|
|
Post by happybunny on Sept 2, 2009 17:58:37 GMT
I heard the 09 stock was 'christened' with its first one under yesterday late evening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2009 18:49:44 GMT
How horrible. Very sad.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282 
|
Post by Ben on Sept 2, 2009 18:50:57 GMT
Surely its just gotta be bad luck that it happened with the 09ts?
Terrible occurance to all involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Sept 2, 2009 19:04:17 GMT
Surely its just gotta be bad luck that it happened with the 09ts? Terrible occurance to all involved. I doubt if the vic gives a monkey's if they were mown down by a brand new 09ts, or a grotty old 67ts! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2009 19:07:53 GMT
Surely its just gotta be bad luck that it happened with the 09ts? Terrible occurance to all involved. The unsung heroes of these events are of course quite often the ERU. Personally, I think it is a disgrace the ERU are not given more recognition for the work they do. |
|
|
|
Post by 1938 on Sept 2, 2009 22:11:58 GMT
**Comment Removed by Colin** That comment was inappropriate to say the least! I would have contacted a forum staff member but none on line. |
|
|
|
Post by Bighat on Sept 2, 2009 22:48:56 GMT
**comment removed by Colin** That comment was inappropriate to say the least! I would have contacted a forum staff member but none on line. And so you should. This person has been banned (under a different name) from one transport forum, and is currently making a nuisance of himself by intemperate posts on another, not to mention breaking forum rules by advertising his own pathetic little forum in his footer! |
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Sept 2, 2009 23:24:02 GMT
Ladies & Gents
Comments here have been noted and the Mods/Admins are aware.
I would like to remind all that one-under's are a sensitive subject and flippant comments, tongue in cheek, or otherwise will NOT be tolerated.
Please think carefully before posting
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,310
|
Post by Colin on Sept 3, 2009 2:46:23 GMT
Further to Chris's post, you are all reminded of the forum's policy on the subject of one under's (which are posted within the forum rules): 7.2 (Person Under Train incidents - also referred to as 'one unders') Person under train incidents are a particularly difficult subject, so the following applies on this forum: - (7.2a) Members are not permitted to enquire about the status of a person under train incident. Such posts or threads will be removed by the forum staff.
- (7.2b) LU staff that are directly involved in an incident may post a brief outline if they feel it is appropriate - however details of a fatal incident are not allowed in case of any prejudice at a future inquest.
- (7.2c) Discussion following such a post will be at the discretion of the forum staff.
As a result, all details of the incident have been removed, as have any references to those details. Furthermore, an insensitive post by Carlovel1 has been removed in it's entirety. Rule 7.2c has now been invoked and this thread is therefore locked. |
|
