Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2008 22:35:15 GMT
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Sept 6, 2008 9:24:08 GMT
It's been done before hasn't it for New Years? And I am sure that a few £££££££ for staff would be a drop in the ocean compared with the overall costs.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 6, 2008 9:39:53 GMT
Nothing new - looking at the TTNs for the '35 and '52 Coronations there was gap of much less than an hour between first and last trains. Of course this was in an era before programme machines reset themselves at 3 and people willingly worked extra hours.
I've never seen a TTN for the '48 Olympics - but I know that there is a full set in captivity.
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Sept 6, 2008 9:50:24 GMT
The spokesperson's words suggest to me that they might be talking about only for the opening and closing ceremonies, which is no more of a challenge than the overnight running for new years and similar events (although there would still be implications for rostering and paying drivers etc.). Not only will there be a load of people to disperse from Stratford, I would imagine there will be parallel events in Central London (and elsewhere) too...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 10:02:41 GMT
The Olympics in Sydney did not need all-night trains....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 10:08:56 GMT
[rant alert] I think the reign of Boris's transport policy is going to turn into the era of nothing being done. Parliament Square pedestrianisation scrapped; £25 gas guzzlers charge scrapped; no more funding for the cross river tram so it might as well be scrapped; nothing done about 24hour tube running during the Olympics. Next will be the Western extension of the Congestion Charge and the DLR extension to Dagenham. All he has done is banned drinking on public transport. I went through Camden last weekend on the Northern Line and there are still plenty of tourists enjoying a can of beer on the tube. Finally, who remembers his election pledge of a no strike deal with the transport unions? [/rant alert]
|
|
|
Post by ducatisti on Sept 6, 2008 10:18:48 GMT
I think a large portion of his appeal was that he wasn't going to do stuff (eg the unconsulted western extension to the congestion charge). I have a lot of sympathy for some of Livingstone's early stuff, but he was starting get project-itis. (I still voted for him as better than Boris).
Won't bother me either way. Interested to note the RMT has been quoted as talking abnout safety issues etc. Wonder if they are going to get talked into a corner as being "anti-olympic", there is certainly widespread cynicsm about their talking about safety whenever they strike.
I certainly don't see there's any issue with running for 24hrs in short bursts (although I hope everything will be checked and fettled beforehand.
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Sept 6, 2008 12:03:50 GMT
@somersetchris - as someone that didn't vote for Boris either, I think your comments pretty much sum up his record so far quite well!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 12:59:57 GMT
I did not vote Boris either
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 13:44:03 GMT
I voted for Spartacus.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Sept 6, 2008 13:46:31 GMT
I didn't vote for him, nor my wife and daughter, though we don't live in London! I am quite a fan of his. As to Mr Livingstone, some of us remember when he was Deputy Leader of the GLC. I am sure that a lot of DD members weren't even born then. However, despite his politics being the anthithesis of my family's I have to say that initially, especially when he stood as an Independent for Mayor, he was probably the right man for the job. He might still have been if dare I suggest if he had remained on an Independent hustings. I started out in local politics back in 1973, in Hounslow, but have had experience back to when my father first stood for Feltham UDC back in 1961. I can say that I have I believe seen 'how the system works' in London. Well, I thought I did until I started watching the televised Questions of the Mayor, and realised that perhaps it is a different ballgame now. I also have to say that I was very much 'around' when the Heathrow T4 extension was mooted and eventually authorised and built. There was no Mayor of London then, but it was still a trying and nail-biting time as to whether the link would ever be built. London has seen a whole string of failed projects in the past. I would, having worked in Acton, like to see the Uxbridge Road tram system but local objections seem to have killed that off. I am sure that the 24-hour or extended-hours for the opening and closing ceremonies would be agreeable to the RMT. In the end it must surely come down to money, and I am sure that there will be plenty to reimburse the staff? Who knows, the District works might even have been finished by then? Still, the Unions (I think ably) represent the workers on the ground and given plenty of time to negotiate and discuss before 2012, something can be agreed for the benefit of London and the country.* Being a cynic again, I do wonder if there is any point in the Gaz Guzzler charge...sales of Smarts have soared as it is unpatriotic/foolhardy/ridiculous/uneconomic or whatever words you want to add in to drive one in this day and age, with fuel costs so high. Sales of SUVs or 4x4s have dropped like a stone. Nowadays even in country and rural areas some cars are virtually worthless compared to a year or so ago. Our little KIA has a 1.1 litre engine, has done 73,000 miles ince March 2005 and has just proven to have averaged 50 mpg over 260 miles (3/4 tank). Yet I absolutely fume at the way that, around here, 4x4 drivers (not Land-Rovers or Utility vehicles) think that they own the road and can lord it over the rest of us. As to pollution control, unfortunately the LTI taxis are still belching out exhaust gases, and yet even under the previous administration no demand for cutting taxi emissions seems to have been proposed. * I should add that London is not the only area to benefit from the Games. Apart from football up in Scotland, down in Weymouth there will be the sailing. This is hoped to benefit the local economy, and I pray that SWT or whomever runs the trains down there at the time gets their act together. Also that the road works down to Portland from Dorchester which are so needed, work as planned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 14:05:12 GMT
Current agreements with the unions would allow for a 24hr service for the opening and closing ceremonies.
