Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2009 19:18:15 GMT
And on the subject of the Olympia service - I'm still new to the District line and was surprised I must admit by the general "oh the Olympia doesn't really matter unless there's an event on" approach but as has been pointed out to me Olympia is not far from Earl's Court......and if an extra train is needed at an unforseen time (such as the very late finish at Wimbledon, which was not anticipated) it's got to be found from somewhere. Olympia isn't particularly busy, but it has passengers and they get the least service anyway. If you say your running a train every 15mins then you should not divert it elsewhere on a whim. Earl's Court is close.. ish ... It'd take about 15mins to walk it and you have to cross two major roads including the A3. There is a bus though not a particularly frequent one. However you'd have to know you need to walk/bus it in the first place, there is no LUL staffing or signage and no Dot matrix at Olympia ...I'm not sure the long line PA goes there either, I've never heard it. None the less I still feel the readiness of cancelling these trains is unacceptable. I gather a fair number of passengers simply avoid Olympia because it can not be relied upon to supply a regular train. Perhaps, as 21146 suggests the map should show the Olympia service in green/white restricted service colours, with the note "Service to Olympia only operates if we don't have a need for it elsewhere" If an extra train is required on the west, I'd think shunting back an e/b Tower Hill reverser would be a better choice, these are mostly a waste of track space and with a following Upminster present no-one with any noticeable extended journey time. In any event I don't really think that there was any justification for use of the Olympia trains, you had the two football spares available and frankly Wimbledon Tennis isn't THAT popular ! Yes, the service requirement for events affecting LUL are decided in advance - but where no extra resources are provided and the service controller is left with a normal WTT and stations asking for more, what is the service controller to do? Tell them they'll have to manage with the service "special events" have decreed is adequate ! Using Station Crowd management as required. [He/she is the operational member of staff on duty and responsible for providing a safe train service on a given line. That is the number one priority and if that means that they feel using an Olympia train in this instance is justified, it is perfectly reasonable. Given the hot weather and the number of people using the Wimbledon branch versus those using the Olympia service, I would suggest that having an extra train on the Wimbledon branch taken from the Olympia branch was justified in terms making passenger journeys more comfortable and leaving the service less prone to a PEA and the resultant delays that would bring. As was stated earlier, the staff on the ground are best able to determine the need for extra trains .... or are they ..... were station staff aware there were trains backed up to Wimbledon, all that was needed to clear crowds was to fill the platform, fill the train and let it go ...instead of holding each train and filling it up slowly from the back as passengers came down the stairs. All the required capacity was there queing back to Wimbledon. Did the controller get onto the station staff and say you've got a queue of trains waiting to get in .... did the controller consider that the presence of the Olympia train was actually just making the queue and thus delay longer and providing no extra capacity Like I say when I (as a person on the ground) tried to ensure the Controller was aware of what was actually going on he wasn't interested. Does it happen that a late-running wimbleware heading south is taken to Olympia, to recover time (i.e. if theres too much reversing at pb/pgn too cope with another one)? Yes, though rarely, a train would have about an hour late to be curtailed at Olympia. Either C or D's can be, and are, sent there from time to time. (From an enthusiast perspective I do rather like the sight of an Olympia bound train running from way out east ;D ) The principle reversing point is Parsons Green, so that branch gains a few extra trains as Richmond and Ealing trains also go there to reverse. However this location will be less flexible after the remodeling (I presume for S stock) as reversing trains will have to run wrong road either into or out of the sidings in order to reverse, presenting some delay to through trains.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 7, 2009 21:28:27 GMT
Re Point Pleasant Junction: the Up line was of course carried over the Windsor Lines ona single-track bridge. Because I gather of its weakness the line was severed. and the bridge demolished. The existin Down Line becae bi-directional betwen Point Pleasant and I suppose it's East Putney Junction? However I am sure that the Up now only connects to the Up Windsor Fast and not the Slow? It is a great shame that no replacement work was carried-out in the past.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jul 7, 2009 21:45:01 GMT
