|
Post by uzairjubilee on Dec 29, 2009 19:31:23 GMT
Hi all. While travelling from Southfields to Earl's Court on a C Stock, I noticed that on every line diagram in the car, 'Westminster' was too much to the left. This is what I mean: Is this a printing error? Has this been noticed by anyone yet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2009 19:42:35 GMT
There was also one C Stock 2-car unit in service today with old car line diagrams.
And there were also examples still today of the (Extended Circle Line) car line diagrams which have a 'muddy' yellow along part of the north and south sides - it was suggested these should have been replaced after the first week of the new service, but not quite yet!!
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Dec 29, 2009 20:24:34 GMT
Given the problems of late with C-stock reliability, be thankful the train turns up at all - with or without up-to-date diagrams. I think some of those still not corrected have basically been rushed in and out of depot with only very essential maintenance carried out, just to keep the majority of trains in service.
I'm sure everything will be sorted soon into the New Year.
|
|
|
Post by uzairjubilee on Dec 29, 2009 20:24:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Dec 29, 2009 20:52:26 GMT
While travelling from Southfields to Earl's Court on a C Stock, I noticed that on every line diagram in the car, 'Westminster' was too much to the left. Could it be like that so that 'Westminster' is not too close to 'Embankment', and it was easier to move the station name than extend that part of the map?
|
|
|
Post by thirstquensher on Dec 29, 2009 20:55:36 GMT
I'd noticed the 'mucky yellow' Circle Line stripes too. Methinks they had tried to do what they did back in the late 80s/early 90s, whereby they used a 'dusky yellow' colour for the Circle, because plain yellow (as used since then) would be (and was) too indistinct to be viewed clearly.
I think perhaps the colour mixing didn't occur properly.
Another telltale sign that the yellow colour wasn't being applied properly or consistently was that, on more than two diagrams I saw, the 'Central' line interchange lozenges on the left-hand half of the diagram were orange (like for the Overground) instead of the proper red, yet the same lozenges at the right-hand side WERE in the proper colour.
Obviously the printers LUL use have got so used to the lazy 4-colour (CMYK) printing process they've forgotten how to do spot colour properly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2009 13:43:30 GMT
Westminster has been like that for a long time. It can't be because it was too close to Embankment because on the taller line diagrams above the doors it was in the correct position. Just a printing error that will hopefully be sorted soon.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Dec 30, 2009 14:31:07 GMT
Yeh between Embankment and Euston, it was black on a train I went on. They need to sort it out. It's almost as if I never posted. They will sort it out, but at what cost would the average customer choose. Huge gaps while we take more trains out and tart them up, or live with the odd inaccuracy for a week or two. None are unreadable, and I think you should grant our customers a little more credit when it comes to working out what colour something should be or how central a word should look.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Dec 30, 2009 14:52:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2010 18:20:04 GMT
This diagram is "politically" correct: it omits the fact that between Paddington(s) and Edgware road, there is a section where the two tracks are common to both the itineraries...
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jan 1, 2010 19:03:54 GMT
This diagram is "politically" correct The whole Underground map is, as you put it, "politically" correct, and chooses to illustrate in the simplest way possible the network of services we provide, rather than the actual track layout of the system. But, given this thread appears to be about spotting maps and the odd occasion where the newest ones aren't as up to scratch as they could be, my comment will probably go unheard like I'm the boring kill-joy uncle of the "map criticism party."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2010 13:35:00 GMT
Calling a diagrammatic map 'politically correct' is possibly one of the silliest things I've ever read!
|
|