Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2010 19:36:38 GMT
Hi All, I'm led to believe that the RPA unit fitted to the C69, D78 and the 73 differed from the 1938 tube stock. ie dual cam to single cam. Did these later stocks have a different amount of notches or was it still ten in series and ten in parallel. Are there any technical publications on the later. I have Mr Agnews Supplement to Electric Trains which goes into great detail on the RPA fitted to the 1938.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 19, 2010 8:27:33 GMT
A single camshaft was fitted to all new stocks 1938 to 1962, tube and sub-surface. Separate series and parallel camshafts were provided for the 1967/72 and C Stocks. 73 & D Stock reverted to one, larger camshaft. The original setup gave a lot of trouble on the 73s as it was too light for the work it had to do.
There are 11 camshaft contactors on the 38TS and 9 on each of the dual camshaft systems. Believe it or not, none of the training documentation I have on 73s or D Stock has a traction power diagram, so I can't tell you the number of notches on the camshaft.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2010 12:51:25 GMT
Thanks Tubeprune. Was the purpose of the dual camshaft system to save the RPA having to notch all the way through the series resistances to get to parallel if the train was already doing a speed above the series threshold. The single camshaft system had to notch up through the whole lot if the driver went from idle to parallel with the train at speed.
I'm wondering, if there were only nine contactors for the dual system they must have had less resistances and less notches for series and parallel.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 19, 2010 18:33:16 GMT
I imagine they wanted to shorten the rotation time and one way to do it was to reduce the number of notches. The motor characteristic was also different.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 19, 2010 19:56:21 GMT
Thanks Tubeprune. Was the purpose of the dual camshaft system to save the RPA having to notch all the way through the series resistances to get to parallel if the train was already doing a speed above the series threshold. The single camshaft system had to notch up through the whole lot if the driver went from idle to parallel with the train at speed. I'm wondering, if there were only nine contactors for the dual system they must have had less resistances and less notches for series and parallel. 67, 72 and C stock still have to notch through series to get to parallel - have a careful listen as the train remotors at speed. When the scheme for rheostatic braking for 67TS was being developed, they used two of the RPA machines to get all the contacts and the overall circuit configuration needed, in conjunction with separate grouping contactors. I think they just used machines available then went with that for production. For 73TS and D78, GEC had a rethink and redeveloped the RPA into a longer one with more power contacts on it, simplifying the overall equipment count a little. All the RPA machines have the same number of actual notches. If you listen carefully you'll find that in Motoring, the Parallel camshaft on C stock takes two notches at a time. I could explain that but this is a bit long already so I'll stop for now...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2010 20:58:51 GMT
Thanks t697, Please do elaborate. I'm an electrician that has designed many an electrical circuit and would love to know more on these pieces of equipment. Were trying to perfect the RPA notching sounds for our Railsimulator D78 stock to get perfection so any and all input is greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 19, 2010 21:57:57 GMT
Thanks t697, Please do elaborate. I'm an electrician that has designed many an electrical circuit and would love to know more on these pieces of equipment. Were trying to perfect the RPA notching sounds for our Railsimulator D78 stock to get perfection so any and all input is greatly appreciated. All RPAs have 10 positions. So you hear 9 clicks as it runs from one end to the other. On D78 stock each of the Series notches cuts out resistance from the motor circuit under control of a Notching Relay. To give a smoother less sudden start, the first 2 or 3 notches build the current up to the current level controlled by the NR. At full Series, grouping contactors reconfigure the power circuit to put the 4 motors into two parallel strings with resistance in circuit again. The RPA then runs back the other way under notching relay control, again cutting out resistance until the motors are in full parallel with 3 notches to go. The last 3 RPA notches actually control weak field contactors. In the actual configuration in use though, none of these close in 'Flag Down' and only the first two in 'Flag up', so you won't feel any increase in traction when an unused notch is taken. It gets to full parallel at about 18 - 20mph from memory. In rheostatic braking, it can initiate at nominally just over 50mph which is higher than the line speed limit. So it will always take a few notches before the brake current establishes for the speed you happen to be at. Again the Notching relay controls the notches taking a notch as the train speed falls and the current falls. The NR settings vary depending on the brake step selected (1 to 4) by the T/Op and the passenger load. Rheo won't start if you initiate braking from below about 22mph - because by the time it had taken enough notches to establish current you would be almost at last notch, so it would just wear the switchgear out pointlessly. Last notch is roughly 10mph then the friction brake comes back on. Double notching in parallel on C stock is because the notching relay only detects one of the two motor strings, and it switches in the other one on the first notch and its own one second notch of the pair then the current keeps the relay closed and the notch is held until same thing again. The D78 one switches two contacts in each notch during parallel, one in each motor string so you don't get the double notch effect. If you travel on D78 you'll notice that the RPA clicks are the quietest on any of the fleets. This seems to be because the equipment case is better sealed and there's more space between it and the vehicle floor. Also the tractive effort swings are less noticeable because the steps are evenly graded and the intercar drawgear is quite stiff longitudinally so you don't get all that longitudinal surging like C stock. Apologies to anyone who fell asleep unexpectedly here!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 19, 2010 22:13:00 GMT
