Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 7, 2009 19:48:05 GMT
I have posted about this signal before, but shock horror - do you think I can find it? ;D ;D Anyway, GB9 is the westbound/down station starter at Gunnersbury. It is also possible to reverse off this platform in the opposite direction (driver changes ends ;D) via a 'wrong road starter' (GB6) at the other end of the platform. Now if this were LU, GB9 would be a semi automatic signal (ie, controlled by a signaller) and would be held at danger when a train reverses in the platform using GB6 - but GB9 is plated as an automatic signal. When I questioned this in the past, it was put down to a quirk of NR signalling. Well after four and bit years of driving on the District, today the plot thickened! I had a Yellow at GB3 (effectively our home signal for Gunnersbury), then as I arrived in the platform GB9 was Red - nothing wrong with that and so far so good - as much as drivers shouldn't assume, it was reasonable to assume I had a train ahead of me. Then GB9 cleared........straight to Green! If GB9 is a true automatic signal (as plated), it should have gone to Yellow first. So is GB9 actually a controlled signal, and if so why isn't it plated as such?
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jan 7, 2009 22:24:11 GMT
This also happened to me today.. and completely threw me! Right down to me wondering if I had the signal plates on NR muddled up!
Also, given the NR rule of immediately getting on the phone if you encounter a red signal... why does GB9 need a minutes board along side it if its an automatic?
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jan 7, 2009 22:36:10 GMT
Colin, this got my brain cells recalling! I was around when those signals were put in (or their colour-light predcecessors)...late March 1980 was it? They replaced the last semaphores on the Richmond branch. Work started on the Friday, and as I was working I missed photographing the old signals' removal...they were on the ground when I went from Gunnersbury to Richmond. I am certain that up until then there was no wrong-road starter semaphore. Trains were reversing that weekend I seem to recall from the WB/Down, but were hand-signalled. It was interesting to note that there was a colour-light wrong-road starter going in. All that was previously controlled from Gunnersbury 'box, and then shifted to Richmond of course.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 8, 2009 0:36:25 GMT
Now if this were LU, GB9 would be a semi automatic signal (ie, controlled by a signaller) and would be held at danger when a train reverses in the platform using GB6 - but GB9 is plated as an automatic signal. When I questioned this in the past, it was put down to a quirk of NR signalling. Was the response along the lines of 'this is normally an automatic signal, but is occasionally controlled'? Gunnersbury plated signals are controlled from the panel in Richmond 'box. I'm not sure if this is an integra/domino panel or just a modern version of IFS. I'd place a bet on this signal being 'fleeted' - which is a ghastly Americanism. However the signal worked it will always clear to the least restrictive aspect possible. Yes. What is so exceptional about that? Has there been a fault or a train sat in Kew Gardens every time you've approached GB9? Or has the Richmond signalman finally remembered to flick the 'Signal GB9 Auto Working switch' (if one exists - my copy of the relevant sectional appendix is still in Wales)? Hmm. Lightbulb switches on - GB9 *is* an Automatic, *but* is approach released as you pass GB1. From what you've said so far, you have described the workings of a three-aspect automatic perfectly. Green on GB9 would indicate that GB11 is either showing Yellow or Green; a yellow on GB11 would be shown if GB13 is Red. GB9 will have gone to Yellow, albeit exceptionally briefly (assuming that Richmond is an NX panel) as the 'route proving ring' makes in the relay logic. It can clear to Green immediately as an 'auto (so fast you may not see the yellow actually light). Looking at what paperwork I can find (and it is a bit ancient as it covers the resignalling from Gunnersbury to Richmond (except platform 7) with effect from 24/2/80) the first signal plated as controlled is GB17 - in effect the inner home from Richmond - with the stencil indicator for platforms. Can I dare to suggest that GB9 has been working properly today (possibly for the first time in ages)? ;D ;D
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 8, 2009 4:04:50 GMT
Up until yesterday, it has always gone from Red to Yellow, and there's always been a train ahead when it does so (otherwise it's always been Green (ie, no train ahead) and is indicated as being so on the post with GB3 (it has it's own repeater) - I've never seen it go straight to Green from Red before.
That's the main reason why I've re-raised this signal - very strange behaviour!
Surely if the signaller has some form of control over it, it ought to be plated as a semi?
