|
Post by Alight on Jan 11, 2008 19:50:23 GMT
I also think a DVA should go like this: "This is Green Park. Change for the Jubilee and Piccadilly lines." as the train arrives into the station and then when the doors open it should go "This is Green Park... This train terminates at Brixton" it gives people more of a chance to get ready to get off and "This is a Victoria line train to Brixton" is too long winded. Pretty decent Idea with the approach. Although they may as well not even announce the station as the doors open if it has been announced before (which is a very a good idea I hadn't thought of) So it could go like this: <<train approaching (slowing down at platform)>> This is Green Park. Change for the Victoria and Jubilee Lines <<doors open>> Mind the gap (if there is one that is!) Please move right down inside the car (peak mode) Stand clear of the doors, please (depending on line's choice) This is a Piccadilly Line service to Oakwood <<DMI display>> Destination: Oakwood A "let customers off the train first please" could also be done however I always feel this is pointless as it is mainly heard by the passengers on the train so pretty pointless!
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 11, 2008 23:19:11 GMT
When changing ends in a siding, would you like to come face to face (on your own) with a person or group of people who are upset at being overcarried? They might be angry and violent. They might be armed. Most people aren't, but would you like to take the chance? At least one member here has been assaulted by a passenger who was angry/upset about not being able to get to his destination. I don't remember the exact details, but I think there were delays and the train was going to be turned short of the passenger's destination (somewhere on the West Ruislip branch of the Central iirc). The member (who was the t/op of the train) was off work for several months recovering from his injuries - this happened at a station where there were lots of other people around. Some sidings are quite remote from help. For peak hour services which will need the higher frequencies, the driver shouldn't even have to walk through the train, there should be one in the other cab for quicker reversing IMO... But I do agree with you... I don't think there needs to be a "Please move right down inside the car" or "stand clear of the doors" personally, most passengers in the peaks know what to do. Instead of having "please stand clear of the doors" there should be a longer warning before the doors close IMO. I also think "Mind the gap" should be at the same time as when the station is announced, it's just as important... And it wasn't really my idea, I just copied it from most other metro systems! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2008 23:26:20 GMT
On the refurbished D stocks, and on the new Piccadilly DVAs, it says 'Mind the gap' before the station - eg - ''Please mind the gap. This is Westminster. Change here for the Jubilee line, and riverboat services from Westminster pier. This is a District line train to Ealing Broadway.''
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jan 11, 2008 23:34:16 GMT
The Piccadilly line has always had a thing about PTI (Platform Train Interface) and in the Line Supplement there was a long list of stations where a mind the gap PA must be made.
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Jan 12, 2008 11:43:13 GMT
On the refurbished D stocks, and on the new Piccadilly DVAs, it says 'Mind the gap' before the station - eg - ''Please mind the gap. This is Westminster. Change here for the Jubilee line, and riverboat services from Westminster pier. This is a District line train to Ealing Broadway.'' Not quite. true the District announces mind the gap first as a priority and then the station name whereas the Picc announces the station name then the gap like most of the other lines. edwin:Yeah only reason why I said "MIND THE GAP" and "STAND CLEAR OF THE DOORS PLEASE" (in case u hadn't picked it up) was for bringing the shouty (jubilee line) man onto the trains once again!! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2008 16:14:07 GMT
The guy who did it at Bank and Waterloo was the best - "MIND THE GAP!" - no ifs, no buts Have to agree with you on that. A booming, authoritative voice he was. But then he used to spoil it by adding a please on the end of " Stand clear of the doors"! I take it that voice is no longer at Bank? (I've not been through there for about 20 years).
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 15, 2008 22:12:48 GMT
Nope, an irritating female voice says something along the lines of "MIN THA GUP"
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Jan 18, 2008 20:06:03 GMT
Nope, an irritating female voice says something along the lines of "MIN THA GUP" He is definately still on one of the stations but Ive forgotten which one as I head him very recently. It was one of the Northern Line ones as I remember about to aboard the train and the voice suddenly came out of no where and made me laugh.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 18, 2008 20:57:13 GMT
I think he's still at Great Portland Street.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 19, 2008 1:02:47 GMT
The Shouty Man was only ever at the following places:
Bank - Central line (eastbound and westbound) Waterloo - Bakerloo line (northbound and southbound) Embankment - Northern line (northbound)
He's definitely gone from Bank, but is still at Embankment. Can't remember if he's still at Waterloo.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 19, 2008 2:09:39 GMT
Still at Waterloo.
