Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2013 20:39:49 GMT
Hello! Long time reader, first time poster so please forgive me if this is posted in the wrong place!
Anyway, what with many UK banks now offering contactless payment debit and credit cards, I wonder how this would eventually fit in with some key features of Oyster. What with its current incarnation for buses and its planned roll out to the tube at the end of the year, I understand it will have both daily capping and journey history.
What is not mentioned on the TFL website, or anywhere else I can see, is if they will support season tickets or rail cards. I understand a proper oyster card has slots to hold them in. Do contactless cards have a similair ability that may be utilised in the future or will they forever be an Oyster Lite?
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Apr 11, 2013 22:16:27 GMT
Hi, welcome to the forums! As for this thread, I can't see them going entirely, I mean, kids still need oyster cards, but not everyone (indeed, very few) has a debit card! If TfL decide that then issuing thousands of paper tickets to children, who somehow break the ticket barriers with them, is a good idea, then carry on!
|
|
|
Post by melikepie on Apr 11, 2013 22:31:26 GMT
Combining Oyster cards and bank cards is not something new. A while back Oyster was combined with a Barclaycard so it was possible to both get the money and pay by Oyster. I wonder if that is still going on.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 11, 2013 22:43:57 GMT
I agree there is not a huge level of detail of how contactless bank cards (CBCs) will work in later phases. What I have gleaned is the following - CBCs are not capable of holding a season ticket and there is no intention to make them do so. A different type of facility will be offered whereby touches of bank cards are captured via Oyster readers and then transferred and processed via a "back office system" and these are then, I think, turned into a charge drawn against the bank account which the CBC is linked to. Daily caps will be offered first and a second stage will offer weekly caps. I would guess that the weekly cap will be the same level as the equivalent weekly bus pass or Travelcard. The back office system will work out what modes are used and what geographic usage has been made with the CBC (i.e. what zones have been travelled through).
Where this really gets a bit involved is if a lot of trips are made in, say, zones 1 to 3 using buses and tubes over a week but there is also a return trip into Zone 4. What charge is made? Is it the Z1-4 travelcard for a week or the Z1-3 Travelcard for a week plus the extension fare to go into Zone 4? The system will have to be capable of working out the absolute best value scenario before a charge is made against a card holder's bank account. There are obviously an almost infinite number of possible charging combinations which the "back office" has to handle. My own view is that TfL have a real challenge on their hands to get the new capping processes to work fairly and transparently.
There are other initiatives running in parallel. The first is the modification of the Oyster system to allow the reading and processing of ITSO spec cards issued by the TOCs (ITSO on Prestige, IoP). This is due for completion later this year and Southern Railway are the vanguard TOC and are involved in joint testing with TfL (this info from TfL Board reports). The other project is called the South East Flexible Ticketing project (SEFT) which is supposed to offer ITSO smart ticketing right across all TOCs and bus companies in the South East. The government have given £45m to push this project along but the procurement process for equipment has only started recently. The original deadline was for completion in 2013 but it is now pushed back to at least 2015 based on what I read on the procurement notice. SEFT may also bring in other platforms such as mobile phones / devices equipped with NFC capability. Quite what ticket products and changes to validities will be possible with SEFT remains to be seen. I think the TOCs are licking their lips at the prospect of being able to have more complex peak pricing to try to shift demand over a wider time period. They may also offer flexible season tickets based on days travelled on rather than a fixed time period.
To close TfL have publicly stated that Oyster will remain in place. This commitment was made to the London Assembly. I believe Oyster has to remain to allow concession tickets to work - I don't know how you could offer child Zip products or income support / veterans type tickets with CBCs. The same obviously applies for TfL staff passes and Freedom Passes. We have exciting times ahead in the world of smart ticketing for London.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,240
|
Post by rincew1nd on Apr 11, 2013 22:49:01 GMT
Combining Oyster cards and bank cards is not something new. A while back Oyster was combined with a Barclaycard so it was possible to both get the money and pay by Oyster. I wonder if that is still going on. Wasn't that just a Barclaycard and an Oyster Card combined on the same piece of plastic but acting independently? AIUI all the BarclayCards have expired now, so they are in effect Oyster Cards that look all the world like a BarclayCard.
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Apr 11, 2013 22:50:13 GMT
Snoggle - thanks. This post alone shows why I love this Forum. Well-argued, well-informed and balanced. Awesome stuff.
And Rincew1nd, no! Mine expired last year and to my surprise they sent me a new, fully-working one. The Barclaycard and Oyster element work as one, as far as I'm aware.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2013 22:56:52 GMT
I must say thanks everyone for the resposnse. Just wanted to clarify I did NOT want to get rid of the standard oyster, just wondered if there could be a FULL alternative in the form of a standard visa/mastercard debit card. Some of the tech going on is very interesting, but as said, it looks to be a while off yet.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,240
|
Post by rincew1nd on Apr 11, 2013 23:15:15 GMT
And Rincew1nd, no! Mine expired last year and to my surprise they sent me a new, fully-working one. The Barclaycard and Oyster element work as one, as far as I'm aware. I guess that shows me up as a "visitor" (not a tourist)! What happens if you try to travel with the expired card?
