|
Post by angelislington on Oct 31, 2009 0:12:20 GMT
Not the wretched bear, but the station.
It's only just occurred to me (yeah, I know!) that there will be *two* Paddingtons on the T-cup. Are they going to rename one, say the H&C one to Paddington Main Line or something?
Paddington Eastbound/Paddington Westbound won't work. Nor would Pad East/Pad West (or North or South for that matter!). I spose really they could call them Paddington Tourist Trap/Paddington Pain-in-the-bum-to-find ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2009 7:56:59 GMT
Wouldn't they just re-add the suffixes of Bishops Road and Praed Street?
|
|
|
Post by angelislington on Oct 31, 2009 8:01:45 GMT
Oh! I suppose they could. On the other hand, those actual locations are nowhere near the stations/platforms, so I think it would addle the passengers. <scratches head>
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 31, 2009 9:52:52 GMT
C Stock did used to carry destination blinds:
PADDINGTON (SUBURBAN)
for terminating trains.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 31, 2009 10:39:37 GMT
It's only just occurred to me (yeah, I know!) that there will be *two* Paddingtons on the T-cup. Are they going to rename one, say the H&C one to Paddington Main Line or something? There are 2 Paddingtons now, and it is only locally that they are known by Circle / Suburban etc. But I (think) I know what you're getting at. There will be 2 Paddington stops on each Circle trip. But then again there will also be 2 Edgware Road stops on each trip. Heading west, is there any real difference between the 2 except where you exit the station. Paddington is Paddington, and do we honestly want to complicate things by telling people they can reach this "other" Paddington by changing at Edgware Road. People familiar with the area will be able to make their own decision, but those unfamiliar will have another decision to make: "Is it Paddington Main we want or Paddington Circle?" Coming east, you may have started your journey on the Hammersmith branch, and will simply stop at "Paddington" en-route to Baker Street. Or you will have started your journey say at Earls Court, and will simply stop at "Paddington" en-route to Edgware Road. Again, those familiar with the area will understand the difference between the 2 stations, but for those unfamiliar, it will introduce an extra level of decision making.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 31, 2009 14:49:41 GMT
Again, those familiar with the area will understand the difference between the 2 stations, but for those unfamiliar, it will introduce an extra level of decision making. The real problem (as I think I have posted elsewhere...) is for those arriving at Paddington Mainline a 'not inconsiderable proportion'. People like me who want to go east will obviously go to the H&C platforms if they know about them - but NOT if they want to autotop up their PAYG oyster since TfL specifically forbids it (ridiculous ) - it's the strangers who will be caught out and end up changing at Edgware Rd every time.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Oct 31, 2009 15:03:39 GMT
With the T-cup trials hailed by LU as a success (what a surprise!) and passengers at Paddington to be directed to the H&C station, what progress is there on providing a staffed ticket office, instead of NR self-service machines, or a second staircase to relieve the current narrow access? None I guess, proving as always that, on LU, "trains are from Mars and stations from Venus", with little joined up thinking. Meanwhile, now that the new duty sheets have gone up at Edgware Road and Hammersmith depots the balloting is already being organised. On the last (final) trial, one T/OP PNR at Edgware Road shut all three lines down in the area for 20 minutes. Happy days ahead!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Oct 31, 2009 17:49:09 GMT
The station infrastructure doesn't really relate to the original question concerning naming.
That said, I think once the timetable is in and if it stays in, certain more permanent alterations will occur. The latest leaflet being handed out concerning the new timetable does make mention of it being the first part of an investment to improve the C&H Lines.
As for the final pilot weekend being a "success" my money is on this being a clear message going out to everyone, and that message is that on the whole it did work, and the small handful of incidents that did occur are not significant enough to change management thinking.
I'm not necessarily moving over to support the new timetable whole-heartedly, but the incidents that did occur could quite easily have shut down a present day service. And as was said very early on, any big change such as this should be planned around positive events, and not be designed around the handful of negative ones.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 31, 2009 19:48:53 GMT
Not the wretched bear, but the station. It's only just occurred to me (yeah, I know!) that there will be *two* Paddingtons on the T-cup. Are they going to rename one, say the H&C one to Paddington Main Line or something? Paddington Eastbound/Paddington Westbound won't work. Nor would Pad East/Pad West (or North or South for that matter!). I spose really they could call them Paddington Tourist Trap/Paddington Pain-in-the-bum-to-find ;D Just gone up on the website, together with a date for the change - Dec 13th www.tfl.gov.uk/gettingaround/13280.aspxThe District Line station will be called Paddington. The H&C station will be called Paddington. (Why not Praed St and Bishops Road?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2009 20:36:31 GMT
IMO Praed Street and Bishops Road would be better. But if that wouldve been the case, where should the [NR]Paddington tag be placed? Both?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 31, 2009 20:56:02 GMT
IMO Praed Street and Bishops Road would be better. But if that wouldve been the case, where should the [NR]Paddington tag be placed? Both? Why not? It used to be done for Euston Square. Of course, it hasn't come to "knee-jerk" Boris's attention yet, so it will probably be changed back if enough people complain.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2009 21:04:41 GMT
Good point. Personally I call them praed st and bishops rd On my last trip to London I came by Hrowconnect, and going to Aldgate East, I headed for Bishop's Rd, ticket machines were out of order, so I went to Praed St for tickets (and thus took the train from there). It wasn't that long to walk
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Nov 1, 2009 8:07:11 GMT
To be honest, this is showing signs of the "what if" syndrome.
