|
Post by jardine01 on May 28, 2012 15:01:38 GMT
hello I have often wondered if Buses/Minibuses were restricted to 62mph? I guess the newer ones are but are the older ones unrestricted? TA
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,317
|
Post by Colin on May 28, 2012 15:12:34 GMT
Buses are not built for maximum speed - the bulk of what they do is stop start stop start stop start etc etc.
Local service buses are usually limited to 50mph. Whilst some are quite capable of reaching 60mph, only those intended for long distance operation will have 70mph capability.
Whilst the maximum speed of a given vehicle may be controlled by a limiter, more often than not its the gearing that determines the maximum speed that can be achieved.
My bus can do 50mph, but that is controlled by the gearing and is thus like driving you car at the fastest speed you get it to go - of course you wouldn't drive your car like that all the time and so I don't tend to go much above 40mph, even on motorways.
|
|
|
Post by charleyfarley on May 28, 2012 15:21:32 GMT
Green Line buses appear to go very fast (for buses) sometimes on the motorway, often even passing vehicles which are themselves going fairly fast. They are certainly familiar with the outside lane.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on May 28, 2012 15:23:02 GMT
I understand that in the old days of London Transport RTs & RTLs, they had fuel governors which had the effect of limiting their speed. But once they had finished in passenger service, if they were subsequently used for the staff runs to Aldenham, those governors were removed.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on May 28, 2012 15:58:46 GMT
I know our Arriva buses are restricted as you can feel them cut out when they reach a certain speed. Yet one of the long distance buses was going flat out at around 70mph double decker! You could see the spedo!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 28, 2012 16:45:47 GMT
The RMAs that went to BEA were geared for 70mph, weren't they?
Sometimes (rarely) you see signs stuck on near the dash saying something like "This vehicle must not exceed 'x' mph"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 16:51:29 GMT
Modern Buses and Coaches are limited by law to 65mph. But surprisingly the speed limit for PSVs for non limited vehicles on a motorway remains at 70mph. So basically anything older than about 40 years (or whenever the limiter rules came in) could theoretically operate at 70mph on a motorway. Obviously as long as it does not stray into the third lane. At which point it would break the law.
However in the days of the RTs it would be unlikely that you could get one on the flat to go over 45mph. Admittedly there would be a few exceptions to the rule! The main problem not being speed but the ability of the brakes and steering to react at high speeds. The braking systems on older buses is not up to today’s standards.
Generally buses delivered to London up to about the mid 1980s were governed to around 45mph and had low ratio diffs which assisted in stop / start motoring, but the downside was a lower MPH and higher fuel consumption due to the low ratio gearing. Like I say there was some exceptions, the RMA,s RMC’s and RCL,s spring to mind. Theses had high ratio diffs (the RMAs with the highest) and 11.3L AV690 engines.
Now days buses tend to be a National product with the same diffs and same driveline. In fact they are very similar to lorries. Surprisingly functions like a sixth gear or a lower ratio gear are locked out electronically, so drivers would not be aware of their existence.
Speed control is through engine management devices rather than fuel management. It’s entirely possible for an E200 Dart to exceed 70mph if you have the relevant software to reset the engine management. Which of course we do not have access to. To inhibit acceleration, TfL require buses to attain a certain speed over a certain period of time. From memory (and without looking!) I think its 20mph but not before 15 seconds has elapsed.
|
|
pitdiver
No longer gainfully employed
Posts: 439
|
Post by pitdiver on May 28, 2012 16:52:50 GMT
Coaches are limited to 100kph.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on May 28, 2012 17:12:43 GMT
Whats the main benefit of limiting at 62.5/65mph instead of 70mph? Seems small enough a difference to be non intuitive.
Would there ever be enough justification to allow buses to accelerate faster? Or is that level determined because of standing passengers, etc?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on May 28, 2012 17:55:59 GMT
Buses and coaches with more than a certain number of seats (8 I think) are limited by law to 100 kph (62.5 mph). Coaches are allowed to use the third lane on Motorways. I have recently driven a 15 seat minibus fitted with a speed limiter, in fact I found it made driving more relaxing as by just resting my foot on the accelerator it acted like a cruise control.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,246
|
Post by rincew1nd on May 28, 2012 18:48:23 GMT
Obviously as long as it does not stray into the third lane. At which point it would break the law. I have wondered at times how this law is phrased. Is it lane three, outside lane, or something else? What are the rules for two lane motorways, or those with more than three?