Hmmm.......interesting......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2009 5:44:27 GMT
Surely if NR have made changes to the way GB9 is operated (no matter how small), T/Ops for both LU and NR should have been notified?
Does GB9 still have it's auto signal plate above it's number? IIRC, an auto signal on NR should carry a white rectangle with a horizontal thick black line on it.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 8, 2009 10:03:26 GMT
Surely if the signaller has some form of control over it, it ought to be plated as a semi? Hmmm.......interesting...... No; if the level of control is an emergency replacement switch, then the signal remains plated as an auto' (as that is the 'usual' method of working). I can think of several installlations, most particularly the Caley main line north from Gretna to Carstairs, which has loooooooooong stretches of auto' signals on plain line [1]. IIRC that emergency replacement switches are on every fifth signal in either direction; and I'm pretty sure that this was the installation that set the 'norm' for signals with these switches retaining the 'auto' plates; signals that functioned automatically, but were replaced to danger by the operating of a local groundframe - emergency crossovers like the now infamous Lambrigg - had the same style of plate as an auto, but with the word 'SEMI' over the black bar. Look at figures 9.26 and 9.27 from the good offices of SDL; this page also gives an explanation of the 'minutes plate' at 9.34. What I can't work out for sure is if the signalbox at Richmond uses this emergency replacement switch to hold GB9 for reversing moves. Have you or anyone else come in for a reverse and GB9 has been shewing a green? I still consider that GB9 is approach released (which ties in with the signalling system sorting out which direction trains will go from Gunnersbury), and both you and chrish managed to trundle into the clearing section with nothing in front of you until at least GB13. [1] 'back in the day' when you could still smoke on the trains, it was quite pleasant if I'd caught the overnight sleeper from Glasgow south, having a tab in the Mk 3 vestibule - poking my head out of the droplight and watching anything up to 5 separate signals clearing in front of the train - more often than not if these signals read into a controlled route (like GB17) you would only see a momentary 'blip' of the first, then the second yellow before the signal went to green. Occasionally I could see this over four signal sections - each signal a register behind the other until they had all reached green.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 8, 2009 11:02:47 GMT
Have you or anyone else come in for a reverse and GB9 has been shewing a green? If only - I've been gagging to get a reverse there just to satisfy my own curiosity! ;D ;D Mind you, I've also dreamed of getting the wrong route at East Putney towards Waterloo (W360) just so I can see if the train stop stays up ;D ;D ;D Somebody somewhere must know the answers.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2009 14:07:04 GMT
I was once held at GB9 and when I got onto the phone to the signaller, he said something along the lines "Oh, sorry - forgot about you" and cleared it straight to green. That was a couple of years ago now.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jan 8, 2009 20:51:38 GMT
Mind you, I've also dreamed of getting the wrong route at East Putney towards Waterloo (W360) just so I can see if the train stop stays up ;D ;D ;D Somebody somewhere must know the answers....... I'll see what I can find out on that one - may not be for a few weeks though!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 11, 2009 12:46:14 GMT
I've asked on a more signalling-related forum about GB9, and the answers are here. There is a germane comment about 'selective auto' working (which confirms my thoughts about GB9 being able to be 'fleeted').
