rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,235
|
Post by rincew1nd on Aug 21, 2012 21:26:57 GMT
Elsewhere: Apart from the horrors of having two Clapham Junction trains leaving Highbury simultaneously from both platforms 2 and 7 ( a subject for an entirely separate thread and a can of worms I have no wish to open yet). Luckily I have my tin opener to hand, would these both be described at Highbury as for Clapham Jct; or would they follow the Leeds/Huddersfield via Halifax precedent and be announced as services to Bramley or Brighouse?
|
|
Rich32
Staff Emeritus
Posts: 1,506
|
Post by Rich32 on Aug 21, 2012 22:08:52 GMT
Only time will tell......
*rushes off to find solder and soldering iron*
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 21, 2012 22:11:31 GMT
would they follow the Leeds/Huddersfield via Halifax precedent and be announced as services to Bramley or Brighouse? I think announcing a Clapham Junctrion service as being to either Bramley or Brighouse would be a little confusing!
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on Aug 21, 2012 22:12:39 GMT
Wasn't the plan to extend New Cross trains to run H&I - New Cross and terminate the Clapham Junction trains at Dalston Junction?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,235
|
Post by rincew1nd on Aug 21, 2012 22:16:07 GMT
would they follow the Leeds/Huddersfield via Halifax precedent and be announced as services to Bramley or Brighouse? I think announcing a Clapham Junctrion service as being to either Bramley or Brighouse would be a little confusing! It would make for a slightly greener view from the window though.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Aug 21, 2012 22:36:22 GMT
I assume it will be displayed and announced as something like
Clapham Junction via Willesden Junction Clapham Junction via Peckham Rye
I wonder how confused people will be when the West Croydon service disappears from Highbury and Canonbury.
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Aug 21, 2012 22:51:09 GMT
I wonder how confused people will be when the West Croydon service disappears from Highbury and Canonbury. Indeed, although pax will be able to board the Clapham Junction via Peckham Rye service and change at Dalston Junction for the next train which is to West Croydon.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Aug 23, 2012 0:05:01 GMT
Which route from H&I to the Junction will be faster?
|
|
|
Post by causton on Aug 23, 2012 0:14:58 GMT
Random sample journey: Stratford - Clapham Junction service (NLL/WLL): H+I: 0734 CLJ: 0823 Time taken: 49 minutes Highbury - Clapham Junction service (ELL/SLL): H+I:0747 CLJ: 0837 Time taken: 50 minutes HOWEVER: The Working Timetable shows that the ELL service gets in at 08:34 technically, but shown as 08:37. In reality, you won't realise I'm sure
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2012 9:49:14 GMT
Which route from H&I to the Junction will be faster? The Victoria line.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Aug 23, 2012 10:40:34 GMT
Random sample journey: Stratford - Clapham Junction service (NLL/WLL): H+I: 0734 CLJ: 0823 Time taken: 49 minutes Highbury - Clapham Junction service (ELL/SLL): H+I:0747 CLJ: 0837 Time taken: 50 minutes As both routes run every fifteen minutes, presumably then there is also an NLL service at 0749, arriving CJ 0838? So the NLL is marginally quicker, but whichever train comes first will get you there first. However, those timings mean the trains pass between H&I and Canonbury. I note in the present timetable that the ELL takes two minutes from H&I to Canonbury, whilst the NLL takes four. ( In the reverse direction the numbers are respectively five and three!) So that means from Canonbury it will always be quicker to take the ELL, even if the NLL train comes first. Canonbury 0744 - NLL - CJ 0838 Canonbury 0749 - ELL - CJ 0837 How will it work at Clapham Junction? Should one always take the first train, or always take the ELL, or always take the NLL? And is the answer the same whether your destination is H&I, Canonbury or Dalston? Will the signage make this clear? or will it be like the hugely misleading signage at my local station, which suggests there are six trains an hour to London, without mentioning that two of them go the long way round, taking 47 minutes instead of 30 by the direct route, and are overtaken by a direct train that leaves five minutes later and arrives twelve minutes earlier.