For those of you with the Agnew books, there's a picture of a GE Notching Relay dated about 1925. This is the basic design used to control all the RPAs from 1935 Experimental right through to D78 stock. The RPA itself also started with GE in the 30's and last built to almost unchanged basic mechanical details through to D78 stock. Quite remarkable that a few equipments of this type will be running 80 to 90 years after someone did the basic design.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2010 7:23:11 GMT
Right, let me get my head round this. Full parallel is between 18 and 20mph, that's a lot slower than I imagined. I had it about 30mph. In parallel you would only here six notches before getting to full if the weak field flag is down and eight if up. The RPA actually puts the resistance back in as the train decelerates. Which I didn't know. Does it notch back up from rest under braking or step back down from parallel or where ever it was last at.
What you said about the C stock double notching sounds very familiar to the Standard Stock when in parallel. That only detected one motor circuit but always switched out the undetected one first.
I need to get one of my friends to take a trip on the D78 to do a RPA sound check I think. From the sound recording I do have I did notice the first 3 clicks to be very rapid.
Thanks for an amazingly informative post. I'd love to get my hands on a circuit diagram for this.
|
|
DrJimi
Virtual District Line construction engineer and arborist
Posts: 365
|
Post by DrJimi on Apr 20, 2010 13:51:52 GMT
Fascinating reading t697 - thank you! I'm one of Darren's collaborators on the Railworks project and have been trying to simulate the RPA activity (logic) in code. Between us we have Mr Agnew's Vol1 and 2 tomes, and the Supplement describing the 38TS operation. We both have a strong electrical/electronic background. I also was unaware that the RPA stepped back as the train slows. I perceive how it notches up via the NR (essentially a flip-flop relay) as it detects the current drop below threshold, but I don't yet see what part of the circuit is feeding it a current value to cause drop back under deceleration. The fact that it does so answers a puzzle I was pondering, but I'd love to learn more how that part works. I echo Darren - I'd love to see a circuit diagram ala those provided by Mr Agnew. I did stumble of what I believe to be the original patent for the 'technology' here: www.freepatentsonline.com/1871777.pdf filed by a Mr A J Clarke in Jan 1930, about 8 years before Mr Agnew's wonderful books.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 20, 2010 19:48:20 GMT
Fascinating reading t697 - thank you! I'm one of Darren's collaborators on the Railworks project and have been trying to simulate the RPA activity (logic) in code. Between us we have Mr Agnew's Vol1 and 2 tomes, and the Supplement describing the 38TS operation. We both have a strong electrical/electronic background. I also was unaware that the RPA stepped back as the train slows. I perceive how it notches up via the NR (essentially a flip-flop relay) as it detects the current drop below threshold, but I don't yet see what part of the circuit is feeding it a current value to cause drop back under deceleration. The fact that it does so answers a puzzle I was pondering, but I'd love to learn more how that part works. I echo Darren - I'd love to see a circuit diagram ala those provided by Mr Agnew. I did stumble of what I believe to be the original patent for the 'technology' here: www.freepatentsonline.com/1871777.pdf filed by a Mr A J Clarke in Jan 1930, about 8 years before Mr Agnew's wonderful books. The Notching Relay used with RPAs isn't of this flip-flop type. I see there are pictures of one or two of those in Agnew. I've seen our type pictured many years ago in an Agnew, but it must be in the 38TS volume, which I don't have. It is a single contact type with a knife edge armature. In rheo brake, the RPA camshaft again switches resistance out as the train speed falls, so as to keep the motor current and hence torque, up to that set by the NR. The circuits are configured so that the camshaft runs up to position 10 then grouping contactors reconfigure things slightly and the cam runs back for the remaining brake notches ending back where it started still cutting out more resistance. The brake energy is dissipated in the resistors of course. If one of you PM's me, I will try to send you a little more to clear things up and stop us all boring everyone else on here too much!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2010 20:40:21 GMT
Your right about the knife edge armature notching relay. It's in Mr Agnews Supplement To Electric Trains and just discusses, in depth, the 1938 RPA mechanism. If the RPA cuts out resistances during braking, how is that controlled by the different braking positions on the CTBC. Is the notching relay "loaded" with different currents to assist the motor current for the different brake positions on the CTBC.