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on Jan 11, 2009 12:49:52 GMT
When I reversed down-to-up at Gunnersbury, then down starter GB9 stayed on.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 11, 2009 12:56:19 GMT
When I reversed down-to-up at Gunnersbury, then down starter GB9 stayed on. Thanks, HB - that confims the last part of the jigsaw! You little star. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by happybunny on Jan 11, 2009 14:16:38 GMT
No problem always glad to help
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2009 15:54:53 GMT
For the record Richmond has 3 emergency replacement buttons on the panel. These are for GB9 (Gunnersbury Down Starter), GB12 (Kew Gardens Up Starter) and GB16 the 1st up line signal after leaving Richmond. GB16 is replaceable to provide a limit to shunting before returning into the platform from GB53. GB9 & 12 have a more interesting need as they protect the river bridge and in the event of a water borne bridge bash they are used to stop trains approaching the bridge. GB9 would also be replaced for a reversing movement. There is no requirement for semi to be added to the plate as this would only apply to signals protecting ground frames controlling points or swing bridges and these would be replaced by the release. All new signalling installations are provided with emergency replacement buttons at all automatic signals and the use of semi automatic plates are unlikely as signals will now be plated as controlled even though they are automatic in operation. The means of operation is irrelevant to the t/op as the plate denoting auto, semi or controlled is all that is required for them to apply the correct rules.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 11, 2009 22:20:05 GMT
Cheers for the replies folks, that's answered pretty much everything - however a new question has now been generated!! GB9 & 12 have a more interesting need as they protect the river bridge and in the event of a water borne bridge bash they are used to stop trains approaching the bridge. GB9 would also be replaced for a reversing movement. There is no requirement for semi to be added to the plate as this would only apply to signals protecting ground frames controlling points or swing bridges and these would be replaced by the release. All new signalling installations are provided with emergency replacement buttons at all automatic signals and the use of semi automatic plates are unlikely as signals will now be plated as controlled even though they are automatic in operation. The means of operation is irrelevant to the t/op as the plate denoting auto, semi or controlled is all that is required for them to apply the correct rules. You say GB9's (and I think GB12's is also plated as an auto, though I'm not at home to confirm that on my diagrams) has the replacing switch to to provide protection in the event of a bridge bash, and you talk about signals being plated such that drivers apply the rules pertaining to the plate rather than having to be concerned about how the signal operates.............that's all well & good, but under Network Rail rules drivers can carry on at auto signals (as far as the next signal only) if they cannot get hold of the signaller - so GB9's, being plated as an auto, would actually be useless at providing protection in the event of a bridge strike! If it were plated as a controlled signal, and the driver cannot contact the signaller, he can't move the train (as per Network Rail rules) - surely that would be a better scenario?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2009 22:39:39 GMT
I was once held at GB9 and when I got onto the phone to the signaller, he said something along the lines "Oh, sorry - forgot about you" and cleared it straight to green. That was a couple of years ago now. The other day, I rolled up to GB1 and waited for it to clear, slowly got my hi-vi on, made a rambling PA, climbed out of the cab watching the stick all the way and 'eventually' had to pick up the phone. As soon as I picked the phone up, the stick cleared to yellow and then within, literally, seconds to green. I spoke to the signaller and he said - along the lines - that I hadn't shown up on his circuit diagram and he assumed I was still at Turnham G. Unusually for a signaller/controller, he was very pleasant and full of apologies. ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jan 11, 2009 22:48:49 GMT
I was once held at GB9 and when I got onto the phone to the signaller, he said something along the lines "Oh, sorry - forgot about you" and cleared it straight to green. That was a couple of years ago now. The other day, I rolled up to GB1 and waited for it to clear, slowly got my hi-vi on, made a rambling PA, climbed out of the cab watching the stick all the way and 'eventually' had to pick up the phone. As soon as I picked the phone up, the stick cleared to yellow and then within, literally, seconds to green. I spoke to the signaller and he said - along the lines - that I hadn't shown up on his circuit diagram and he assumed I was still at Turnham G. Unusually for a signaller/controller, he was very pleasant and full of apologies. ;D ;D ;D Are you allowed to leave the cab without a still further delaying radio message to the Controller first?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 11, 2009 23:54:44 GMT
Are you allowed to leave the cab without a still further delaying radio message to the Controller first? Yes. We are supposed to inform the controller when we leave the cab, and can ask for traction current to be switched off, but in reality only the pedantic or those that can't trust themselves will do so (call the controller first that is).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2009 1:14:51 GMT
Cheers for the replies folks, that's answered pretty much everything - however a new question has now been generated!! You say GB9's (and I think GB12's is also plated as an auto, though I'm not at home to confirm that on my diagrams) has the replacing switch to to provide protection in the event of a bridge bash, and you talk about signals being plated such that drivers apply the rules pertaining to the plate rather than having to be concerned about how the signal operates.............that's all well & good, but under Network Rail rules drivers can carry on at auto signals (as far as the next signal only) if they cannot get hold of the signaller - so GB9's, being plated as an auto, would actually be useless at providing protection in the event of a bridge strike! As t/op's need to know what type of signal it is and for that the various signal plates were provided to enable them to apply the correct section of the rule book. The use of auto plates in this case is due to the scheme having been undertaken during 1980. The signalling principles have been continually updated since then following various problems but are not generally retrospective. Quite right as that provides for a greater protection for the vunerable t/op in his cab as a dunking in the river would be a little fatal. The precedent has been set on another NR line where the LUL services runs, where the auto signals protecting section gaps have been plated as controlled for the obvious reason. Previously they were plated as auto and there was always the risk that a t/op would proceed but never actually happened in this case.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2009 13:26:44 GMT
I once sat at GB9 at danger and eventually got onto the signal phone, to a very narked signaller who told me I was supposed to be reversing at Gunnersbury and hadn't I been told ! No, was the answer! I proceeded to change the train display to an "Upminster" and change ends, whilst the signaller gave the LUL controller a rant .... I was then called up and told it was a mistake and the train behind was reversing there ! So I had to then change the display again and exchange passenger load again !!! I have reversed there once, but only when i was a trainee !!! On a related theme, I gather from assorted persons, that it is perfectly possible at various locations to clear a green signal at both ends of the same platform. ie. it is not necessarilly the case that a starter will be held at red, when a train is reversing at that location. Can anyone say with any certainty where this is possible ?