I think 'shouty man' should refer to the one at Victoria...
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Jan 19, 2008 10:16:58 GMT
I don't think there needs to be a "Please move right down inside the car" or "stand clear of the doors" personally, most passengers in the peaks know what to do. Instead of having "please stand clear of the doors" there should be a longer warning before the doors close IMO. I also think "Mind the gap" should be at the same time as when the station is announced, it's just as important... And it wasn't really my idea, I just copied it from most other metro systems! ;D When we were allowed to Make PA's on the move and before DVA's were put in, I used to announce the station and interchanges and gaps on approach. Once in the platform I would announce where the train was going and via points first with any neccesary "stand either side of the door openings to allow passengers off the train first please", "move down inside", "use all available space/ doors" (as required) and of course stand clear. I disagree with you, rush hour passengers are better but still require herding. I can knock a third off my dwell time with the effective use of PA's, and trust me, passengers can definitely hear the PA when they are standing by the train As already mentioned, its an authoritative voice State the interchanges/ gaps and attractions on the approach and unlike the Bakerloo and Vic lines, ensure its loud enough to be heard whilst on the move!! Here are my thoughts on all this: I prefer the destination and Via points to be said first as generally people need time to work out where the blummin thing is going and that the train is it going to take the people to their destination!!!! The main via points being missing is a step backwards IMHO!! I think once in a platform destination and via's are far more important than tourist spots as these have already been mentioned on approach to the station. The way we do things now means that people have no time to work out where they are going because by the time she has stated the destination we have to close the doors or we will be holding the road causing queuing into the station. When running late, we end up cutting her off without any destination being stated at all to try and regain some time. The result is obvious. We might as well say. . . "This is Westminster, please mind the gap between the train and the platform, change for the Jubilee line, alight for Westminster abbey the Houses of Parliament and Westminster pier. . . . .Oh and by the way this train goes to Wimbledon just in case you wondered"!!! As you lot can probably tell, professional PA's and our current company standard on DVA's is something close to my heart and I think we are currently a long way from getting it right on sub surface at least!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2008 10:31:43 GMT
When we were allowed to Make PA's on the move and before DVA's were put in, I used to announce the station and interchanges and gaps on approach. Once in the platform I would announce where the train was going and via points first with any neccesary "stand either side of the door openings to allow passengers off the train first please", "move down inside", "use all available space/ doors" (as required) and of course stand clear. I disagree with you, rush hour passengers are better but still require herding. I can knock a third off my dwell time with the effective use of PA's, and trust me, passengers can definitely hear the PA when they are standing by the train As already mentioned, its an authoritative voice State the interchanges/ gaps and attractions on the approach and unlike the Bakerloo and Vic lines, ensure its loud enough to be heard whilst on the move!! Here are my thoughts on all this: I prefer the destination and Via points to be said first as generally people need time to work out where the blummin thing is going and that the train is it going to take the people to their destination!!!! The main via points being missing is a step backwards IMHO!! I think once in a platform destination and via's are far more important than tourist spots as these have already been mentioned on approach to the station. The way we do things now means that people have no time to work out where they are going because by the time she has stated the destination we have to close the doors or we will be holding the road causing queuing into the station. When running late, we end up cutting her off without any destination being stated at all to try and regain some time. The result is obvious. We might as well say. . . "This is Westminster, please mind the gap between the train and the platform, change for the Jubilee line, alight for Westminster abbey the Houses of Parliament and Westminster pier. . . . .Oh and by the way this train goes to Wimbledon just in case you wondered"!!! As you lot can probably tell, professional PA's and our current company standard on DVA's is something close to my heart and I think we are currently a long way from getting it right on sub surface at least!! I think you talk a lot of sense.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 19, 2008 17:30:26 GMT
