Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 8:37:03 GMT
The November issue of Modern Railways is reporting that LU are "considering" the acquisition of additional trains to bolster the Northern and Jubilee line fleets. The reason given is that the Olympics showed the practicality of running at a higher tph with TBTC and LU has an aspiration to make this a regular feature on both lines. It goes on to to say that the existing fleet is not large enough to sustain regular operation at a higher tph hence the thoughts about enlarging it.
The piece doesn't say what the trains might be*, when this might happen, how many extras are being "considered" or what the disposition of the combined, enlarged fleet between the lines might be.
*Other than that one option being looked at is more of the "same". It doesn't say if this means some 95ts and some 96ts, all of one type, a hybrid of the two or what.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 8:43:48 GMT
Given the budget cuts, I'd be surprised if anything is ordered before 2016, given Boris wants driverless trains on the Jubilee, presuming Boris wins a 3rd term of course.
Not having seen the article myself, is anything mentioned about driverless trains?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 8:51:34 GMT
I must admit I was surprised but Modern Railways are usually fairly reliable.
I can't recall it mentioning driverless trains. I don't have it with me atm so I can't confirm. I'll check later if no-one else has done so in the meantime.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 9:32:14 GMT
The 83ts have found employment! No I joke.
Will Alstom produce more 95/96ts if asked?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 10:32:30 GMT
This all sounds highly unlikely, it’s not as if Alstom or anyone else have got a shed load of tube stock stuck away at the back just in case LUL needed some more, they’d have to be ordered. If you stuck another stock on the Northern and/or Jubilee then the TOps would all have to be trained on that stock, just as up until the District Line gets it’s S stock TOps have to be licenced for C and D stock.
I wouldn’t put any credit in anything Boris says, he’s either purposefully being misleading and vague or he really has no idea what he’s talking about. Jubilee and Northern are well down the queue for new trains, if and when the driverless system currently being developed up at Old Dalby works the Bakerloo will be first and the Piccadilly next.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 10:57:42 GMT
I can't see it happening either, as much as MR is a good source, it just seems like another aspiration which is nearly impossible when you look at the facts.
Building new trains would be awkward as you have the familiarisation of working on two types of stock, how both operate together, maintenance, how it combines with existing systems etc etc.
If Alstom really were to build a small amount of 1995/6 stock trains this would make no economic sense considering the main fleets are approaching the middle of their lifetime.
It would be difficult to produce small amounts of redundant traction equipment, and hence extremely costly, I think this was a challenge when the four trains of 1996 stock were built in 2005. Though I do believe the 1995 stock's IGBT equipment is relatively still modern in railway standards (I'd be happy to stand corrected)
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Oct 29, 2012 10:58:38 GMT
Given the budget cuts, I'd be surprised if anything is ordered before 2016, given Boris wants driverless trains on the Jubilee, presuming Boris wins a 3rd term of course. Not having seen the article myself, is anything mentioned about driverless trains? If additional trains were considered for the Jubilee, they would more or less have to be built to match the 96 stock design, just as the previous 4x additional trains were. Of course this could raise issues with the supply of certain components, and the cost of a small order may also prove uneconomic. The Northern Line is more complicated, as any fleet changes are also tied in with the fortunes of the Battersea extension and plans to separate the Northern Line.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,410
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 29, 2012 11:56:54 GMT
Is there depot space for a significant expansion of the fleet, or would additional outstabling or depot extensions be required?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 12:14:02 GMT
The November issue of Modern Railways is reporting that LU are "considering" the acquisition of additional trains to bolster the Northern and Jubilee line fleets. The reason given is that the Olympics showed the practicality of running at a higher tph with TBTC and LU has an aspiration to make this a regular feature on both lines. It goes on to to say that the existing fleet is not large enough to sustain regular operation at a higher tph hence the thoughts about enlarging it. The piece doesn't say what the trains might be*, when this might happen, how many extras are being "considered" or what the disposition of the combined, enlarged fleet between the lines might be. *Other than that one option being looked at is more of the "same". It doesn't say if this means some 95ts and some 96ts, all of one type, a hybrid of the two or what. If LU does so, then push on if they want to. Bringing more fleet will cost an arm and a leg but will of course, give more trains but they won't eliminate overcrowding. If they will produce more 95 stock, they should produce it when the extension to Battersea starts coming up. Unfortunately, that should be in about in the 2020s.
