Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 19:00:27 GMT
Sorry if this isn't in the right place, couldn't see where else to put it. I went along to the new Vale Parkway station on Saturday, couldn't help noticing that not only is the station itself still a building site, but work on the adjacent housing development didn't seem to have even started, so the station doesn't appear to have anything to serve. I spoke to the driver of the train who told me that the station building is due to open in May, but that the housing development wouldn't be going ahead because the land is a floodplain and no developers wanted it. In light of all that Aylesbury Vale Parkway is starting to look pretty pointless Unless of course Chiltern Railways extend their passenger services beyond as is their long-term ambition.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 30, 2008 19:27:16 GMT
There are still areas to the North of Aylesbury that will hopefully benefit, Quarrendon for example. I'm not sure about the traffic offerings North of Aylesbury, Quainton has some commuters, and Winslow maybe too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 20:44:52 GMT
Well, given that there is quite a movement for the reinstatement of the 'Varsity Line', that was Oxford - Cambridge, I'd suggest Chiltern have factored this plan in, and given that AVP was designed to be modded to an island platform... well, who knows? I would like to see the Oxford - Cambridge line reopened, tho quite a number of places have been built across. I'm not too sure how things would work around Calvert, because of the the Binliner traffic, but surely pathing issues could be easily sorted!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Dec 30, 2008 20:47:46 GMT
Chiltern are thinking of constructing a chord to reach Bicester Town, only £200m!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:12:38 GMT
All part of the plan! In looking at the last episode of Beechings Tracks on the BBC iPlayer, I was quite excited when one of them stated that he expected to see a lot of railway reopenings in the next 20-30 years. Woohoo! Yeah, go for it.
If there are plans to run west through Claydon and Winslow to Bletchley. I *think* the track might need to be tamped a little; my visit last November revealed rails turned in on themselves where the 'keys' had come loose!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:18:58 GMT
Chiltern are thinking of constructing a chord to reach Bicester Town, only £200m! So they can provide an Oxford-London service. But that will have more effect on the Chiltern Main Line rather than London-Aylesbury tbh. They can't be serious about reopening that much of the old Varsity line though can they? It's been closed for so long, even though some of the track is still in place it will have degraded so much that the cost will be astronomical, and more so the longer it's left. Also as you say the trackbed has been built across at many points.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Dec 30, 2008 21:24:21 GMT
Worse than that.....at Winslow,there are little trees growing in the four-foot,and,I am told,enterprising scrapdealers have helped themselves to signalwire,even running rail! There has been a lot of controversy about safeguarding this route at least as far as Sandy on the GN mainline.Last I heard,they were severing the alignment near Bedford to build an olympic rowing lake. Don't get me wrong....I'd love to see many lines re-opened;it just seems like many local authority planning depts aren't singing from the same songsheet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:27:59 GMT
Look at the Robin Hood Line; tunnel buried with waste and allsorts, cuttings filled in, houses built over the site [unknown to developers]. Those houses had to be demolished, waste extracted etc. Proves it is possible, though at a cost! And look at the Bluebell Railways plans... It might take 20 years, but I think it is possible for at least part of the old Varsity Line to be reopened. I respect your being sceptical about the plan, but if they are determined to see it come to fruition, they will acheive that... It's just finding the funding and foresight from respective parties that are the hurdles to overcome, not to mention current landowners where the trackbed has been reclaimed...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:33:31 GMT
Worse than that.....at Winslow,there are little trees growing in the four-foot,and,I am told,enterprising scrapdealers have helped themselves to signalwire,even running rail! There has been a lot of controversy about safeguarding this route at least as far as Sandy on the GN mainline.Last I heard,they were severing the alignment near Bedford to build an olympic rowing lake. Don't get me wrong....I'd love to see many lines re-opened;it just seems like many local authority planning depts aren't singing from the same songsheet. Yes, Swanbourne is a pure example of this, where, lets say 'enterprising people' have removed some of the rails, chairs, bolts and the keys for a significant stretch, I'd estimate around 600 yards! At the time of my visit, there was a number of caravans and motorhomes in a field nearby, with suspicious looking tire tracks from the trackbed towards the caravans... Hmm, I'm not making any accusation, but it wouldn't take a great detective long to determine the likely culprits!