Although I am not LU staff and have not been an active critic of this year's service, I believe my previous post in this thread would fulfil the rest of your criteria. I'm afraid not Chris! On a weekday, and let's assume we're looking at the 'return traffic'.... Your spare trains will come from 'early stablers' after the peak - you can't use anything above what's out on the railway as anything in depot will either be undergoing exams, booked up with defects or held as spare for any train going defective on the road. So, the first 'early stabler' is designated as a 'football spare' and does have a rostered spare driver; this train is shown as being available from 1919 Ealing Common Depot and must be stabled at Ealing Common depot by 2305. So let's look closer at how it would work............. In reality, that train will actually come from Ealing Broadway (1912) via High St Ken (1935 - 1940). It must leave High Street Ken by 1940 as 152 is due in platform 3 then (platform 4 already has a scheduled reverser). Assuming everything is running right time, that's a very tight turn around let alone if we're running a few minutes late or well off book. To be useful at Southfields it'll have to go via Wimbledon, so if it leaves High Street at 1940, it'll be Wimbledon (2001 - 2011) making it Southfields on the East at 2015. That might be ideal, then again it might not - but it's the only shot you'll get with this train due the availability of paths/platforms. You could put it in Parsons Green and use it as required, but it'll still need to go via High Street Ken and will need to be tipped out in that 5 minute turn around - it'll go in any of the roads to the west of Parsons Green. It could be shunted around to the east of Parsons Green, but you couldn't do it without affecting the through service. You are then told it's required - by the time you've got it out onto the Westbound, and the driver has changed ends to take it via Wimbledon (thus causing a delay to the westbound service) it'll be a good 30 minutes.......potentially it'd miss the the crowd it's aimed at with that sort of lead time. Before any bright spark suggests it, looking at the WTT, I would suggest that leaving it in one of the platforms at Wimbledon wouldn't be wise; in any case I doubt the Network Rail signaller would agree to it. That's just one train. The next Ealing Common stabler - for which a spare driver from Acton Town or Earls Court would have to be sought, arrives at Ealing Common depot at 1956. Subsequent 'early stablers' would require the same and arrive at Ealing Common at 2002, 2025, 2117 & 2137. Given the timings for the first example, and taking consideration of the paths/platforms available in the Earls Court & High Street Ken areas, how useful will any of those later trains actually be? Remember, this all assumes everything is on time, not canceled and not deliberately on an 'early stabler' because the depot requires the stock. You also have to keep in mind drivers hours - what is the window for Wimbledon finishing times? Drivers can only be on a train for a maximum of four hours (roughly!), and if they're spares, the DMT will have to juggle their book on and meal break times to get any meaningful use out of them - spares book on at different times and you won't have as many available as you may think, particularly as uncovered duties need to be covered and they may be needed to cover operational incidents (ie, reforming, late meal relief, etc). Not as easy as it is to type "use a spare train & driver" is it?!! In any event I don't really think that there was any justification for use of the Olympia trains, you had the two football spares available and frankly Wimbledon Tennis isn't THAT popular ! On a Saturday yes, but not on any other day of the week. But even those football trains are only so useful. Taking what I said above into account, and the unpredictable finishing time of Tennis, it would take a lot of work to get the best use out of them. Tell them they'll have to manage with the service "special events" have decreed is adequate ! Using Station Crowd management as required. So not only would you rather have an unsafe station (closed due to overcrowding), you'd also see the crowds pushed back out into the street, which will the affect the surrounding area and generate stories of how the District line was badly managed and the station couldn't cope. Is that the result you'd rather service control aimed for? I thought the ultimate aim was to provide a useful and safe service for our customers! As was stated earlier, the staff on the ground are best able to determine the need for extra trains .... or are they ..... were station staff aware there were trains backed up to Wimbledon, all that was needed to clear crowds was to fill the platform, fill the train and let it go ...instead of holding each train and filling it up slowly from the back as passengers came down the stairs. All the required capacity was there queing back to Wimbledon. Did the controller get onto the station staff and say you've got a queue of trains waiting to get in .... did the controller consider that the presence of the Olympia train was actually just making the queue and thus delay longer and providing no extra capacity Like I say when I (as a person on the ground) tried to ensure the Controller was aware of what was actually going on he wasn't interested. Yes, people on the ground are best placed to deal with what is happening on the ground. The controllers will always welcome information - what they choose to do with that information is different for every controller though, and they will weigh it up against the rest of the line/branch. Bigger picture and all that. It may well have been the case that station staff had indeed told the controller what they were doing and/or that the flow of people though the station hadn't peaked. I don't know as I wasn't there (or indeed even working on the day(s) in question), but neither will you have had the big picture either.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Jul 7, 2009 21:53:19 GMT
Re: finishing times.