I don't think there needs to be a "Please move right down inside the car" or "stand clear of the doors" personally, most passengers in the peaks know what to do. Instead of having "please stand clear of the doors" there should be a longer warning before the doors close IMO. I also think "Mind the gap" should be at the same time as when the station is announced, it's just as important... And it wasn't really my idea, I just copied it from most other metro systems! ;D When we were allowed to Make PA's on the move and before DVA's were put in, I used to announce the station and interchanges and gaps on approach. Once in the platform I would announce where the train was going and via points first with any neccesary "stand either side of the door openings to allow passengers off the train first please", "move down inside", "use all available space/ doors" (as required) and of course stand clear. I disagree with you, rush hour passengers are better but still require herding. I can knock a third off my dwell time with the effective use of PA's, and trust me, passengers can definitely hear the PA when they are standing by the train As already mentioned, its an authoritative voice State the interchanges/ gaps and attractions on the approach and unlike the Bakerloo and Vic lines, ensure its loud enough to be heard whilst on the move!! Here are my thoughts on all this: I prefer the destination and Via points to be said first as generally people need time to work out where the blummin thing is going and that the train is it going to take the people to their destination!!!! The main via points being missing is a step backwards IMHO!! I think once in a platform destination and via's are far more important than tourist spots as these have already been mentioned on approach to the station. The way we do things now means that people have no time to work out where they are going because by the time she has stated the destination we have to close the doors or we will be holding the road causing queuing into the station. When running late, we end up cutting her off without any destination being stated at all to try and regain some time. The result is obvious. We might as well say. . . "This is Westminster, please mind the gap between the train and the platform, change for the Jubilee line, alight for Westminster abbey the Houses of Parliament and Westminster pier. . . . .Oh and by the way this train goes to Wimbledon just in case you wondered"!!! As you lot can probably tell, professional PA's and our current company standard on DVA's is something close to my heart and I think we are currently a long way from getting it right on sub surface at least!! Interesting post! Which trains did you drive? And what did passengers do wrong during rush hours? How about "This is Green Park, change here for the Jubilee and Piccadilly lines" then doors open, about 5 secs and then "This train terminates at Brixton" do you think that the lines are all receiving "This is a Victoria line train to" to remind passengers of which lines they are on? "This train terminates" is quicker and more to the point. After that there should be a longer door closing chime, perhaps "Stand clear of the doors" and then a 2 second ringing sound, if i'm right the current "Stand clear of the doors"s are driver operated? They should be automatic. I also think that the DVAs should have correct English, why does the Northern line's say "Change for Victoria line" you change for the Victoria line, it's a noun! Another thing that would shave off a few seconds would be to open the doors quicker, many times i've had to wait for the doors to open at rush hour, they should open before the train even stops! Some operators seem to "clock it" and do it at every station though. This is done in Paris and Moscow which both have higher frequencies than us! These are just my observations as a commuter, i'm not pretending I know how to do the job better then anyone else!
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Jan 20, 2008 11:37:51 GMT
How about "This is Green Park, change here for the Jubilee and Piccadilly lines" then doors open, about 5 secs and then "This train terminates at Brixton" do you think that the lines are all receiving "This is a Victoria line train to" to remind passengers of which lines they are on? "This train terminates" is quicker and more to the point. After that there should be a longer door closing chime, perhaps "Stand clear of the doors" and then a 2 second ringing sound, if i'm right the current "Stand clear of the doors"s are driver operated? They should be automatic. I also think that the DVAs should have correct English, why does the Northern line's say "Change for Victoria line" you change for the Victoria line, it's a noun! Yeah i noticed that on the Northern Line and assumed that they were trying to be very colloquial in order to be down to Earth and speed up the process however I agree with you, it doesn't sound very good e.g. "This is Tottenham Court Road. Change for Central Line". I think (I can't remember if this is right), the Jubilee line also does this e.g. "This is Canary Wharf. Change here for DLR" when it used to always be correct e.g. "Change here for the Docklands light railway" and the like. I think in terms of standard English, Piccadilly wins for me. I love the way the announcer phrases everything and it is the right tone for me. I think the Northern Line is probably the worst for the DVA in the fact it doesn't announce interchanges on route to the station; it says "stand clear of the doors" without a please; is too informal; gives too much information at Euston and Camden when it could just say "northern line services to other destinations"; and finally it says "Main line and surburban rail services" when it could just say national rail services. Finally Edwin (appologies for length), I actually prefer the "This is a Victoria Line train/service to.." as opposed to terminates for some reason. I think its just a matter of opinion and it is nice the fact that different lines are all unique.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Jan 20, 2008 19:32:21 GMT