However LU recognise that with some events finishing late in the evening the Olympics would create a third peak period at around midnight. The current belief is that this third peak will be as busy as the current AM peak period. (It is also believed the AM peak will be longer and the PM peak longer and much busier!)
The current thinking is that services will need to run until at least 2am everyday of the Olympics to allow all spectators to get home.
The 2am closure has been costed by the infracos as any maintenance will obviously still need to be done but in a shorter time window.
As far as station staff are concerned, LU will need to cancel all annual leave and to change the current working agreements to facilitate smooth running during the Olympics. Given that LU favour multi-year pay deals it makes huge sense to start discussing the changes to any agreements now rather than what normally happens.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Sept 6, 2008 15:59:50 GMT
As we have a while yet, and that by summer 2012 there will be new staff joining with an eye on the Games, I agree that negotiations should start, well now!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2008 18:20:47 GMT
there is a way of not getting the programme machine to reset itself after the last 376 number there is also a end of service hole (rewind) when we had the new year running there was a gap of 1hour between the last and first trains the machines simply moved on to the next service at approx 4am well it would of been simple but one of the machines at hammersmith decided to give up that night and i got a job at 2am for a programme machine the only thing with programme machines and running a long service is the roll has a maximum length (dont ask what it is i dont know) so usually the service in theory is still split up into different days to fool the machine but the should run quite happy if they are punched right
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 6, 2008 20:03:10 GMT
the only thing with programme machines and running a long service is the roll has a maximum length (dont ask what it is i dont know) so usually the service in theory is still split up into different days to fool the machine but the should run quite happy if they are punched right Depends which bit of paperwork you read; I've seen 40 foot long with 1200 entries and also 45 foot long with however many entries it is at 0.3" pitch. Perhaps Acton Town S5 or JR 15 Secs can confirm, as they've both contributed to Programme Machine related threads? I know we've had a discussion that mentions 50 foot long with 1400 entries.... Chanelling Colin: The documentation I have says that a programme machine roll can be up to 50 feet long and it is possible to accomodate 1,400 entries in that length. The same documentation suggests that if the programme machine has not reached the end of service position on the programme machine roll at 3am it will not rewind but simply continue operating as normal. Thus provided the programme machine roll has the continuous overnight service on it there is no reason it should not run. In this way one off all night running can be accomodated such as now seems to be a regular feature of New Year's Eve. More than one consecutive night of all night running might begin to run into the limitations of the system but in any case is unlikely to happen owing to other problems unrelated to signalling such as the inability to carry out track inspections in the tunnel areas while the service is running. How many programme machines will still be around in 2012?
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Sept 6, 2008 20:28:46 GMT
Has anyone ever dropped one of these programme machine rolls?
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 6, 2008 20:32:15 GMT
Yes - it unwound all over my dining room floor! ;D
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Sept 6, 2008 21:58:27 GMT
How many programme machines will still be around in 2012? They are starting to be replaced on Piccadilly line sites over the next 18 months with Progammable Logic Controllers (PLC) like at Hatton Cross. The project is being funded by LUL. I don't know exactly what sites are included though.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Sept 6, 2008 22:26:07 GMT
Has anyone ever dropped one of these programme machine rolls? No, but I have had to hand wind a roll on its carrier before now. It takes a good few minutes...