Surely the simplest system is to set a cut-off time at which the game will be stopped. It cannot be reasonable to expect transport operators to work with a time of "maybe 8pm, maybe 10pm, maybe somewhere in between". Don't the organisers of such events have a responsibility for the situations they cause?
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jul 7, 2009 22:03:14 GMT
Re: finishing times. Surely the simplest system is to set a cut-off time at which the game will be stopped. It cannot be reasonable to expect transport operators to work with a time of "maybe 8pm, maybe 10pm, maybe somewhere in between". Don't the organisers of such events have a responsibility for the situations they cause? There is a cut-off time: it's 2130 (or earlier if it's getting dark earlier.....). But even you can't make a 5-set match last till 2130 if the guy wins in 3 straight sets!! And if it does finish at 1930 - or 2000 - or 2030 etc., you can't then keep all the spectators imprisoned till 2130 because that's when the extra trains are booked. Which is why I said above that Wimbledon is uniquely unpredictable. And then there's the days (not this year) when rain stops play as early as say 1700. Not easy for the railway to manage.
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Jul 7, 2009 22:16:37 GMT
So let's look closer at how it would work............. In reality, that train will actually come from Ealing Broadway (1912) via High St Ken (1935 - 1940). It must leave High Street Ken by 1940 as 152 is due in platform 3 then (platform 4 already has a scheduled reverser). Assuming everything is running right time, that's a very tight turn around let alone if we're running a few minutes late or well off book. To be useful at Southfields it'll have to go via Wimbledon, so if it leaves High Street at 1940, it'll be Wimbledon (2001 - 2011) making it Southfields on the East at 2015. That might be ideal, then again it might not - but it's the only shot you'll get with this train due the availability of paths/platforms. You could put it in Parsons Green and use it as required, but it'll still need to go via High Street Ken and will need to be tipped out in that 5 minute turn around - it'll go in any of the roads to the west of Parsons Green. It could be shunted around to the east of Parsons Green, but you couldn't do it without affecting the through service. You are then told it's required - by the time you've got it out onto the Westbound, and the driver has changed ends to take it via Wimbledon (thus causing a delay to the westbound service) it'll be a good 30 minutes.......potentially it'd miss the the crowd it's aimed at with that sort of lead time. Before any bright spark suggests it, looking at the WTT, I would suggest that leaving it in one of the platforms at Wimbledon wouldn't be wise; in any case I doubt the Network Rail signaller would agree to it. That's just one train. You could have saved yourself some serious typing, because that's not how it worked at all. You make it sound like a military operation! Instead of running to Ealing Broadway on its last timetabled trip, it was diverted straight to Wimbledon and then just shuttled back and forth between Wimbledon and High Street without any specific effort to time it to arrive at Southfields at the same time as the crowds. T125 could easily have stayed out and done the same if it was really necessary, rather than one of the Olympias.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2009 22:18:19 GMT
Re: finishing times. Surely the simplest system is to set a cut-off time at which the game will be stopped. It cannot be reasonable to expect transport operators to work with a time of "maybe 8pm, maybe 10pm, maybe somewhere in between". Don't the organisers of such events have a responsibility for the situations they cause? There is a cut-off time: it's 2130 (or earlier if it's getting dark earlier.....). But even you can't make a 5-set match last till 2130 if the guy wins in 3 straight sets!! And if it does finish at 1930 - or 2000 - or 2030 etc., you can't then keep all the spectators imprisoned till 2130 because that's when the extra trains are booked. Which is why I said above that Wimbledon is uniquely unpredictable. And then there's the days (not this year) when rain stops play as early as say 1700. Not easy for the railway to manage. And then you had the night last week when it finished after 22.30 - totally unpredicted. Southfields nearly closed that night..........
