Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2009 17:56:09 GMT
Following on from a request in another thread here is a link to a series of scans of the Metropolitan Railway 1933 signalling arrangements between Great Missenden and Harrow. Harrow to Baker Street and Aldgate to South Kensington to follow sometime next week cbhistoricphotos.fpic.co.uk/c1772534.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2009 18:49:24 GMT
Following on from a request in another thread here is a link to a series of scans of the Metropolitan Railway 1933 signalling arrangements between Great Missenden and Harrow. Harrow to Baker Street and Aldgate to South Kensington to follow sometime next week cbhistoricphotos.fpic.co.uk/c1772534.htmlThanks for these- very much appreciated! One little thing- on your shot showing the Harrow station area and east end approaches part of the plan is obscured by what looks like a fold-down flap. Would it be possible to re take this shot with the flap folded down please? Finally does the book only contain the 'main line' or are the Uxbridge and Watford branches included and the Hammersmith and City? EDIT: Just looked at the scan of the cover in the first shot which says it is 'Harrow to Great Missenden.' Do you have equivalent books for other sections of the Met (as your 'to do' list suggests?) Thanks again!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2009 22:44:08 GMT
Following on from a request in another thread here is a link to a series of scans of the Metropolitan Railway 1933 signalling arrangements between Great Missenden and Harrow. Harrow to Baker Street and Aldgate to South Kensington to follow sometime next week cbhistoricphotos.fpic.co.uk/c1772534.htmlThanks for these- very much appreciated! One little thing- on your shot showing the Harrow station area and east end approaches part of the plan is obscured by what looks like a fold-down flap. Would it be possible to re take this shot with the flap folded down please? Finally does the book only contain the 'main line' or are the Uxbridge and Watford branches included and the Hammersmith and City? EDIT: Just looked at the scan of the cover in the first shot which says it is 'Harrow to Great Missenden.' Do you have equivalent books for other sections of the Met (as your 'to do' list suggests?) Thanks again! I have corrected the scan The books are a bit fragile somewhat like myself I have the books for the Watford Branch, Harrow to Baker Street and Aldgate to South Kensington (via Edgware Road). I intend to scan and post these over the coming weeks.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 25, 2009 23:30:25 GMT
Thanks, this is great stuff!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2009 11:49:47 GMT
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 26, 2009 12:57:03 GMT
Thank-you very much! Exceptionally interesting - something odd seems to happening with the Preston Road sheet: is that how the document folds?
Below Neasden there seems to be more than a passing similarity with the style of drawings used by the Interboro' - there are obviously several generations of symbols in use, eg. at West Hampstead and Kilburn where the normally clear UQ auto signals have been drawn over with 3-aspect colour lights.
Out of interest, what are the half black/half white symbols - are they short-range outdoor signals? Looking at Finchley Road - Swiss Cottage, there seems to be a change into what was the 'standard' symbols for tunnel signals (RS16, RS14/S16 for example); with the symbols for C16, C18/RC17 being the same, but half-shaded.
*penny drops* - Is the half-shading semi-automatic? Obviously the 'S' signals are autos, but the half-shading is also present on the normally 'ON' semaphores C2/RC3 and C17/RS 68. I wonder if any of these signals could be 'fleeted'?
Other interesting snippets are the emergency crossover on the Stanmore branch, during CTC days: I've a vague memory of seeing a mention about that somewhere (*not* on Gunnar's site); the siding to the substation on the same page, and also the pointed-end auto semaphore A79 on the down fast south of Wembley Park. That in itself is quite unusual, as I can't immediately remember any use of those on the UndergrounD apart from the E&SB.
Fascinating!
