Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 9:12:18 GMT
I've heard and read a bit about nine-car 1938TS, but not much.
How were they supposed to work? Did they ever run in such a formation?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 10, 2010 9:40:54 GMT
Yes they did - there were two traffic circulars produced with pictures in *rummage*. Although I've just realised that this image is from the 1937 edition, ISTR the 1938 edition had the same illustration.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 11:15:59 GMT
Ah thanks. So the formations were drawn up, but did they ever actually run? Thanks again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 11:42:08 GMT
The formations weren't strictly as above. The info is in Piers Connors excellent work on the 1938 tube stock which I can't find at the mo. 'Tis an excellent book and will tell you all you need to know and then some about it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 12:23:09 GMT
The formation (above) applied to the Pre-1938 Tube Stock. The 1938 Stock formations were different. The first 9-car entered service 8/11/37 between Colindale and Kennington via CHX. 9-car operation extended to Edgware from 7/2/38 when a second train was introduced. Third train introduced 14/2/38 and a fourth (the maximum ever achieved) 21/2/38. All were Pre-1938s.
The first two 9-car 1938s entered service on 19/6/39 in the formation M-NDM+SNDM-T-NDM-T-SNDM+NDM-M
The SNDMs were 'special' NDMs, having guard's controls (there were none on the 9xxxx motor cars). The '+' sign indicates an emergency uncoupling position. 'Ward' couplers were provided between cars 2/3 and 7/8, so that two cars could be detached and got out of the way in a dire emergency.
However, 9-car (1938) stock had first entered service from 15/5/39 but in 'block' 7-car formations. At the outbreak of WW2, six 7-car trains (of 9-car 1938 stock) were in service, along with two genuine 2x9. Another 9-car 'block' entered service as a 6-car on 30/9/39 which was at the time formations were reduced to 6-cars because of closures regarding under river protection work taking place.
For interest, at the time of the opening of the East Finchley extension, the stock requirements from 3/7/39 were increased by one to 96 trains, as follows:
60x7 1938 Stock, 4x7 'block' 1938 Stock, 28x7 Pre 1938 with the 3-car north end, and 4x9.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 12:23:37 GMT
Somewhat underpowered compared to most tube stock formations; I assume 2 DM's and 2 UMDM's?
Xerces Fobe
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 12:33:39 GMT
Certainly not underpowered - in a 9-car 1938 there were 7 'motored' cars and 2 'non-powered' trailers. There were no UNDMs at that stage - the concept wasn't to appear for another 10 years. The cars were M - driving motor, NDM - non-driving motor car, SNDM - special non driving motor car, and T - trailer.
On a 9-car Pre-1938 there were four motor cars - same number as would be on an eight car.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 12:49:16 GMT
But my understanding is that they did not last?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 13:41:37 GMT
What do you mean by "they did not last"?
The 1938 9-car stock survived with the rest of the 1938 Tube Stock until scrapped (from the early-1970s) and it was made compatible with the rest of the fleet in the early 1950s. Some of the NDMs were converted to UNDMs at that time.
If "they did not last" refers to 9-car operation, then 9-car operation ceased at the outbreak of WW2 and was never reinstated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 14:09:30 GMT
I meant the latter... Of course the cars themselves lasted to scrapping of the main fleet...
So how did the 9-car trains fit into the stations?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 10, 2010 14:25:03 GMT
So how did the 9-car trains fit into the stations? They didn't - At certain tunnel stations the first two cars stopped in the tunnel, and at certain other stations the last two did - that was why the guards controls were moved two cars from the end. Presumably notices were displayed at stations and on trains telling passengers which cars to join for which stations. Presumably iunder wartime conditions it just got too complicated. The pre-1938 formations had four DMs and five trailers, a slightly better power/weight ratio than the normal formation of 3+4. (4+4 was a formation only introduced in 1940, for the Central Line). The 1938 formations had 7+2, so also had a better power/weight ratio than the normal 7-car (5+2) formations. (Edited because I got my sums wrong)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 14:30:41 GMT
Stations Golders Green to Burnt Oak were lengthened to take 9-car trains. They had to be "squeezed" into platform 1 (only) at Edgware, which was lengthened only by a short section - but by the maximum that could be. Even then the south end car-and-a-bit was still off the platform. An additional starting signal (AE33C) was provided south of the normal starting signal at the normal 7-car berthing point. I am fairly certain that additional 'trap' proints were provided just in advance of this, but this would need to be checked.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 14:54:16 GMT
So basically they didn't fit... Interesting. Thanks everyone
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 15:18:44 GMT
Not at 'tube' stations they didn't but in (most) open stations they did ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2010 15:38:16 GMT
Oh ... What was the exact reason for the withdrawal of the 9-car formation?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 10, 2010 15:51:36 GMT
Oh ... What was the exact reason for the withdrawal of the 9-car formation? I understand it was a combination of keeping things simple in wartime (a 9-car could only operate between Kennington - CX - Edgware, so diversion to Highgate or Morden was out of the question), plus less need for the extra capacity as a result of the abandonment of much of the New Works programme (Bushey Heath, Mill Hill - Edgware, and Ally Pally). This meant that a higher frequency could be used on the original main (Edgware via Golders Green) line than would otherwise have been the case, reducing the need for extra capacity on each individual train.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Oct 10, 2010 18:49:54 GMT
Nine car trains were introduced on the Northern line on the 8th November 1937 and ceased at the outbreak of war. A notice was placed either side of the doors to warn passengers.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Oct 10, 2010 22:07:19 GMT
If the war hadn't of interviened, is it likely that 9 cars would have lasted?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Oct 10, 2010 22:17:02 GMT
If the war hadn't of interviened, is it likely that 9 cars would have lasted? It was a very awkward arrangement so it was surprising it lasted as long as it did. Service frequency improvements achieved the same effect.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 10, 2010 23:44:46 GMT
If the war hadn't of interviened, is it likely that 9 cars would have lasted? It was a very awkward arrangement so it was surprising it lasted as long as it did. Service frequency improvements achieved the same effect. FWIW, I don't think the answer is quite as simple as that. The post-war service intervals were about 1 - 1½ minutes further apart (as a rough comparison between 1940 and 1950 - however.. I do have a large selection of WTTs of that era - perhaps one day I should sit down and compare them cumulatively. I shall use a Morden-Edgware WTT to send me to sleep.
|
|