|
|
Post by astock5000 on Mar 26, 2010 0:43:02 GMT
|
|
Rich32
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1,506 
|
Post by Rich32 on Mar 26, 2010 19:39:13 GMT
Nice work!
Always think the 60TS was a missed opportunity, but the standard stock was on it's last legs and a tried and tested replacement was required ASAP.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2010 19:55:11 GMT
I agree, I always liked the 1960 stock, thought it looked better than the 59/62 stocks.
Astock5000 the image looks pixelated. When I do drawings I save them as PNG files, that way they don't pixelate.
|
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Mar 28, 2010 0:08:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Mar 28, 2010 20:45:50 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2010 22:55:21 GMT
So from a recognition point of view was the difference between ATO and non-ATO the cream coloured cab top? That was the bit that always made them obvious to me as a child when they ran past my parents house between Woodford and Roding Valley.
|
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Mar 28, 2010 23:11:48 GMT
The main difference was that the N and O doors (on the sides of the cab) were removed when they were converted to ATO.
|
|