I drive District Line trains, the C and D stocks. The main issue with dwell times at all times of the day is that people tend to crowd round entrance ways without spreading themselves down the platform, standing in the paths of people trying to alight and then you get people that don't use all the doors when the doors either side are free. This is a bigger issue for off peak trains but some of the peak hour throng are guilty too. Sorry, I omitted the fact that I state the line to so I state "This is a district line train to .... via........ If the platform is really crowded, i'll say stand either side of the doors to allow the passengers off the car first please, then i'll spiel line, destination etc. It boils down to common sense at the time really. The D stock system is so user unfriendly and time consuming (it means pressing 3 buttons (assuming the buttons and software lag take) and then waiting up to 15 ish seconds) just for her to say stand clear of the doors. Its easier for us to pick up the handset and make the announcement manually before closing the doors. As an aside, i would still love to be able to make my own announcements at interchanges, but by doing that you lose the door chimes when closing the doors with the handset off the hook and even more annoying than that, as soon as you hang your PA handset back up onto the cradle, she makes the announcement in full about the previous station even though you're accelerating off!!! They don't always make life easy for us to do whats best for the customer. As good as those ideas are, it's sometimes easier said than done to put in best practice. The C stock has a much better system in most respects. Door chimes work regardless, one button press for stand clear of the doors etc and its instant. When it works its a great piece of kit, and is easier to work round. I agree about the door opening. Many drivers do that so the doors are open the moment the train stops. Some stocks can do it, some can't. Thankfully sub surface stock can.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jan 24, 2008 22:13:02 GMT
I drive District Line trains, the C and D stocks. The main issue with dwell times at all times of the day is that people tend to crowd round entrance ways without spreading themselves down the platform, standing in the paths of people trying to alight and then you get people that don't use all the doors when the doors either side are free. This is a bigger issue for off peak trains but some of the peak hour throng are guilty too. Sorry, I omitted the fact that I state the line to so I state "This is a district line train to .... via........ If the platform is really crowded, i'll say stand either side of the doors to allow the passengers off the car first please, then i'll spiel line, destination etc. It boils down to common sense at the time really. The D stock system is so user unfriendly and time consuming (it means pressing 3 buttons (assuming the buttons and software lag take) and then waiting up to 15 ish seconds) just for her to say stand clear of the doors. Its easier for us to pick up the handset and make the announcement manually before closing the doors. As an aside, i would still love to be able to make my own announcements at interchanges, but by doing that you lose the door chimes when closing the doors with the handset off the hook and even more annoying than that, as soon as you hang your PA handset back up onto the cradle, she makes the announcement in full about the previous station even though you're accelerating off!!! They don't always make life easy for us to do whats best for the customer. As good as those ideas are, it's sometimes easier said than done to put in best practice. The C stock has a much better system in most respects. Door chimes work regardless, one button press for stand clear of the doors etc and its instant. When it works its a great piece of kit, and is easier to work round. I agree about the door opening. Many drivers do that so the doors are open the moment the train stops. Some stocks can do it, some can't. Thankfully sub surface stock can. Very informative, thank you It seems DVAs aren't neccessarily designed the way they should be... Do you think they'll be any better for the 09TS and 'S' Stock? Which stocks can operators not open the doors before the train stops? The 92TS and 96TS are the only ones i've never seen do it. Apart from that, I don't have much else to say! Thanks for your replies, I think we both agree that announcing the station as the train arrives is a better way of doing it, I also think that any warnings (e.g. "This train terminates here" and "Mind the gap") should be done in a loud male voice. We'll have to agree to disagree with the "This is a Victoria line train to..." thing, I prefer the briefness of "this train terminates at Brixton"!
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Feb 9, 2008 13:24:17 GMT
At least we don't yet get the National Rail-style automated "I'm sorry, but the 1.01 One train from platform 1 is running 21 minutes' late..." (OK I made up the details!). Seriously, how can a computer be sorry? I could start a thread on LU recorded station announcements (at least one made every 20 seconds it seems) but aren't sure my blood pressure could stand such a debate!!!
|
|
|
Post by dannyofelmpark on Jun 16, 2008 19:42:57 GMT
i think i can tell you where all this started.
back in 1990 we celebrated 100 years of the city and south london. at the same time there was a programme on L.W.T called "six o clock live"(, it replaced the "six o clock show" which was much better)
that november they did a whole programme about L.U.L which included a "new voice of mind the gap contest" and these contestant all used the "please" suffix. In my opinion the please version does not have the same ring to it as the original.
