|
Post by charleyfarley on May 30, 2012 15:34:29 GMT
Am I correct in thinking that the 59TS was the last stock that could run over the entire network? It seems that each line now has different signaling systems or ATO and so once stock is delivered for a particular line, it pretty much has to remain on that line for its entire working life. Would it not have been more economical in the long term for the Tube Upgrade to have included standardisation of systems on the Bakerloo, Central, Northern and Piccadilly Lines to permit one huge order of the same stock (presumably attracting a bigger discount) for use on any one of the four lines. What benefit does A60/A62/D78/S stock offer operationally over TS other than being bigger and visually more impressive? Why should SSR lines go to the extra expense of acquiring "big" trains simply because SSR lines have always had big trains. I just think it is a waste of money having to order different specifications for each individual line.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on May 30, 2012 15:46:33 GMT
In theory the plan is for the Bakerloo, Piccadilly and Central to get the same stock.
One advantage of different stocks ordered at different times is that you don't get lumbered at some point with a huge bill for refurbs/refits/replacement.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on May 30, 2012 16:53:32 GMT
The key issue with the subsurface lines was that rolling stock replacement was not required at the same time. Consider 1959; the Met is running about 5 different types of stock and needs to expand with electrification to Amersham. Much of the stock is old and outdated and a safety risk in tunnels! The Circle and Hammersmith and City have O/P stock only 20 years old and the District has new R stock and Q stock which still has 5-10 years life left.
So the Met gets the brand new trains, all the old Met stock is scrapped and the most modern trains go to the District which allows the oldest Q stock to go to the breakers.
Ten years later and the Q stock is nearly 50 years old. It is replaced by a small order of high capacity trains and the CO and CP stock can go to the District and join the R stock which is 10 years younger. It is at this point that it must be realised that perhaps the R and CO/CP stocks can be replaced together by a universal stock for the District. The CO/CP stock just has to hang on, it does. Therefore in 1980, a new batch of purpose built district stock is ordered and a further 11 trains of C stock enter service.
It is interesting to consider if the A stock was poorly built and packed up at the end of the 90s what would have replaced it and how would this have been affected by the upgrade plan.....
Returning to tube stock, perhaps the 1972 stock was the last that could run on the entire network?
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on May 30, 2012 16:54:25 GMT
It's a good use of infrastructure; and IIRC tube stock is more expensive to produce because it has to be compact.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 30, 2012 17:12:05 GMT
Probably concur with Metman on this, the 72s might possibly be the last trains built that can fit the variety of structural gauges on the system, though would not have been able to run in passenger service as delivered and when delivered on the victoria line!
Probably that accolayde of universal clearance in pax mode upon delivery might go to the 62ts.
Throw in a suggestion; the 1986ts, in terms of body envelope? Though not signalling wise, and possibly not aux equipment wise?
I would suggest the 1992ts body (if it lasted long enough!), though aren't the axel boxes an issue or something?
Think its fair to say now though there technically can't be one, as only the 1992ts has run on the W&C, yet this has never and would never run on the Vic, eg.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on May 30, 2012 20:06:10 GMT
The 72 stock could run on the Northern line currently? But then TBTC goes live it can't not that the 1972 stock runs on the Northern line anyway well it did a few years back.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on May 30, 2012 22:25:49 GMT
Yes the 1972 stock (both mark I and II) ran on the Northern. The Mark II stock has also run on the Jubilee and now on the Bakerloo. Some converted Mark I cars ran on the Victoria and still make up a few trains on the Bakerloo. There was talk of 1972 stock on the Waterloo and City a few years back. There is a 1972 stock unit on the Aldwych shuttle too -I think it is still there.
The last stock to really do the rounds was the Standard Stock which ran on all the lines at one stage!
|
|
Fahad
In memoriam
Posts: 459
|
Post by Fahad on May 30, 2012 22:29:17 GMT
What benefit does A60/A62/D78/S stock offer operationally over TS other than being bigger I think you're *really* underestimating the advantage of "bigger". As we keep being told, the tube network runs way above capacity, and larger trains are a nice way of getting loads of it - 1003 people per S8 stock vs 864 to an 09 stock.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on May 31, 2012 19:55:11 GMT
Indeed, the 2009 stock was built to bigger proportions than the 1967 stock to increase capacity too.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 2, 2012 9:37:38 GMT
big trains carry more people than tube stock.
The East London Line was run with 1938 stock for a while. Wouldn't want to be that cramped nowadays.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Jun 2, 2012 10:47:12 GMT
The ELL was a bit of special case. Only recently has an increase in capacity been required due to the additional journey options.
