Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on Oct 28, 2006 20:07:44 GMT
For ease of reference, I've quoted this from another thread: As promised, here is the 'S' Stock numbering scheme. The 8 car Mets are as follows: Train 001 = (DM)21002-(M1)22002-(M2)23002-(MS)24002/(MS)24001-(M2)23001-(M1)22001-(DM)21001 Train 002 = (DM)21004-(M1)22004-(M2)23004-(MS)24004/(MS)24003-(M2)23003-(M1)22003-(DM)21003 and so on until Train 27 which starts the M2 car de-icing units: Train 027 = (DM)21054-(M1)22054-(M2D)25054-(MS)24054/(MS)24053-(M2)23053-(M1)22053-(DM)21053 All the way through to: Train 072 = (DM)21144-(M1)22144-(M2D)25144-(MS)24144/(MS)24143-(M2)23143-(M1)22143-(DM)21143 Which means all 8 car trains have a middle digit of 0 or 1. The 7 Car C&H/District are as follows: Train 073 = (DM)21202-(M1)22202-(M2)23202-(MS)24202/(MS)24201-(M1)22201-(DM)21201 and so on until Train 142 which, again, starts the M2 car de-icing units: Train 142 = (DM)21340-(M1)22340-(M2D)25340-(MS)24340/(MS)24339-(M1)22339-(DM)21339 All the way through to: Train 190 = (DM)21436-(M1)22436-(M2D)25436-(MS)24436/(MS)24435-(M1)22435-(DM)21435 Which means all 7 car trains have a middle digit of 2, 3, or 4. All trains start life with even numbers as the North/West end and all odd numbers on the South/East end. This will all change of course within mere moments of hitting LU metals when they get turned for the first time! Just one thing I'd like to raise at this time - at the moment, using connect, we can call the leading car of a train using it's four digit car number. We can also call each other's hand helds using their 5 digit number. Spot the potential issue yet? I have a funny feeling that at some point in the future 5 didgit car numbers won't mix well with 5 digit hand held numbers........I wonder if it might be an idea to re-think the numbering scheme?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2006 20:24:20 GMT
Agreed. The numbering of the train units should be in a high range, assuming that the Connect numbers are in the low range.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on Oct 28, 2006 20:41:52 GMT
Not sure quite how I worked it out, but I reckon there'll be something in the region of 8,000 - 9,000 Connect hand helds in use, once the system is fully up & running.
Does anyone know how many permutations are possible with five digits (I ain't that clever ;D)?
If a four digit system could be devised that would work with the current stocks (for the transition period), surely it'd be a better solution?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2006 20:45:34 GMT
9000 nPr 5 = 5.8983 x 10^19. I think you asked the wrong question
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on Oct 28, 2006 20:54:06 GMT
Ok then smarty pants ;D ;D
Using the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 - how many combinations of five digit numbers can you make?
EDIT: is the answer obvious? ie, 9,999? If so, that'd leave 999 combinations available for trains.
Hmmmmmm........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2006 20:56:32 GMT
5.8983 x 10^19 - 5.8 thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand, times 10.
I was merely referring to whether or not this is the answer you wanted to hear ;D
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 28, 2006 23:05:08 GMT
But if Connect is rolling out over the whole system, somebody must have thought of it already. Look at car numbers for the Central, the Jubbly, the Northern.................
Hopefully that problem will not arise.
Oh, and the answer for 5 digits is 100,000 combinations
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2006 19:56:45 GMT
Precisely, Phil - COLIN wanted to know how many ways there were to arrange the headsets, when instead he should have asked how many ways there were to arrange the digits 0-9. which I actually missed
|
|
|
Post by orienteer on Oct 30, 2006 21:36:23 GMT
Proud user of Teh Second Fox of Fire
So much for the spell checker then! ;D
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on Oct 31, 2006 9:15:02 GMT
orienteer - what has that got to do with this thread?
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 31, 2006 9:40:08 GMT
orienteer - what has that got to do with this thread? He has just noticed TheOneKEA's sig, which has been the same since time in memoriam! But to digress even further (!!!) TOK is right - the more I use Firefox 2.0 the more I like it. Best browser setup ever.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Nov 6, 2006 20:40:37 GMT
Getting back to the thread (wow, me getting back on subject?), I don't think anyone has thought of this. I will ask some questions and let you know, it's a good point though Colin. Thanks.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on May 9, 2007 5:59:09 GMT
Bumpety bump!!
prjb - did you ever find out an answer to my little poser?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 16, 2007 18:10:17 GMT
The engineers seem to think that this may not have been thought of and have fed the info to the Connect team. I will chase them up and find out what is happening. Sorry for not getting back to you mate.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on May 17, 2007 2:11:15 GMT
As long as it's been passed on to the relevant people, my/your job is done (but as I'm a nosey b*gger, I'd still be interested in knowing the answer ;D ;D)
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 17, 2007 11:36:38 GMT
Oh a bit like the current conundrum - not with car numbers but with set numbers. Same meat different gravy though. Given that they are working to allow certain safety procedures to be possible via the Connect system, they need to overcome the problem that has already arisen where I work. There are times when I can call 2 train 202s and they can of course both be in the Kings Cross area (Circle and Victoria.) This is just one example of course. This is with only a handful of lines enabled. Imagine when the Bakerloo and Picc join in - they both use 2xx series as well. The responses so far from the Connect team have been more or less thus: CONNECT: Give each line a series, so H&C can have 001-100, District 101-200 and so on. LUL: Fair enough, except there are more than 10 lines CONNECT: Oh LUL: And we don't use 8s and 9s CONNECT: (Bigger) Oh. Well why don't you use some 4 digit set numbers? Or update your systems to use 8s and 9s. Or both. LUL: Thank you Mr Connect for providing the end user with a product that immediately adapts to our need. Yes of course we will change to meet what you can provide. (Made that last bit up, but maybe that's what we should be saying)
|
|
|
Post by 100andthirty on May 17, 2007 17:53:13 GMT
I'm confused and I'd appreciate a bit more information
We run only 530 or so trains. Once all the upgrades are done there'll be less than 600. With three digit train/set numbers, there should be plenty.