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on Jan 13, 2009 14:20:57 GMT
I once sat at GB9 at danger and eventually got onto the signal phone, to a very narked signaller who told me I was supposed to be reversing at Gunnersbury and hadn't I been told ! No, was the answer! I proceeded to change the train display to an "Upminster" and change ends, whilst the signaller gave the LUL controller a rant .... I was then called up and told it was a mistake and the train behind was reversing there ! So I had to then change the display again and exchange passenger load again !!! I have reversed there once, but only when i was a trainee !!! On a related theme, I gather from assorted persons, that it is perfectly possible at various locations to clear a green signal at both ends of the same platform. ie. it is not necessarilly the case that a starter will be held at red, when a train is reversing at that location. Can anyone say with any certainty where this is possible ? West Ken EB platform can be green both ends
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Jan 13, 2009 15:32:33 GMT
On a related theme, I gather from assorted persons, that it is perfectly possible at various locations to clear a green signal at both ends of the same platform. ie. it is not necessarilly the case that a starter will be held at red, when a train is reversing at that location. Can anyone say with any certainty where this is possible ? Harrow On The Hill Platforms 2, 5 & 6. Liverpool Street Outer Rail platform is another place but in this case one of the signals is an automatic.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 13, 2009 15:35:20 GMT
West Ken EB platform can be green both ends Isn't that because the EB signal is controlled from a different IMR to the WB signal? IIRC it is WC9 one way and ??WB34 the other.
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jan 13, 2009 16:17:02 GMT
West Ken EB platform can be green both ends Isn't that because you need to pull up past the EB starter to get clear of No 12 xover and allow the route WB to be set? Do you remember the Picc guy who went along the EB back towards Barons Court?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2009 21:12:35 GMT
mr tubeprune is right that is why when reversing east to west you have to stop at the R stopping mark
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2009 0:07:26 GMT
Indeed you do have to pull up to the R mark at West Ken. But wouldn't this mean that the signal at the west end would still be red until you pulled up to the R board, by which time the signal at the east end would be red? I've never actually done the move, although there is one train early morning from Ealing Common that does (empty).
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jan 14, 2009 0:46:38 GMT
But wouldn't this mean that the signal at the west end would still be red until you pulled up to the R board, by which time the signal at the east end would be red? I suppose it all hangs on what ΔDT (and ΔQ, possibly) do, looking at the relevant peril. I suspect that you are correct - the EB signal will be returned to red by by the train dropping the track in advance of the EB signal. ΔDT will register the move as clear of the crossover and occupancy of track circuit D will drop the EB. Edit: Curses! I thought that I'd finally got Proboards to accept a Delta symbol - for the A plus umelaut/diaresis above read a triangle. Edit part 2:I think I've managed to fix it.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Jan 14, 2009 2:29:14 GMT
although there is one train early morning from Ealing Common that does (empty). IIRC, that is a Barking night turn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2009 2:46:09 GMT
Can anyone say with any certainty where this is possible ? It used to be possible in platform 2 at Leytonstone. I once saw this during severe disruption. I think the signalman was hoping someone would just take the train anywhere.
|
|