Nice to see something from Morkill's era, rather than Dell. (runs away very quickly!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2009 16:29:39 GMT
Hi Chris I know I have already thanked you but I will thank you again for these. I assume that you are familiar with the MT6 files for the Met and the stuff in the London Metropolitan Archive? If not contact me! Do you have any other Met stuff that you would like to share with us- for instance Baker Street Junction box with a single track connection to the circle. (I have a diagram which shows a double junction but becoming single shortly afterwards to run through the platform- I have read that it was altered to become a single track junction- was it in this form or was it a double to single junction? I'm not sure that I have worded that very well..)
Eagerly looking forward to the rest of the plans.
|
|
|
Post by abe on Oct 27, 2009 8:20:24 GMT
Excellent to see these old diagrams - many thanks for making them available.
I've noticed a ground frame and short stub between Northwood and Pinner (image 17). Does anyone know what this was for? Might it have been a siding used in the construction of Northwood Hills, which would have been in progress in 1933?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Oct 27, 2009 12:01:16 GMT
Very interesting. Baker St doesn't seem too different from when I worked on the Met in the 60s/70s. Also seems that extension line auto were given A prefixes while Circle autos had S prefixes. Repeaters with AR prefixes too!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2009 17:34:00 GMT
Thank-you very much! Exceptionally interesting - something odd seems to happening with the Preston Road sheet: is that how the document folds? Below Neasden there seems to be more than a passing similarity with the style of drawings used by the Interboro' - there are obviously several generations of symbols in use, eg. at West Hampstead and Kilburn where the normally clear UQ auto signals have been drawn over with 3-aspect colour lights. Out of interest, what are the half black/half white symbols - are they short-range outdoor signals? Looking at Finchley Road - Swiss Cottage, there seems to be a change into what was the 'standard' symbols for tunnel signals (RS16, RS14/S16 for example); with the symbols for C16, C18/RC17 being the same, but half-shaded. *penny drops* - Is the half-shading semi-automatic? Obviously the 'S' signals are autos, but the half-shading is also present on the normally 'ON' semaphores C2/RC3 and C17/RS 68. I wonder if any of these signals could be 'fleeted'? Other interesting snippets are the emergency crossover on the Stanmore branch, during CTC days: I've a vague memory of seeing a mention about that somewhere (*not* on Gunnar's site); the siding to the substation on the same page, and also the pointed-end auto semaphore A79 on the down fast south of Wembley Park. That in itself is quite unusual, as I can't immediately remember any use of those on the UndergrounD apart from the E&SB. Fascinating! Nice to see something from Morkill's era, rather than Dell. (runs away very quickly!) The drawing has a new section pasted in between Preston Road and Neasden. It looks to me as though the Wembley Park area has been modified for the addition of the Stanmore Line. If you look at the Baker Street section you will see that the drawing was originally produced in 1923 and has a list of dates showing it had been altered 7 times since then. The signals with shading (both colourlight and semaphore) are classed as semi-automatic. I think this means they are returned to danger automatically. For a signal to be capable of auto working then an 'A' light would be provided. The drawing obviously shows a partial transition from semaphore to colourlight. Looking carefully at the original I can see where the symbols have been changed over time. You have referred to 'Gunnars' site. Do you have a link for this please?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2009 17:38:02 GMT
Excellent to see these old diagrams - many thanks for making them available. I've noticed a ground frame and short stub between Northwood and Pinner (image 17). Does anyone know what this was for? Might it have been a siding used in the construction of Northwood Hills, which would have been in progress in 1933? I assume you are referring to Ground Frame 'F'. This looks as though it was part of the original installation as it is letterd in sequence. Could it be a substation siding ? Quite a few such sidings used to be provided.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2009 17:44:53 GMT
There will be a delay in scanning the remainder of the books as my scanner has just packed up Oh well off to Staples/PC world then................
