|
Post by auxsetreq on May 22, 2009 9:41:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on May 22, 2009 9:59:44 GMT
Where is that ?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on May 22, 2009 10:06:16 GMT
Unless anyone knows different, I believe this is Acton Works. After withdrawal, two 62 stock units spent some years at Northfields Depot nominally assigned to "Piccadilly Line Engineering", before moving to Acton. I don't know what, if anything, the units were used for during their time at Northfields.
|
|
|
Post by Colin D on May 22, 2009 12:29:26 GMT
Sad to see these trains like this, I really enjoyed working on them as a Guard/Guard MM out of Hainult.
Is their any chance one of these trains could be salvaged to become another heritage train along side the 38ts, Sarah Siddon and maybe an A60/62?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 22, 2009 12:41:30 GMT
Cravens are already preserving a four car unit; thats at Hainult I believe. How long have these units been sitting there?
|
|
|
Post by Colin D on May 22, 2009 13:01:25 GMT
Cravens are already preserving a four car unit; That's good to hear. They always look impressive when they came back from Acton Works, new lacquered woodwork, clean seats, nice and shiny on the outside and an almost new train smell about them
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 22, 2009 17:27:54 GMT
They don't look in too bad condition actually, I've seen much worse!
|
|
|
Post by mileendfan on May 22, 2009 18:30:07 GMT
A foolish question I suppose, but why, really why, was their replacement necessary?
Hugh
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2009 20:04:10 GMT
They were part of the Central 2000 project... new signalling meant new stock!
|
|
|
Post by edb on May 22, 2009 21:11:42 GMT
It's funny, they look in better condition than their replacements!
|
|
|
Post by mileendfan on May 22, 2009 21:36:38 GMT
So there was nothing inherently wrong with them then?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 22, 2009 21:45:19 GMT
No, they operated well for their 33 years of service! As said, the Central was to go ATO and the 62s couldn't join the party. They were also some of the few fleets to still use guards.
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on May 23, 2009 0:18:50 GMT
Few A stock to join them soon eh, in the Tube Train Graveyard..... (Hands tissues to metman)
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on May 23, 2009 2:41:52 GMT
What were the boxes on the right hand side with the wires used for?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on May 23, 2009 8:00:16 GMT
Few A stock to join them soon eh, in the Tube Train Graveyard..... (Hands tissues to metman) Well at least they will still survive if they are there. Then if I win the lotto I can set up my own railway and use them as my fleet!! The wires on the front were a late modification from the Kings Cross Report and carried the emergency alarm wires (rather than apply the emergency brake). High intensity headlights were also fitted.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2009 12:13:29 GMT
A foolish question I suppose, but why, really why, was their replacement necessary? Hugh Ever hear of old age? When machines get old they need to be replaced.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on May 23, 2009 15:53:46 GMT
Ever hear of old age? When machines get old they need to be replaced. The 62TS was built around the same time as the A stock. The A stock is still in service, but the 62TS was replaced 15 years ago, so it wasn't 'old age'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2009 16:42:39 GMT
Ever hear of old age? When machines get old they need to be replaced. The 62TS was built around the same time as the A stock. The A stock is still in service, but the 62TS was replaced 15 years ago, so it wasn't 'old age'. Yes, but if the A-stock didn't have the refurbishment 15 years ago they would be in a far more sorry state. Since a total replacement of equipment was on the table for the Central, it was the correct option to buy new trains.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 23, 2009 17:48:33 GMT
The 62TS was built around the same time as the A stock. The A stock is still in service, but the 62TS was replaced 15 years ago, so it wasn't 'old age'. Yes, but if the A-stock didn't have the refurbishment 15 years ago they would be in a far more sorry state. Since a total replacement of equipment was on the table for the Central, it was the correct option to buy new trains. I would expect that Tube stock wears out faster than surface stock, because of compromises from the greater design constraints and harsher environment (poor ventilation affects electric motors as well as passengers). Met trains also do less stopping and starting because of the relatively long stretches between stations - it all adds to wear and tear.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on May 23, 2009 18:48:11 GMT
Still say they got it the wrong way round,IMHO the Northern was in a much worse state than the Central they could've got another 10 years out of the 62s easily.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on May 23, 2009 18:55:04 GMT