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Apr 12, 2013 7:42:18 GMT
I agree there is not a huge level of detail of how contactless bank cards (CBCs) will work in later phases. What I have gleaned is the following - CBCs are not capable of holding a season ticket and there is no intention to make them do so. A different type of facility will be offered whereby touches of bank cards are captured via Oyster readers and then transferred and processed via a "back office system" and these are then, I think, turned into a charge drawn against the bank account which the CBC is linked to. Daily caps will be offered first and a second stage will offer weekly caps. I would guess that the weekly cap will be the same level as the equivalent weekly bus pass or Travelcard. The back office system will work out what modes are used and what geographic usage has been made with the CBC (i.e. what zones have been travelled through). Where this really gets a bit involved is if a lot of trips are made in, say, zones 1 to 3 using buses and tubes over a week but there is also a return trip into Zone 4. What charge is made? Is it the Z1-4 travelcard for a week or the Z1-3 Travelcard for a week plus the extension fare to go into Zone 4? The system will have to be capable of working out the absolute best value scenario before a charge is made against a card holder's bank account. There are obviously an almost infinite number of possible charging combinations which the "back office" has to handle. My own view is that TfL have a real challenge on their hands to get the new capping processes to work fairly and transparently. There are other initiatives running in parallel. The first is the modification of the Oyster system to allow the reading and processing of ITSO spec cards issued by the TOCs (ITSO on Prestige, IoP). This is due for completion later this year and Southern Railway are the vanguard TOC and are involved in joint testing with TfL (this info from TfL Board reports). The other project is called the South East Flexible Ticketing project (SEFT) which is supposed to offer ITSO smart ticketing right across all TOCs and bus companies in the South East. The government have given £45m to push this project along but the procurement process for equipment has only started recently. The original deadline was for completion in 2013 but it is now pushed back to at least 2015 based on what I read on the procurement notice. SEFT may also bring in other platforms such as mobile phones / devices equipped with NFC capability. Quite what ticket products and changes to validities will be possible with SEFT remains to be seen. I think the TOCs are licking their lips at the prospect of being able to have more complex peak pricing to try to shift demand over a wider time period. They may also offer flexible season tickets based on days travelled on rather than a fixed time period. To close TfL have publicly stated that Oyster will remain in place. This commitment was made to the London Assembly. I believe Oyster has to remain to allow concession tickets to work - I don't know how you could offer child Zip products or income support / veterans type tickets with CBCs. The same obviously applies for TfL staff passes and Freedom Passes. We have exciting times ahead in the world of smart ticketing for London. What a waste of money! A much better model would be to have completely free travel and to ban the keeping and usage of private vehicles within a 10 mile radius of Charing Cross. The system could be funded wholly from the public purse through government subsidies and council tax revenue. There would be no costs to design, install and maintain revenue collection, no need to check tickets as there would be none, savings to be made in highway maintenance, elimination of traffic wardens, reduced costs in policing the streets, additional savings to be made by scheduling delivery of goods to shops efficiently, savings in energy costs, less reliance on fossil fuels, a much greener capital. Businesses would be more efficient with reliable transport timetabling, there would be less pollution and people would become healthier through the daily exercise of walking to the bus stop and or station reducing the burden upon the NHS etc etc. It really is about time that politicians began to look seriously and together at a nationwide future which benefits all the citizens in the country instead of the badly thought out and even less well implemented policies of division that we had lived with for so long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2013 7:51:45 GMT
But then if the government don't give money to the tube or bus companies, how are they going to get new buses or continue with "The Upgrade Plan" if everyone has free travel?
|
|
Rich32
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1,506
|
Post by Rich32 on Apr 12, 2013 8:01:14 GMT
It really is about time that politicians began to look seriously and together at a nationwide future which benefits all the citizens in the country instead of the badly thought out and even less well implemented policies of division that we had lived with for so long. I agree, but can you seriously ever see any of our craven politicians being brave enough to start such a discussion? No, me neither.
|
|
|
Post by messiah on Apr 12, 2013 9:09:22 GMT
10 miles from Charing Cross is very roughly the North and South Circular.
I don't believe that it is in any way a credible proposal to ban keeping and usage of vehicle within this area.