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Oct 27, 2009 18:24:45 GMT
You have referred to 'Gunnars' site. Do you have a link for this please? I thought I'd already given it to you elsewhere 'for bedtime reading' *goes off to search other forum* EDIT: On Gunnar Eveking's site : Clicky a technical account of the Stanmore CTC system. Sorry to hear that our pleadings for more have killed your scanner. Whoops.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2009 13:27:28 GMT
You have referred to 'Gunnars' site. Do you have a link for this please? I thought I'd already given it to you elsewhere 'for bedtime reading' *goes off to search other forum* EDIT: On Gunnar Eveking's site : Clicky a technical account of the Stanmore CTC system. Sorry to hear that our pleadings for more have killed your scanner. Whoops. Thanks for that. I had forgotten about the link in the other place
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2009 13:30:19 GMT
Hi Chris I know I have already thanked you but I will thank you again for these. I assume that you are familiar with the MT6 files for the Met and the stuff in the London Metropolitan Archive? If not contact me! Do you have any other Met stuff that you would like to share with us- for instance Baker Street Junction box with a single track connection to the circle. (I have a diagram which shows a double junction but becoming single shortly afterwards to run through the platform- I have read that it was altered to become a single track junction- was it in this form or was it a double to single junction? I'm not sure that I have worded that very well..) Eagerly looking forward to the rest of the plans. Hi Natallie, I am aware of the London Met Archive but living in the far west as I do means that it is very difficult for me to arrange a visit. I have looked at their web site so I have a bit of an idea what they have. I will send you a PM so as to avoid boring everybody else. Chris.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2009 12:30:40 GMT
As I was unable to attend the Xmas meet at the (very) last minute (having to remain on-call for an overrunning project) I have taken the time to post the next installment showing South Kensington to Aldgate: cbhistoricphotos.fpic.co.uk/c1791258.htmlEnjoy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 12, 2009 18:11:41 GMT
Fantastic - many thanks - for them all!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Dec 14, 2009 0:09:41 GMT
TVM. I know I've mentioned this in the other place - but I find the bell catenary fascinating - different lengths and positioning on every platform. I'm sure there is a non-building-related story behind the positions.
Ooo! And you can see which TCs were going to be used at Edgware Road for the connection from Willesden Green (or whereever)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2009 15:32:40 GMT
TVM. I know I've mentioned this in the other place - but I find the bell catenary fascinating - different lengths and positioning on every platform. I'm sure there is a non-building-related story behind the positions. Could that have been something to do with the platform curvature and related guards position in the train
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Dec 15, 2009 15:46:52 GMT
Yes - unfortunately I'm snowed under with accessioning recent TTNs into the database-of-much-confusion to check in detail; but the general principle is that of train length, train origin(look at Aldersgate - where the outer rail catenary is much longer than the inner rail: this would cater for through trains, reversing moves over 32 crossover and moves out of the sidings) and train make-up where there would be a 'serving suggestion' for the guards' likely location.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 22, 2010 16:39:09 GMT
Ooo! And you can see which TCs were going to be used at Edgware Road for the connection from Willesden Green (or whereever) I've now got most of the details (somewhere) of when Edgware Road 'did a Whitechapel' albeit in reverse - as it was changed to auto signalling and ran as through platforms for a while.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 22, 2010 16:45:19 GMT
Although this isn't 1933 - the detail here comes from 1925 and 1930, and covers the Uxbridge branch.
I've made an executive decision to put it in this thread, so all the Met. signalling of a similar vintage is in one place. to AI for the use of her FTP. Right then, these are all extracts from Traffic Notices, covering the Rayners - Uxbridge section - as they are UERL notices the information isn't quite as detailed as it would be if they were Met. notices, but there is still plenty of gen. (TN XX/XX are the links) Abolition of block working and three-aspect signalling. - Rayners Lane 1925:
- TN 45/25 Alterations at Rayners Lane, 14th October 1925
- TN 47/25 Diagram of Rayners Lane, 31st October 1925
- Uxbridge - Ruislip 1930:
- TN 30/30 Alterations Uxbridge - Ruislip WEF 19th July 1930
- TN 30/30 Diagram Uxbridge - Ruislip, 26th July 1930
- Ruislip - Eastcote (Rayners Lane) 1930:
- TN 35/30 Alterations Ruislip - Eastcote, WEF 23rd August 1930
- TN 35/30 Diagram Ruislip - Eastcote 30th August 1930
Note the use of this marker light - I'm pretty sure that this was the first surface use of a marker light by UERL trains [1] note too that the light is in the + formation, rather than the x favoured on the Northern and Central new works extensions of some 10 - 20 years later. [1] the first underground marker light is a subject for another thread! (and I need to try and find where I put that bit of information).
