|
Post by silverlight on Jan 24, 2011 17:12:23 GMT
Hi just a random question was wondering how beneficial people are finding the new East London Line and from what station they have left from to get to their destination. I have found it very useful I must say leaving from West Croydon. (of course the question always ponders in my mind If I left from East Croydon I would have connected with the Jubliee line a lot quicker.... however for people who have also thought about this its all about value for money!! Travelling on London Overground is cheaper as oppose to jumping on a Southen rail service or for any other matter First Capital Connect 'Thameslink' as they are not owned by TFL obviously. Even more so if you have a rail-card the prices u get off peak on London Overground are BARGIN!! I love the new line I have been on all the lines of The London Overground network and think East London line is the best. Whether your getting to the line via DLR, Bus,Overground, Tram, or Underground interchange I wanna hear from you! Also for those living or travelling from Highbury and Islington or Canonbury please comment on your thoughts about the convenience of the new line or being able to get to West Croydon, Crystal Palace or New Cross, with no changes! I know there are bad points too probably more so than good anyway whatever REPLY!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2011 17:49:20 GMT
Never realy found it useful to be honest, doesnt seem to be crowded at all either but I suppose pax numbers will get up to strength
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 24, 2011 19:23:19 GMT
Travelling on London Overground is cheaper as oppose to jumping on a Southen rail service or for any other matter First Capital Connect 'Thameslink' as they are not owned by TFL obviously. How does that work then? Surely the fares are the same on the only route where you have a choice - Croydon to NXG and intermediate stations. (Or can the Oyster readers tell which train you used?) TfL rates certainly apply to some FCC journeys: Elephant to West Hampstead or Moorgate to Finsbury Park, for example.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2011 19:23:59 GMT
I have found it useful. My parents live near to one of the southernmost stations and I've found it very comfortable to get their places.
One of my colleagues also prefers using it to get to the office (near Southwark Tube) being less stressful and more reliable than using Southern's services to London Bridge which are always rammed having originated somewhere in Surrey or Sussex.
|
|
|
Post by redbond on Jan 24, 2011 19:24:00 GMT
Not crowded? I'm always amazed driving on the ELL how packed it is early mornings from West Croydon to Canada Water. The amount of people streaming off it down onto the Jubilee still amazes me.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 24, 2011 22:09:21 GMT
I've found it useful a few times getting to Hoxton and Shoreditch, joining it from the DLR at Shadwell.
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Jan 25, 2011 19:47:49 GMT
As I live on the southern extension of the ELL, I've found it useful in saving money on PAYG journeys to TfL stations (using Canada Water/Whitechapel/Shadwell) where as if I use a NR service to London Bridge then change, it's an extra £1.10 (maybe more since the fare rises?) on my journey. However, the late evening services are less frequent and as the final train to Forest Hill leaves Canada Water at 2356, Southern services from London Bridge are still the only viable option for late night journeys. Not crowded? I'm always amazed driving on the ELL how packed it is early mornings from West Croydon to Canada Water. The amount of people streaming off it down onto the Jubilee still amazes me. I used to wait for a Crystal Palace service to Dalston to board to beat the crowds, but since December they're also packed!
|
|
|
Post by dazzmcguinness on Jan 26, 2011 6:24:38 GMT
I like it, but then I was always going to. I moved to south west London in the summer having been based in Essex and Mile End for the last few years of Uni. From Waterloo I can take Jubilee to Canada Water and then get the line to Whitechapel, which is always preferable as no one ever knows when they're going to close the Waterloo and City line.
Plus the trains look cooler than most of the other things that travel through the tube network.
'McGuinness
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 14:27:33 GMT
It is terrific line, imho. I live at Norwood Junction - no I don't, I live near the station - and in the past would get the NWD - VIC Southern to work on some occasions. Living in NWD and working at ECT, I have alternatives to getting to work, although they're mostly forced on me dependant on shifts;
On dead earlies, I will drive to Beddington and get the cab in; Reversing the homeward trip I get the DR to WIM and Tram back to Beddington; On the later earlies - anything with a book on after I can get the first train - I drive to WIM PK and get the DR in; Obvious reversal on the way home.
On anything with a book on after 06:00, I get the LO to WCL and DR to ECT; This is roughly an hours journey time; reversing it on the way home.
Book-on's after 15:00 I drive to WIM PK as I will generally be finishing late and it's more convenient to have the car handy for a quick getaway.
Out of all of the variations, I much prefer the LO angle as I find them utterly reliable - and even if they're not, I'm on the system and any lateness ain't down to me then!! - and comfortable. Yes they get busy from Forest Hill up to Canada Water and Shadwell, but no busier than a DR in the peak. On the way home I can get either a Crystal Palace train or W.Croydon - changing at Sydenham for the later W.Croydon, but that gives me a chance to feed the smoking habit!
Cost? I can't answer that one, personally I find all public transport very reasonable, but on the odd occasion I do have to buy a rail ticket to travel to London Bridge or Vic, it does seem expensive.
|
|
|
Post by edwardfox on Jan 28, 2011 15:20:54 GMT
So we've got the NLL (North London Line), ELL (East London Line), WLL (West London Line). Is the future extension from Surrey Quays to Clapham Junction going to be named the SLL?
