towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,886
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 21:30:31 GMT
Post by towerman on Aug 30, 2006 21:30:31 GMT
New timetable starting 17th September for reopening of T4 loop,slight adjustments to Uxbridge branch plus spares provided for events at new Arsenal Stadium.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 21:49:38 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2006 21:49:38 GMT
Where will the spares be kept until they are needed in service?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 22:05:53 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2006 22:05:53 GMT
At a wild guess I'd say Arnos Grove
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 22:25:11 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2006 22:25:11 GMT
At a wild guess I'd say Arnos Grove Maybe putting a manned train in Wood Green siding prior to event finish would allow for better reaction times to late running matches, extra time, or unpredictable pop concer finish times? The journey time to Finsbury Park would be at a rough guess approx 10 mins shorter than trains entering service from Arnos Grove sidings or Cockfosters depot. Obviously this is only going to help for one train.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 23:13:07 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2006 23:13:07 GMT
Where will the spares be kept until they are needed in service? The spares will be kept in Cockfosters Depot for use as required. The way its actually worked out is rather complicated, and thats mainly because of the duty sheet constraints that we worked around in providing the spare trains - and to be honest I struggled to understand them myself!! From memory, it goes like this: there are three spare trains per night. WTT 42 offers times for which they can be used - the times are meant for events which are expected to finish around a time when the Picc line is operating at 21 TPH (when the Picc line is operating 21 TPH, then no spare trains are required the research conducted by others shows this is sufficient) So this typically would be on a weeknight when an Arsenal match would finish at 10pm roughly - but thats one example. Mondays - Saturdays, the spare trains start and stable at Northfields Depot - so they will run to Oakwood Depot to stand spare as required, to return to Northfields Depot by a specified time. Sundays, the spare trains are sourced from Cockfosters Depot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 30, 2006 23:17:33 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2006 23:17:33 GMT
At a wild guess I'd say Arnos Grove Maybe putting a manned train in Wood Green siding prior to event finish would allow for better reaction times to late running matches, extra time, or unpredictable pop concer finish times? The journey time to Finsbury Park would be at a rough guess approx 10 mins shorter than trains entering service from Arnos Grove sidings or Cockfosters depot. Obviously this is only going to help for one train. Keeping a spare train in Wood Green - there are pros and cons to dong that. I think there are more cons in doing that as it blocks Wood Green as a reversing point for late running, for the sake of one spare train. It does take more time for the spare train to run from Oakwood to Arsenal than it does to run from Wood Green to Arsenal. What I have noticed being done is that any Arsenal event - whether it overruns or not, some trains run empty WB to Arsenal to entrain football passengers. And I think thats a more productive idea. Typically they do this to trains that reverse at Arnos Grove in the timetable - they run empty on their WB trip to Arsenal, then pick up. But Arnos Grove reversers don't happen thoughout the timetable day.
|
|
|
WTT42
Aug 31, 2006 10:11:14 GMT
Post by Tomcakes on Aug 31, 2006 10:11:14 GMT
Maybe putting a manned train in Wood Green siding prior to event finish would allow for better reaction times to late running matches, extra time, or unpredictable pop concer finish times? Amazing how the London Underground service frequency can be dictated by a bunch of footballers, or a pop "singer" deciding they're going to spend a bit longer pretending to sing or whatever. What's the problem in setting a finish time for such an event and scheduling extra trains for that time and then sticking to it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 31, 2006 10:17:13 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2006 10:17:13 GMT
|
|
|
WTT42
Aug 31, 2006 20:10:23 GMT
Post by trc666 on Aug 31, 2006 20:10:23 GMT
What about using the King's Cross Loop as a siding? This is hardly ever used anyway, and wouldn't block the area for early reversals.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,100
|
WTT42
Aug 31, 2006 20:51:13 GMT
Post by Tom on Aug 31, 2006 20:51:13 GMT
What about using the King's Cross Loop as a siding? This is hardly ever used anyway, and wouldn't block the area for early reversals. But it would block the area while the train shunts off the main line. Likewise the loop is only connected to the EB so when a train needs to go west it results in the EB service being affected for the shunt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Aug 31, 2006 22:00:14 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2006 22:00:14 GMT
