Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 16:03:12 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 16:03:12 GMT
Me again. I was wondering what was meant by this kind of signal numbering. So, for example, on the Jubilee before resignalling, on the SB between Swiss Cottage and Baker Street you had:
A231 (Swiss cottage starter), A2311, A237, A2371, A259 (St. John's Wood starter), A2591, A261, A263, A2631 R265/1, A2632 R265/2, A265...
What does the Annn1, Annn2 numbering scheme denote?
|
|
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 16:36:28 GMT
Post by revupminster on Jul 31, 2014 16:36:28 GMT
I need help here. Four numbers on a signal plate generally meant it was a Draw-up (in my day a Permissive) signal that worked with the semi automatic signal ahead usually controlling a junction. It would not clear to green unless the speed of the train was reduced to a safe breaking distance that the signal ahead at red was protecting.
For automatic signals it may have been some form of speed control.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 17:20:21 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 17:20:21 GMT
lots of speed inductors in them days but yes AXXXX are speed controlled
|
|
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 17:24:33 GMT
Post by v52gc on Jul 31, 2014 17:24:33 GMT
They can also be used when a signal has been added between two existing ones
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 17:24:51 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 17:24:51 GMT
Okay thanks both of you Presumably in the cases I've given these signals are just for changes in PSR, or for ensuring that the PSR/line speed limit is observed, since these are located on perfectly plain stretches of track?
|
|
|
Annn1
Jul 31, 2014 18:29:39 GMT
Post by Harsig on Jul 31, 2014 18:29:39 GMT
I'm wondering if the examples you quote above might be 'Round-The-Benders'. This is slang for additional signals that were installed in curved tunnel sections in the years following the Stratford collision of 1953, with the sole purpose of ensuring that there was always at least one signal capable of displaying a red aspect visible to drivers at all times. They had no purpose with respect to headway as they had the same limit of control as the signal in rear.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 11:59:07 GMT
Post by Tom on Aug 2, 2014 11:59:07 GMT
I'd agree with Harsig that they are 'round the bend' signals. Generally if a new signal were to be added between existing ones and the number sequence didn't fit some renumbering would take place rather than adding a signal with a four digit number. Using tut's example, there are plenty of gaps in the sequence; A233, A235, A239-A257 are all skipped.
That said, there are a few draw-up autos with four digit numbers, however the last digit is always a zero in those cases.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 12:47:12 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2014 12:47:12 GMT
Thanks I was just wondering if I might ask for some clarification. I'm not really sure I follow why, after the Stratford collision, these additional signals were considered necessary. Am I right in thinking the Stratford collision followed from a stop and proceed where the driver passed a signal at danger under rule but failed to control his speed afterwards and collided with a train in front? I thought we got SCAT for that, but I'm not really sure I follow how the additional signals would help, or how they work. Sorry, I wonder if you could just explain what is meant by having the same limit of control as the signal in rear. Ta!
|
|
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 13:28:17 GMT
Post by programmes1 on Aug 2, 2014 13:28:17 GMT
Two accidents in the 1940/50s no SCAT only the driver. Here is the link that has both reports. Stratford
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 14:29:33 GMT
Post by North End on Aug 2, 2014 14:29:33 GMT
I'd agree with Harsig that they are 'round the bend' signals. Generally if a new signal were to be added between existing ones and the number sequence didn't fit some renumbering would take place rather than adding a signal with a four digit number. Using tut's example, there are plenty of gaps in the sequence; A233, A235, A239-A257 are all skipped. That said, there are a few draw-up autos with four digit numbers, however the last digit is always a zero in those cases. The 4-digit signals seem to fit into three categories, which I presume depends on date of installation rather than anything else. 1) Basically normal signals, complete with overlaps and repeaters, at which you can come to a stand if there is a train in the section ahead. I think this basically applied to some parts of the Northern Line, certainly I've stopped at A.7171 and A.7172 between South Wimbledon and Morden, both of which also had repeaters. 2) Those without a defined overlap, and which clear at the same time as their associated headway signal, but which had repeaters. There were some around the Kennington to Embankment area, where you could see certain signals go straight from red to green over green. Presumably green over yellow would only ever be seen under failure conditions, and you would never normally stop at the 4-digit signal. 3) Those without a defined overlap, and with no repeater. There was one north of Euston CX, where if the 4-digit signal were 'on', there would be insufficient sighting distance to stop from line speed. I don't recall this ever happening however, I never ascertained if the 4-digit signal has to be proved clear in order for the preceding signal to clear. My understanding is this is certainly the case for the ones on the Bakerloo.
|
|
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 16:49:34 GMT
Post by Dstock7080 on Aug 2, 2014 16:49:34 GMT
I thought we got SCAT for that, but I'm not really sure I follow how the additional signals would help, or how they work. Sorry, I wonder if you could just explain what is meant by having the same limit of control as the signal in rear. Ta! 'SCAT' as its called now, was only introduced with the D Stock in 1980, followed by the 1983 Tube Stock, then called 'slow-speed limit'. It was only fitted to other Stock ('67/'72/'73/A/C) upon refurbishment in the early '90s. Prior to this the 'stop and proceed' Rule demanded the driver operate the train 'at caution speed' or 'at a speed to stop short of any obstruction', this was therefore governed solely by the driver.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Annn1
Aug 2, 2014 20:39:20 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2014 20:39:20 GMT
I thought we got SCAT for that, but I'm not really sure I follow how the additional signals would help, or how they work. Sorry, I wonder if you could just explain what is meant by having the same limit of control as the signal in rear. Ta! 'SCAT' as its called now, was only introduced with the D Stock in 1980, followed by the 1983 Tube Stock, then called 'slow-speed limit'. It was only fitted to other Stock ('67/'72/'73/A/C) upon refurbishment in the early '90s. Prior to this the 'stop and proceed' Rule demanded the driver operate the train 'at caution speed' or 'at a speed to stop short of any obstruction', this was therefore governed solely by the driver. Thanks for the details So I suppose the round the benders - in the absence of SCAT - would, at danger, remind the driver that s/he was proceeding under rule and that s/he needed to keep the speed down and it was a warning a train was in the section ahead? Also presumably if, say, A259 has failed and has been passed at danger under rule - if A2591 is working it will be able to show green or red and will so provide accurate information of the condition of the line ahead. I know you have to pass two clear signals before line speed can be resumed, but obviously if you pass a signal at danger after applying the rule and you come up against another signal at danger you have to go through it all again, so I suppose that's how it helps?
|
|