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 28, 2012 19:12:56 GMT
Here's the definitive answer; For buses (anything with eight or more passenger seats (and goods vehicles under 7.5 tonnes), the speed limits are 30 in built-up areas, 50 on single carriageways, 60 on mnon-motorway dual carriageways and 70 on motorways. However, modern buses are fitted with limiters, some of which are set at 60 mph (112kph), (vehicles with more than 16 seats registered between 1974 and 1987) More recently, new vehicles have been required to have limiters set to 100kph (62mph) - the requirement has been phased in for different types on various dates since 1988, but now applies to all petrol vehicles with eight or more passenger seats registered since 2001 (except petrol engined minibuses under 7.5 tonnes, for which the cut off registration date is 2005). Vehicles fitted with speed limiters set below the speed limit for the road they are travelling on, may not use the right-hand lane if there are three or more.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on May 28, 2012 19:41:45 GMT
I can see why Buses are restricted but why are vans/Minibuses restricted? I know my minibus which we rented once was restricted to 62mph it was a 16 seater iveco daily. However with it being non- comerical I can't understand why it was?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 21:20:15 GMT
I'm a coach driver. For all intents and purposes anything over 8 seats is restricted to 100 kph / 62 mph by EU law. Use of the outermost lane on a motorway with three or more lanes is not permitted. Vehicles with capable of exceeding a powered speed in excess of 60 mph must have seat belts. Just as an aside coach drivers do not like to be called bus drivers
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2012 21:27:01 GMT
Whats the main benefit of limiting at 62.5/65mph instead of 70mph? Seems small enough a difference to be non intuitive. Would there ever be enough justification to allow buses to accelerate faster? Or is that level determined because of standing passengers, etc? It's just the law that's been standardised across the EU re: the 100 kph limit. (new) Buses are restricted to save fuel and for passenger comfort. London bus drivers drive quite harshly lol.
|
|
|
Post by causton on May 29, 2012 0:03:44 GMT
Obviously as long as it does not stray into the third lane. At which point it would break the law. I have wondered at times how this law is phrased. Is it lane three, outside lane, or something else? What are the rules for two lane motorways, or those with more than three? Easy! Don't know how it is phrased exactly in law, but the meaning is as follows: Third lane or higher. So a one lane carriageway - any lane. Two lanes - any lane. Three lanes - the first two lanes. Four lanes - the first two lanes. Five lanes - the first two lanes. You may see a pattern emerging it sounds complicated, but is easy enough if you think of it as that
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 29, 2012 6:46:50 GMT
I can see why Buses are restricted but why are vans/Minibuses restricted? I know my minibus which we rented once was restricted to 62mph it was a 16 seater iveco daily. However with it being non- comerical I can't understand why it was? OH, poor, poor jardine01. Speed obsessed AGAIN!!! The reason is simply risk assessment. A coch or bus travelling at 70mph has 27% more (kinetic) energy than at 62mph so the effect on passengers in a crash is much higher. And a line has to be drawn somewhere so 62 (a nice round 100 in metric) is deemed appropriate. And why should non-commercial passengers be at more risk than commercial ones? Why are there any speeds? Why still no 80mph on motorways despite many of the safety organisations say it would be safer (though some don't)? The answer is calculated risk by the risk experts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2012 7:00:46 GMT
Phil is very much right - KE = 1/2mv2!
If you have a vehicle travelling at 70mph (which is 31.3 ms-1) and weighs 5000kg, it's kinetic energy is 2.45MJ!
62mph (27.7 ms-1) on the other hand, works out to be 1.91MJ.. that's a lot less energy to dissipate!
Now taking a more reasonable figure for a double decker bus of 11000kg... travelling at 70mph gives 5.39MJ Travelling at 62mph gives 4.22MJ and that's before you add the passenger weight... which if we look at an Enviro400 that can hold 91 people, assuming 75kg per person, that's 6825kg in it's own right!
