|
Post by tubeprune on Jun 5, 2007 6:13:07 GMT
I am sure someone must have asked this before but I can't find the thread. Why do the train describers on the Northern regularly show destinations at either end of the line on the same display such as:
1. Edgware 2. Kennington,
seen recently at Charing X NB or
1. Morden 2. Edgware
seen at TCR SB?
It doesn't seem to happen on the City branch. I have a theory that it's something to do with identifying Kennington Loop reversers but I would be interested to hear the real story.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jun 5, 2007 6:33:54 GMT
I have seen a Morden description quite a few times at London Bridge N/B.
As for the reason, pure guess, as I am not a techie, wrong PTI codes by the T/op?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2007 8:06:42 GMT
Don't know anything about the new Northern stock, but i'm assuming the driver enters the PTI into a computer which somehow gets the train up on the dot matrix via Cobourg St, signallers etc. However, i can rememeber seeing the same thing from time to time when the 59 and 72s were running about down there, and I know there was no technology of that nature on those beasts.
While on the subject of train describers, why is it that they can't describe all destinations? Surely it's just a matter of typing it in? eg; Districts to West Ken at the weekend were up as Ealings, west side of the circle can't (or won't) show Kings Cross for the last outer rail Circle, Lambeth North reversers on the Bakerloo are shown as Waterloo or Elephant, Circles reformed into Districts on the inner rail show Edgware Rd only til Edgware Rd before they become Wimbledons yet the driver and LC know since Moorgate. I've also seen descriptions on the Edgware Rd boards of Northfields, Richmond when the signalman has been bored on nights (station closed obviously!) when there are never any trains booked to run passenger from ERD to these places. Which makes me wonder whether the Bakerloo describers are capable of showing Watford, Stanmore etc, the Picc Aldwych, Central, Ongar etc. The mind boggles...
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Jun 5, 2007 8:36:14 GMT
While on the subject of train describers, why is it that they can't describe all destinations? Surely it's just a matter of typing it in? eg; Districts to West Ken at the weekend were up as Ealings, west side of the circle can't (or won't) show Kings Cross for the last outer rail Circle, Lambeth North reversers on the Bakerloo are shown as Waterloo or Elephant, Circles reformed into Districts on the inner rail show Edgware Rd only til Edgware Rd before they become Wimbledons yet the driver and LC know since Moorgate. I've also seen descriptions on the Edgware Rd boards of Northfields, Richmond when the signalman has been bored on nights (station closed obviously!) when there are never any trains booked to run passenger from ERD to these places. Which makes me wonder whether the Bakerloo describers are capable of showing Watford, Stanmore etc, the Picc Aldwych, Central, Ongar etc. The mind boggles... As far as Sub-Surface Lines are concerned, except for the area controlled by Baker St SCC (Aldgate to Wembley) the train describer system in use was that installed circa 1960/61. This is relay based and uses five TD code lines known as ABCDE. Simple arithmetic shows that there are only 31 different combinations (the 32nd (00000) option indicates no code being transmitted). Thus on any given line there are only 31 different Train Descriptions that can be displayed. While you might think this is quite a lot those in regular use rapidly use up this allocation particularly when you allow for the fact that you have to be able to maintain this one code for the entire length of the journey of that train. e.g. the code for trains to Hammersmith via Kings Cross cannot be used on the WB District west of Tower Hill because any such destination might be required for a train starting it's westbound journey at a point east of Aldgate East where the code is in use for the Hammersmith trains. Also being of such vintage the system still carries descriptions that are no longer used such as the Hounslow or Northfields descriptions you referred to earlier. Baker St SCC does have a wider range of train descriptions, being computer based but when trains pass out of it's area of control it is back to the old ABCDE system and so even the SCC can only transmit the 31 different descriptions. Oh and when circles are reformed to Districts on the Inner Rail, the driver and line controller may know well in advance but the signalman at Baker Street does not because no-one bothers to tell him more than to put train 2xx up as an Edgware Road. In theory this avoids confusion to passengers who are not expecting trains on the Circle or H&C to go to Wimbledon. Baker St SCC does have a Wimbledon via Kings Cross description but we are not sure what TD this transmits to the signalman at Edgware Road when reverting to the old ABCDE system.
|
|
|
Post by citysig on Jun 5, 2007 13:05:30 GMT
Sorry to continue the off-thread tangent but, strangely enough District TDs were tested yesterday following a brief meeting with someone involved on the information upgrade project.
I had suspected some of the results from my time at Edgware Road.
