Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2006 20:34:13 GMT
Today, I saw a C-stock coming into Stepney Green westbound a tad too fast and I saw the T/O lift the handle. I heard some hissing and the train decelerated slightly faster than one might expect.
The strange thing is that, the "door open" indicator lights also came on despite the fact the doors themselves were closed and the train doing a good 20mph still!
I wonder why that happened...
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Sept 30, 2006 20:54:05 GMT
The driver was, as you say, going a little too fast. In order to bring the train speed down he released the Combined Traction Brake Controller (CTBC) in order to activate the deadman device briefly (causing a loss of trainline air - which was the sound you heard). This has the basic effect of applying the brakes harder.
The reason why the Outside Door Indicator Lights (OSDIL) came on is because the sudden deceleration caused the doors to open slightly against their push back tolerance. This will result in a loss of doors closed visual (Pilot Light) in the leading cab and the OSDIL's to illuminate on the car exteriors. There was no risk to the customers with regards to this as the doors are still held at their pushback tolerances by the door arms, which are locked in place.
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on Sept 30, 2006 20:57:33 GMT
The driver released the deadman's handle which applies the emergency brake (that was the louder than usual hissing sound).
The kinetic energy of someone leaning against a door that was at the leading end of a pair would force that door open within its limits which would cause the door interlocks to break and "door open" lights to come on.
The doors are designed to open a couple of inches to allow anyone getting something trapped between the doors to release it.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Sept 30, 2006 20:59:36 GMT
If any "Boss" saw the exercise would that mean censure of some sort?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Sept 30, 2006 21:07:33 GMT
No, not really. As a manager it would not concern me too greatly if I saw this type of occurence. However, it would be a little different if the driver in question was doing this at every stop. I think every driver has 'dropped the button' at some point in his carrear! The only risk here is if the sudden additional braking force caused a customer to fall and injure themselves. This is why a 'one off' occurance can be forgiven as a slight misjudgement but a consistent misuse would need to be addressed through the Competence Assurance process.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2006 21:27:28 GMT
Thanks for the quick reply, understand 100% now! I still evily wish drivers would take it to the limit and emulate Central Line's ATO! ;D
Going slightly off-topic but do new tube stock have an automatic safety device that if the door was open to open a tiny bit, would the train automatically stop? I was on the Northern Line sometime back and the train stopped in the tunnel abruptly.
"Please do NOT lean on the doors as it would activate the train's automatic stop." was what the t/o said...
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Sept 30, 2006 21:37:37 GMT
No, trains do not automatically apply an emergency brake - this is the responsibility of the driver. If however, the door circuit was broken for whatever reason the traction would be cut off.
I deal with new trains and I have advised Bombardier that LU do not require this feature on future rolling stock.
EDIT: To clarify - I have advised BTUK that LU do not require a feature that applies the Emergency Brakes in the event of a loss of doors closed visual.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2006 22:33:20 GMT
"Please do NOT lean on the doors as it would activate the train's automatic stop." was what the t/o said... Sounds like a slight exaggeration in order to get the desired reaction! Strictly speaking the driver should move the TBC to emergency rather than releasing the deadman to get an emergency brake application (or even better not need emergency in the first place, but as prjb says we've all done it! )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2006 22:52:22 GMT
No, trains do not automatically apply an emergency brake - this is the responsibility of the driver. If however, the door circuit was broken for whatever reason the traction would be cut off. I deal with new trains and I have advised Bombardier that LU do not require this feature on future rolling stock. Um, huh? Why would you want to remove a feature like that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2006 0:22:49 GMT
I deal with new trains and I have advised Bombardier that LU do not require this feature on future rolling stock. So you mean new trains which are supposed to be at the forefront of technology will now be able to travel along at top speed with all their doors wide open? Whereas on NR if a door opens whilst the train is in motion, the emergency brakes apply? Whats the difference and where is the logic, as I cannot see it! Strictly speaking the driver should move the TBC to emergency rather than releasing the deadman to get an emergency brake application (or even better not need emergency in the first place, but as prjb says we've all done it! ) Yes you should, because you get a stronger application by going to emergency as you get Full EP and Full Westinghouse. Where as if you just drop the handle you get a full westinghouse application.....I think?? And yes we have all been there, or seen people do it. We all make mistakes from time to time and misjudge things.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 1, 2006 15:18:56 GMT
No, trains do not automatically apply an emergency brake - this is the responsibility of the driver. If however, the door circuit was broken for whatever reason the traction would be cut off. I deal with new trains and I have advised Bombardier that LU do not require this feature on future rolling stock. Um, huh? Why would you want to remove a feature like that? We are not removing this feature, it was never there to start with. I have just advised BTUK that it is not a feature that is required on LU rolling stock.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 1, 2006 15:40:03 GMT
