|
Post by cbrownuk on Apr 2, 2006 21:57:26 GMT
I have searched the site for this but there doesnt seem to be an existing thread yet...
Can anyone explain why the Wimbledon branch continues to have a timetable whereby there is often overcrowding to/from Wimbledon, when trains to/from Ealing & Richmond are relatively empty in comparison?
Is this a common issue? Has LU been lobbied to improve things for the Wimbledon branch? What was the outcome? How can passengers air their views? etc
Cheers
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 22:32:41 GMT
There was a discussion here on a related thread ...pertaining to the Olympia service. The Wimbledon branch gets a 5min service compared to a 10min to each of Richmond and Ealing and 15min to Olympia. (5min to Upminster except sundays x10min). The Wimbledon's are certainly busier than the other western branches, but it is difficult to see where additional paths could be created without having an un-acceptably detrimental effect on the other branches. Wimbledon's 4 reversing platforms are generally all occupied and shaving some recovery time from the standing there would likely throw the pattern for returns to Upminster / Edgware Road. The current timetable generally works well, but a minor delay in zone 1 can often result in the Wimbledon's 1 x 5mins running as 2 x 10mins which is when the leading train become crowded (midweek evening games at Chelsea create excessive overcrowding often resulting in the Olympia service being abandoned). Also being at x5mins the Wimbledon service can often "donate" a train to cover cancellations on the other branches. In times of disruption extra trains often run to Parsons Green to reverse. The difficulty in reversing trains going west elsewhere often has a severely detrimental effect on the (unseen by control) service east of Dagenham East where gaps of 30 or even 50 mins to Upminster keep appearing ! I would say that although reversing capacity exists at Putney Bridge and Parsons Green (and Mansion House, Plaistow, Barking and Dagenham) it's the paths through Earl's Court and zone 1 that would be the difficulty, as well as stock provision. Marginal increase in Wimbo's and reduction in Ealings and Richmonds would throw the pattern of the Edgware Rd and Circles without some major choreography ! Possible, but the residents furthest west may object
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Apr 2, 2006 22:35:35 GMT
AFAIR Justine Greening, the incoming MP after the last election, said that she would sort the Wimbledon line out in a minimum of time. Hasn't she done it yet??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 22:35:38 GMT
Edit: This post was made at exactly the same time as the above two, so I may repeat them!
In actual fact, the WImbledon branch is the best served branch on the DIsrtict. The line is almost full to capacity, with trains running every few minutes... Of course that's during perfect conditions!
The Tory MP for Putney is Justine Greening and she has successfully campaigned to get certain other trains diverted from elsewhere to Wimbledon in the peak. She also has regular meetings with senior District managers, so she's the best one to contact if you have any suggestions.
I'm not quite sure how you see trains 'relatively empty' heading towards Ealing and Richmond... I can assure you that those two branches are just as heavily used as the Wimbledon branch is in the peaks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2006 23:00:16 GMT
The Tory MP for Putney is Justine Greening and she has successfully campaigned to get certain other trains diverted from elsewhere to Wimbledon in the peak. She also has regular meetings with senior District managers, so she's the best one to contact if you have any suggestions. I'm not quite sure how you see trains 'relatively empty' heading towards Ealing and Richmond... I can assure you that those two branches are just as heavily used as the Wimbledon branch is in the peaks. Yep, the extra train on the Wimbledon branch at the expense of the Olympia branch, during the peaks, that will be implemented with the new timetable from June onwards. I also don't agree that Richmond and Ealing trains are "relatively" empty - and think there's a loss of perspective there. I see many passengers use the District Line between Hammersmith and Central London; the trains are fairly busy upto and from Hammersmith during Sats and certainly during the MF peaks all the way to Richmond and Ealing. And I can also see when the change mentioned above gets implemented, you will have people on the Olympia branch complaining about why one of their trains has been used to served the Wimbledon branch! I wonder if the campaigners understood what the consequences of their simple sounding demands would be? Its not as simple as to say: "more trains to Wimbledon"
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,317
|
Post by Colin on Apr 2, 2006 23:50:08 GMT
From my perspective as ex station staff at Earls Court, the only customers that ever complained on the westbound platforms were Wimbledon bound customers. In fairness though, most of those using Ealing and Richmond trains have other alternatives (ie, Picc to Hammersmith/Acton) - so are easier to please when gaps occur.
The Wimbledon service can suffer from reliability problems in the evening peak, but the timetable has a train every 4 mins - that's every other train coming from as far away as barking with a 4 minute window. Now let's be fair, we do pretty well most days of the week - it's that perception thing kicking again isn't it? A couple of dodgy days, maybe Chelsea are at home - and our names mud again.
IMHO - one of the biggest problems with the Wimbledon branch in the evening peak, is the position of the station exits at Fulham Broadway (was worse), Putney Bridge, Southfields and Wimbledon. These are the busiest stations, meaning the first four cars are always rammed full in the evening peak. If people would actually spread out along the train, the journey wouldn't be half as bad.
And that's something that always makes me laugh - apparently we force people to travel in worse conditions than cattle - since when were all the customers for Southfields banned from using the five other cars? we don't force customers to 'kiss the windows'....they squash themselves on.
Then there's the complaints about the confusing platform indicators at Earls Court............