Wimbledon - displays on westbound platforms within our control at least from Moorgate onwards. Does not transmit to Edgware Road Putney Bridge - displays on westbound platforms from Kings Cross and will transmit to Edgware Road (although it won't be seen by the signalman until the signal clears for the platform.) Parsons Green - displays on our platforms from Kings Cross but does not appear to transmit to Edgware Road.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2007 21:39:37 GMT
Going back to the Northern Line's (and Victoria's) train identification system, I was under the impression that drivers switch the destination at the stop before the terminus e.g Waterloo SB, South Wimbledon SB on the Northern, Stockwell SB on the Victoria Line.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jun 6, 2007 7:22:19 GMT
So how is the PTI supposed to work on the Northern? Are there Rx locations approaching each interlocking?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2007 15:50:50 GMT
there should be a various points on the line PTI arriels on the line controllers diagram and signal diagrams it would look like a folk but yes manily from each control site to another
going back to the ABCDE codes the only one with a E code is anything displaying a MET/H&C/CIRCLE code for instance if at Earls court they recieved a ABCD and that turned out to be a Upminster (not sure what the code is) but instaed got a ABCDE it would not show nothing and the regulator would just get a red X on there diagram
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jun 7, 2007 20:13:28 GMT
My theory is that the TD system is geared to send SB descriptions of train reversing via Kennington loop to the next NB destination if the programme machines are working on programme only.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 7, 2007 23:18:40 GMT
My theory is that the TD system is geared to send SB descriptions of train reversing via Kennington loop to the next NB destination if the programme machines are working on programme only. <much whirring of cranial cogs> I think you might very well be right - however I say this guardedly; after looking at the various textbooks on programme machine wiring and a couple of Northern perils that give the ABCD(E) codes - there doesn't seem to be a 'don't send this code back in the other direction' code or a filter to initiate a fresh code. There is the push-button 'XCL' Kennington Loop via Charing Cross - which (of course) isn't programme-only operation. I hasten to add that I'm only looking at textbook examples rather than specific locations. However, is there not the code ABD - Kennington Loop via CX? On further digging it seems that ABD was used from Finchley Central and ABCD from Edgware for this destination- could it be that these codes and anomalous descriptions are a hangover from the installation of the programme machines? ABD was also used at Archway for the loop. Hmm, think this is a 'two-pipe problem'
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,105
|
Post by Tom on Jun 8, 2007 8:37:28 GMT
I have been told the answer to this one, but I can't for the life of me remember what it is.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 8, 2007 17:27:19 GMT
I've thought on this some more to-day and my gut feeling is that ABCD SB does get transmitted NB - but I've got to check through what few ABCD codes I've got a note of for the Northern. Sadly I've not got a copy of Peril 38/1968 [1] which I think will give the TD codes for the converging branches . [1] in one of the documents I was looking at last night - think it was installation of programme machines at Golders - there was a helpful note saying 'Train descriptions will be transmitted in the manner outlined as per TC Supplement 38/68 for Camden Town' Grrrrrr. ;D The answer (in part at least) I suspect lies in which machine does what at Kennington. And of course the PTI codes - I'm the wrong side of the village to read my set at the moment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2007 22:09:23 GMT
I have been told the answer to this one, but I can't for the life of me remember what it is. That sounds like Palmerston on the Schleswig-Holstein question
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2007 1:43:16 GMT
I think that I once saw a 1995TS heading southbound with a northbound description on the front that had the platform describers showing Kennington, but I can't remember clearly enough to say.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2007 14:52:59 GMT
I see fairly often a Northbound train heading north with a southbound destination. In fact I belive when Alex visited we witnessed such an event.
Additionally southbound trains that have been extended from Kennington. They show Kennington on the station staff PIMs screen but the platform indicator is simply blank.
Then not forgetting trains with the train number programmed but not the destination which come up with "check destination on front of train" and of course the 477 train, which is a train not entered correctly into the PTI (normally a zero has been incorrectly not/ added so I'm told) which then hides all the trains travelling behind it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2007 20:03:49 GMT
at belsize park northbound i saw a destination which read high barnet via charing x was it the driver keying the wrong pti code?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2007 22:16:54 GMT
I recently travelled northbound from Clapham Common, and the station announcements were running in southbound sequence - very confusing!
|
|
|
Post by jimini on Jul 10, 2007 21:59:21 GMT
One more example tonight-- got a S/B train at London Bridge about 2200. The Platform indicator said Edgware, although the train correctly said Morden. Upon arrival at Colliers Wood, the platform board said Edgware via Bank. There were a few confused faces at London Bridge this evening!
|
|
|
Post by nexus6 on Aug 5, 2007 18:21:28 GMT
I understand there are PTI readers placed on the track (looks like a flat-ish metal box) which reads the information entered by the TO on the TMS. It then displays this information, i.e. the train's destination, on the describer. However, I have seen it display "check front of train for destination" even though I have entered the correct PTI code. It usually corrects itself after a few stations, though. Also, the other day I was going to High Barnet via Bank and the describer said I was going to Edgware via Charing Cross (?!) Glitches happen I guess.
If you find yourself at Edgware station, take a look at describers there - they usually display heiroglyphics with a bit of English thrown in for good measure. Bizarre.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2007 18:23:03 GMT
One at London Bridge NB used to show H[blank] NET and the scroll text was also missing where it passed the relevant section...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2007 19:24:19 GMT
I understand there are PTI readers placed on the track (looks like a flat-ish metal box) which reads the information entered by the TO on the TMS. It then displays this information, i.e. the train's destination, on the describer. However, I have seen it display "check front of train for destination" even though I have entered the correct PTI code. It usually corrects itself after a few stations, though. Also, the other day I was going to High Barnet via Bank and the describer said I was going to Edgware via Charing Cross (?!) Glitches happen I guess. Some of the trains have defective PTI and don't transmit correctly to the equipment. They come up on the displays at Cobourg St as 000XXX in place of train number and destination code, and if you ever sit in the control room for any length of time you will hear the signal ops saying "train so-and-so is noughts and crosses" which confused the life out of me when I first went there as I had no idea what they were talking about!!!
|
|