Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2005 11:37:23 GMT
Well on the official T website they say that it's POSSIBLE that they may install Air Conditioning in the stock cars by, wait for it......2010. Great! considering that we will all be 7ft under (joke, you are all young beautiful creatures) I hope the next generation enjoy it! I've visited London 15 times overall and each time used the Tube. And on summers days it gets so bloody hazy!
Considering what Dave and co. discussed in the other parts of the forum about costs and taking up passenger space, I can kind of relate to having problems but come on, we need SOMETHING to cool us down on those summers days when we find ourselves propped into a sewer workers armpit. Yum!
Even if it's something as basic as what the Tube drivers get? mind you, they need it the most, considering they are down there all day/night.
Either that or they can invest in ice-packs! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Admin Team on Jun 1, 2005 13:11:16 GMT
I presume you're talking about TfL's press release which can be read at www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/press-centre/press-releases/press-releases-content.asp?prID=358Certainly there's reference to air cooling in the new Sub Surface lines trains, but air cooling and air conditioning aren't necessarily the same thing. Time will tell. Heat extraction on the SSL's is relatively simple - there's many areas where the lines are open to the 'outside' so the build up that occurs on the deep tube lines (see below) isn't the same issue. As for the deep tube lines, this is an altogether more complex problem. OK, they may technically be able to air cool the trains (and again presumably that would be in the new stocks whenever they arrive) but the problem in the deep tube sections is the dissipation of the heat once it's taken away from the trains. This builds up in the stations and tunnels and in turn leads to even more heat build up! As you'll have read from the press release they're looking at ways of improving ventilation and extraction, and this will help, but as the press release suggests by the results (or lack of) of the competition which was held it's all incredibly complex.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2005 14:47:21 GMT
I was thinking maybe they could disperse the heat to things that may need it like say, buildings (central heating etc etc) or maybe greenhouses?
It would save energy but maybe the T don't want to spend half their worth on cooling passengers?
very complex problem I can imagine.
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Jun 1, 2005 16:31:39 GMT
When I was on the Berlin S-Bahn the stock with double glazing had, on the inside at the bottom of each window, a perforated grille that let cool air enter the car while in motion The air was brought up through trunking between the two car skins from under the car. This was very effective and brought a nice cool breeze in the hot weather. My own thought would be to have new SSL stock with the same body design/seating plan as the old Tanks (F Stock) brought up to date with moder equipment and double glazing. The large square vents on the rooof of the tanks were so effective they had to be blocked off. Another way to ensure adequate ventilation is the old style clerestory roof as on the older stocks of years gone by. Hot air rises (except in the Commons) and the clerestory was excellent for venting it. If fans were used in conjuction with it the problem MAY be solved. It may look old fashioned but the old guy knew a thing or two. As for stations there is a way and that is to install extractor trunking on the platforms and run the trunking to the surface via the lift/escalator shaft. These fans could be boosted by the over-current from the regen brake on the trains. I.E. the fans run at traction current voltage and and speed up when a train in section pumps juice back in to the rail.. Only an idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2005 16:34:30 GMT
I think Q8 hit the target in one!
although if you did have open panels, wouldn't all this rumour about poisonous air in the tunnels crop up again?
|
|
|
Post by yellowsignal on Jun 4, 2005 10:05:59 GMT
I was thinking maybe they could disperse the heat to things that may need it like say, buildings (central heating etc etc) or maybe greenhouses? It would save energy but maybe the T don't want to spend half their worth on cooling passengers? very complex problem I can imagine. I remember reading something about this last year as a result of the contest for cooling the tube by the mayor. It was either an idea which used water from the thames or an aquifer. It's possible to take heat from the tube and store it in an underground aquifer (waterbearing layer deep below ground) during the summer and extract it during winter for heating buildings, or just let it dissipate into the air via a heat-exchanger. I've visited a project where they did this with a number of large officebuildings.
|
|
DescendingSadlyguest
Guest
|
Post by DescendingSadlyguest on Jun 4, 2005 12:07:10 GMT
That would preserve energy quite well.
|
|
|
Post by igelkotten on Jun 4, 2005 14:55:52 GMT
A problem with everybody+dog installing HVAC on everythign they can get their hands on is that an AC plant doesen't make the heat disappear -it just transports it to somewhere else. Thus, there are several examples of air-conditioned office blocks creatign all sorts of weird microclimates around their buildings, leading to local heat build-up -and an increased need for air conditioning, which leads to even more heat build-up, which...
The advantage of storing the heat somewhere for later use (sort of like DIY geothermal energy) is that you cut that vicious cycle, but it can also be a more expensive and complicated solution.
|
|