Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 20:26:52 GMT
I recently heard that the planned Stratford - Camden Road service will be extended to Willesden Junction (because the bay platforms at Camden Road were 'rationalised').
Is there anything preventing TfL from merging together Stratford - Willesden Junction and Willesden Junction - Clapham Junction services?
So that instead of: 4tph - Stratford - Richmond 2tph - Stratford - Clapham Junction 2tph - Stratford - Camden Road (or Willesden Junction) 2tph - Willesden Junction - Clapham Junction
we will have: 4tph - Stratford - Richmond 4tph - Stratford - Clapham Junction
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 21:10:43 GMT
The flat junction west of Willesden Junction probably can't support the relevant movements, due to the need to keep paths open for the Southern services that join/depart further south at Mitre Bridge and the freights that join up at the KXStP junctions and head for the Southern Region.
Something like this probably won't happen until the Nuneaton works are finished and the majority of the 9'6" freights from Ripple Lane and the GEML/ECML are diverted to the north.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Aug 2, 2010 21:30:27 GMT
The flat junction west of Willesden Junction probably can't support the relevant movements, due to the need to keep paths open for the Southern services that join/depart further south at Mitre Bridge and the freights that join up at the KXStP junctions and head for the Southern Region. Something like this probably won't happen until the Nuneaton works are finished and the majority of the 9'6" freights from Ripple Lane and the GEML/ECML are diverted to the north. As the Clapham Junction service is already going to 4 tph, I don't think the junctions west of Willesden Junction can be the problem. In the short term, the problems will be pathing around the freight trains, which are running from Wembley via the City line and Gospel Oak, until the loops east of Camden Road are commissioned (supposed to be next year) and then lengthened to the west of Camden Road after the Olympics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 21:56:59 GMT
Hopefully from May 2011 all WLL LO services will run through to Stratford all day every day. That is our current planning target in TfL London Rail.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2010 22:16:15 GMT
Fingers crossed it will work out! With 7.5 min frequency Willesden Junction - Stratford will finally become real turn-up-and-go railway (obviously my definition of turn-up-and-go is much stricter than TfL's)
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Aug 2, 2010 23:29:06 GMT
I recently heard that the planned Stratford - Camden Road service will be extended to Willesden Junction (because the bay platforms at Camden Road were 'rationalised') Where were the bay platforms at Camden Rd? It was four through platforms in the 70s,at least,though I'm sure only two were used by passenger trains....Or are we talking about proposed ones that aren't going to be built now because of "de-scoping"? (Climbs on hobby-horse) I hope these extended services are routed via a re-opened Primrose Hill,to terminate at Willesden Jct Bay! (Climbs back down)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2010 8:44:33 GMT
Or are we talking about proposed ones that aren't going to be built now because of "de-scoping"? Yes, the imaginary bays (Climbs on hobby-horse) I hope these extended services are routed via a re-opened Primrose Hill,to terminate at Willesden Jct Bay! (Climbs back down) Why? Who would want to use (almost) Central London station with measly 2tph service?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Aug 3, 2010 9:50:42 GMT
It's actually more about operating convenience and other stations,Primrose Hill being a benefit (supported by,amongst others,the local council,as it happens) at marginal extra cost. My main objection is to turning trains at Highbury and Islington,the platform arrangements there (which will cause hundreds of people to surge over the footbridge from the ELL to the NLL and vice versa) and the rather absurd new track plan which re-mixes goods and stopping passenger traffic on the same tracks between H&I and Camden Road East-jct. Given that this is all a bad idea (bear with me on that,this is MY hobby-horse,remember) where is the next good termination point? Camden Rd? Not really.Terminating trains will get in EVERYBODY's way,at a known bottleneck. My idea would be to extend the ELL to Willesden Junction bay via Primrose Hill,and the Stratford-"Camden Rd"'uns as well.Both bay tracks would have to be put into commission. The advantage would be that passengers changing between NLL and ELL could step off at any station between Canonbury and Camden Rd,wait ON THE SAME PLATFORM and get on their connecting service. Goods would be completely segregated on its own pair of tracks between Camden Road West-jct. and Dalston West-jct. And Primrose Hill could be opened onto an existing service if the money stacked up. That is the context for my statement,but the argument stands for both services. Camden Road is in any case a poor choice of reversal point,don't you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2010 10:40:11 GMT