[note to self - stop ranting!!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 9:56:46 GMT
Just to continue on the Wimbledon theme, do Wimbledon branch trains routinely terminate at Putney Bridge, unless they're being reversed / turned there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 10:24:06 GMT
I don't think it is a routine manoeuvre, except for road training etc.
Although during service disruptions C's do turn back there and D's at Parsons Green. Somewhere i was told that D's couldn't turn back at Putney Bridge, as there isn't enough space in the bay.
Which is quite correct, but i pointed out to my friend that there is a crossover just south of the station for D Stock to turn back.
Has anyone got any pictures of such a movement? as i would be interested to see them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 10:52:42 GMT
There is one D stock late at night timetabled to reverse via Putney Bridge I believe, although I've never done it (it's an Earl's Court duty). You are quite correct that the bay platform at Putney Bridge isn't quite long enough to take a D stock, so if we need to reverse a D, they have to go onto the bridge, stop, change ends and get the shunt signal back into the eastbound. This obviously takes time, so the most usual option for D stocks is reversing via Parsons Green sidings.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,424
|
Post by DWS on Apr 3, 2006 11:43:06 GMT
Some time ago the Wimbledon Branch was to become part of a new underground line, the Chelsea - Hackney line, but it was never to be built due to reasons I have forgotten.
|
|
|
Post by chbus04 on Apr 3, 2006 13:49:38 GMT
I cannot see the Chelsea-Hackney line being built, so as long as there is a Wimbledon branch on the District Line, passengers to Wimbledon from Zone 1 may suffer delays. Although this is the heaviest used and the most frequently scheduled of the three western branches, when trains are cancelled to Ealing and Richmond, trains are diverted to cover gaps. So, if you are waiting longer than 5 minutes for a Wimbledon train at Earls Court, it is quite likely that your train has been diverted to cover for a cancellation to either of the other two branches.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Apr 3, 2006 16:36:59 GMT
The Tory MP for Putney is Justine Greening and she has successfully campaigned to get certain other trains diverted from elsewhere to Wimbledon in the peak. She also has regular meetings with senior District managers, so she's the best one to contact if you have any suggestions. But why have they listened to her? She obviously has a biased opinion and is only interested in her branch - if that screws up the Ealing or Richmond lines she doesn't care, because they don't vote for her!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2006 16:54:56 GMT
Some time ago the Wimbledon Branch was to become part of a new underground line, the Chelsea - Hackney line, but it was never to be built due to reasons I have forgotten. The Chelsea-Hackney proposal is now part of Crossrail Line 2, which will run to Clapham Junction and beyond, and not use the District's Wimbledon branch. Not that it'll ever get built anyway.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 6, 2006 9:29:45 GMT
So how do you like your 3 minutely peak service to Wimbledon then?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,317
|
Post by Colin on Apr 6, 2006 9:57:13 GMT
This week (in relation to the Richmond possesion) i've heard 'em moaning cos Wimbledon gets too full at times, and "it's slowing everything down" - customers words, not mine.......... We'll never win .
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 6, 2006 20:06:44 GMT
Wimbledon just cannot cope with a train more than every 4 minutes. Thats why were blocking back from Southfields during the peaks. A 3 minutely service is impossible as it takes roughly 2 mins to get in and 2 mins to get out of Wimbledon. This week came in handy to illustrate our point regarding Wimbledon branch frequencies though.
|
|
|
Post by cbrownuk on Oct 29, 2006 14:00:53 GMT
Off peak it is worse, mainly in the evenings. Passengers for Wimbledon crowd the platforms at Earls Court while two trains often each go to Ealing Broadway and Richmond, with few people getting on.
Surely that is just poor timetabling.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,317
|
Post by Colin on Oct 29, 2006 15:38:32 GMT
After the evening peak, say from around 7pm, some trains go out of service. The sensible place to put them at the west end of the line is Ealing Common depot - that is why customers often get the impression of more Ealing trains.
Should the Richmond branch then have a gap in the service, a D stock Wimbledon train may get diverted to go there [as Wimbledon has double the frequency of other braches, it's easier to use one of these].
You are then left with the C stocks supplying the Wimbledon branch service - which leaves customers with the impression that Wimbledon is no longer part of the District line.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2006 20:03:19 GMT
The biggest problem with the Wimbledon service is the layout at Earl's Court - the missing crossovers result in a severe bottleneck that prevent the Line Controllers from having 'two on the trot' to Wimbledon after a diversion.
A scissors crossover between the e/b lines west of the e/b island and a scissors crossover on the w/b lines at the top of the diveunder would significantly improve the flexibility of EC, with the biggest advantage being that incoming Wimbledon trains can now use BOTH sides of the e/b island, and a shutdown in pfm2 doesn't completely b****r that particular branch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2006 21:02:47 GMT
i agree when their is a problem in platform 2 the whole service to wimbledon becomes useless why dont lul see that is they did the work in the area then even with a problem in one of the 2 platforms then a good service could still operate through earls court
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2006 21:12:27 GMT
I suspect that when the area was simplified back in the early 1960s during the Great Resignalling, the Wimbledon branch was either a LOT less busy than it is today, or the Richmond and Ealing routes were considered more important.
|
|