|
Post by knap on May 12, 2010 8:47:32 GMT
When I arrived at Amersham at about 18:30 there were a few staff in orange on the platforms and two emergency vehicles outside the station. I hope nothing serious had happened.
However, seeing two vehicles outside, I then wondered where they had come from and where they are based. Coming to Amersham right on the edge of the network could have been a long journey.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2010 9:57:07 GMT
Sounds like the ERU (Emergency Response Unit) attending to a call out from their depot at Acton. Not all the call outs are that serious but usually require a rapid response. I am sure someone will be able to enlighten us as to their reason for attendance, though we know they will be at Earls Court this morning.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on May 12, 2010 12:40:16 GMT
The ERU attend all sorts of things from putting in temporary speed restrictions, to minor repairs on things like fencing or track side equipment right through to full on derailments, persons under trains, etc. Their remit is very much wide ranging and diverse, so just because an ERU vehicle is outside a station, it doesn't necessarily mean anything serious is going on.
The ERU is based at three locations, which I believe are Acton, Battersea and Camden Town. I also believe it is quite normal for only two of the three to be staffed at any one time. I happily stand corrected if any part of this paragraph is wrong though!
|
|
|
Post by liamharrison72 on May 12, 2010 12:43:16 GMT
I have also seen some ERU vehicles based in Camden town in an industrial unit/merchants. I would guess there are more than 2 bases considering how big the network.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on May 12, 2010 13:02:32 GMT
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on May 12, 2010 13:15:35 GMT
The ERU is based at three locations, which I believe are Acton, Battersea and Camden Town. The ERU doesn't have a big web presence (presumably as it's not a public-facing unit), but www.tubelines.com/whatwedo/eru.aspx says there are four depots, without mentioning where they are. This article from 2006 talks of three depots (Camden, Vauxhall and Acton) but also mentions the "ERU's Tottenham base". www.ukemergency.co.uk/others/railways1.htm also mentions Acton, Camden, Vauxhall and Tottenham Hale The only other things I can find is that the London Assembly report into the 7th July attacks recommended that London Underground seek "blue light status" for the ERU. Does anyone know whether they did or not? Based on the first link they still don't have this status.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on May 12, 2010 13:31:18 GMT
Tottenham Hale was closed 2/9/2009 without replacement.
I believe the "blue light status" is imminent!
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on May 12, 2010 14:24:30 GMT
Ah well, Vauxhall & Battersea are close enough!! ;D
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on May 12, 2010 14:33:51 GMT
Ah well, Vauxhall & Battersea are close enough!! ;D There are currently three depots, Acton, Battersea and Camden. The former depots at Tottenham and Vauxhall were closed about the time Battersea opened.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on May 12, 2010 14:34:24 GMT
The Tottenham Hale ERU base has closed. The Vauxhall base has relocated to Battersea. The ERU were removing some defective shoegear from the sidings at Amersham yesterday. The 'blue light' status has to go before parliament, currently they're rather busy!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 12, 2010 15:40:39 GMT
When I arrived at Amersham at about 18:30 there were a few staff in orange on the platforms and two emergency vehicles outside the station. I hope nothing serious had happened. However, seeing two vehicles outside, I then wondered where they had come from and where they are based. Coming to Amersham right on the edge of the network could have been a long journey. A train had a negative shoe missing and cables from the train were hanging off and touching the positive rail.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 12, 2010 21:57:00 GMT
Hopefully that was repaired! Do we know the car involved?