Indeed it is a poor choice - that's why it won't be one! (read the very first line of the first message in this thread) Yes, interchange at Highbury and Islington and Canonbury won't be convenient, but it has an advantage of keeping north end of ELL segregated from rather failure prone NLL. Also, any service via Primrose Hill will add two sets of flat junctions (on NLL and DC line) - it might be problematic for any high frequency railway.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Aug 3, 2010 15:11:39 GMT
It's actually more about operating convenience and other stations,Primrose Hill being a benefit (supported by,amongst others,the local council,as it happens) at marginal extra cost. My main objection is to turning trains at Highbury and Islington,the platform arrangements there (which will cause hundreds of people to surge over the footbridge from the ELL to the NLL and vice versa) and the rather absurd new track plan which re-mixes goods and stopping passenger traffic on the same tracks between H&I and Camden Road East-jct. But the freight won't be sharing the tracks between H&I and Camden Road East, as this is the very section where the freight loops are (even if they are not currently commissioned due to the delay in resignalling). Said loops are planned to be extended to Camden Road West in the future, but what ever happens there will always be a bottle neck at Camden Road West where the lines to Primrose Hill and Gospel Oak diverge. But there won't be sufficient capacity to put everything through the short two track section at Camden Road West and widening it would be a lot more expensive than the reinstatement of the other four track sections at Camden Road as the formation was only ever two tracks. Operationally, I don't think running the ELL units beyond H&I is a good idea, as delays could be imported to and from the Southern, also it would need the class 378/1s to be fitted with AC equipment. What will be interesting is whether the ELL normally uses the platform at H&I which is nearest to the westbound NLL, to allow easy connections, or whether the trains will alternate between platforms.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 3, 2010 16:43:49 GMT
The current plan is that the Camden Raod area will be rebuilt after the Olympics. Two tracks will be reinstated between Camden East and West Junctions making four in all. An additional platform will be reinstated at Camden Road for eastbound NLL trains with an eastbound freight loop using the northrnmost trackbed. The existing westbound platform track will be used by freight and westbound passenger trains and the current eastbound platform will probably be used as a bi-directional road for passenger trains. There is still an option to run at least 2 tph via Primrose Hill as the new signalling between Stratford and Camden Road is actually designed to handle up to 10 passenger tph plus freight. The reason we cant pump more passenger trains than 2tph via Primrose Hill is the number of freight workings AND the need to change traction supply from AC overhead to DC 3rd rail. Also please remember that there is now only 1 bay at WJLL as the other one has been built on!
|
|
|
Post by glenntandh on Oct 14, 2010 4:33:50 GMT
More GOBBLEDEGOOK from TfL in their press release dated 17th September,
"When the complete upgrade is finished in mid-2011, London Overground will run more frequent services with longer trains providing greater capacity. Services from Richmond and Clapham Junction to Stratford will run four times per hour, all day every day.
There will be six trains per hour between Willesden Junction and Camden Road, and eight trains per hour between Camden Road and Stratford.
According to LOROL at a 9th September meeting the June 2011 NLL/WLL timetable will be: PEAK 4TPH Stratford-Richmond & 4TPH Stratford-Clapham Junction giving a combined 8TPH Stratford-Willesden Junction High Level. OFF-PEAK" 4TPH Stratford-Richmond & 2TPH Stratford-Clapham Junction giving a combined 6TPH Stratford-Willesden Junction High Level 2TPH Willesden Junction High Level-Clapham Junction
It's just as well its LOROL that actually runs the service!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2010 10:59:28 GMT
The current plan is that the Camden Raod area will be rebuilt after the Olympics. Two tracks will be reinstated between Camden East and West Junctions making four in all. An additional platform will be reinstated at Camden Road for eastbound NLL trains with an eastbound freight loop using the northrnmost trackbed. The existing westbound platform track will be used by freight and westbound passenger trains and the current eastbound platform will probably be used as a bi-directional road for passenger trains. There is still an option to run at least 2 tph via Primrose Hill as the new signalling between Stratford and Camden Road is actually designed to handle up to 10 passenger tph plus freight. The reason we cant pump more passenger trains than 2tph via Primrose Hill is the number of freight workings AND the need to change traction supply from AC overhead to DC 3rd rail. Also please remember that there is now only 1 bay at WJLL as the other one has been built on! I am scared that this will be one of the "cuts"
|
|