In the past the ELL used whatever spare stock was required. Between 1953 and 1977 it used in approx this order F stock, Q stock, CP Stock, Q stock, CO/CP Stock and finally 1938 stock. The reason the 1938 stock was used was due to wheel faults developing on the CO/CP stock. This stock was still in everyday use on the District Line and (please correct me) made up half of the train fleet (including the Putney serivce). Therefore the units on the ELL were pulled out. The 1938 was actually in the process of being rationalised and scrapped but 8 units were put aside for the service.
Sometimes Extra heavy overhaul units from the Bakerloo were used as the older 38ts was not very reliable. When the Northern City closed, the float of spare units became greater.
As Met services had never reached anticipated levels of use, spare A60/62 (yes A62 did use the ELL in those days too) were made available for the service. In reality, if the wheel problems had not surfaced on the CO/CP stock it is likely that these 5 car trains would have continued till the late 1970s when the first stage of scrapping began on delivery of the C77 stock.
It says a lot for the versitility of the 1938 stock that it ran on the ELL, Northern (and City), Piccadilly, Bakerloo and breifly the Central Line (Ongar shuttle!).
|
|
|
Post by chrisvandenkieboom on Jun 2, 2012 11:31:03 GMT
Would the C77 order have replaced the CO/CP's on the ELL too? Or would it still have been replaced by the A60/62?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Jun 2, 2012 19:50:40 GMT
Probably not directly but the ELL trains like the A stock were part of a larger pool of trains set aside for the task. The CO/CP stock was formed into 2 and 3 car units. The Putney service used 2x3 M-T-M+M-T-M cars but the District Line used 2x2+1x3 M-M+M-M+M-T-M. The East London Line used M-T-M+M-M although M-M+M-M no doubt were used in times of shortage of 3 car units.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Jun 2, 2012 20:22:35 GMT
Probably not directly but the ELL trains like the A stock were part of a larger pool of trains set aside for the task. The CO/CP stock was formed into 2 and 3 car units. The Putney service used 2x3 M-T-M+M-T-M cars but the District Line used 2x2+1x3 M-M+M-M+M-T-M. The East London Line used M-T-M+M-M although M-M+M-M no doubt were used in times of shortage of 3 car units. An Underground Management Meeting at the time of the 1938 stock running on the ELL gave an instruction that steps were to be taken to ensure that sub surface stock should never run on the line again. Luckily it got forgotten.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Jun 2, 2012 20:26:24 GMT
I wonder if that was due to the engineering modifications carried out....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2012 21:03:34 GMT
Many years ago before WW2 LNWR Oerlikon and Siemems stick used to work into Earls Court on the Outer Circle Service. If there was a shortage of LNWR EMU's did District stock ever run this service?
XF
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Jun 2, 2012 22:24:10 GMT
I think District stock used to run the service in 1914 before the above noted stock was ready. This was mainly E stock during the Great War I think I read. Not sure about the inter war period.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2012 22:38:12 GMT
Yes - the electrification was ready before the LNWR's trains - MDR ones were borrowed until they arrived.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2012 8:22:07 GMT
Yes - the electrification was ready before the LNWR's trains - MDR ones were borrowed until they arrived. Thanks - Do you know if there are there any photos of these workings ? XF
|
|
gantshill
I had to change my profile pic!
Posts: 1,348
|
Post by gantshill on Jun 3, 2012 17:00:37 GMT
1938 stock I seem to recall reading somewhere that the 1938 stock ran on the Metropolitan line between Wembley Park and Stanmore before that branch was taken over by the Bakerloo. I also saw a picture of the same stock at Charing Cross Jubilee before that line was opened to the public. Alas this is reliant on my memory rather than being able to give proper references.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Jun 4, 2012 5:29:15 GMT
1938 stock I seem to recall reading somewhere that the 1938 stock ran on the Metropolitan line between Wembley Park and Stanmore before that branch was taken over by the Bakerloo. I also saw a picture of the same stock at Charing Cross Jubilee before that line was opened to the public. Alas this is reliant on my memory rather than being able to give proper references. Similarly, didn't the District allow Standard Stock from the Picc to work thru to South Harrow until the 1932 handover of that branch to the Picc?
|
|
gantshill
I had to change my profile pic!
Posts: 1,348
|
Post by gantshill on Jun 4, 2012 9:58:22 GMT
I've found a reference to 1938 stock on the Metropolitan Stanmore branch. See pages 30 and 31 of Piers Connor's excellent "The 1938 Tube Stock". Now I'm wondering what line diagrams (if any) they displayed before they became part of the Bakerloo fleet.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Jun 4, 2012 10:02:57 GMT
I'm not sure there were any unless Met ones were used. The 1931 stock was used on the District as a shuttle between Sth Harrow and Acton Tn.
|
|