Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,820
|
Post by Dom K on Jan 25, 2011 20:22:46 GMT
The Piccadilly line is due new trains at some point in the future (said with a hint of sarcasm)... but what features would you like to see? What parts of current stock would you like to see feature and anything new, like luggage space or carriage arrangements, windows etc... I personally love the big windows on the Central Line!
Thoughts and ideas?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 20:59:06 GMT
1996/1995 stock style bodywork not the slab sided 92 and 09's. Comfortable seating also 96/95ts inspired (I am aware 73ts already have these seats), Nothing to do with the Space Train concept, Good build quality
|
|
|
Post by littlebrute on Jan 25, 2011 21:02:24 GMT
Personally I'd like to see comfortable seats! I'd also like the displays that are on the 09 stock showing destination and next station on the outside too
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,405
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 25, 2011 22:52:42 GMT
I'd like a design that somehow discouraged people from congregating in the doorways! After literraly being shoved into a sardine can-type huddle of people around the doorway on a DLR train the other day I stood in the articulated section and had enough room to swing a cat (not that I had one to swing).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 23:03:36 GMT
Its nearly always tourists who do that! lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2011 23:13:59 GMT
Its nearly always tourists who do that! lol In my brief 2 weeks of Central Line commuting I saw it in the rush hour as well, every day. That and on the Vic. Not quite so much if I took the SSR but the doors are far differently distributed on the Ds and Cs!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2011 1:13:58 GMT
New Picc Stock design requirements:
6 Cars Walk thorugh 3 pairs of Double Doors per car. 92TS Windows married to 09TS Styling TBTC/ATP akin to system used on Jubilee.
Internally I'd remove all seats between the 3rd set of doors in the driving cars, and the 1st set of doors in the 2nd/5th car, replace one 'bench' with wheelchair area, the other 3 with luggage racks (if people don't get what I mean I'll draw a diagram) - effectively giving a large luggage/wheelchair space in the articulate sections between cars 1 and 2, and 5 and 6.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,310
|
Post by Colin on Jan 26, 2011 2:31:33 GMT
This thread is in the wrong place - which area it should actually be in depends on your answer bigbaddom......
Are you asking the question because you have some form of influence over the future train design for the Piccadilly line? or are you asking merely to stimulate discussion?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2011 2:41:33 GMT
Same as current except articulated if possible (South Ken is quite tight on the turns could that squeeze people in those folds ). By the time the stock is built you're one stupid tourist if you aren't using Crossrail. We're all gonna be a bit fatter by then as well so some wider seats maybe?
|
|
Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,820
|
Post by Dom K on Jan 26, 2011 5:50:26 GMT
I wish I had an influence! Its just to see what people think, I guess this thread lies between Piccadilly and New and Future plans!
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,310
|
Post by Colin on Jan 26, 2011 18:13:47 GMT
Then you ought to have made that clear in your OP....
As you are quite new here, we'll leave this thread as it is.
In the future though, if you are merely asking peoples views to stimulate an informal discussion, I would suggest the more appropriate place to do so would be the Railway Ideas, Proposals and Suggestions area which can be found at the bottom of the home page.
|
|
Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,820
|
Post by Dom K on Jan 26, 2011 18:54:53 GMT
Please accept my apologies
|
|
|
Post by jardine01 on Mar 10, 2011 17:20:41 GMT
I think these new trains should be based on a brand new design not on the 1992 stock for example. I would like to see more standing room air conditoning ( I know its not possible on deep lines but something like forced air like on the victoria line)
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Mar 10, 2011 17:44:09 GMT
I think these new trains should be based on a brand new design not on the 1992 stock for example. I would like to see more standing room air conditoning ( I know its not possible on deep lines but something like forced air like on the victoria line) Short of making ALL the seating on modern tube stock 'tip-up', it would be very difficult to make MORE provision for standing room in them!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2011 17:48:17 GMT
LU should remember that, its trains dont only serve tourists. The Underground also goes out to far away places like Epping or Uxbridge meaning that more standing room is not ideal.