Maybe putting a manned train in Wood Green siding prior to event finish would allow for better reaction times to late running matches, extra time, or unpredictable pop concer finish times? What's the problem in setting a finish time for such an event and scheduling extra trains for that time and then sticking to it! The nature of these events means that the finishing time can sometimes be unpredicable. You can't stop a football match halfway through extra time, or stop Madonna from doing an encore because the first train is about the leave the sidings! Within reason a public transport system should fit around its demand, not the demand fitting around the transport system. It's common practise on many metro systems for spare trains to be added to the service when required after a big event. Unfortunately as LU's infrastructure pre-dates most stadia, then it doesn't have the luxury of having train stabling at the point of the event. This makes the timetabling for events harder. However, on the other hand LU does have a very good off-peak service, with spare capacity for events, making the need for extra trains lower.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 0:16:21 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2006 0:16:21 GMT
Maybe putting a manned train in Wood Green siding prior to event finish would allow for better reaction times to late running matches, that will never happen drivers do not sit on empty spare trains in sidings underground. anyways, that shower of brown stuff at the emerates toilet do not have enough fans to warrant extra trains ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 7:51:16 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2006 7:51:16 GMT
so does ythat mean less pic traines to uxbridge is this luls attempt to start pulling pic services out of uxbridge like they are considering when t5 opens
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 16:42:54 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2006 16:42:54 GMT
so does ythat mean less pic traines to uxbridge is this luls attempt to start pulling pic services out of uxbridge like they are considering when t5 opens No - there is still the same level of service to Uxbridge as before - and there are no changes planned for a few years yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 16:52:42 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2006 16:52:42 GMT
What about using the King's Cross Loop as a siding? This is hardly ever used anyway, and wouldn't block the area for early reversals. I don't see that being practical. Could only hold one spare train to run EB to help with EB traffic from Arsenal station. Getting that spare train to Kings Cross Loop in place, would be a big pain as well. The train would have travel EB to Kings Cross, and reverse - into Kings Cross loop, which would cause a big hold up, even if you're a running a basic 5 minute train service. Using Green Park/Down Street siding was considered at one stage - but that idea was abandoned. And as another poster has indicated above, drivers don't sit on empty spare trains in sidings for extended periods of time. Mentioning Kings Cross loop is interesting though - I don't think Picc drivers are even road trained for that area. Kings Cross loop is frequently used by Northern Line trains to reverse, to recover from late running. (as the loop is accessible from both the Picc line and the Northern line) - and its only able to hold one train AFAIK. The Northern Line would hate it if the Picc started using Kings Cross loop!
|
|
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 19:14:24 GMT
Post by trc666 on Sept 1, 2006 19:14:24 GMT
How about Barons Court or Acton Town sidings? Mind you, there is the potential that it would screw up early reversals at Acton, but Barons Court is very rarely used as a reversing point these days.
The Aldwych platform at Holborn could have been another stabling point but then again this would involve reversing just beyond the station to reach the platform. This could be done quicker if the train was double manned.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,405
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 19:58:40 GMT
Post by Chris M on Sept 1, 2006 19:58:40 GMT
And as another poster has indicated above, drivers don't sit on empty spare trains in sidings for extended periods of time. Does/would the time spent in the siding on an empty train in sidings be counted as part of a driver's driving hours, even if they are not driving it? If so then this reduce the flexiblity as there are a maximum number of consecutive hours driving a driver can legally do - they might leave the sidings with only 30 minutes left before they needed a break, whereas if they were in a depot waiting they would start with the maximum time?
|
|
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 21:26:31 GMT
Post by c5 on Sept 1, 2006 21:26:31 GMT
And as another poster has indicated above, drivers don't sit on empty spare trains in sidings for extended periods of time. Does/would the time spent in the siding on an empty train in sidings be counted as part of a driver's driving hours, even if they are not driving it? Yes. Train Operator's can work a 5 hour 15 minute duty before a meal break, but can only drive for 4 hours and 15 minutes before meal break. Also mealbreaks agreements are in place which means that meal breaks shoud be taken at a Train Crew Depot (though there maybe local/historical diferences and of course it varies during an "Emergency")
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WTT42
Sept 1, 2006 22:55:25 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2006 22:55:25 GMT
if they were in a depot waiting they would start with the maximum time? No. Unless the driver had a full meal relief before getting on the train in the depot then the clock would not be set back to zero.
|
|