Don't worry about boring others with this thread. I started it and I am greatly interested in what you are explaining to me and you will be suprised at the amount of users that are most probably following this, with interest, in the background. After all, that's what this section of the forum is for. Thanks and keep posting.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 20, 2010 20:53:46 GMT
Your right about the knife edge armature notching relay. It's in Mr Agnews Supplement To Electric Trains and just discusses, in depth, the 1938 RPA mechanism. If the RPA cuts out resistances during braking, how is that controlled by the different braking positions on the CTBC. Is the notching relay "loaded" with different currents to assist the motor current for the different brake positions on the CTBC. Don't worry about boring others with this thread. I started it and I am greatly interested in what you are explaining to me and you will be suprised at the amount of users that are most probably following this, with interest, in the background. After all, that's what this section of the forum is for. Thanks and keep posting. I recall the 38TS NR has power coil, lift coil and rate coil. This is still the same concept in D78 stock. Other low voltage (-50V fed) circuits modify the current in the lift and rate coils in accordance with passenger load and the T/Op selected motoring rate (rate 1 or 2) acceleration or Service Brake (1 - 4). The effect of current in these control coils is to add to or oppose the effect of the power coil that has the motor current in it. Thus the motor current level at which the relay drops out varies in line with setting selected through the control currents in lift and rate coils. The lift coil is also energised fully, still used in the way used on 38TS to close the relay as a notch is taken ready to hold the next one. But the inter-interlock circuit is 50V not 600V as on 38TS, so that all these other controls can be added too. Offer of other info via PM still stands.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2010 23:11:47 GMT
Definitely not boring everyone else, rather interesting as it happens! Are there any pictures of an RPA on the web as I'm struggling to visualise what's going on?
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 21, 2010 6:05:00 GMT
t697, as far as I remember, the PSG and weak field switches are on separate contactors, not on the camshaft itself. Can you confirm?
I'm not sure if this comes out in what is being discussed but pre-67TS, the single camshaft ran up to full series and ran back to full parallel so it was effectively in the off position at full parallel. For 67/72TS, the series camshaft ran back to its off position as soon at it reached transition and then the parallel camshaft ran back after it reached full parallel. You can hear two camshafts running as the train progresses through the parallel notches, one going fast (the series camshaft running back) and one notching under load (the parallel one). When it gets to full parallel, the parallel camshaft runs back. The sequence is similar for rheo braking.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2010 10:42:05 GMT
Here you go peter. The RPA mechanism as fitted to the 1938 Tube Stock and the Notching relay.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 21, 2010 20:24:09 GMT
t697, as far as I remember, the PSG and weak field switches are on separate contactors, not on the camshaft itself. Can you confirm? I'm not sure if this comes out in what is being discussed but pre-67TS, the single camshaft ran up to full series and ran back to full parallel so it was effectively in the off position at full parallel. For 67/72TS, the series camshaft ran back to its off position as soon at it reached transition and then the parallel camshaft ran back after it reached full parallel. You can hear two camshafts running as the train progresses through the parallel notches, one going fast (the series camshaft running back) and one notching under load (the parallel one). When it gets to full parallel, the parallel camshaft runs back. The sequence is similar for rheo braking. 