Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2012 17:14:37 GMT
Hi All I was at Camden Town on Monday evening and saw this. Any ideas what the 2nd train via platform 2 was about please?   I was running late or I would have gone and seen what it was. Turned out they held the next Bank train from the other platform anyway!  Cheers Shell |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 21, 2012 17:55:35 GMT
No idea what it's about, but this and this will explain why it wasn't stopping at Mornington Crescent - it wouldn't be going through it! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2012 18:05:37 GMT
Whenever a train terminates at Euston (Bank branch) that message will always display on the DMI, as it did during the boxing day strike.
|
|
|
|
Post by hollywood on Jun 21, 2012 18:22:02 GMT
Train is reversing from the Euston bank branch platforms. Since there is an apparent belief that "Euston via Bank" is misleading to the customers (as the train will not be carrying on to Bank) "not via Mornington Crescent" is the compromise. No such move is timetabled at that hour. Was this a reform to cover a gap in one branch, or was the train being returned to the depot? No idea what it's about, but this and this will explain why it wasn't stopping at Mornington Crescent - it wouldn't be going through it! "Look at the map and figure it out yourself" is not the kindest greeting for a new member making her first post...just sayin'  |
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 21, 2012 19:24:29 GMT
Usually trains reversing there are late running Kennington via Charing Cross trains, or any train that for some reason is out of sequence.
The 1995 stock will display "Euston via Bank" on the front though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2012 19:27:57 GMT
My wonder is over the NR symbol attached to Euston...
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,237 
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jun 21, 2012 19:51:17 GMT
Does Sonia announce "The next stop is Euston, via Bank, where this train will terminate. All change please, all change."?
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Jun 21, 2012 20:12:39 GMT
Does Sonia announce "The next stop is Euston, via Bank, where this train will terminate. All change please, all change."? More like the following: The next station is Euston, Bank Branch. <doors open> This station is Euston, Bank Branch. Change here for Southbound Northern Line services via Charing Cross, from Platform 2, and for Victoria line, and Main Line InterCity and Suburban Rail Services. This train terminates here. All change. Please make sure you have all your belongings with you. |
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,237
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jun 21, 2012 20:36:08 GMT
Surely, there must be more, commas, involved?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2012 9:26:02 GMT
My wonder is over the NR symbol attached to Euston... That was what confused me the most, why the NR symbol? Shell |
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 26, 2012 20:37:45 GMT
My wonder is over the NR symbol attached to Euston... That was what confused me the most, why the NR symbol? Shell Just the way it's been programmed. There's no reason for having it though! |
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jun 28, 2012 5:07:15 GMT
Train is reversing from the Euston bank branch platforms. Since there is an apparent belief that "Euston via Bank" is misleading to the customers (as the train will not be carrying on to Bank) "not via Mornington Crescent" is the compromise. No such move is timetabled at that hour. Was this a reform to cover a gap in one branch, or was the train being returned to the depot? Might not be timetabled but it happens regularly. I've been on such a service around that time. Was heading for London Bridge and couldn't resist seeing it terminating there. Was a slick operation. |
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Jun 28, 2012 20:51:13 GMT
My wonder is over the NR symbol attached to Euston... That was what confused me the most, why the NR symbol? Shell The NR symbol might be indicating that the train will reverse into the King's Cross Loop, run down the Piccadilly, Rayner's Lane, reversing off a bay there down the Met main, taking the Jubilee at Neasden, crossing over to the Bakerloo at Baker Street, reversing once more, and again at Queen's Park, and then following the Watford DC line to Euston. That might be what they're trying to say. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2012 0:14:08 GMT
That was what confused me the most, why the NR symbol? Shell The NR symbol might be indicating that the train will reverse into the King's Cross Loop, run down the Piccadilly, Rayner's Lane, reversing off a bay there down the Met main, taking the Jubilee at Neasden, crossing over to the Bakerloo at Baker Street, reversing once more, and again at Queen's Park, and then following the Watford DC line to Euston. That might be what they're trying to say. Unlikely though |
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on Jun 29, 2012 9:06:13 GMT
I was being facetious  unlikely is an understatement - Northern line trains can't even draw power south of Kilburn High Road I wonder if any Bakerloo line trains have ever done a District Dave towards Euston? |
|
|
|
Post by fleetline on Jul 1, 2012 6:40:03 GMT
I was being facetious unlikely is an understatement - Northern line trains can't even draw power south of Kilburn High Road I wonder if any Bakerloo line trains have ever done a District Dave towards Euston? Not sure what you mean by this but during problems (can't remember when) but Kilburn High Road has seen a Bakerloo Line train with passengers on. |
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 1, 2012 7:55:46 GMT
Not sure what you mean by this but during problems (can't remember when) but Kilburn High Road has seen a Bakerloo Line train with passengers on. I think Fahad was implying if a Bakerloo train has ventured beyond Kilburn High Road towards Euston, in homage to our sadly missed "District Dave". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2012 13:39:50 GMT
I am sure there is something in the regulations somwehere which state that Bakerloo's to/from Kilburn High Road must not carry passengers.
However, that is not to say fleetline is wrong in seeing one with punters on - stranger things have happened ;D ;D
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,427
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 1, 2012 22:52:15 GMT
The NR symbol might be indicating that the train will reverse into the King's Cross Loop, run down the Piccadilly, Rayner's Lane, reversing off a bay there down the Met main, taking the Jubilee at Neasden, crossing over to the Bakerloo at Baker Street, reversing once more, and again at Queen's Park, and then following the Watford DC line to Euston. That might be what they're trying to say. Unlikely though Not least because there are no bay platforms at Rayners Lane (nor apostrophes in its name)  </pedant> |
|
PGtrips
Ahh... don't you just love PG?
Posts: 113
|
Post by PGtrips on Jul 19, 2012 14:19:48 GMT
No idea what it's about, but this and this will explain why it wasn't stopping at Mornington Crescent - it wouldn't be going through it! Confused as to how this is done efficiently reversing SB-NB. This diagram www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Euston%20&%20KX-leu5-4.gif would seem to imply that the train would have to traverse Euston Loop, and then enter the NB tunnel in the wrong direction at Kings Cross. Or does it go onto Kings Cross Loop to enable the driver to change ends and not block up the Northbound Service? |
|
unlikely is an understatement - Northern line trains can't even draw power south of Kilburn High Road
