feb 9, 2011 14:12:26 GMT
I did say that staff would be required to obviate total train radio failure. The sad fact is very few stations would have the ability to staff platforms and even less chance of providing staff to allow for double staffing. Since Sunday, when LU have changed the ticket office hours and have "Staff who were previously behind under-used ticket office windows will be able to be deployed to places where they can better assist passengers" the station I work at has lost 9 full-time staff. During the peak hours I could realistically put a handsignalperson on about half of the available platforms and retain some sort of basic station control - this would mean all non safety crticial roles would be used i.e. ticket office closed etc. Come 1900 during the week or anytime at weekends then I couldn't even offer an assisted dispatch without having to close ticket offices. Some of you here will travel through the station I work at, some of you will drive a train through my station or control the railway through my station. I apologise to the controllers and drivers that assistance will not be as quick as you like and I apologise to the public for any delay or lack of information that you will receive. I can only do what I can do and I will do my best. And the problems are widespread - one colleague not on my line has said "no part time staff, having to pay overtime to cover mealbreaks or the station will close. The mobile supervisor has to be on a gateline for over 2 hours (hardly mobile and able to respond to problems) and no staff to carry out security checks!!!! Prior to 7/7 weren't trains double staffed when the OPO alarm (deadmans alarm springs to mind) was defective. Stig, These are all well made and valid points, everyone in the industry knows that the situation has really been created by LUL management, directly or indirectly. As I have asserted, devolvement has done nothing for the customers but it has created a top heavy bloated corporate organisation with duplicated roles at the top and in the middle while drastically reducing the working staff at the sharp end. It all could have been so different if those at the very top had made a proper case for public service instead of giving in to ignorant politicians who have done the damage, wrung their hands and walked away.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Feb 9, 2011 14:14:59 GMT
I have heard it said by LU on the news that you can't update a network that dates from Victorian times overnight... That is true, but sometimes an excuse I feel. The Central Line signaling and radio system doesn't date from Victorian times... It dates from the 90s onwards? Perhaps they mean Victoria Beckham’s time? All that high tech equipment needs maintaining and if you don’t have enough staff to keep up with the workload then you are going to get a rise in failures. LUL is trying to keep the wage bill down by not filling vacancies and the passengers will suffer the consequences. The only people who are happy are the bean counters Well unfortunately the bean counters are well entrenched with plenty of cannon fodder installed beneath them in middle management to justify their existence.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Feb 10, 2011 18:19:05 GMT
If the radios didn't work, how did the message get to drivers that the service was getting suspended?
Is it possible to suspend the line only in tunnels... Above ground, could contact not be established via mobile phone in an emergency?
And what about tunnel telephones, in the event?
|
|
|
Post by causton on Feb 10, 2011 19:57:36 GMT
Are mobile phones not too unreliable to guarantee vital messages getting through? Unfortunately, despite the amount of progress with phones many times, simply getting through with a call isn't 100% guaranteed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2011 20:37:01 GMT
If the radios didn't work, how did the message get to drivers that the service was getting suspended? Is it possible to suspend the line only in tunnels... Above ground, could contact not be established via mobile phone in an emergency? And what about tunnel telephones, in the event? Platform staff, easy as...
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Feb 10, 2011 20:47:48 GMT
Is it possible to suspend the line only in tunnels... Above ground, could contact not be established via mobile phone in an emergency? OMG - what a can of worms that is! Mobys have to be switched off while in the cab. It's the rules. " Brrr Brrr.............Brrr Brrr - "Bollox Line Control"................." This is the driver of train zero six-uh zero, I've been standing at signal Charlie Oscar Charlie Kilo four-uh, two-uh, nine-uh for over ten minutes and I haven't been able to get in contact with anyone as the radio has gone down"..............."Driver, are you using a mobile phone?"........................."Yes"........................"You're fired"........... We are told to contact whoever in an emergency by moby if necessary. Even asking to use a punter's moby ( ugh, it could stink of curry or puke ) if we don't have one of our own.............Talk about hip-hop-ocrasee..........or having a piece of cake and eating it..........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2011 22:04:41 GMT
District Dave's information site has several stories of contacting controllers by the portable blower!
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Feb 11, 2011 8:22:12 GMT
You'd hope that they would allow some common sense regarding mobile phones.
It is understandable and sensible that mobiles are banned in the cab.
But, humans are humans...
I have occasionally seen drivers holding a phone or looking down at one when the train pulls in. I blame ATO! It must get boring sitting there between stations and not driving the train...
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Feb 11, 2011 10:19:12 GMT
You'd hope that they would allow some common sense regarding mobile phones. It is understandable and sensible that mobiles are banned in the cab. But, humans are humans... I have occasionally seen drivers holding a phone or looking down at one when the train pulls in. I blame ATO! It must get boring sitting there between stations and not driving the train... Then if the driver is bored, on the CL at least, he can drive it. Drivers looking down are not looking at their phones, but at their excitement at just being there. It's such a thrill............
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
Member is Online
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 11, 2011 10:27:30 GMT
I was once invited into a cab by a driver who was looking to alleviate boredom by having someone to talk to! Unfortunately for me he was going via the wrong branch and I didn't have time to make the diversion.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Feb 11, 2011 10:33:42 GMT
But, getting back to the original thread, station staff cuts would impact on the service in a communications failure, then? If there are no staff on the station, how can the message get to the driver that the service is suspended....
|
|