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Dec 30, 2008 21:36:29 GMT
It might take 20 years, but I think it is possible for at least part of the old Varsity Line to be reopened. I respect your being sceptical about the plan, but if they are determined to see it come to fruition, they will acheive that... It's just finding the funding and foresight from respective parties that are the hurdles to overcome, not to mention current landowners where the trackbed has been reclaimed... I agree entirely,and I'm not sceptical,just a bit depressed by the snail's pace of English rail development. Apparently local authorities can designate disused railway lines as "future rail use" for planning purposes at very little cost,and then re-opening can take place on an as-and-when basis. What upsets me is when a local authority refuses to do this,even on a line with such proven strategic value as the Varsity Line,meaning more delay,more costwhen the job comes to be done.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Dec 30, 2008 21:39:20 GMT
I went along to the new Vale Parkway station on Saturday, couldn't help noticing that not only is the station itself still a building site, but work on the adjacent housing development didn't seem to have even started, so the station doesn't appear to have anything to serve. I spoke to the driver of the train who told me that the station building is due to open in May, but that the housing development wouldn't be going ahead because the land is a floodplain and no developers wanted it. In light of all that Aylesbury Vale Parkway is starting to look pretty pointless Unless of course Chiltern Railways extend their passenger services beyond as is their long-term ambition. Just going by the name, the station was probably intended to serve an area well beyond its immediate vicinity. Even if it had been built would the proposed nearby housing development alone have justified a whole station?The plan for an Oxford service and the bits of 3- and 4-tracking are quite promising. At this rate I wonder if Chiltern might outgrow Marylebone? (The overspill would have to go to Paddington so hope not!)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:42:54 GMT
To quote the Chiltern website "Situated on the A41, Aylesbury Vale Parkway removes the need to drive into Aylesbury itself for those passengers from areas north-west of the town."
They are also running a free (for season ticket holders) bus from Quainton, Waddesdon etc. so I doubt they are expecting many passengers to arrive on foot.
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Dec 30, 2008 21:44:51 GMT
As I understand it,the plan was initially for an Oxford/Aylesbury to Milton Keynes service.The line would be extended incrementally toward Cambridge,but not using the old line via Gamlingay (too twisty and built over),rather using a new North curve at Hitchin. The completed line would have borne an Oxford Cambridge service in addition to those I mentioned,as well as being used as a freight/diversionary route.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 21:45:23 GMT
Hmm, joined up thinking eh? The trouble is, we have the rather insane 'policy' of having to consult everyone and everything about the slightest change. Take the High Speed Rail Link for example... Yes environmental concerns are important. Look at France, Japan and Germany and how they sort out their railways. Being polite, I think we just need to get on with rebuilding the railway and battle out the doubters in the courts! Thats what happened in the mid 19th Century with obstinate landowners. Brunel and his difficult sub-contractors; he just sacked them all and got his own working on the projects! Rail in the UK has effectively been starved of investment for some FIFTY YEARS, and now were are beginning to see the bad effect that has had. Perhaps now we are having, or are starting, Railway Mania 2, 1840 - 1860 all over again! There are a few pics on Railway Stations UK, linky, for you at; therailwaystationgallery.fotopic.net/
|
|
slugabed
Zu lang am schnuller.
Posts: 1,480
|
Post by slugabed on Dec 30, 2008 21:58:22 GMT
Hmm, joined up thinking eh? The trouble is, we have the rather insane 'policy' of having to consult everyone and everything about the slightest change. Take the High Speed Rail Link for example... Yes environmental concerns are important. Look at France, Japan and Germany and how they sort out their railways. Being polite, I think we just need to get on with rebuilding the railway and battle out the doubters in the courts! I heard the plans to re-open the line Oxford-Thame-Princes Risborugh were scuppered due to bats nesting in a tunnel near Wheatley! Someone tell me this isn't true! Please?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2008 22:09:35 GMT
Possibly... given that a railway line , was talked about being reopened, but plans were scuppered after a rare breed of newts/snails were found in a particularly damp section of cutting.
The most hopeful reopening I head of, was the rebuilding of Belah Viaduct. Well, thats some dream, but... you never know!!! www.forgottenrelics.co.uk/bridges/belah.html
I'm not so sure that the exact structure would be replicated if it ever were to happen, but?
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Dec 30, 2008 22:25:09 GMT
I heard the plans to re-open the line Oxford-Thame-Princes Risborugh were scuppered due to bats nesting in a tunnel near Wheatley! Someone tell me this isn't true! Please? 100% complete and utter ball hooks - unless by "bats" you mean "the M40" and by "nesting" you mean "built across the trackbed in the most expensive-to-cross way imaginable". Bats can be moved, the M40 can't. In other words, the enormous cost of reopenings vs the likely demand is what's scuppering reopenings. Likewise, high-speed rail is delayed by the terrifyingly huge amounts it's likely to cost.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2008 0:42:57 GMT
At this rate I wonder if Chiltern might outgrow Marylebone? (The overspill would have to go to Paddington so hope not!) Maybe they could do something about linking Marylebone and Baker Street directly, could be an opportunity to improve Marylebone's (currently dire it has to be said) underground links. Was thinking about that the other day, the distance can't be any greater than the distance between Bank and Monument. We're probably getting a bit ahead of ourselves though.
