|
Post by c5 on Oct 25, 2006 19:17:27 GMT
It is very mobile phone ish ...but like an ancient brick type ! Given that it was originally meant to be Connect 2000, and either Harsig or Citysig commenting on their units using CRT technology rather than flatscreens, I imagine that the handheld units would be about equivalent to the mobile phones of the late 1990s! I have a photo of the connect PC terminal if you'd like Chris... its very Johnny Five! We have touchscreen ELO monitors but they are much chunkier than a normal LCD monitor and have a massive handset. The Connect Handhelds are very similar in size to the O2 Airwave handsets that the Police use
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 25, 2006 20:03:18 GMT
I would be interested in a photo, thanks ZEDex.
I'm not familiar with what size the police handsets are though - I've seen a policeman on the beat in Cheddar perhaps 4 times in 15 years!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2006 22:21:12 GMT
The handset is so large it's a real pain. The aerial is about 5 inches long, which makes it tricky to find anywhere to clip it to your belt without it getting in the way.
I had c stock today and found the best thing to do was leave the train radio on Channel 4 (Met) and leave the handheld on all the time. That way you get all the messages, much more reliably than through the train radio, but without the feedback you get when handheld and train radio are on the same channel.
I really hate the volume control on the train Connect radio! Hold down the tick button, then press it again to select volume, then use the arrow keys to change volume, then the tick again to confirm. I want the knob back!!!
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 26, 2006 2:19:13 GMT
Presumably as each one of the receivers is in a fixed place it will be possible to assign them a designated emergency contact number. I'd have therefore thought it possible for an ermgency "contact the next station" feature to be possible - i.e. the driver presses the relevant button and your unit sends the message to the beacon with a code that the beacon interprets as "forward to the emergency contact number", whatever it is. In the event of a station being closed I wouldn't have thought it too hard to get the system to be told to forward the message onwards. I'll explain a little more in the next reply, but it basically doesn't work like that Chris! In an earlier post you mentioned something about not being able to use all Connect features until more places and people are 'connected'. What kind of features should I think of and who has to be connected to make use of them? Ok, to expand on this as far as I think is reasonable in the public domain, have a look at this image (sorry for poor quality): This is the train bourne unit fitted in all cabs. If Connect were working in the way it should be, we'd only use the four buttons on the right (the ones with the handy pictures). The one with the train in what looks like a tunnel is for the depot (if the train is in one of course ;D), the person with 'LC' on their chest is the line controller, the signal button will put you in touch with the signaller for the area the train is in, and finally the orangey-red triangle button is the 'mayday' (emergency) call button. They are 'call request' buttons - in simple terms, press the button for the person you wish to speak to, and they will call you back at their convenience. At the moment, the C stocks are still using the 'old' "legacy" radio, the signallers will not be a part of Connect until after the 30th October, half the stations are still un-Connected...........essentially we are still in 'transition mode'. To enable the C stocks to still receive the line controller via the train radio, the two systems have been merged such that we are using Connect in 'group call mode' - that is we simply pick up the handset, press the button on it and talk. We can use the 'LC' button to request a call from the line controller, but that is getting mixed results at the moment....I assume that's because they are still getting used to their equipment. As for the post's regarding the size of the hand held, here is a piccy of my current mobile phone (Sony Ericsson K800) next to the hand held, on a sheet of A4 paper (again, apologies for poor quality):
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2006 12:12:59 GMT
Wow, thanks for that very informative post!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2006 12:52:10 GMT
Thanks for the Colin - very interesting
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2006 12:57:19 GMT
looking forward to the new radio... will it mean line controllers will start to regularly answer calls from circle/h&c's or continue to be "busy" every time we call as with the old radios?! ;D
had my connect training last week, it's a lot more simple than it first looks.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 26, 2006 14:52:11 GMT
One of the benefits of using Connect in the way we are at the moment is that we can, for the first time, hear both sides of a conversation. All I'll say is: us drivers were right all along with regard to being ignored ;D ;D On the other side of the coin, it's not so good when a certain Acton driver took a D stock to Northfields last night The poor driver had to go through the indignity of making himself known when he called the line controller explaining his predicament.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2006 14:55:19 GMT
could he call the District line controller from Northfields? is the Connect system rolled out throughout the system but not used yet?
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on Oct 26, 2006 15:03:29 GMT
Wouldn't he have to contact the Piccadilly line controller first, as it is off the line?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 26, 2006 16:49:35 GMT
could he call the District line controller from Northfields? is the Connect system rolled out throughout the system but not used yet? Connect infrastructure is in place throughout the vast majority of the network, and from what I heard, it worked fine in the South Ealing area. Wouldn't he have to contact the Piccadilly line controller first, as it is off the line? If we'd have been using the old radion system, it would not be possible to contact the Piccadilly line controller by radio. As we're now using Connect, it's still not possible (on account that the Picc is not using it yet). In any case, the current set up has the District and Piccadilly line controllers sitting next to each other in the same room - so communication is easy enough. The train involved last night hadn't actually passed the points, so technically it hadn't reached the Picc's metals - but as the route was approached locked, it was decided to send the train to Northfields anyway.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Oct 27, 2006 1:07:03 GMT
The abilty to call the Service Operator/Controller Level One may be delayed as there is no arrangement/agreement for them to answer the calls, unlike the Signal Post Telephone- so I heard on the grapevine today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2006 19:18:22 GMT
The abilty to call the Service Operator/Controller Level One may be delayed as there is no arrangement/agreement for them to answer the calls, unlike the Signal Post Telephone- so I heard on the grapevine today. Barking cabin is already using the Connect system to contact drivers, the only signal cabin that is afaik. I also made a call to him last night.