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 23, 2010 11:41:19 GMT
This is very interesting M. I have had a look at the Uxbridge area diagram. I'm no expert on old Met. signalling but it seems as if the home signal (W28) is a two aspect signal showing only a yellow and red aspect. This is modern main line practice but not LU practice. It also appears to have a theatre type route indicator for all three routes, even though one was the siding.
Moving on to shunt signals, they seem to come in two different types - one is a disc (like W1), which presumably rotates to allow movement and the other is one like W9 which is a red and yellow colour light signal bracketed on the main signal.
Then, look at the fog signals. They are single lights, (M, you call them "marker lights") presumably showing yellow only if the signal ahead was showing a red, otherwise no aspect at all? LER practice was to have two aspects. And, they appear to have fog signals half way down each platform, suspended from the awning like a platform repeater. Did I read all this right? Perhaps we should prepare a diagram showing Metropolitan Railway signals as they were in 1930ish?
Looking again, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the symbol for a shunt signal and a red colour light controlled signal. Do they both have a double horizontal line in a circle? I can't quite make it out from the diagrams.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 23, 2010 13:16:13 GMT
Oops - when I cut and pasted this text I didn't lift the edited version of the marker light...... Note also the use of this marker light [ size2]instead of a yellow as U 13 was yellow over red over marker light [/size][/i]I'm pretty sure that this was the first surface use of a marker light by UERL trains [1]...... The marker light was installed on U 13 - the exit signal from Ruislip Goods Yard; rather than the fog lights: which were two-and-a-half aspect. I'm not sure exactly what the aspects comprised, but I'm guessing that they were green over yellow with a FOG on a third white fresnel: the 'FOG' being the half-aspect as a reminder to the Motorman. Ruislip branch repeaters were on a gallows bracket or suspended from the canopy. Looking again, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the symbol for a shunt signal and a red colour light controlled signal. Do they both have a double horizontal line in a circle? I can't quite make it out from the diagrams. Looking at my original copy and winding up the looking glass: the answer seems to be that three aspect main signals have a double line in the red, as do red aspect associated with the reduced size yellows bracketed off the side. Shunt signals on their own (W14/23, W27, W18/5, W1, W4 at Uxbridge and V2 at Hillingdon) do all have the double line; yet in the second diagram from TN 35/30 follows a different convention: U11 (Ruislip) and T6 (Eastcote) only have a single line. Some of the questions might be answered if a copy of the Met. signalling notices could be found - I shall see what else I can find. Of interest, and not explicitly enumerated in the Traffic Notices is that signals T4 (Eastcote) and V3 (Hillingdon) have the marker light; the virtually identical symbol for a fog repeater has the vertical and horizontal bars running out and touching the circumference, together with a black dot in the centre of the circle. I shall have a look in my 1933 copy of the Met. Rule book (and more particularly the supplements at the back) to see if there are any snippets of information therein. There is also a few drawings/mentions in the Winters and Lancaster book about the Uxbridge installation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2010 13:32:28 GMT
This is very interesting M. I have had a look at the Uxbridge area diagram. I'm no expert on old Met. signalling but it seems as if the home signal (W28) is a two aspect signal showing only a yellow and red aspect. This is modern main line practice but not LU practice. It also appears to have a theatre type route indicator for all three routes, even though one was the siding. Moving on to shunt signals, they seem to come in two different types - one is a disc (like W1), which presumably rotates to allow movement and the other is one like W9 which is a red and yellow colour light signal bracketed on the main signal. Then, look at the fog signals. They are single lights, (M, you call them "marker lights") presumably showing yellow only if the signal ahead was showing a red, otherwise no aspect at all? LER practice was to have two aspects. And, they appear to have fog signals half way down each platform, suspended from the awning like a platform repeater. Did I read all this right? Perhaps we should prepare a diagram showing Metropolitan Railway signals as they were in 1930ish? Looking again, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the symbol for a shunt signal and a red colour light controlled signal. Do they both have a double horizontal line in a circle? I can't quite make it out from the diagrams. In another place Harsig posted this link (which MRFS is aware of): www.4shared.com/file/200468975/1b8c4e08/RailwayEngineerApril1931.