It is often laboured on here how things can be made easier for the visitor to London.
So, just before Christmas, a visitor passing through London makes his way to the Heathrow express. Leaving Liverpool Street he studies the map and wonders where the "Paddington" that the National Rail person told him about is. He can see Bishops Road. He can see Praed Street. He can also see that both of them are National Rail interchanges. But he cannot see Paddington.
There is no real case to make drastic name changes that will simply add to the confusion that this timetable will introduce.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Nov 1, 2009 14:17:08 GMT
As for the final pilot weekend being a "success" my money is on this being a clear message going out to everyone, and that message is that on the whole it did work, and the small handful of incidents that did occur are not significant enough to change management thinking. I'm not necessarily moving over to support the new timetable whole-heartedly, but the incidents that did occur could quite easily have shut down a present day service. I'm sure it was a great success, but it wasn't a weekday peak. There was also engineering works on other parts of the SSR which meant that there wasn't even the normal number of trains for a normal weekend - Plaistow/Barking alternate reverser's have not yet been properly tested [aside from the token afternoon extensions] and I can see them causing all sorts of problems; particularly with the likes of the compromised overlap at West Ham on the eastbound. The full impact won't be seen till December, obviously, but I'm certainly not celebrating the apparent success of the trial weekends just yet.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Nov 1, 2009 14:21:37 GMT
My use of the word "success" was surrounded by quote marks ;D
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Nov 1, 2009 14:48:00 GMT
But he cannot see Paddington. Eh? I got the impression that Paddington (Praed St) and Paddington (Bishops Road) were the names suggested. There is no real case to make drastic name changes that will simply add to the confusion that this timetable will introduce. Telling words. However, I think somebody (maybe even your good self) has made the point in somewhere in the mix of EC/T-Cup threads that the capacity of passengers to learn must not be underestimated. I would add a corollary - 'The capacity of tourists to get lost cannot be overestimated'. ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Nov 1, 2009 19:59:56 GMT
Eh? I got the impression that Paddington (Praed St) and Paddington (Bishops Road) were the names suggested. Fair enough, if the word Paddington is still visible that would help. But then again, apart from satisfying a minority that the 2 stations are distinguishable by having different names, what other advantage would there really be? I know what some of you are looking for here, but it's not going to happen. We don't have Cabbell Street and Harrow Road Flyover, we have Edgware Road. We don't have Beadon Road and Broadway, we have Hammersmith. And of course there are more. And both stations in both examples are a short distance apart and serve completely different lines and purposes. It's probably why Paddington is Paddington and was renamed from its old names. Telling words. However, I think somebody (maybe even your good self) has made the point in somewhere in the mix of EC/T-Cup threads that the capacity of passengers to learn must not be underestimated. I would add a corollary - 'The capacity of tourists to get lost cannot be overestimated'. ;D Passengers will learn. How many regular commuters through either Paddington station would actually notice (or care) that the name has been added to. To them, as long as the station is in the same place (for when they're walking on auto-pilot) and the trains arrive (let's forget the detail for a minute ) it's still the station they use. Tourists, on the other hand, will be looking for Paddington, and then realise there are not just 2, and not just 2 on the same line, but 2 differently named ones on the same line. Do they get off at Edgware Road and change or not? Much better to let them get to a "general" Paddington station and then sort out the finer details if it's needed.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 1, 2009 22:19:12 GMT
We don't have Cabbell Street and Harrow Road Flyover, we have Edgware Road. We don't have Beadon Road and Broadway, we have Hammersmith. And of course there are more. And both stations in both examples are a short distance apart and serve completely different lines and purposes. You (LU/TfL) do have "Shepherd's Bush"/"Shepherd's Bush Market", "Euston"/"Euston Square" and "Tower Hill"/"Tower Gateway" though.