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Mar 10, 2011 17:54:17 GMT
LU should remember that, its trains dont only serve tourists. The Underground also goes out to far away places like Epping or Uxbridge meaning that more standing room is not ideal. Precisely. Whilst it certainly does serve as a mass 'people mover' in Central London, it is essentially a 'commuter service' for a vast number of passengers (sorry...customers ) each day. The LAST thing they want is to have to stand for up to an hour TWICE a day, assuming that they ARE lucky enough to get a seat in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Mar 10, 2011 18:03:38 GMT
Short of making ALL the seating on modern tube stock 'tip-up', it would be very difficult to make MORE provision for standing room in them! Like they've tried in New York with an R-160?!?: tinyurl.com/6ctev97
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Mar 10, 2011 18:09:50 GMT
Short of making ALL the seating on modern tube stock 'tip-up', it would be very difficult to make MORE provision for standing room in them! Like they've tried in New York with an R-160?!?: tinyurl.com/6ctev97Yes, but their subway is FAR more localised than out UndergrounD system and anyway you have to make allowances, they ARE American! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2011 19:47:11 GMT
Yes, but their subway is FAR more localised than out UndergrounD system and anyway you have to make allowances, they ARE American! ;D Now that's not quite true. You can ride all the way from the northern most point of The Bronx through Manhattan and through to the western Brooklyn or SW Brooklyn via Manhattan into Western Queens. It's roughly the same as going from Morden to Barnet. Maybe not quite the same as Epping to West Ruslip but who the hell does a journey like that on a daily basis? Most people commute from the toward the outskirts to the centre. So in most people's journeys that would seem to equate in both NYC and London's to be about 10-15 km (6.2-9.3 miles). I digress from the thread title. I personally think new trains should be a mixture of high capacity standing room and lots of seats. For example, you could have 1/3 of each car with seats facing forwards and backwards in a 2x1 formation. One 1/3 of each car just having fold up seats. And the final third having 2x2 like the some cars of the Bakerloo and 67 stock. It makes for flexible seating and luggage arrangements while keeping a relatively high density of seating.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Mar 10, 2011 23:44:04 GMT
In the space that 6 of 2x1 seats fit in you could equally have 6 longetudinal seats with the benefit of better standing space.
Personally I'd get rid of the grab poles in the middle of the doorway and have replacement poles by the seats in the longetudinal bits. That'd mean some fewer people standing by the door.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Mar 11, 2011 3:56:19 GMT
LU should remember that, its trains dont only serve tourists. The Underground also goes out to far away places like Epping or Uxbridge meaning that more standing room is not ideal. Precisely. Whilst it certainly does serve as a mass 'people mover' in Central London, it is essentially a 'commuter service' for a vast number of passengers (sorry...customers ) each day. The LAST thing they want is to have to stand for up to an hour TWICE a day, assuming that they ARE lucky enough to get a seat in the first place! People at the extremes of the line will get a seat as they'll be the first on an empty train! In the example of the Piccadilly I bet in a normal rush hour there are still available seats as far down the line as... Wood Green (for the Cockfosters branch) by the time the train is at Finsbury Park i'd imagine a large amount of passengers would've got off to get the Victoria, meaning those who'd got on after say Wood Green can take their seats. This argument that passengers have to stand up for over an hour is just not valid IMO. I only live in Kilburn on the Jubilee line and when I travelled every morning I often got a seat, despite it being in Zone 2!
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,400
|
Post by metman on Mar 11, 2011 9:29:07 GMT
Try living on the Uxbridge branch!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2011 10:24:49 GMT
When you first join LUL amongst other things you are told is that regular commuters only make up a third of our passengers and that the majority use us less than 7 days a year. Or something along those lines, it was a very long time ago.
In the peak less seats means more standing space means more passengers can get on board and with demand growing unless we can find a way to increase frequency (cheaply) this will be a growing trend. Off peak there should be plenty of seats for people on long trips.
Crowding around the door inside the train, everyone does it, all are equally guilty. Same with not moving down the platform so you have big crowds around the stairs and empty spaces further along.
The biggest sin of tourists is large groups entering or exiting the train by a single door, the worst sin of commuters is crowding around the door on the platform so people can only get off one at a time.
Last I heard was that the replacement due in 2014 had been cancelled and they will soldier on with the 73s until someone coughs up the readies. Maybe sometime after the next General Election, depends on who gets in and how much is in the piggy bank.