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jan 28, 2011 16:52:27 GMT
Once it opens to Highbury, it may be useful for me personally. I will try it for a week or two, to/from work when it opens, but I would imagine the journey time will be the same as my current route. Handy if my usual way has delays or is suspended though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 21:15:08 GMT
Is the future extension from Surrey Quays to Clapham Junction going to be named the SLL? Well, it will run over the SLL - so I'd imagine it will.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 21:19:05 GMT
Is the future extension from Surrey Quays to Clapham Junction going to be named the SLL? Well, it will run over the SLL - so I'd imagine it will. But according to the London Overground sub-website it will be part of the ELL.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 28, 2011 22:46:10 GMT
So we've got the NLL (North London Line), ELL (East London Line), WLL (West London Line). Is the future extension from Surrey Quays to Clapham Junction going to be named the SLL? It's been known as that since the Act of Parliament authorsiing its construction 149 years ago. But according to the London Overground sub-website it will be part of the ELL. I thought the current fashion was to call them the "Dalston-Croydon", Stratford-Richmond" etc lines.
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on Jan 31, 2011 13:10:33 GMT
Yes - unfortunately TfL doesn't trust the public to remember lines by names anymore, it seems. We should be greatful they haven't renamed the Met line to the "Chesham/Amersham/Watford to Baker Street/Aldgate" line, I suppose.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2011 14:01:59 GMT
Who actually decided to rename it the Highbury and Islington to New Cross Crystal Palace and West Croydon Line.
Must admit i am glad that people are still calling it the East London Line rather than the Overground or its ''official'' name.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2011 15:02:19 GMT
Officially the NLL is the North London Railway and the ELL is the East London Railway and this was decreed by Mayor Ken Livingstone! However, when we actually asked passengers what they wanted, for some very odd reason the majority seemed to like the quasi-Paris style 'xxxx to xxxxxxxx line' - goodness only knows why! The current Mayor seems to like SLL for Phase 1b to Clapham Junction but in reality it will all probably end up as the 'Highbury & Islington to New Cross, Clapham Junction, Crystal Palace and West Croydon Line' but as most people would be dead from lack of air after saying all that, we will all end up probably calling it ELR!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 31, 2011 17:52:30 GMT
What are the route headcodes for the line? If such things exist for it! As in 1E37 or something. Perhaps they could be advertised more? Failing that, as (if) the network grows, perhaps routes can be given arbitary letters? All speculation, no doubt all these have been considered however!!
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Jan 31, 2011 22:34:34 GMT
I'm sure on the departure board plasma at Canada Water, it says "East London Line"
|
|
|
Post by redbond on Feb 1, 2011 17:15:51 GMT
What are the route headcodes for the line? 1st Digit 9 for passenger service 3 and 5 for ECS 2nd Digit Dalston - Crystal Palace: A Crystal Palace - Dalston: B Dalston - West Croydon: C West Croydon - Dalston: D Dalston - New Cross: E New Cross - Dalston: F
|
|
|
Post by patstonuk on Feb 1, 2011 19:13:45 GMT
What are the route headcodes for the line? 1st Digit 9 for passenger service 3 and 5 for ECS 2nd Digit Dalston - Crystal Palace: A Crystal Palace - Dalston: B Dalston - West Croydon: C West Croydon - Dalston: D Dalston - New Cross: E New Cross - Dalston: F Interesting - and thanks. I'm intrigued by the use of 9 as the first digit rather than the 2 which would be the norm on the national network for this type of train service. IIRC the use of 9 has been for Eurostar services on classic (non-HS lines) and for certain Virgin (as they were) Cross Country services. In both instances this was to make them more readily identifiable to signallers as services which needed to be accorded higher priority than the next highest category, Class 1. Does the use of 9 on ELL services fulfil the same function when trains are running south of New Cross Gate - to make them stand out from other services run by FCC and Southern?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2011 20:23:26 GMT
Will 9A, 9B, 9C, and 9D replace Dalston with Highbury & Islington when the Northern Extension opens later this month (Feb)?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2011 21:10:33 GMT
Found it useful a few times to get off the Jubilee when that has had problems, getting me to Whitechapel to carry on west.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2011 21:12:30 GMT
I wonder if re-opening Shoreditch station (the one closed in 1940 on the corner of Kingsland Rd / Old St) rather than opening the new Hoxton Station would have boosted passenger numbers in this area. Hoxton Station is a bit out of the way located in a side alley, whereas Shoreditch is right in the centre of bars, clubs etc. I know there was a "Health & Safety" issue with the curvature of the line at the old Shoreditch site but I still think this would have been a better choice of station location. I do not have a problem with the new Shoreditch High St - this could have been called Bishopsgate or Brick Lane if the original Shoreditch had been re-opened. However, congrats to all involved in the ELL project (and the current operating staff) as it is a good line.
|
|