So you mean new trains which are supposed to be at the forefront of technology will now be able to travel along at top speed with all their doors wide open? Whereas on NR if a door opens whilst the train is in motion, the emergency brakes apply? Whats the difference and where is the logic, as I cannot see it! No, I mean that new trains at the forefront of technology will continue to operate quite safely as other rolling stock has done on LU since we introduced OPO with air operated doors. The Pilot Light will be lost and the traction will be cut, it is then the responsibility of the professional Train Operator to take appropriate action. Furthermore, I fail to see how this will cause trains to travel along at full speed with all the doors open. Coventional stock out there on the railway today cannot do this and future stock will not be able to either. The future stock will be fitted with a raft of safety features which would prevent this from occuring, including (but not limited to) Door Interlocking/speed sensing/Emergency Door Opening (a more modern Correct Side Door Enable system)/APR's etc. You cannot compare NR to LU in this respect. We have a vastly higher amount of short start/stops and carry much higher passenger numbers. If we introduced a train to the railway that EB'd (Emergency Braked) every time it lost the doors closed visual I dread to think what would happen. Indeed, in the example given which started this thread the train would have applied full emergency brakes and come to a complete stand. All the driver actually needed here was a little more brakes, not a complete EB application. Yes you should, because you get a stronger application by going to emergency as you get Full EP and Full Westinghouse. Where as if you just drop the handle you get a full westinghouse application.....I think?? And yes we have all been there, or seen people do it. We all make mistakes from time to time and misjudge things. On a 'C' Stock, in this scenario, it is better from a drivers point of view to 'drop the button' briefly rather than apply the emergency brakes for a number of reasons. In this instance the driver kept better control as he only wanted a small amount of extra braking rather than the full EB application that would have been received had he moved the CTBC into Emergency. The difference in terms of psi between dropping the handle and applying full emergency brakes isn't actually that great (Solidbond will be along shortly to confirm the actual additional braking force!). Also if you are in MAX and move the CTBC into Emergency, on a 'C' Stock, you get an occurence which most drivers do not find preferable. Drivers will know what I mean here, and other LU staff are welcome to PM me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2006 17:24:22 GMT
Furthermore, I fail to see how this will cause trains to travel along at full speed with all the doors open. Coventional stock out there on the railway today cannot do this and future stock will not be able to either. The future stock will be fitted with a raft of safety features which would prevent this from occuring, including (but not limited to) Door Interlocking/speed sensing/Emergency Door Opening (a more modern Correct Side Door Enable system)/APR's etc. I read your post (number 11) and to me you said that you (or LUL) has told Bombardier that they do not require trains that have a feature that stops power when the doors open. Conventional stock cannot do it, (unless of course you are on a downhill gradient!), but it would if it didnt have the feature? You cannot compare NR to LU in this respect. We have a vastly higher amount of short start/stops and carry much higher passenger numbers. If we introduced a train to the railway that EB'd (Emergency Braked) every time it lost the doors closed visual I dread to think what would happen. That is not what I or you said. I know perfectly well that our trains do not have an emergency brake application when the doors open, and I wasnt expecting the trains to be made with this. However I would have thought having a train that doesnt have the feature that cuts power when the doors open is actually taking two steps back? Indeed, in the example given which started this thread the train would have applied full emergency brakes and come to a complete stand. All the driver actually needed here was a little more brakes, not a complete EB application. That wasnt the point i was making either....... Also if you are in MAX and move the CTBC into Emergency, on a 'C' Stock, you get an occurence which most drivers do not find preferable. Drivers will know what I mean here, and other LU staff are welcome to PM me! That happens with all trains (near enough) when you go from Full brake to Emergency.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 1, 2006 17:42:12 GMT
I read your post (number 11) and to me you said that you (or LUL) has told Bombardier that they do not require trains that have a feature that stops power when the doors open. Conventional stock cannot do it, (unless of course you are on a downhill gradient!), but it would if it didnt have the feature?. In my post (Number 6, not 11) I quite clearly stated: No, trains do not automatically apply an emergency brake - this is the responsibility of the driver. If however, the door circuit was broken for whatever reason the traction would be cut off. As this was discussing the question of trains EB'ing when the doors are opened it was posted in that context. That is not what I or you said. I know perfectly well that our trains do not have an emergency brake application when the doors open, and I wasnt expecting the trains to be made with this. However I would have thought having a train that doesnt have the feature that cuts power when the doors open is actually taking two steps back? That wasnt the point i was making either....... I think this just stems from misreading my post Number 6. Hope this is now clarified for everyone? Also if you are in MAX and move the CTBC into Emergency, on a 'C' Stock, you get an occurence which most drivers do not find preferable. Drivers will know what I mean here, and other LU staff are welcome to PM me! That happens with all trains (near enough) when you go from Full brake to Emergency. No it doesn't, perhaps your not sure what I mean here? PM me and I will ellaborate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2006 21:33:14 GMT
Also if you are in MAX and move the CTBC into Emergency, on a 'C' Stock, you get an occurence which most drivers do not find preferable. Drivers will know what I mean here, and other LU staff are welcome to PM me! Is it 'brown trousers time'? just guessing.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Oct 19, 2006 17:39:49 GMT
No, not really. It is an expected and normal occurance, it's just drivers prefer to 'drop the button' rather than experience this in some scenarios. The one listed here that started the thread would be one of those times!
|
|