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jul 8, 2009 0:50:46 GMT
Re Point Pleasant Junction: the Up line was of course carried over the Windsor Lines ona single-track bridge. Because I gather of its weakness the line was severed. and the bridge demolished. The existin Down Line becae bi-directional betwen Point Pleasant and I suppose it's East Putney Junction? However I am sure that the Up now only connects to the Up Windsor Fast and not the Slow? It is a great shame that no replacement work was carried-out in the past. At that point,the Windsor lines are (from S to N) DF-DS-US-UF. The old set-up at Point Pleasant was that the flying junctions took off from the fast lines,and East of the junction were crossovers to enable access to/from both lines in either direction (trailing AND leading crossovers between fast and slow,in both Up and Down directions) as well as,I think,a very rusty trailing crossover between the US and DS. The new set-up is that the connection to East Putney (now,strictly speaking,no longer a "flying" junction) takes off from the DF;this diverging line,the old Down connection,is now reversible.East of that point is a "ladder" of crossovers right across all lines to the UF.The old Up flying junction track is still there,disconnected,disappearing into the shrubbery.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 8, 2009 5:35:34 GMT
In the days of 4-SUBS, etc., there was a lovely SR green enamel sign next to the junction saying 'POINT PLEASANT JUNCTION' in white lettering. I passed it regularly as a kid on trips to London from Feltham with the school. I used to wonder where the line came from in the London direction. I have never been over that connection, though I did the Down incline in 1980 on a Class 50-hauled tour. And thanks for the updated info!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 8:36:23 GMT
At that point,the Windsor lines are (from S to N) DF-DS-US-UF. The old set-up at Point Pleasant was that the flying junctions took off from the fast lines,and East of the junction were crossovers to enable access to/from both lines in either direction (trailing AND leading crossovers between fast and slow,in both Up and Down directions) as well as,I think,a very rusty trailing crossover between the US and DS. The new set-up is that the connection to East Putney (now,strictly speaking,no longer a "flying" junction) takes off from the DF;this diverging line,the old Down connection,is now reversible.East of that point is a "ladder" of crossovers right across all lines to the UF.The old Up flying junction track is still there,disconnected,disappearing into the shrubbery. A correction: the lines at Point Pleasant are DESIGNATED (from S to N) Down Windsor Slow, Down Windsor Fast, Up Windsor Fast, Up Windsor Slow - i.e. the (nominal) Fast Lines in the middle - even though for many years they were (and still are on the down) used by the slow trains, while the fast trains use the outer slow lines. And (acccording to Quail) the ladder connection doesn't go all the way across to the up slow.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 8, 2009 9:08:14 GMT
the ladder connection doesn't go all the way across to the up slow. That's what I thought...so Up trains have to use the Up Windsor Slow and then presumably cross-over at Clapham Junction if required. The relevance is that this restricts, in theory, the capacity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 9:20:31 GMT
And then you had the night last week when it finished after 22.30 - totally unpredicted. Southfields nearly closed that night.......... And what's going to happen if (when) the tennis goes on for another hour or two? I hope someone is thinking about this - before the crowd turns up to find the last train going (or gone)... Or next year when (AIUI) there will only be one Olympia train? If it's in line to be diverted then that implies no District service at Olympia: is there going to be a means of informing passengers there about that? A situation were the procedure for dealing with an expected (even if not terribly predictable) rush is to divert a train from another branch cannot really be described as acceptable. And given Colin's post I am bound to wonder how quickly it can get to where it's needed (i..e Northbound at Southfields) - how does it compare with one sent from stabling? And how long does it take from the tennis ending to the crowd arriving at Southfields?