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on May 12, 2010 22:26:07 GMT
As an aside, emergency vehicles operated by Gothenberg Tramways (GS) have had blue light status for years.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,197
|
Post by Tom on May 13, 2010 6:59:15 GMT
As an aside, emergency vehicles operated by Gothenberg Tramways (GS) have had blue light status for years. It's the same in most, if not all of Sweden.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 13, 2010 7:46:44 GMT
Interesting that that the vehicles have blue lights, and yet to my knowledge the ERU and predecessors never have before. Of course, apart from the police, military police (and I assume RAF Police and Naval Provost), ambulances, bomb disposal, Blood Transfusion Service, Coast Guard, Fire Service (official services only now; no preserved and limos) and Mountain Rescue, the only vehicles with permitted blue lights appear to be the politicians' cars on the TV!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on May 13, 2010 8:53:21 GMT
I believe some RNLI vehicles are permitted to use blue lights as well.
I was reading somewhere recently that simply having blue lights does not entitle you to break the speed limit or disregard other traffic regulations, and this applies even to the police - I believe you need to have passed an advanced driving test, and have authorisation. The same article also implied that there were more controls regarding emergency vehicles passing to the right of "keep left" signs than about any other specific traffic regulation/sign.
This is now getting a bit off-topic though!
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on May 13, 2010 10:57:52 GMT
AIUI - blue lights are simply to warn you who's in the vehicle - the test as to whether you can jump red lights etc is down to the nature of the incident you are dealing with. Duress/emergency *can* (under very limited circumstances) be a defence to a speeding charge for anybody. More relevantly, a policeman has no defence to speeding if he was, eg in a hurry to the chip shop
Bomb disposal have blue lights - and according to my instructors on the bike test, nuclear types have flashing white light... (I am quite pleased never to have seen them)
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 13, 2010 11:57:10 GMT
Doctors have green lights though no powers to jump lights etc. I have only ever seen one doctor on emergency call with a green flashing light. This is what Wiki says: The use of blue flashing lights is regulated by the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989, and sirens by the Road Vehicles Construction and Use Regulations 1986, both as amended by various other pieces of legislation (see right). The 1989 restrictions state that no vehicle, other than an emergency vehicle, shall be fitted with a "blue warning beacon or special warning lamp", or a device which resembles a blue warning beacon or a special warning lamp, whether it works or not. I can only surmise that TfL vehicles couild be "used for purposes of a fire and rescue authority (or relevant authority in Scotland)". Hmmmm!
|
|
|
Post by aldenham on May 13, 2010 20:56:39 GMT
Just to muddy the waters yet further, a bell, siren, gong or two tone horn maybe fitted to a vehicle used for; fire brigade, police or ambulance purposes, if used by a body formed primarily for fire salvage or similar purpose, if used by the forestry commission or local authority for fighting fires, bomb disposal, blood transfusion, Coastguard, mine rescue, mountain rescue and the RNLI for launching lifeboats. Only police, ambulance and fire brigade have an exemption from obeying speed limits when to do so would hinder the use for which the vehicle was being used. As it stands at the moment TfL vehicles are NOT a fire and rescue authority vehicle.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 13, 2010 21:49:03 GMT
As it stands at the moment TfL vehicles are NOT a fire and rescue authority vehicle. I would put a 1p bet down that they think that they are within that classification, unless there is something in a local Act of Parliament that classifies them as rescue vehicles.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on May 13, 2010 22:45:31 GMT
It's perfectly true that under present legislation, ERU vehicles are not allowed to carry or use blue lights/sirens. That's why there is an attempt to change the law in parliament. Not so that Tube Lines can deliver a spare trainstop to Epping quicker; but to assist with emergency life-threatening situations. This was a recommendation after the 7th July bombings and is being championed by a GLA member,
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on May 14, 2010 9:35:44 GMT
It's perfectly true that under present legislation, ERU vehicles are not allowed to carry or use blue lights/sirens. That's why there is an attempt to change the law in parliament. Not so that Tube Lines can deliver a spare trainstop to Epping quicker; but to assist with emergency life-threatening situations. This was a recommendation after the 7th July bombings and is being championed by a GLA member, Yes but its been nearly 5 years on from the bombings and still no change