|
|
|
Post by trt on Oct 29, 2012 12:31:01 GMT
I wonder if they can do anything with the trains that are down for maintenance? I mean, what % of the fleet are not running at any one time?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Oct 29, 2012 14:21:31 GMT
Is there depot space for a significant expansion of the fleet, or would additional outstabling or depot extensions be required? I think the Jubilee Line may be tight - existings depots and sidings are well utilised, there's little room for expansion at Stratford, and I assume any spare space at Neasden would be taken up by SSR trains. There is the option to stable potentially up to 4 trains at Charing Cross, though this option has complications. The Northern Line should have space, there are potentially 3x sidings at Golders Green which are not used for stabling, and there is space for a modest number of additional sidings at High Barnet and Highgate without too much work being required.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Oct 29, 2012 18:50:30 GMT
I can't think that LUL would order any more stock now. As has been suggested, the Northern may get extra trains if split but that's it. I think the Jubilee is stuck with what its got.
One could speculate that either the Piccadilly or Bakerloo could get the 1995 stock but that is nearly 15 years old....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 7:50:48 GMT
I've now had the chance to read the report again and it does not mention driverless trains or the mayor.
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,421
|
Post by DWS on Oct 30, 2012 8:33:17 GMT
Is there depot space for a significant expansion of the fleet, or would additional outstabling or depot extensions be required? I think the Jubilee Line may be tight - existings depots and sidings are well utilised, there's little room for expansion at Stratford, and I assume any spare space at Neasden would be taken up by SSR trains. There is the option to stable potentially up to 4 trains at Charing Cross, though this option has complications. The Northern Line should have space, there are potentially 3x sidings at Golders Green which are not used for stabling, and there is space for a modest number of additional sidings at High Barnet and Highgate without too much work being required. Three sidings at Stratford Market Depot were taken out of use for a temporary fit out shed for the TBTC work on trains, these sidings could be reinstated.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Oct 30, 2012 19:50:31 GMT
It is likely that the various tube stocks will be moved around.
I wouldn't be surprised to see different trains on the Central Line sooner rather than later.
Given the way that Hitachi have provided new traction systems for trains on SouthEastern, I am sure that 15 year old trains could be made better than new.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Oct 30, 2012 23:31:51 GMT
That's an option but will be pricey. We wait to see....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2012 7:38:24 GMT
It is likely that the various tube stocks will be moved around. I wouldn't be surprised to see different trains on the Central Line sooner rather than later. Given the way that Hitachi have provided new traction systems for trains on SouthEastern, I am sure that 15 year old trains could be made better than new. I’d say it is highly unlikely that Tube stock will be moved around. As they all vary TOps are only licenced for the stock they work on and until recently the only Line that was trained on more than one stock was the District where the TOps got an extra training for C and D stock. The introduction of S stock on the Sub Surface Lines means that any TOp on those lines can transfer around and only need to learn route knowledge. The last I heard was that the Bakerloo and Piccadilly will be next to get new trains then the Central/W&C but as Mike Brown pointed out to the GLA Transport Committee with the Treasury cutting billions from TfL’s budget over the life of the current parliament LUL’s piggy bank is empty. I don't expect to be driving anything other than 92s up to Epping and back for the next 15 years.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Oct 31, 2012 10:20:39 GMT
That's probably the realistic forcast. Times are hard and it does look unlikely that additional trains will be put onto either the Northern or the Jubilee. TBTC will help the Northern to run for frequently and if Edgware and Barnet are kept separate perhaps even more tph can be achieved.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Nov 1, 2012 19:24:15 GMT
The 92 TS will be around for a while yet. Will be 20 years since they entered service next April - I remember being there for their second day in service! Where did the time go . . .
They were the first new trains that I ever saw coming into service, so part of me always thinks of them as new!
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Nov 1, 2012 20:06:56 GMT
The 92TS has had a number of serious defects over the years.
Twists in the car bodies are evident around the end windows.
