Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 11:25:59 GMT
It took a while to be commissioned, over a year after the Hainualt Sydac Simulator went live; but the Ruislip Depot sim has finally been bedded in. Used for new driver training, continuous development programme for drivers; or introducing people to a drivers world. It has a mixture of Surface, and Tunnel workings of an alternative Central line running from Ickenham North (West Ruislip) to South Weald (Epping). The rational behind this is owing to the fact the line was to long to record, and that each training module is programmed to run to an hour only. Thus the stations have taken there names from the local area, White City was rebranded Loftus Road also that the chap from LU who worked on it is a QPR fan. This simulator does everything a real 92TS would in line with defect handling, all minus the sticky tape around the cabs though! Plus when running a session, you can perform the werid and wonderful, re-routing trains into unusal areas such as running over the BR link road onto the main from the depot Great piece of kit, though the new Victoria line simulator has taken what has been learn from the Central and built an even better one. At least these units replace the unrealistic, cramped, laserdisc operated former simulators at Hainault. More pictures at www.flickr.com/photos/routemaster/Edited by Colin: Post re-formatted to prevent screen stretch
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Feb 11, 2010 17:14:50 GMT
Don't you find the sounds and visuals of movement, coupled with lack of actual movement makes you want to puke? I, and most of my colleagues come out of that thing with hamster cheeks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 19:27:40 GMT
I found some of the guys went a wee bit green around the gills, this was eased with the light on.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Feb 11, 2010 19:37:20 GMT
Now that is very, very snazzy! (He says as somebody who does this sort of thing at the amateur end of the scale). I presume the main image is projected?
As for the lack of movement, it's theoretically possible to build a simulator which uses hydraulics or suchlike to simulate movement. Exactly how much that would cost is another question entirely! Airline simulators do this already, but I suppose it's a more integral part of their training!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2010 20:13:48 GMT
Looks fantastic - I want one!!
|
|
|
Post by auxsetreq on Feb 12, 2010 11:58:50 GMT
The old simulator was made out of what looked like a metal shipping container. Entranced through a door in the side it had two sims at either end of it, with the "controllers" sitting inbetween the two. It too was front screen projection from an old fashioned, though for then high tec, red, green, blue CRTs projector. The video source being from a laser disc, which took an age to load and frequently crashed out. Comparing it to the new sim, the graphics were crude, of Sinclair Spectrum quality, and were overlaid on top of the video. The video featured 62's coming at you from the opposite direction and the colour light signals and BMBs floated in mid air, such was the crude alignment to the video. It also featured SVHS video recorders so those on the sim could bring in a tape and record themselves simming it............ermm, no thanks. A horrid piece of kit, that was over air-conditioned to keep the electronics cool, and the thing had a sinister halon fire extinguisher system installed inside, along with gas cylinders on the inside walls to protect the then valuable gear, which by today's standards would be worth about £2.50. It was primarily located behind the old White City training school, but was later relocated, by helicopter I believe to Hainault depot where it was used for awhile. What happened to it I don't know, maybe it's still around, but hopefully it was filled with dynamite and detonated far out to sea, or space.
The new sim by comparison is far more welcoming, but vomit inducing like it predecessor. The graphics are very good, but Australian looking as far as the punters go. Oh, and they bizarrely do sharp 90 degree turns when the exit the platforms. A good introduction the the stock and job, but for someone who's been on the real thing since we've had them, it's a novelty.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Feb 12, 2010 14:52:08 GMT
Why do the station names have to be changed?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Feb 12, 2010 19:08:24 GMT
So the T/Ops don't get lulled into a false sense of security: it reinforces the dividing line between reality and training?
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Feb 12, 2010 19:25:44 GMT
I recall the old simulator inside White City training school circa 1980. I never saw it working, my understanding was that it was not used often, if at all, by then as it could not run without a signal lineman standing by to deal with the frequent failures. AFAIK that simulator went to the science museum. However, it was I believe capable of giving somewhat 'realistic' movement though I have been told that the motion was what caused so many failures as brittle wiring tended to fracture!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2010 21:57:20 GMT
Length of the training simulations, they can only run for an hour before timing out..
|
|