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on May 14, 2010 14:19:40 GMT
There were recommendations from the Kings Cross fire not actioned 20 years after the event.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,197
|
Post by Tom on May 14, 2010 22:55:37 GMT
There were recommendations from the Kings Cross fire not actioned 20 years after the event. Only two - and one of those wasn't done because LU went further than the recommendation.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 17, 2010 22:36:42 GMT
The 1989 restrictions state that no vehicle, other than an emergency vehicle, shall be fitted with a "blue warning beacon or special warning lamp", or a device which resembles a blue warning beacon or a special warning lamp, whether it works or not. How do preserved fire engines get round that? Or cars acting the part of police cars in TV and film. (I recall reading that the producers of "The Bill" can use blue lights but have to dub the sirens on afterwards, which seems a sensible compromise) I can only surmise that TfL vehicles could be used for purposes of a ......(relevant authority in Scotland). It would take a long time for them to attend an incident on the Glasgow Subway!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2010 23:01:14 GMT
As it stands at the moment TfL vehicles are NOT a fire and rescue authority vehicle. I would put a 1p bet down that they think that they are within that classification, unless there is something in a local Act of Parliament that classifies them as rescue vehicles. I second that bet! I'm confident that the ERU could be classed as rescue personnel. After all, they attend one-unders which is a sort of rescue is it not? I agree that the ERU should have the ability to use blue lights and sirens, as long as they're not abused.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 18, 2010 5:39:57 GMT
Preserved fire engines cannot now be registered [with a tax disc accordingly] that says 'FIRE' and thus exempt from MoT and tax. This came about because of so many abuses, namely, as I understand, the operators who used old 'engines with crewcabs as limos. Only bona fide fire authorities airport fire services and authorised private fire and emergency companies [see TOP GEAR for example with the private fire engine used on filming work], are allowed the exemptions, and that may include the 1960s Bedford TK 'engine that Lyndhurst Fire Station have along the A35 from us. I gather that no blue lights are allowed as well. In the case of filming and TV work, there may well be a licensing system which is rigidly controlled. As far as I know, vehicles are not allowed to have blue lights etc. on the public highway and have to have them removed or covered-up. This does not apply when vehicles are being displayed/shown. After writing this, and a cup or two of tea made my my wife, I thought I would check further. Preserved vehicles are not allowed to have blue lights under any circumstances on the road but the Police may take the attitude that if no light is visible then that is acceptable. However, back in 2008 there was a petition raised on this point and this is the official response: webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page17887
The Met Police and probably other forces have old police cars that are 'active' in their collections. These are deemed to be active-duty vehicles and thus can be used with all the equipment on.
My belief is that the TfL have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Met and City of London Police authorising them to have blue lights on ERU vehicles under conditions.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on May 18, 2010 13:47:07 GMT
My belief is that the TfL have a Memorandum of Understanding with the Met and City of London Police authorising them to have blue lights on ERU vehicles under conditions. I would suggest your belief is incorrect, on the basis that current ERU vehicles have Amber lights fitted, not Blue lights. If the use of Blue lights were granted (which as previously stated, is something a politician is still pushing for as per the recommendations following 7/7), the Amber lights currently fitted would have to be removed from the vehicles and Blue ones fitted in their place.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on May 18, 2010 15:26:30 GMT
From the (out of date) article on the Tubelines website that I linked to earlier, the agreement with the police is that the ERU are given a blue light escort by the police when justified and required. This means that the ERU vehicles, which are not fitted with sirens or blue lights, are escorted to the incident site by police vehicles that are so fitted. I understand that the police can give an escort of this nature to any vehicle should the situation warrant.
Colin - are you sure that blue lights would necessitate the removal of the amber ones? Even if/when the ERU gain blue lights, they will not be used for all jobs. On those jobs that are not suitable for the use of blue lights, it may still be beneficial to display amber lights as at present.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 18, 2010 21:21:21 GMT
I would just finish by mentioning that light bars with both blue and amber lights are available.
|
|