|
|
|
Post by angelislington on Nov 2, 2009 0:18:57 GMT
It's only just occurred to me (yeah, I know!) that there will be *two* Paddingtons on the T-cup. Are they going to rename one, say the H&C one to Paddington Main Line or something? There are 2 Paddingtons now, and it is only locally that they are known by Circle / Suburban etc. But I (think) I know what you're getting at. There will be 2 Paddington stops on each Circle trip. But then again there will also be 2 Edgware Road stops on each trip. Hmm. I see what you mean, but when I look at the map, there is only one Edgware Road station. What I mean is, it's adjacent platforms on the same bit of track, whereas the 'two Paddingtons' are actually separate 'stations' so to speak, so they are almost like the two Shepherds Bushes (of yore) or the two Hammersmiths. Heading west, <sniperoo> Coming east, <snippety> How do you mean when you say 'east' and 'west'? For instance, if I start at Tower Hill and head to Paddington, I could go via Westminster or Euston Square - to me I'm still going west. Ditto if I start at Pad and head to Tower Hill. Not being pedantic here (well, maybe I am!), just trying to clarify. Back to the comment that a few of you have made that it wouldn't serve any purpose either for regular commuters or occasional visitors, that's a very good point and one I hadn't really thought of. I'm thinking of it from a tubegeek point of view I spose! ;D
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Nov 2, 2009 17:40:21 GMT
You (LU/TfL) do have "Shepherd's Bush"/"Shepherd's Bush Market", "Euston"/"Euston Square" and "Tower Hill"/"Tower Gateway" though. I know, but Shepherds Bush is a very recent change, and Tower Gateway is DLR rather than LU (I know it's all Tfl). I'm not saying these should or should not be as they are. I'm simply saying there's no real case to change any more stations - especially principal interchange stations. Don't lose sight of the fact that I am merely commenting and speculating from the side of the fence I sit. Stranger things have happened, and maybe one day the Paddingtons will be renamed. I'm merely stating that it is at present unlikely, and also arguing that, from the point of view of the customer, is there any real point?
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Nov 2, 2009 17:49:30 GMT
How do you mean when you say 'east' and 'west'? For instance, if I start at Tower Hill and head to Paddington, I could go via Westminster or Euston Square - to me I'm still going west. Ditto if I start at Pad and head to Tower Hill. Not being pedantic here (well, maybe I am!), just trying to clarify. "My" east and west as I see it from the control room at Baker Street ;D ;D So to clairfy, heading west towards Paddington in my eyes, is Aldgate, Liverpool Street, then via Kings Cross. East is from Earls Court to High Street Ken, then on to Paddington / Edgware Road / Kings Cross.
|
|
|
Post by djlynch on Nov 4, 2009 18:52:13 GMT
Changing a station name at the same time as you introduce a major change in the service is just asking to make the confusion even worse.
As it is, you can have two C Stock trains leave the same platform at Edgware Road one after the other and end up at different stations called Paddington. The change to T-Cup actually reduces that confusion, because (as long as the WTT holds up) all of the trains on Platform 3 will go to Bishops Road and all of the trains on Platform 2 will go to Praed Street. I might add an additional reminder to the DMI/DVA for the inner rail trains about changing for "Circle Line trains via Gloucester Road and Tower Hill" at Bishops Road and "trains to Hammersmith via Shepherds Bush" at Praed Street. It's not the best interchange, but it's a reminder in case your train isn't going where you want it to and can stay in place if they decide to go back to a circular Circle Line after a week or two.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 4, 2009 19:40:53 GMT
all of the trains on Platform 3 will go to Bishops Road and all of the trains on Platform 2 will go to Praed Street. Actually, all trains on both platforms 2 (Circle) and 3 (District) will go to Praed St. All trains on platform 4 (through westbound) will go to Bishops Road.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2009 21:54:53 GMT
I saw how the T-Cup line is going to look on the TFL website, and anyone who can read simple diagrams will work out the best station to go to. Name changes are pointless, you could call the stations Paddington Sillyass and Paddington Waldorf Astoria and those who can read simple diagrams would work out Paddington Waldorf Astoria was best for them. The positioning of the NR symbol at only one Paddington would influence passengers, otherwise the lost will still be lost even if you screamed directions at them.
I think the Paddington HandC station is wholly inadequate for any potential increase in usage from the more frequent service and more interchanges. It gets really really busy there sometimes, and the overbridges look old and tired. The lack of a ticket office has been mentioned as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2009 15:12:04 GMT
Don't rename anything. The T-cup won't last a year.
|
|
|
Post by mikebuzz on Nov 9, 2009 14:24:05 GMT
Paddington (North Side) and Paddington (South Side)?
Paddington (North Side) and Paddington (East Side)?
Paddington (West Side) and Paddington (East Side)?
Paddington (North Side) and Paddington?
It's just too confusing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2009 17:27:40 GMT
Paddington North and Paddington Paddington Faraway and Paddington
:-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2009 19:19:51 GMT
Paddingounce and Paddingpound. Padded and Unpadded. Paddle and Spank.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2009 21:38:19 GMT
Paddington-next-to-impossible-to-cross-road. Paddington-tucked-away-in-hidden-corner.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 10, 2009 23:19:47 GMT
I think the signs on the mainline station describe them as "Underground" and "Hammersmith and City Line".
|
|