I know which I'd rather have to dissipate - that's one hell of a lot of energy (though if you look at a train hitting buffer stops, it seems minimal)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2012 7:18:40 GMT
I think it was prior to 2007 that vehicles up to 7.5 tons did need limiters at all. That includes small lorries. When the restrictions were brought it, it included any vehicle with over 8 seats - which means a Mercedes Sprinter vehicle with a gross vehicle weight of under 3.5 tons is restricted to 62 and banned from the outside lane.
Does anyone know if the clause whereby 'if your vehicle is fitted with a limiter then you are banned from the outside lane' is a recent addition? Examples of this are speed limited tesco delivery vans - restricted to 58 mph trying to over take a coach which can do 62 mph but is stuck at 55 mph behind a lorry in lane 2.
The energy calculations make sense however, tell that to a truck driver whose 3.5 ton vehicle is limited by law to 90 kph / 56 mph when a huge behemoth like a tri-axle Van Hool Astromega Oxford tube coach can thunder past at 100 kph / 62 mph and maintain that speed on uphills!
One further point is that many drivers make is why they are speed limited in the name of safety when they've seen trains thundering past at more than 100 mph in thick fog at Watford Gap alongside the M1?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2012 10:28:14 GMT
One further point is that many drivers make is why they are speed limited in the name of safety when they've seen trains thundering past at more than 100 mph in thick fog at Watford Gap alongside the M1? The train driver has signals at regular intervals, which indicate whether or not the track ahead is clear. A green signal is an absolute assurance that there is no train on the line ahead for at least one or two miles. The driver of a motor vehicle may find an unexpected obstruction at any time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2012 10:50:35 GMT
Buses used on urban stop/start services have gearbox and rear axle ratios set for urban speeds, and the engine speed governor determines how fast they can travel. Buses and coaches used on longer distance services tend to have more gears and a faster rear axle ratio which means they have to have their road speed limited.
One question, though. Is there a speed limit if the vehicle is carrying standing passengers? National Express coaches don't carry standing passengers, but any "bus" could use a motorway or dual carriageway. If it does, is there a speed limit if the vehicle is carrying standing passengers, or if it is certified to carry standing passengers?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2012 11:40:41 GMT
I have wondered at times how this law is phrased. Is it lane three, outside lane, or something else? What are the rules for two lane motorways, or those with more than three? Easy! Don't know how it is phrased exactly in law, but the meaning is as follows: Third lane or higher. So a one lane carriageway - any lane. Two lanes - any lane. Three lanes - the first two lanes. Four lanes - the first two lanes. Five lanes - the first two lanes. You may see a pattern emerging it sounds complicated, but is easy enough if you think of it as that No. If your vehicle has a limiter, you're not allowed to use the outside (i.e. right hand) lane if there's more than 2 lanes. So using lane 3 on a 4 lane bit of motorway is OK. As per Here's the definitive answer; <snip> Vehicles fitted with speed limiters set below the speed limit for the road they are travelling on, may not use the right-hand lane if there are three or more.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on May 29, 2012 13:58:13 GMT
Except for the first lane the correct term for all lanes on a dual carriageway or a motorway is 'overtaking lane'. Coaches are not barred from the outside lane on three lane carriageways, this rule only applies to heavy goods vehicles.
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on May 29, 2012 14:46:33 GMT
I think the 62mph limit is because of a minibus crash some years back
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on May 29, 2012 16:00:40 GMT
I used to know a driver who drove for first, he normally drove a trident plaxton on my old school route which would end it's last journey at Harold Hill (Dagnam Park Road) and then he'll be requires to go back to Dagenham Depot and I lived in Dagenham so I'd often go with him on this journey. He's chosen route from Harold Hill to Dagenham was via the A12, M25 & A13 which is of course the fastest so to this he had to do something with the ignition thingy (the thing that started the engine (not a key)) which turns off the limiter. I think he mentioned to me that he isn't actually allowed to do it but did (although that might not have been said).