Far more appropriate would be to tax it appropriately - similar to the congestion charge with the proceeds being used to fund public transport improvements.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Apr 12, 2013 11:20:16 GMT
It really is about time that politicians began to look seriously and together at a nationwide future which benefits all the citizens in the country instead of the badly thought out and even less well implemented policies of division that we had lived with for so long. I agree, but can you seriously ever see any of our craven politicians being brave enough to start such a discussion? No, me neither. Unfortunately not, it is a utopian dream but at some future time it will have to happen. People think things are bad now but they are set to get much worse in the next decade because of all the decisions the politicians have been unable or unwilling to make in the last couple.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Apr 12, 2013 11:50:31 GMT
10 miles from Charing Cross is very roughly the North and South Circular. I don't believe that it is in any way a credible proposal to ban keeping and usage of vehicle within this area. Far more appropriate would be to tax it appropriately - similar to the congestion charge with the proceeds being used to fund public transport improvements. It is credible, it would be unpopular but there really is no need for personal transportation in a large conurbation with properly integrated, regular and accessible public transport. The congestion charge was not about congestion at all, it is simply a cash cow, however, there are far too many private vehicles on Britain's roads and especially within Greater London. One would think that taxing private vehicles appropriately would keep them off the roads but it isn't so, the congestion charge managed that for a few weeks before things returned to pretty much as they were and people's wages and salaries increased to cover the increases fairly quickly simply pushing up costs of goods and services for everybody else. The only way to get a grip is to take control and manage the infrastructure properly, something which our politicians have failed at. I don't think any of the current crop, government or opposition, have a clue and those that might are far too concerned about this, that or the other lobby. There are enough cars in Britain now, I'd be shrinking car production in favour of buses, trams and utility vehicles which are essential to the provision and maintenance of transportation, goods and services. I think replacing major bus highways with trams would be a good start to reducing private car use and ownership too. As for transport improvements, it is frequently little more than rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic, often little more than a shop window for architects to show their artistic flair and rather shortlived for the most part. Real tube improvements for example would be projects that delivered new wider tunnels affording better passenger H&S in readiness for future driverless rolling stock and perhaps realignment of parts of some lines to make them more useful within a properly integrated framework infrastructure. I just think there are better ways to spend public money than on revenue collection. For those who dislike free travel another option would be a daily flat fare system i.e. buy a ticket and travel all day on it anywhere within the capital on any of the ststems.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,430
|
Post by Chris M on Apr 12, 2013 13:03:01 GMT
While it's true that car journeys are almost always unnecessary in the centre of London (although there are exceptions), a ban on private vehicle ownership would not be appropriate for those who live in this area as people do need to make journeys to places outside the capital where cars are the only realistic method of transportation.
Far better would be to cover the whole of the area inside the M25 with lots of coherent zones that you were charged to drive in or though. Pricing would depend on the journey you make and the time of day you make it. For example driving from say Earl's Court to Westminster at 9am would be massively expensive as this is a journey that should be done by bus or Underground. A journey from Loughton to Upminster at 2am would not attract any significant charge as this journey is not possible by public transport. You would be required to install a tracking device that recorded your route before being allowed to drive in the zones. These charges would replace part of the road tax to reduce the effect of standing charges.
|
|
|
Post by rheostar on Apr 12, 2013 14:52:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Apr 13, 2013 11:41:58 GMT
What strikes me (I was going to say "surprises", but it doesn't) is that the government are spending £45,000,000 on bribing the TOCs and bus firms to upgrade their equipment to ITSO standard. In these austere times, why not withdraw that subsidy and tell the firms that they must do it out of their own pocket - with the "stick" that no TOC franchise or bus operator's license will be issued if they don't accept ITSO tickets?
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Apr 14, 2013 15:54:49 GMT
What strikes me (I was going to say "surprises", but it doesn't) is that the government are spending £45,000,000 on bribing the TOCs and bus firms to upgrade their equipment to ITSO standard. In these austere times, why not withdraw that subsidy and tell the firms that they must do it out of their own pocket - with the "stick" that no TOC franchise or bus operator's license will be issued if they don't accept ITSO tickets? The problem is that both Labour and the Coalition parties have adopted the same policy of manipulating Bus Service Operator Grant (BSOG) to force the adoption of certain equipment (e.g. ITSO spec ticket machines) or to further environmental objectives. The argument was that without these "incentives" the companies would not adopt the government's preferred smartcard technology. The government has, of course, forced the adoption of ITSO for the use of concessionary tickets in England. It was all rather pointless without the buses having machines that could read the smart tickets and generate data to help the reimbursement process. Without financial carrots I don't believe any bus operator would have adopted smart ticketing in its own right. As Buses magazine recently remarked there is little time saving outside of London from the use of smart tickets. This is because London has fairly simple season ticket products and a flat PAYG fare. This is very rarely the case outside London so PAYG capability doesn't exist, only bus season ticket products are put on ITSO cards. I also read, in a TfL document, that ITSO is incapable of offering a PAYG facility that mirrors the TfL one with capping, especially multi modal. TfL also expressed concerns about transaction speeds on ITSO cards and when I've seen them being read on bus ticket machines outside London the txn speed is snail like in comparison to London. The TOCs have only adopted ITSO when it has been mandated through their franchise agreements. Even then implementation seems extremely patchy indeed with Southern Railway being furthest along. SWT's scheme seems patchy as does East Midlands. The London Midland scheme has kit installed around bits of the Midlands but I'm not aware of it stretching further than that. No other South East area TOCs have a requirement to install ITSO. I think, therefore, that the South East Flexible Ticketing project is a way of accelerating the spread of "smart travel" on to rail. This, I think, is partly to increase fares flexibility for the TOCs and to "calm down" the incessant demands for the expansion of Oyster outside of London which the DfT does not want to see (given it's put all its eggs into the ITSO basket) because Oyster is proprietary technology and not an "open" spec. I do not believe any TOC would voluntarily adopt ITSO hence direct government funding via SEFT or mandating technology via franchises.
|
|