Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2010 1:30:04 GMT
I remember reading somewhere once that the UERL/LPTB intended to purchase sufficient land at the existing site of Northfields Depot to build a depot and stabling facility of sufficient size for both the new standard stock fleets of the Piccadilly Line and the allocation of the District Line's surface stock fleet at Ealing Common, allowing the latter to be replaced and the servicing of a heavily integrated line to be concentrated at one facility. This was apparently one of the reasons why the District Line's Hounslow branch was quadrupled as far as Northfields (as opposed to ending the quadrupling at Acton West Junction) to allow District and Piccadilly trains equal access to the site with minimal conflict.
However, the information I read stated that a private property developer got the drop on the UERL/LPTB and purchased a third of the site, south of the existing depot boundary, forcing LT to keep Ealing Common and leaving us with the current, slightly underutilized quadruple track west of Acton (IMHO it would have been better if the LPTB had quadrupled Acton West Junction to Hanger Lane Junction instead, or if a better junction had been built west of Northfields to allow trains to reach platform 4 without crossing the e/b line).
Do any of our local historians (fx: nudge nudge Oracle) know if this is a pile of baloney or if it's actually true? Rails through the Clay makes no reference to it and I don't recall reading about it in Capital Transport's Piccadilly Line book either.
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Jan 12, 2010 11:44:52 GMT
The following comes from Q8.
When I joined LTE in 1966 we had a wonderful old Motorman at Upminster who was an absolute mine of information. Older members may remember him by his initials CC and he had a very famous namesake. Now when this wonderful gentlemen joined it was still the DR and I think he said it was pre 1910. Promotion was very slow in those days but he started as a sort of office-boy-cum-runner-minute-taker at HQ. As part of the job he had to take minutes at various committee and other meetings conferences that involved all aspects of running the outfit. I say minutes but I suppose it was more like note taking as he said nothing was ever signed off at the conclusions of these yakkin sessions. These did not always involve the tube but also the electric tramways and the buses that became part of the combine. Now prior to the setting up of LPTB in 1933 there were lots of interdepartmental conferences and also with the government ministries and the LCC as to what form the new body was to take and what it's aims were. For instance, the combine wanted to have three separate organizations for London's public transport network. These were, all trams and trolleybuses to be under the LCC. All buses under the London General which would have been floated as a separate body. All tubes to be part of the combine within the "Underground" umbrella. All this was mooted as part of a plan to see each mode of transport compete against each other for traffic. A sort of "grouping" for London. Herbert Morrison didn't like that idea at all and would not sanction it. Then things turned to what the new body was going to do, like line extensions and new infrastructure etc. The Piccadilly Line proposals were nothing like what transpired in the event. In 1931 meetings were held as it was seen that the whole caboodle would change in the next couple of years. It was recognized that the District line was operating close to or even beyond capacity especially west of Earl's Court. So things were discussed about extending the Piccadilly beyond it's then terminus of Hammersmith. Now at that time Hammersmith was two separate stations side-by-side with the Piccadilly station on the north side and dead end platforms. Proposal one was for a covered way west of Hammersmith for the Piccadilly alone up to the end of the Studland Road viaduct [this exists as the eastbound tunnel for the D/P] From Studland Road the Picc was then to run over the former LSWR tracks to Turnham Green the west of TG and dive under the DR and thence to Richmond. This fell through due to objections from the LMS and Southern railways who were not happy about having tube sized rolling stock among the "big trains" This seem s bit of an odd thing on the part of the LMS as tube trains already ran with full size stock to Watford. The next proposal was for the Metropolitan to take over the LSWR tracks to Richmond for the H & C line. Leaving the Piccadilly terminating at Hammersmith. That fell though as the DR were not happy about that. Then it was proposed that the DR could have the LSWR tracks as "fast" lines to Acton and Northfields. That did not wash either. So what was built is what we have now. As to the proposal about a Mega-depot at Northfields I never heard any mention of that. That does not mean to say that it was not mooted but perhaps the old gentlemen was not at that meeting. However I do remember him saying that there was a suggestion to buy a large tract of land at Rayners Lane to construct a new joint DR/Met depot which languished for a while before expiring. Ealing Common would then have been exclusively for the Piccadilly Line. What would have happened about Northfields I know not. So there you have some of the memories I have of this wonderful old gentleman and his recollections. I have more if anybody is interested. These include the LMS owned rolling stock that ran on the District. The Tank Stock [F] The rebuilding of Mansion House station, and four tracking in the Aldgate East area.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2010 12:22:44 GMT
Nice! I didn't know that the LPTB was intended to be competitive like that! Great info!
I also didn't know that there were also plans to build a running depot or a stabling site at Rayners Lane - I do know about the mooted Met/Picc depot at Ickenham (possibly connected to Ruislip Depot) but I knew nothing of Rayners Lane.
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Jan 12, 2010 14:19:18 GMT
Nice! I didn't know that the LPTB was intended to be competitive like that! Great info! I also didn't know that there were also plans to build a running depot or a stabling site at Rayners Lane - I do know about the mooted Met/Picc depot at Ickenham (possibly connected to Ruislip Depot) but I knew nothing of Rayners Lane. none of the numerous editions of H.F. Howson's book 'London's Underground' make any mention of it either. The similar, but later book, entitled 'The story of London's Underground', by John R. Day, is similarly bereft of any comment on such proposals.
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Jan 12, 2010 17:09:13 GMT
Q8 has asked me to reiterate that all these things were not firm plans.. Just ideas being bandied about at meetings as to what would occur once LPTB was formed. None of them came to fruition. They were "what might have been"
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 12, 2010 20:45:50 GMT
Looking at what's to the south of Northfields depot today, namely some allotments and a recreation ground, it is quite possible the land was earmarked for a larger depot, but if it was snapped up by a developer, he went bust before he could build on it!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 13, 2010 4:51:42 GMT
Thats if he ever planned to develop it. Perhaps it was a case of preventing the mega-depot mitigating the negative aspects of a depot in the first place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2010 13:58:16 GMT
Interested in more memories? Oh yes indeed! Especially memories of the F stock.
|
|