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on May 29, 2012 17:43:41 GMT
However limiters are not good for long journeys around down buses should not go any faster than 40mph. Trucks and HGV's are limited to 56mph I think even those ASDA delivery vans are as it says restricted to 56mph by law. I think cars are limited to an extent not to 62mph of course but you can have the software programmed to limit the speed.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 29, 2012 18:08:37 GMT
Easy!Don't know how it is phrased exactly in law, but the meaning is as follows:Third lane or higher. So a one lane carriageway - any lane. Two lanes - any lane. Three lanes - the first two lanes. Four lanes - the first two lanes. Five lanes - the first two lanes. You may see a pattern emerging it sounds complicated, but is easy enough if you think of it as that No! Highway Code section 265 "The right-hand lane of a motorway with three or more lanes MUST NOT be used (except in prescribed circumstances) if you are driving •any vehicle drawing a trailer •a goods vehicle with a maximum laden weight exceeding 3.5 tonnes but not exceeding 7.5 tonnes, which is required to be fitted with a speed limiter •a goods vehicle with a maximum laden weight exceeding 7.5 tonnes •a passenger vehicle with a maximum laden weight exceeding 7.5 tonnes constructed or adapted to carry more than eight seated passengers in addition to the driver •a passenger vehicle with a maximum laden weight not exceeding 7.5 tonnes which is constructed or adapted to carry more than eight seated passengers in addition to the driver, which is required to be fitted with a speed limiter" In summary: - anything required to have a speed limiter - anything over 7.5 tonnes - anything towing a trailer must not use the right hand lane if there are at least two others. So: So a one lane carriageway - ok. Two lanes - either lane. Three lanes - the first two lanes. Four lanes - the first three lanes. Five lanes - the first four lanes. "prescribed circumstances" include immediately after a lane drop, where a "reasonable distance" is allowed to leave the outside lane, and when overtaking an abnormal load with a police escort.
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on May 29, 2012 18:34:53 GMT
Busses don't have anything like the same quality of seats and restraints as cars either. And there is the possibility of standing passengers. If the bus crashes at 62mph, then (give or take) the bus stops immediately and Mrs Miggins (and her shopping) is therefore accellerated (relative to the bus) to 62 mph until she hits something in her way. (This same issue is why it is less same for car drivers in normal seatbelts not to wear crash helmets as the extra mass around the head would increase whiplash as the un-restrained head and upper body would have more kinetic energy I'd be all for compulsory 5-point harnesses and Sparco seats and no limiters, but I'm told this is unpopular with bus companies... (or we could all wear leathers and hang out of the doors and get our knees down round left-handers). IIRC one of the reasons that luggage racks on trains are getting more vestigial is that post-Clapham(?) there was some research done as to the effect of all those unsecured heavy bags. 3.bp.blogspot.com/_U8_idfVlFvk/TMlQFrI2QEI/AAAAAAAAADU/bKzn4Kf2IAw/s1600/in-the-air-again-tt-races-isle-man.jpg The Isle of MAn has worked on this particular idea for some years... here is a number 29 bus pulling away from Ballaugh A number 73 bus
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,317
|
Post by Colin on May 30, 2012 1:16:48 GMT
Well at least norbitonflyer's post at reply #26 has some factual basis to it, with a source mentioned. There seems to be a number of "I think" posts, and a few opinions on what the law may or may not be yet with no sources quoted at all. As a PCV licence holder, and bus owner, I thought the law was quite simple and hadn't changed since I passed my test in 1997 - clearly the law has technically changed but the basic principle appears to be the same; my bus is not allowed in the right hand lane where there are 3 or more lanes. That has always been the case as far as I'm concerned, though I was starting to get confused by all the different interpretations. Thank you to norbitonflyer!! Judging by this thread, the need for LGV/PCV licence holders to complete a yearly one day training course - driver CPC - is an absolute necessity. As for vehicles being legally limited to less than they're legally allowed to do for their class....nope, I don't get it How can a vehicle that is legally allowed to do 70mph on a motorway be "legally limited to 56mph". Or even "legally limited to 60mph". And as for 62mph....... At the end of the day it'll either reach the legal limit for the class of vehicle and type of road, or it won't. My bus will do 50mph at a push, so I don't need to worry unless I'm in a 30 or 40 area - and I know I can't legally go in the right hand lane so I'll shall worry about myself and leave the rest to tie themselves up in legal knots!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2012 7:20:10 GMT
I must quickly say the outside lane ban only applies on motorways. I've frequently and legally used lane 3 on the A2. Why would I need to? Because of lorries overtaking each other on hills and a modern powerful coach can maintain 62 mph up those hills.
|
|