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jul 8, 2009 10:43:37 GMT
And how long does it take from the tennis ending to the crowd arriving at Southfields? AIUI for those not in a hurry (the majority) it's a good 15-20 min walk at least. And that's after getting out of the venue.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 8, 2009 10:53:23 GMT
TfL's journey planner says 30 minutes walk, Wimbledon's website says about 15 minutes walk.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jul 8, 2009 19:09:27 GMT
You could have saved yourself some serious typing, because that's not how it worked at all. You make it sound like a military operation! Instead of running to Ealing Broadway on its last timetabled trip, it was diverted straight to Wimbledon and then just shuttled back and forth between Wimbledon and High Street without any specific effort to time it to arrive at Southfields at the same time as the crowds. T125 could easily have stayed out and done the same if it was really necessary, rather than one of the Olympias. I made it sound like a military operation because within the control room it is just that - doing things willy nilly and without planning or forethought is the worst thing a controller can do! The first train in my example (train 34) has a crew relief at Acton Town west at 1854 (driver just booked on for duty at Acton Town), so diverting the train at Earls Court means you must use a spare driver. The diversion will also give you a 16 minute gap to Ealing Broadway. If a 30 minute gap on the Olympia's is considered a disgrace, what is a 16 minute gap on the far busier Ealing Brodaway service considered to be? Whilst it might well have been a deft move on the day in question, it doesn't look too simple/pretty on paper. Using 125 may have been an option - you could even use train 40, which stables earlier - the gap would only be 8 or 9 mins to Ealing on either of those which would certainly be preferable to a 16 minute gap, but it would depend on the availability of spares, whether the depot wants the stock, the state of the service at the time and even whether the trains are not canceled already. This is why I insist it's very easy to sit at your computer and bounce all these apparently simple and blindingly obvious solutions around, but it's a damm sight harder to make a judgment call on the day as there are so many variables at play. Things like Football are generally highly predictable - the Tennis at Wimbledon is at the opposite end of the spectrum with even the weather potentially the most variable of the lot.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Jul 8, 2009 19:19:42 GMT
The first train in my example (train 34) has a crew relief at Acton Town west at 1854 (driver just booked on for duty at Acton Town), so diverting the train at Earls Court means you must use a spare driver. Or, could you not have the driver booking on earlier and traveling to Earls Court?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jul 8, 2009 20:25:44 GMT
That's a big no no - it would have to be arranged in advance and is subject to minimum periods of notice as agreed with Unions; I can't remember the time period off hand, but I'm quite certain we are talking days here.
'stepping up' (using a driver that's already booked on early to cover a duty with an earlier start time than the one they've booked on for) is also frowned upon by the Unions. Although it's a possible 'get out of jail free card', it wouldn't apply at the time of day in question as there are no other relevant duties booking on to play with.
It's certainly not something that ever comes into play in this sort of scenario.
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Jul 8, 2009 20:34:30 GMT
I made it sound like a military operation because within the control room it is just that - doing things willy nilly and without planning or forethought is the worst thing a controller can do! By "military operation" I was referring only to your completely fictional account of how T34 was utilised. I don't need to be told what goes on in a control room, I've had far more experience in them than you realise. The first train in my example (train 34) has a crew relief at Acton Town west at 1854 (driver just booked on for duty at Acton Town), so diverting the train at Earls Court means you must use a spare driver. The diversion will also give you a 16 minute gap to Ealing Broadway. If a 30 minute gap on the Olympia's is considered a disgrace, what is a 16 minute gap on the far busier Ealing Brodaway service considered to be? One 30 minute gap isn't ideal and might be unavoidable sometimes, but to remove one of the Olympia trains for 3 hours just after the PM peak - throughout the tournament - is not on especially when other early stablers could have been used in addition to T34. At the beginning of the tournament before better plans could be made maybe, but not right up to the last Friday. Whilst it might well have been a deft move on the day in question, it doesn't look too simple/pretty on paper. If your version of events was correct then I'd agree! Using 125 may have been an option - you could even use train 40, which stables earlier - the gap would only be 8 or 9 mins to Ealing on either of those which would certainly be preferable to a 16 minute gap, but it would depend on the availability of spares, whether the depot wants the stock, the state of the service at the time and even whether the trains are not canceled already. OK so it might not have worked if all early stablers were required by the depot, the service was completely destroyed and there were no spare drivers available during the same 3 hour period for a fortnight, but I somewhat doubt that was the case. I can however say with utmost certainty, that there was at least one spare driver available when I was working one of the diverted Olympias. They had to take me off early because I ran out of time to do a 3rd Wimbo and still pick up my second half!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2009 20:34:59 GMT