Think they will struggle to last 20 more years.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Nov 1, 2012 21:32:28 GMT
Agreed. I remember them coming into service and they looked shiney and new but they've not aged well. Come 2025 they will be due for replacement.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Nov 1, 2012 21:43:03 GMT
The refresh has made them look a bit better. But sadly, they were built on the cheap, and it's all too evident now!
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Nov 1, 2012 23:32:18 GMT
The body panels at the end of the cars were built up of 7 parts where as the new ones are built up of 3 parts. The refreshed units look decent and I'd be surprised if they didn't last for the next 15 years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2012 12:12:22 GMT
Agreed. I remember them coming into service and they looked shiney and new but they've not aged well. Come 2025 they will be due for replacement. Replacement at age 33? I want their replacement at about age 40 (2032). But I will doubt my "2032" won't happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2012 12:14:03 GMT
The body panels at the end of the cars were built up of 7 parts where as the new ones are built up of 3 parts. The refreshed units look decent and I'd be surprised if they didn't last for the next 15 years. Me too. I will be very suprised and I will cry like crazy if they do.
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Nov 2, 2012 15:31:21 GMT
When Modern Railways introduced the 'evo' stock, they said that it would be deployed on the Central, W&C, Piccadilly, Bakerloo AND Northern line. So the Northern line could end up operating a mixture of '95s and 'evo' and they could even displace some '95s onto the Jubilee line so that they're near-to-compatible with the PEDs and look almost identical to the '96s.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2012 16:00:02 GMT
It is likely that the various tube stocks will be moved around. I wouldn't be surprised to see different trains on the Central Line sooner rather than later. Given the way that Hitachi have provided new traction systems for trains on SouthEastern, I am sure that 15 year old trains could be made better than new. I’d say it is highly unlikely that Tube stock will be moved around. As they all vary TOps are only licenced for the stock they work on and until recently the only Line that was trained on more than one stock was the District where the TOps got an extra training for C and D stock. The introduction of S stock on the Sub Surface Lines means that any TOp on those lines can transfer around and only need to learn route knowledge. The last I heard was that the Bakerloo and Piccadilly will be next to get new trains then the Central/W&C but as Mike Brown pointed out to the GLA Transport Committee with the Treasury cutting billions from TfL’s budget over the life of the current parliament LUL’s piggy bank is empty. I don't expect to be driving anything other than 92s up to Epping and back for the next 15 years. I didn't know that LUL operated up lines and down lines...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2012 20:39:54 GMT
Older readers will remember when the 1959 trains were moved from the Piccadilly, onto the Northern in the 1970's. This came about as the then new longer Piccadilly trains from 1973 onwards, displaced the 1959's onto the Northern, along with a small batch of 1972 Mk 1 trains.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Nov 3, 2012 17:43:07 GMT
The 1959 (and the three 1956) stock trains were moved onto the Northern Line so the Piccadilly Line could receive new purpose built stock for the Heathrow Extension and so that replacement of the life expired 1938 stock could continue. Generally LUL does not like to mix stock on a particular line as it creates many problems.
The Northern Line was actually equipped with 63 trains of 1972 stock because the Mk2 stock also operated on the Northern until the 1959 stock started to move over. It was a difficult time for LT and the country as the reliability of the 1938 stock was so poor it had been dubbed the misery line! At the same time, Metro-Cammell had to be kept in business hence why the 1972mk2 stock was built 5 years early to operate on the Jubilee Line.
The original plan had been to refurbish, rewire and repaint the 1938 stock silver to work with the 1959 stock until the late 90s when the entire lot would be replaced. I can't see LUL wanted to have a joint stock on the Northern. It would make sense to split the Northern and provide Evo trains on one branch only. There would most likely be an excess of 1995 stock which I don't believe could easily be used with the 1996 stock as the equipment is different and hard to procure. My guess is that we might see some trains of 1995 withdrawn!
|
|
|
Post by 100andthirty on Nov 4, 2012 10:10:26 GMT
Older readers will remember when........about as the then new longer Piccadilly trains from 1973 onwards............. '73 tube stock is about 6m SHORTER than 1959 tube stock was.
|
|