When they do finally get round to replacing them unless any serious issues have come up since they refurbed the 73s I doubt if the interior design of the new trains will be much different, they’ll be designing with Heathrow in mind first and foremost, so it will be “tourist friendly” no matter what.
|
|
|
Post by djlynch on Mar 12, 2011 0:51:20 GMT
Yes, but their subway is FAR more localised than out UndergrounD system and anyway you have to make allowances, they ARE American! ;D Not so much on the localized bit. Central line from Epping to West Ruislip: 85 minutes (+/-), per journey planner "F" train from Jamaica Center to Coney Island: 88 minutes, per published timetable. Having been on both stock (if not for that kind of duration), I can easily say that I'd rather be on the R160 for an hour and a half.
|
|
|
Post by v52gc on Mar 12, 2011 1:13:32 GMT
<cough><cough> Piccadilly Line Uxbridge to Cockfosters is +/- 100mins. Often forgotten about!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2011 6:37:37 GMT
Not so much on the localized bit. Central line from Epping to West Ruislip: 85 minutes (+/-), per journey planner "F" train from Jamaica Center to Coney Island: 88 minutes, per published timetable. Having been on both stock (if not for that kind of duration), I can easily say that I'd rather be on the R160 for an hour and a half. The R160 doesn’t have to fit into tunnels so it doesn’t have loads of kit (EPBIC, DIC, etc) under seats that need to be lifted up to access it. Interesting, capacity of an R160 on the F, 216 seated, 1002 standing, capacity of a 92 on the Central, 272 seated, 620 standing.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Mar 12, 2011 9:32:30 GMT
I'd like a design that somehow discouraged people from congregating in the doorways! After literraly being shoved into a sardine can-type huddle of people around the doorway on a DLR train the other day I stood in the articulated section and had enough room to swing a cat (not that I had one to swing). I used to congregate in the doorways even on empty trains! Personally I hated sitting down and apart from travelling to and from work in the few years that I didn't drive to work I was generally on duty in overalls with a toolbag or two and sometimes a briefcase as well. Londoners like sardine cans, they are not only used to them but also enourage their use. Trains without seats for all but the temporarily or permanently disabled would be far better. They'd carry more customers who just love to be close to one another!
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Mar 12, 2011 9:41:55 GMT
Precisely. Whilst it certainly does serve as a mass 'people mover' in Central London, it is essentially a 'commuter service' for a vast number of passengers (sorry...customers ) each day. The LAST thing they want is to have to stand for up to an hour TWICE a day, assuming that they ARE lucky enough to get a seat in the first place! People at the extremes of the line will get a seat as they'll be the first on an empty train! In the example of the Piccadilly I bet in a normal rush hour there are still available seats as far down the line as... Wood Green (for the Cockfosters branch) by the time the train is at Finsbury Park i'd imagine a large amount of passengers would've got off to get the Victoria, meaning those who'd got on after say Wood Green can take their seats. This argument that passengers have to stand up for over an hour is just not valid IMO. I only live in Kilburn on the Jubilee line and when I travelled every morning I often got a seat, despite it being in Zone 2! I used to use the Picc daily between Finsbury Park or Turnpike Lane and Earl's Court and while it may have been possible to get a seat it was not a comfortable experience and it was always better to stand in the rush hour. Evenings were always worst with the sardine can jam packed from Earl's Court. It's true to say that by King's Cross many customers would've alighted but by then it wasn't worth sitting for the few minutes left to complete the journey. A better idea would be no standing at all. The idea of moving right down inside the car was abhorrent to me especially when travelling only a few stops. It's ridiculous forcing people to positions in crowded trains whence egress for themselves and others becomes difficult which is why I hated sitting in the first place!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Mar 12, 2011 16:47:49 GMT
Nowadays you can't really have a compromise. I doubt there'll ever be 2+2 seating in a tube train again because you can't fit a wheel chair in a carriage with it. Unless you go for a layout the same as the 38ts, but remove on of the benches nearest each doorway. Hmmmm...
As previously mentioned by someone though perhaps having only tip up seats in centre vehicles would be a good idea? But only on the proviso that the remaining few seats would be as comfortable as possible. Mentioning the pic reminds me of a good few people from around my area (Ruislip) who went to Middlesex uni in Enfield. Their preferred mode of transport was the Pic all the way as it was more comfortable than a change and an hour on the bus.
You know the way the Northern did its 9 car service with what equates to SDO seems remarkably ahead of its time now.
|
|