The diversion will also give you a 16 minute gap to Ealing Broadway. If a 30 minute gap on the Olympia's is considered a disgrace, what is a 16 minute gap on the far busier Ealing Brodaway service considered to be? Preferable ! Thats only +6mins on the usual headway anyway. Rather better than +15 to Olympia !! The efforts to get past Acton Town often result in trains being more than +6 anyway !! Only two stations would be directly affected Chiswick Park and Ealing Broadway. If there are spares aplenty, and usually a spare or two can be russled up, then T103 could be made available much earlier from High Street from 1745, the East End football train 27 is at Wimbledon 1750 and could remain on the branch. The second East End spare train could be at High Street for 1845. none of these would cause a significant gap at the East End, though any train would have to end up at Upminster or have a compensating stock balance train end up there. However where theres a will there's a way. T125 is a push in train (on the east only running as far as Barking) this could probably be taken for it's whole pm peak (I don't know what it's driver duties do, so spares permitting). The easy option of stealing a train, sometimes both trains, from the Olympia service, demonstrates a shocking lack of customer care and focus. I rather feel the organisers of these big events also need to have some regard to the effect they have on both their attendees and those incidentally affected rather than to expect the transport providers to simply jump to their whim. Generally i do not consider is appropriate that bread and butter (highest fare paying) commuters should be sacrificed at a whim for the sake of providing an enhanced service for one off users. Does Centre Court really hold such numbers as to warrent all these extra trains ? !!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 8, 2009 21:14:03 GMT
Things like Football are generally highly predictable - the Tennis at Wimbledon is at the opposite end of the spectrum with even the weather potentially the most variable of the lot. There I think you've hit the nail on the head, the sheer variability of finish time would make timetabling 'push-ins' for this fortnight an absolute pain. I'm sure that's largely why there is such a dearth of notices in the historical and current records.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jul 8, 2009 21:47:21 GMT
I don't need to be told what goes on in a control room, I've had far more experience in them than you realise. Whilst we may well be quoting or responding to each other's comments, I am mindful that this is not a private message conversation but a publically viewable one - one where the vast majority of readers are not LU staff. It may seem like I am teaching someone to 'suck eggs' but what I'm actually trying to do is allow our non LU readers to follow the thread with some form of understanding - and perhaps offer some justification or sound reasoning to back up my viewpoint. I have not intended anything I've said to be read as a personal comment/reply and I'm disappointed if you've taken it that way.
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Jul 8, 2009 21:48:07 GMT
Things like Football are generally highly predictable - the Tennis at Wimbledon is at the opposite end of the spectrum with even the weather potentially the most variable of the lot. There I think you've hit the nail on the head, the sheer variability of finish time would make timetabling 'push-ins' for this fortnight an absolute pain. I'm sure that's largely why there is such a dearth of notices in the historical and current records. I don't think anyone is suggesting that Tennis finishing times are not unpredictable; this was covered for by having the extra trains running a shuttle service for a prolonged period rather than timing them to arrive at Southfields at a specific time. What is being questioned is why one of said trains needed to be nicked from the Olympia service when another early stabler could have been used instead. EDIT - It may seem like I am teaching someone to 'suck eggs' but what I'm actually trying to do is allow our non LU readers to follow the thread with some form of understanding - and perhaps offer some justification or sound reasoning to back up my viewpoint. I applaud efforts to allow non LU readers a better understanding of what goes on behind the scenes, but I simply don't agree that the picture you have painted accurately describes what went on with regard to this specific topic.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jul 8, 2009 22:05:26 GMT
During the first week of Tennis I was on earlies, and the second week I have been in training - I therefore have absolutely no knowledge of what has or hasn't occurred on the District line with regard to the Tennis. I'm sure I did say that somewhere All I have talked about is how, given the controller training I'm doing at the moment, I'm seeing things from a different angle to the one I saw as a driver. EDIT: Actually, I didn't make it clear I haven't worked this year during Wimbledon - sorry I didn't make that clear and I apologise for any confusion caused.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 8, 2009 22:31:10 GMT
What is being questioned is why one of said trains needed to be nicked from the Olympia service when another early stabler could have been used instead. Which is how the question has evolved - I'm still responding to the original question from ruislip: I know that WTTs carry supplements for soccer games, but are there any special arrangements for extra trains on the Wimbledon branch during the fortnight of the tennis tournament? I think ruislip asked this question last year, and there was a similarly inconclusive answer. I spent quite a bit of time reading through the WTT/TTN and Traffic Circular library as it moved across the country in an attempt to answer this question more fully, which is why my responses are in the 'timetabling' vein. Where would T/ops be without a WTT - a free-for-all-fight to get to Richmond? ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by setttt on Jul 8, 2009 23:17:59 GMT
I'm still responding to the original question from ruislip: ...and I was responding to your inference that extra trains can't easily be provided to serve Wimbledon when the tennis is on (ref. the part of my post which you neglected to quote).
