|
|
Post by harlesden on Jul 1, 2010 20:22:47 GMT
It's always seemed rather a long run to me. Was it planned that way, or was it a case of plans for an intermediate station being abandoned?
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jul 1, 2010 21:01:17 GMT
J believe there was supposed to be an intermediate station at Barnsbury,but I'm not sure when this was mooted or abandoned.....
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jul 1, 2010 21:38:35 GMT
I'd have thought that if the proposal for Barnsbury was serious then the gradients would have been more in favour; pointing to the suggestion being dropped at an early stage in the planning process.
I might have misinterpreted things, but the location for Barnsbury would be roughly where the two tunnels crossover, I think.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Jul 1, 2010 21:39:12 GMT
Stop Press! www.davros.org/rail/culg/victoria.htmlScroll down till you get to the bit about "Scheme D" It's satisfying to actually FIND the reference you were sure you had remembered correctly! |
|