anyway a woman won the contest and a couple of weeks later i herd mind the gap at bow road for the first time and you know what - IT WAS A BLOKE (the same one you still get at Aldgat now) and that was without please.
to end this can anyone remember the name of the original voice that you still get at Embankment northern line, i think it was Peter something or other.
|
|
|
Post by dannyofelmpark on Jun 16, 2008 19:53:02 GMT
also elm park station had "mind the gap" for a few months last year and then it disappeared, anyone know why?
such a shame i felt quite privaliged that we had it at my home station.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jun 16, 2008 23:29:04 GMT
It seemed to be installed as standard at every station that Metronet refurbished - presumably someone with some common sense realised that there was no need for such an announcement at Elm Park and got it turned off
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jun 17, 2008 1:01:21 GMT
Turned off at Ealing Common and Bethnal Green as well, I believe.
|
|
|
Post by dannyofelmpark on Jun 17, 2008 11:08:52 GMT
I HAVE PUT VIDEO ON YOU TUBE OF ELM PARK
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 17, 2008 19:41:25 GMT
It seems DVAs aren't neccessarily designed the way they should be... Do you think they'll be any better for the 09TS and 'S' Stock? No I don't think they will be better. Can you imagine S stock DVA? 'This is Chalfont and Latimer. Change here for trains to Chesham. This is a Metropolitan line train to Baker Street caling at Chorley Wood, Rickmansworth, Moor Park, Harrow-on-the Hill...'!
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jun 23, 2008 20:15:42 GMT
'This is a xxx line train to' should be used where trains on different lines use the same platform.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jun 23, 2008 20:38:47 GMT
I don't understand why? Maybe i'm letting my idealism cloud my judgement here, but can't people see the line colour in enamel all along the platform, or the colours of the poles on the train, or simply... Know where to go? It's the fact that people can't take responsibility for themselves that all these stupid announcements have to be made. Anyway, the "This is a xxx line train to" is useless these days as it sounds too late for people to get off if they're on the wrong train.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2008 21:32:52 GMT
I don't understand why? Maybe i'm letting my idealism cloud my judgement here, but can't people see the line colour in enamel all along the platform, or the colours of the poles on the train, or simply... Know where to go? It's the fact that people can't take responsibility for themselves that all these stupid announcements have to be made. Anyway, the "This is a xxx line train to" is useless these days as it sounds too late for people to get off if they're on the wrong train. A passenger's POV. I touch in at, say, Bayswater and at the top of the stairs see there's a train in the platform. I decide to catch it whatever it is so the sooner I hear an announcement the sooner I know whether or not I need to change... Of course, with the new stock I'll no longer be able to play Mr Smartypants and explain to grockles (this works best at Earl's Court platform 2) that trains with single doors go to Victoria and those with double doors to Paddington...
|
|
|
Post by District Dave on Jun 24, 2008 7:21:45 GMT
I don't understand why? Maybe i'm letting my idealism cloud my judgement here, but can't people see the line colour in enamel all along the platform, or the colours of the poles on the train, or simply... Know where to go? It's the fact that people can't take responsibility for themselves that all these stupid announcements have to be made. Anyway, the "This is a xxx line train to" is useless these days as it sounds too late for people to get off if they're on the wrong train. You are dealing with an 'imperfect world' here; believe me that the vast majority of the public who travel on an occasional basis (i.e. not the daily commuter crowd) do not have the awareness of the items to which you refer! We will all have to agree to disagree over the rights and wrongs of the announcements made by the train bourne equipment; my view is that it has to pander to the least knowledgeable/least common sense!
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jun 24, 2008 23:20:38 GMT
Silly me, expecting people to actually know where they are going! ;D
|
|
|
Post by johnb on Jun 26, 2008 14:12:29 GMT
Of course, with the new stock I'll no longer be able to play Mr Smartypants and explain to grockles (this works best at Earl's Court platform 2) that trains with single doors go to Victoria and those with double doors to Paddington... ...which works fine until you throw yourself onto a double-doored yellow-poled train at Aldgate East, and then discover on your way to Tower Hill that it's a Circle train that entered service at Barking. (you win bonus points if you do this while on your way to King's Cross to make a very tight connection with a mainline train that you've got a pre-booked ticket for.)
|
|