I'm aware that the car number is coded into the connect radio. Surely the only area of confusion could be with the Picc, and their set numbers could, for example be 900 plus. I think I've missed the point along the way
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,313
|
Post by Colin on May 17, 2007 19:43:51 GMT
Have a look at the first post on the first page of this thread
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on May 17, 2007 19:59:45 GMT
I'm confused and I'd appreciate a bit more information We run only 530 or so trains. Once all the upgrades are done there'll be less than 600. With three digit train/set numbers, there should be plenty. I'm aware that the car number is coded into the connect radio. Surely the only area of confusion could be with the Picc, and their set numbers could, for example be 900 plus. I think I've missed the point along the way Ahh - but the way the dispatcher terminals work is that you call a train/set number (as from a Service Controller or Operators point of view, that is what is important), but the system will allow you to then select ANY trains with that set number, anywhere on the system. Thus, the District Controller calls Train 211 at Victoria, and is then given a choice of two car numbers to select - one Victoria line and one Circle. the other problem is that, with the new stock numbering, since it is possible to call an individual car number (providing it has a cab and a connect radio fitted of course ), or an individual handset or dispatcher terminal number directly, there could be a problem arising whereby there is a handset that has the same number as an individual car.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,429
|
Post by Chris M on May 17, 2007 20:50:21 GMT
Well there shouldn't be a problem (in this regard) if individual handsets are allocated numbers that collide with cars without cabs - if shunters need to be contacted while shunting from a driving position other than a cab (is this common? are shunters on connect?) then I'd have thought that contacting them via there individual handsets would be sufficient?
Whether this will cause problems in another area of operations I don't know though.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on May 18, 2007 10:32:47 GMT
We run only 530 or so trains. Once all the upgrades are done there'll be less than 600. With three digit train/set numbers, there should be plenty. It's a common discussion that there are over 600 numbers to choose from with our current usage, and yet far fewer than that trains running around. However, just as National Rail use certain numbers/letters to identify where a train is going to/from, so do we to a certain extent. The current numbering makes monitoring the service as a whole muh easier, as you can tell more or less where the train is going, which depot it starts from/ stables at and whether the train is a peak-hours only working or not. Historically, LU has chosen the number series for each line based on its interaction with other lines. This was to help avoid the possibility of having 2 trains with the same number in the same area both listening to the same radio message. In the example I gave above, the Victoria Line is completely unattached to the Circle Line and therefore, until the "advance of this technology" never caused problems with numbe conflicts. Where larger areas of control exist, numbering also takes account of possible conflicts whereby you could in theory have 2 trains numbered the same within the control area. Computers don't take too kindly to being told train 101 is a District when in fact it could be an Uxbridge. When Aldgate was transferred to Baker Street control, the Met series of numbers were changed from 0xx to 4xx to prevent conflicts with Districts which had similar 0xx numbers. As SB says, the dispatcher unit gives the operator a choice of car numbers. In theory, once the Piccadilly and Bakerloo join Connect, there could be 4 possible 2xx numbers, as they all currently have trains using numbers in that series.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Feb 9, 2008 22:38:31 GMT
The numbering scheme has changed for 7 car 'S' Stock, I will update you all shortly (I left the file at work! ). Thought I would tell you now and update you later.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 19:17:16 GMT
Just a quick question regarding connect, Will LUL be adding the handsets to drivers equipment? So far drivers do not have to carry them. ;-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2008 2:18:23 GMT
Just a quick question regarding connect, Will LUL be adding the handsets to drivers equipment? So far drivers do not have to carry them. ;-) Funnily, I had this conversation with the Upminster DMT a couple of hours ago. His theory is that if the handsets became part of our PPE, there would need to be several spare handsets always available in case a driver forgot or lost his handset, these would also need the numbers logging when issued. Whilst they are happy to have spare handlamps, hi-vis and timetables around, connect handsets are a lot more expensive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2008 19:35:52 GMT
Out of 200 drivers at neasden i'm guessing only a dozen carry the handsets and out of that only a couple have them switched on. I carry mine but its not switched on, I have only discovered recently that the auto phone facility has been activated which is good news.
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Jul 21, 2008 12:30:44 GMT
LUL: And we don't use 8s and 9s Is it true that the reason for that is somewhere in control or communications sytems there is still octal based gubbins that can only deal with eight different digits (or at least leading digits?). Netherlands railways certainly still has sich a restriction on some of its devices - they use digits 1 - 8 (translated at I/O devices from octal 0 - 7) and not 0 and 9. -- Nick
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jul 21, 2008 12:37:05 GMT
LUL: And we don't use 8s and 9s Is it true that the reason for that is somewhere in control or communications sytems there is still octal based gubbins that can only deal with eight different digits (or at least leading digits?). Netherlands railways certainly still has sich a restriction on some of its devices - they use digits 1 - 8 (translated at I/O devices from octal 0 - 7) and not 0 and 9. -- Nick Yes, it is probably most of the network where 8, 9 and numbers above 377 are impossible! Anywhere with Programme Machines, Piccadilly PLCs, C&H Signalling Centre at Baker St (though might be a bit more high tech there). Not sure about the Central and Jubilee line extension.
|
|