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2010 13:50:19 GMT
...........rather than the fog lights: which were two-and-a-half aspect. I'm not sure exactly what the aspects comprised, but I'm guessing that they were green over yellow with a FOG on a third white fresnel: the 'FOG' being the half-aspect as a reminder to the Motorman. Ruislip branch repeaters were on a gallows bracket or suspended from the canopy. The fog repeater arrangement and other details of the aspect colours/route indications etc. are also shown in the document linked in my previous post above.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 23, 2010 14:44:38 GMT
...........rather than the fog lights: which were two-and-a-half aspect. I'm not sure exactly what the aspects comprised, but I'm guessing that they were green over yellow with a FOG on a third white fresnel: the 'FOG' being the half-aspect as a reminder to the Motorman. Ruislip branch repeaters were on a gallows bracket or suspended from the canopy. The fog repeater arrangement and other details of the aspect colours/route indications etc. are also shown in the document linked in my previous post above. Thank you very much for this smeswdu. The article shows that the fog repeaters were 3-aspect repeaters of the stop signals. It doesn't make clear whether the lower aspect with the word FOG on it was red or yellow. I doubt they would have used red. Perhaps it was white? The Met Rly Appendix of 1921 refers to "lamp repeater signals" provided 100 yards in rear of certain stop signals on the extension line between Finchley Road and Wembley Park having two aspects "green" and "orange" [sic]. Another, specially provided at South Kensington is referred to as having a "yellow" light. It would just be credible for a signal to have two yellow aspects but this requires the driver to be paying close attention to see whether it means the next signal is yellow too or red. My recollection of the fog repeaters with the letter F on the yellow aspect was that they were adequate. And anyway, you would know that the bottom of the three aspects repeated the red. Also, now I know what the marker lights were. They were illuminated A signs used to indicate a semi-automatic or controlled signal was working automatically. They used to be all over the Underground but centralised control has seen most of them disappear.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2010 14:58:12 GMT
Did you spot the words about the route indicator at Uxbridge (It showed G for the yard and 1 or 2 for the platforms with a main yellow aspect for all moves). I assume that when routed to the goods yard that the road had to be set to what looks like a reception road at the back of the platform only Notice also that the existing retained ground discs showed a yellow light for off The fog repeaters etc. are described in another document published by MRFS and found here: www.256.eclipse.co.uk/tube/DSCF5137%20copy%20.jpg
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 23, 2010 21:16:43 GMT
Did you spot the words about the route indicator at Uxbridge (It showed G for the yard and 1 or 2 for the platforms with a main yellow aspect for all moves). I assume that when routed to the goods yard that the road had to be set to what looks like a reception road at the back of the platform only Notice also that the existing retained ground discs showed a yellow light for off The fog repeaters etc. are described in another document published by MRFS and found here: www.256.eclipse.co.uk/tube/DSCF5137%20copy%20.jpgOK!!! It was a white light! Ha!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2010 22:21:17 GMT
Just a thought. The FOG signals are the otherway around to those currently existing on the MET Main are they not I believe these show FOG on a yellow aspect with white (or lunar white) for OFF for all other aspects. ........or am I dreaming (again )
|
|