1. Yes, on all the pre 67TS equipments Series/Parallel transition is on the separate PSG switch (Parallel/Series Grouping switch) which has 1 n/c power contact for Series and 2 n/o power contacts for Parallel. Also weak field is on separate contactors for all the equipments with RPAs right to D78. On D78 and 73TS they are sequenced off control contacts on the RPA. On 67TS onwards PSG is replaced by individual single pole contactors. There are more too for Braking grouping and Full parallel so the Parallel RPA can run back. I always thought the PSG switch was the most 'Victorian' looking item in a PCM case! 2. Good description of the camshaft sequences. In rheo on the 2 RPA equipment the Series RPA does the first group of notches then stays put while the Parallel RPA does the rest, until they are both fully notched up. After rheo fade down the last notch the Rheo Proving relay drops out and both RPAs run back fast off load. You can also get them running back in a brake release. They run back inserting resistance and reducing motor current until RPR drops out and then run the rest of the way back. 3. On 73TS and D78 from new, the RPA direction can also be reversed to reduce motor current to correct wheelslip detected by armature voltage imbalance within a motor pair. 67TS and C stock had a mod in the 80's to do the same but can't notch back through parallel/series transition. I don't think we did the mod on 72TS but not sure.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 21, 2010 20:31:34 GMT
The RPA mechanism as fitted to the 1938 Tube Stock and the Notching relay. Yes. Both first made in the 1930s. Still in production recognisably similar through to the last D78 stock in 1981. Still running well for a few years yet. Last full fleet to go should be Bakerloo 72TS. (Arguably the worst of these schemes in my opinion.)
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 21, 2010 20:44:43 GMT
The RPA mechanism as fitted to the 1938 Tube Stock and the Notching relay. Yes. Both first made in the 1930s. Still in production recognisably similar through to the last D78 stock in 1981. Still running well for a few years yet. Last full fleet to go should be Bakerloo 72TS. (Arguably the worst of these schemes in my opinion.) Yup. The worst feature was the RBPR. As you run into a station, one car fails to pick up rheo and the whole train dies while the e.p catches up. Horrible! Still, it doesn't matter too much on the existing Bakerloo, it's so slow!!! But it was dire on the Stanmore line running SB.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Apr 21, 2010 21:58:20 GMT
72TS. The worst feature was the RBPR. As you run into a station, one car fails to pick up rheo and the whole train dies while the e.p catches up. Horrible! Still, it doesn't matter too much on the existing Bakerloo, it's so slow!!! But it was dire on the Stanmore line running SB. When new they also had an issue that the rheo would suddenly build up too fast for the releasing e.p. on brake entry, banging your nose on the windscreen (not really) or driving the wheels into slip. We did a mod to improve that in about 82/83. This smoothed the rheo effort build up by momentary use of weak field. It's still fitted. Did you drive 72TS before and after? Was the mod worth the effort? As a reminder, the Rheo Cut-Out Switch was blanked off at the same time.
|
|
DrJimi
Virtual District Line construction engineer and arborist
Posts: 365
|
Post by DrJimi on Apr 22, 2010 21:53:20 GMT
Gentlemen - thank you all! Once again our simulaiton efforts will be that much more realistic thanks to your expert input. I'm sure in the future we'll post a video of the Railworks D78 being put through its paces - on some metals we hope you recognize.
Best to all, Jimi
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2010 6:58:57 GMT
I echo Jimi's comments. Thanks to all for such a detailed input. Darren.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Apr 23, 2010 10:43:45 GMT
72TS. The worst feature was the RBPR. As you run into a station, one car fails to pick up rheo and the whole train dies while the e.p catches up. Horrible! Still, it doesn't matter too much on the existing Bakerloo, it's so slow!!! But it was dire on the Stanmore line running SB. When new they also had an issue that the rheo would suddenly build up too fast for the releasing e.p. on brake entry, banging your nose on the windscreen (not really) or driving the wheels into slip. We did a mod to improve that in about 82/83. This smoothed the rheo effort build up by momentary use of weak field. It's still fitted. Did you drive 72TS before and after? Was the mod worth the effort? As a reminder, the Rheo Cut-Out Switch was blanked off at the same time. No, I was overseas with LTI by then.
|
|