The 62TS was built around the same time as the A stock. The A stock is still in service, but the 62TS was replaced 15 years ago, so it wasn't 'old age'. Yes, but if the A-stock didn't have the refurbishment 15 years ago they would be in a far more sorry state. Since a total replacement of equipment was on the table for the Central, it was the correct option to buy new trains. It was always the intention to replace the Central Line trains - the line was more in need of modernization than the Northern because it was the only major line still to be almost entirely controlled by local signal cabins. It wasn't economical to convert the 62 stock to ATO, likewise the modifications necessary for OPO. There was at one time a plan to scrap the 59 stock first, and move the 62 stock to the Northern. However at the time the Northern was due to be getting the 95 stock actually in 1995, so it wasn't worth the effort given their limited life. I believe the 59 stock had also by this time had certain life-extending modifications done.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on May 23, 2009 20:06:19 GMT
There was at one time a plan to scrap the 59 stock first, and move the 62 stock to the Northern. However at the time the Northern was due to be getting the 95 stock actually in 1995, so it wasn't worth the effort given their limited life. Was the reason it 'wasn't worth the effort' that some 4-car 62TS units would have had to have been shortened to 3-car? Couldn't they have just transferred enough 62TS to replace the 4-car 59TS units, so the Northern would then have run 3-car 59TS and 4-car 62TS units?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on May 23, 2009 21:13:09 GMT
There was at one time a plan to scrap the 59 stock first, and move the 62 stock to the Northern. However at the time the Northern was due to be getting the 95 stock actually in 1995, so it wasn't worth the effort given their limited life. Was the reason it 'wasn't worth the effort' that some 4-car 62TS units would have had to have been shortened to 3-car? Couldn't they have just transferred enough 62TS to replace the 4-car 59TS units, so the Northern would then have run 3-car 59TS and 4-car 62TS units? Still not worth the effort. In delivery terms, the stocks followed on from each other, so the difference in age was more on paper than real. Moving the 62 stock to the Northern would have created hassle for no real benefit. 62 stock was not "ready to run" on the Northern in any case, for a start you would have to fit PTI equipment, change destination blinds, line maps etc. Some 62 stock did make its way to the Northern Line - to replace the 56 stock, and make up for various 59 and 72MkI units which had left the line for various reasons.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on May 23, 2009 21:20:34 GMT
What is 'PTI equipment'?
|
|
|
Post by upfast on May 23, 2009 21:28:23 GMT
Positive Train Identification Where the train's set number and destination are transmitted between the train and the signalling equipment/control room. It helps to reduce the number of wrong signals being lowered.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 23, 2009 21:52:15 GMT
Would the centrals fleet of 62 ts be enough to cover the entire northern's rosters? Would have created some flexibility, but then the 72mk1s would only have done 20 years revenue.
Thing is the mechanics of the 62 ts were still largly behind that of the A stock. Each motor was rated at 600v for example, instead of having series pairs of 300v. If the Cravens design on the other hand had made it to be the Centrals main fleet, perhaps its worth considering whether they would have been refurbished and still stomping their ground.
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on May 23, 2009 22:33:34 GMT
Would the centrals fleet of 62 ts be enough to cover the entire northern's rosters? Would have created some flexibility, but then the 72mk1s would only have done 20 years revenue. The 62TS fleet wouldn't have been enough on its own, but if a some 59TS units were kept it would have been. Some of the 72TS Mk1s could then have been used on other lines, like the Bakerloo, Victoria, and W&C (LU were thinking of using some on the Vic and W&C when they were replaced by 95TS). Anyway, the 83TS only lasted for 15 years.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 23, 2009 23:34:47 GMT
Thing is the mechanics of the 62 ts were still largly behind that of the A stock. ......... If the Cravens design on the other hand had made it to be the Centrals main fleet, perhaps its worth considering whether they would have been refurbished and still stomping their ground. Got confused there: for a moment I thought you meant the Cravens-built A stock, which would have had a difficult time on the Central, to say the least!. I'd forgotten that the 1960 prototype tube stock was also Cravens.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2009 2:51:41 GMT
Uh, some 83 TS units lasted less than 10 years. Secind batch, methinks.
|
|