|
|
|
Post by patstonuk on Aug 23, 2012 13:07:54 GMT
It's really no different to the choices to be made by those travelling by Underground or Tube though is it? Take the Circle for instance - when it was literally just that it was a choice made routinely (and usually without proper foundation given the scaling of the map in certain areas) as to whether to travel on the outer or inner rail. Travelling from The City to say Paddington was a case in point.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Aug 23, 2012 13:27:16 GMT
It's really no different to the choices to be made by those travelling by Underground or Tube though is it? Take the Circle for instance - when it was literally just that it was a choice made routinely (and usually without proper foundation given the scaling of the map in certain areas) as to whether to travel on the outer or inner rail. Travelling from The City to say Paddington was a case in point. However the enamel route diagrams in the station do show that part of the Circle (and stations) which is quicker from each platform. Therefore some of the guesswork is removed. When the new platforms opened at Highbury all the new signs were still uncovered. I took this snap of the signs which show the services from platforms 2 and 7. Now TfL / LOROL might modify this but it shows Clapham Junction as accessible via either platform. It also suggests there is a service to each southern branch which isn't strictly correct but it's no different to how the tube is portrayed despite complex service patterns on some lines. www.flickr.com/photos/24759744@N02/4660065461/in/set-72157624059569335
|
|
|
Post by bicbasher on Aug 23, 2012 20:42:04 GMT
It's worth noting that there's padding on the WLL to Clapham Junction which could lead to a service reaching the station earlier than timetabled.
I really can't see the ELL CJ's taking 9-10 mins as timetabled from Wandsworth Road, this is to ensure LOROL meet their targets, so either way, the ELL could be even more faster from H&I/Canonbury.
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Aug 23, 2012 22:33:57 GMT
In any case, I don't think many people will be going all the way 'round via Shoreditch High Street The [NW]LL has the advantage of being cheaper than the Vic and Southern. To travel via the [ES]LL takes more time than this, yet goes through zone 1, so costing the same I wonder how confused people will be when the West Croydon service disappears from Highbury and Canonbury. Indeed, although pax will be able to board the Clapham Junction via Peckham Rye service and change at Dalston Junction for the next train which is to West Croydon. I'd do this at Haggerston, so as not to have to walk around the buffers if the train is leaving from Platform 2
|
|
|
Post by redbond on Sept 2, 2012 23:50:38 GMT
I really can't see the ELL CJ's taking 9-10 mins as timetabled from Wandsworth Road, this is to ensure LOROL meet their targets, so either way, the ELL could be even more faster from H&I/Canonbury. Indeed, we are timetabled six minutes from Canonbury to Highbury, never takes that long
|
|
|
Post by charleyfarley on Sept 3, 2012 13:13:51 GMT
Does anyone know how the new route from Highbury to Clapham J will be fitted into the in-car diagrams? Here is a station diagram showing the route.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Sept 19, 2012 11:25:14 GMT
Does anyone have any insight into the factors which influence the service pattern for the ELL? Why will the CP & CJ services go to H&I as opposed to any of the other combinations?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Sept 19, 2012 13:28:36 GMT
Now that there are less than twelve weeks to go you can see the times on Journey Planner, and thinking about it it may be something like this>
Squeezing four trains into every fifteen minutes would ideally have a service pattern of 3/4/4/4 minutes between trains, but there is a complication. The Forest Hill line has a 5-minute interval service, with every fifteen minutes, two trains from the ELL (to West Croydon and Crystal Palace) and one train from London Bridge (to Caterham, or to Victoria via Gipsy Hill) Inserting thye London Bridge services results in a 5/10 minute interval into the ELL services via Forest Hill. On the core the CJ and NX services have to fit round this.
The ELL intervals therefore have to be either 2/3/5/5 (with one NX or CJ service fillling the 5 minute gap between Forest Hill services and the other filling the ten minute gap. Alternatively, you could go for 5/3/4/3, with no train in the five minute gap between the two Forest Hill trains. The constraints of operation at the two northern ELL termini require alternate trains to go to H&I. As the Forest Hill line trains are consecutive, one will go to H&I and one to DJ. Similarly the NX and CJ trains - one will terminate at DJ and one at H&I. Why it should be the CP and CJ trains which go the extra mile I don't know, but it seems that H&I has to have one of the NXG services: it can't have both, nor can it have neither!
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Sept 19, 2012 14:01:10 GMT
Staying on the topic of timings, I notice the CJ and CP services will have to same number of stops. Will this mean they will have similar journey times and stock requirements? Would be a good reason to pair them?
|
|