|
|
|
Post by ruislip on Dec 31, 2008 2:08:59 GMT
I guess the likelihood of reintroducing the former GCR/LNER line north of Aylesbury to the Midlands and beyond is non-existant?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2008 4:48:08 GMT
I guess the likelihood of reintroducing the former GCR/LNER line north of Aylesbury to the Midlands and beyond is non-existant? Rail has reported it (re-instatement to Rugby) as a long-term aspiration of Adrian Shooter, and in the shorter-term that Chiltern wish to run a service North from Aylesbury to Milton Keynes via Calvert and the re-laid East-West line, in conjunction with the other East-West proposals. It was also mentioned in Edwina Currie's Dr Beeching documentary. I think the suggested service pattern was for 2tph Oxford to Milton Keynes or Bedford and 2tph Aylesbury to Milton Keynes. Plus of course Chiltern's 2tph Oxford to Marylebone via the new chord at Bicester and High Wycombe. Signalling for the reinstated East-West line was IIRC proposed to allow 8tph each way so that there is room for freight and possible use by Cross-Country. IIRC the CBR was lower for the Aylesbury route than for the Oxford-MK route but both were positive. This diagram may be of interest - www.eastwestrail.org.uk/downloads/Maps/schematic_milton_keynes_south_mid.pdfAlso, there was some suggestion that various HS2 proposals (eg Greengauge) would use parts of the GCR alignment, which was built to continental gauge and still runs largely through open countryside. UPDATE: Modern Railways July 2008 quotes Adrian Shooter suggesting a 2012 opening for Aylesbury-MK and also states that Aylesbury Vale Parkway has been built to allow it to act as an island platform for future through services.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Dec 31, 2008 20:55:17 GMT
100% complete and utter ball hooks - unless by "bats" you mean "the M40" and by "nesting" you mean "built across the trackbed in the most expensive-to-cross way imaginable". Bats can be moved, the M40 can't. In other words, the enormous cost of reopenings vs the likely demand is what's scuppering reopenings. That sounds closer to what I've heard. Had it been easier to achieve Chiltern might have preferred the Princes Risborough link to the Bicester link due to the opportunity to swipe not just Oxford but also the Cotswold line from FGW. The Bicester link obviously has the added benefit of boosting the the E-W link though. On the issue of better links for the Marylebone customers I won't repeat my incomprehension that they rejected Crossrail. Chiltern on the other hand have been very proactive so they should try to improve links, expecially for people off the High Wycombe/Banbury branch.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jan 1, 2009 1:06:50 GMT
Maybe a very distant solution to a possible overcrowding solution at Marylebone could be a crossrail link between there and Fenchurch Street? The route would be a nice inbetween corridor of the Met and Jubilee.
I do so hope though that Chiltern keep on having dreams about what they want for the future. The country need more infrastructure, and a lot of it seems to be on or connected to the former GCR
|
|
|
Post by signalfailure on Jan 1, 2009 15:06:24 GMT
I have heard that there are plans in the pipeline to continue services through to Milton Keynes and Oxford.
Shame they will be running it via Calvert tho, being as though its the Household Waste Landfill site.
Cover your noses!!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2009 21:31:36 GMT
I do so hope though that Chiltern keep on having dreams about what they want for the future. Amen to that. Even so I do think there are some obstacles that simply can't be overcome with the GCR. Cost mainly.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 4, 2009 18:06:18 GMT
Saw a Chiltern turbo the other night with just AVP on the front! Lets hope people know where its going!
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Jan 6, 2009 20:45:28 GMT
I saw one the other day too. Considering that I had to think before working out what it meant what hope have the general public?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 6, 2009 20:47:30 GMT
Quite, If they can get Birmingham Snow Hill on the destination I think a better effort could be made! Perhaps the system has not been upgraded yet?
|
|
|
Post by astock5000 on Jan 6, 2009 20:51:50 GMT
Is it that important? I thought Chiltern had announcements on the stations, and if passengers hear an announcement that the next train is going to Aylesbury Vale Parkway, a lot of them wouldn't even look at the front of the train, and also, it only takes a day or to to get used to it, so it isn't a problem for people who use the line often.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Jan 6, 2009 21:39:16 GMT
It's just bad practice. If it is possible, why not provide as much information as is effectively possible. You don't see FBS on the front of a Fast Baker Street train or EBY on a District line train. Sure, the regulars will know the route, but would someone at Chorleywood know?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,776
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 6, 2009 22:58:00 GMT
If "Aylesbury Vale Parkway" (22 characters, including spaces) is too long, "Aylesbury Vale Pkwy" (19) or "Aylesbury Vale" (14) would be better than "AVP". "Brimingham Snow Hill" is 20 characters, so assuming a monospace font (I don't know if it is or not) either of the shorter versions should fit. The following is a quick sample of 6 proportional fonts showing that even "Aylesbury Vale Pkway" is likely to fit in the space of "Birmingham New Street"
|
|