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 9, 2009 0:33:21 GMT
...and I was responding to your inference that extra trains can't easily be provided to serve Wimbledon when the tennis is on (ref. the part of my post which you neglected to quote). In the same vein as Colin - and writing for the benefit of the readers (including staff): I did not infer that at all. 'Push-in' trains are timetabled extras, rather than ad-hoc shuttles formed from other trains sculling around. I contend that if there was a known finishing time for this event then there could be timetabled workings. Much of the discussion this time round has been centred around the variability of options. When there are events on at Wembley, there are usually (amongst other routing arrangements) two 'push-in' trains that enter service on the Met. during the return traffic period. What cannot be easily provided are TTNs. Please do not read inferences into my replies. No-one is too old to reread 'Through the Looking Glass' and see what Humpty-Dumpty has to say on the subject of words, but that is a very small aspect of the morals contained in the book. ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jul 9, 2009 1:20:35 GMT
Presumably if Chelney Hackney is built and the proposed take over of Wimbledon Depot takes place, this arrangement of having to send trains al over the place to get to Southfields Northbound will be moot?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2009 7:38:04 GMT
Presumably if Chelney Hackney is built and the proposed take over of Wimbledon Depot takes place, this arrangement of having to send trains al over the place to get to Southfields Northbound will be moot? No-one is too old to reread 'Through the Looking Glass' and see what Humpty-Dumpty has to say on the subject of words, but that is a very small aspect of the morals contained in the book. Now now, MRSA and Ben, dragging threads into fantasy land isn't allowed anymore!! ;D ;D ;D (I may have assumed the whole thread was in fantasy land had it not actually occured for two weeks on the railway !!!) ;D
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jul 9, 2009 7:56:29 GMT
Now now, MRSA and Ben, dragging threads into fantasy land isn't allowed anymore!! ;D ;D ;D (I may have assumed the whole thread was in fantasy land had it not actually occured for two weeks on the railway !!!) ;D Not entirely true - we have been watching it, and have once or twice done some wondering, but in this thread the posters (apart from Ben's last ) have been genuinely trying to bring sense to an actual operational problem. But is it just cost that prevents a couple of 'push-ins' being rostered in advance for the whole afternoon from say 1600 onwards? Yes, it means pre-planning both for the t/ops, the stock and the WTT, but all this is feasible assuming the will to do it and that the planning starts well earlier in the year. Or is the feeling in the ivory towers that it's just not worth bothering with - hence giving the lie to the attitude that the casual visitors take precedence over the regular travellers.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,763
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 9, 2009 9:27:58 GMT
But is it just cost that prevents a couple of 'push-ins' being rostered for the whole afternoon from say 1600 onwards? Yes, it means pre-planning both for the t/ops, the stock and the WTT, but all this is feasible. Indeed a couple of Colin's comments have to me seemed like saying it is not possible to arrange T/ops for push-in trains on short notice. While this may have been true this year, the Wimbledon website already has a countdown to next year's tournament on it so LU can't say they haven't been given notice of when different arrangements may be needed. Perhaps any detailed timetable planning will have to wait until after the t-cup service has bedded down (or been abandoned), but that still leaves several months - far longer than they will know about such things as the replay of a football match in the later stages of a competition.
|
|