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on Oct 27, 2006 22:05:11 GMT
I assume that train would have tipped at South Ealing, or would it have ran fast to Northfields to tip, then reverse?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 28, 2006 0:16:58 GMT
I think I remember someone saying in a recent thread that D stocks are not permitted to run in passenger service beyond South Ealing. If this is correct then it would have to terminate there.
I also remember, from a lot longer ago, that a District driver was speculating that at some point in the not too distant future they would be road trained to Northfields to give futher options in case of service disruption. If this happens it would seem to make sense to pass the D stock (or possibly S stock) to allow passengers to be carried that far.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 28, 2006 6:45:31 GMT
Back to the present...........we ain't road trained - so the passengers would be kicked off at South Ealing. In any case, is there much point in running 'passenger' to Northfields in this scenario? The punters were expecting to go to Ealing Common & Ealing Broadway. I can confirm that the train was indeed tipped out at South Ealing on this occasion
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on Oct 28, 2006 17:25:54 GMT
Was the driver concerned a member of this forum by any chance?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Oct 28, 2006 17:36:46 GMT
No, he isn't.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2006 23:19:02 GMT
so have there been any occurrences of drivers just having a casual chat yet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2006 23:54:51 GMT
I think I remember someone saying in a recent thread that D stocks are not permitted to run in passenger service beyond South Ealing. If this is correct then it would have to terminate there. D Stock IS permitted to run in passenger service to Northfields depot. (Though as commented elsewhere, drivers are not trained over this route and may require a pilotman)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 0:13:04 GMT
But nobody seems to know if it can physically run to Hounslow Central anymore. If it can't, then why are the silver tubes still guarding X412a?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 6:57:06 GMT
D Stock IS permitted to run in passenger service to Northfields depot. Tut Tut! Northfields Depot
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 31, 2006 7:23:05 GMT
I am certain that the Hounslow East and Central brudge replacements preclude SS stock from getting to the Central. I thought at the time that this was short-sighted but I suppose it was economy? And why on earth is there a detector? As I have said before, the last D Stock train to the Central was on the D Stock Tour over 25 years ago.
On reflection is SS stock technically banned from the west end Boston Manor exit from Northfields Depot? I cannot recall if trains can exit the Depot and then reverse EB. Mind you in 45 years of traveling on the Picc I have never seen a Picc train exit the west end either...the late night rusty rail Hounslow Central trains used to go that way I seem to recall.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 15:42:48 GMT
Tut Tut! Northfields Depot Ok Jim ! I assume your point is that no stock can run in passenger service to any depot !!! I'll be more accurate then and say it is permitted to run in passenger dervice to Northfields and then empty into Northfields Depot. It is NOT permitted to run between Northfields and Boston Manor, so by default I asume answers the question about depot ends. For the record D stock is no longer permitted on the East London Line (not sure why). 6 car C stock is permitted to run passenger non-stop to New Cross Gate from St Mary's or Whitechapel. Meanwhile .... back to Connect ! The very useful ability to hear both sides of a radio call seems now to have been stopped and we can't hear the drivers side of any conversation, negating one of the real benefits of Connect ! (Except when a train radio is used to direct call control - in which case all the train radios can hear the driver, but the hand portables and more importantly the controller can not
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 16:42:50 GMT
For the record D stock is no longer permitted on the East London Line (not sure why). 6 car C stock is permitted to run passenger non-stop to New Cross Gate from St Mary's or Whitechapel. 'dyou think that it's because the ELL is only configured for 4 car trains? I thought they didn't break down the D stock into smaller units anymore?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 18:13:40 GMT
'dyou think that it's because the ELL is only configured for 4 car trains? I thought they didn't break down the D stock into smaller units anymore? Well there's no reason I am aware of why a D stock can't operate as a 3 car unit, provided it's a double ended unit. But in practise, there are not sufficient cars to provide any to the East London Line. But that is not the basis upon which the Working Reference Manual dictates what stock can go where, without special permission, that's pirely to do with guaging and compatability etc... Perhaps the appearance of Canada Water gives issues ? Or perhaps no guaging for a D78 has occurred since Canada Water opened ? (1967 and 1972 Mk II are allowed down there but not in passenger service)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 18:38:43 GMT
The double ended D stocks had one of their compressors removed, so they can't operate alone anymore.
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on Oct 31, 2006 19:22:01 GMT
The double ended D stocks had one of their compressors removed, so they can't operate alone anymore. I'm sure I posted elsewhere when this was last raised, the double-enders have NOT had any of their compressors removed. They still have two fully functioning compressors on the trailer cars. SOMETIMES one of them may be cut out locally, but that is unusual. I've been training on a few double-enders recently, and in each case both compressors were working on the trailer of the double-ender
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 20:42:52 GMT
Really? I don't recall you posting elsewhere; I would have remembered such, as a posting from you would be quite authoritative
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on Oct 31, 2006 21:43:46 GMT
I refer my learned friend to this thread, reply no's 41 through to 46 ;D ;D
|
|