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Sept 6, 2008 22:26:50 GMT
How many programme machines will still be around in 2012? They are starting to be replaced on Piccadilly line sites over the next 18 months with Progammable Logic Controllers (PLC) like at Hatton Cross. The project is being funded by LUL. I don't know exactly what sites are included though. At the moment Tubelines are looking at Ealing Common, Hanger Lane Junction and Acton Town.
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Sept 6, 2008 22:31:05 GMT
They are starting to be replaced on Piccadilly line sites over the next 18 months with Progammable Logic Controllers (PLC) like at Hatton Cross. The project is being funded by LUL. I don't know exactly what sites are included though. At the moment Tubelines are looking at Ealing Common, Hanger Lane Junction and Acton Town. I know that Boston Manor and Northfields were also among the first. At least the 3 you mention are now on the cards, as when Tube Lies were paying for it, they were going to miss out them sites as they are Metronets! I wonder if Ealing Broadway is included or if that is too complicated!
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Sept 6, 2008 22:34:05 GMT
I wonder if Ealing Broadway is included or if that is too complicated! Ealing Broadway is far too complicated - and that's just the lever ops for the slot to come over from the Central line! From what I gather, Tubelines are doing the work for Metronet...
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Sept 7, 2008 0:54:26 GMT
However - least said soonest mended - Ealing Broadway is only complicated from an asset ownership/management POV [1] - I'd hesitate to suggest: but I'm going to anyway - check your DC [2] feeds.
As it is bad form to use textspeke:
[1] Point Of View, I'd suggest that (ultimately) it might be worth looking into the supply/rectification between the Central and District - 'cus I think one is 'Yellow'and t'other is 'Blue' - think of: phase angle, vanes &c. Not to mention the historical antipathy.
[2] Direct Current.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2008 17:00:06 GMT
all the district line machines will still be there except those maintained by tubelines which are going over to a computer based program to replicate the machine
|
|
|
Post by programmes1 on Sept 8, 2008 13:04:55 GMT
the only thing with programme machines and running a long service is the roll has a maximum length (dont ask what it is i dont know) so usually the service in theory is still split up into different days to fool the machine but the should run quite happy if they are punched right Depends which bit of paperwork you read; I've seen 40 foot long with 1200 entries and also 45 foot long with however many entries it is at 0.3" pitch. Perhaps Acton Town S5 or JR 15 Secs can confirm, as they've both contributed to Programme Machine related threads? I know we've had a discussion that mentions 50 foot long with 1400 entries.... Chanelling Colin: The documentation I have says that a programme machine roll can be up to 50 feet long and it is possible to accomodate 1,400 entries in that length. The same documentation suggests that if the programme machine has not reached the end of service position on the programme machine roll at 3am it will not rewind but simply continue operating as normal. Thus provided the programme machine roll has the continuous overnight service on it there is no reason it should not run. In this way one off all night running can be accomodated such as now seems to be a regular feature of New Year's Eve. More than one consecutive night of all night running might begin to run into the limitations of the system but in any case is unlikely to happen owing to other problems unrelated to signalling such as the inability to carry out track inspections in the tunnel areas while the service is running. How many programme machines will still be around in 2012? 1. I was told Brixton S2 had the longest roll can't remember the length though. 2. Well if all goes well not many the Northern & Victoria lines should be in their new control rooms and the new SSL control at Hammersmith should open before then although we will have to wait and see how the first change overs go on the Met.
|
|
|
Post by upfast on Sept 8, 2008 14:55:04 GMT
Apparently the first PMs to be replaced by PLCs will be easy sites at Hyde Park Corner and King's Cross. new SSL control at Hammersmith should open before then although we will have to wait and see how the first change overs go on the Met. No chance!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2008 15:09:16 GMT
Apparently the first PMs to be replaced by PLCs will be easy sites at Hyde Park Corner and King's Cross. new SSL control at Hammersmith should open before then although we will have to wait and see how the first change overs go on the Met. No chance! Indeed! A victim of the collapse of Metronet, I believe the contract for the signalling is being re-tendered and ground has not yet been broken on the building site.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2008 16:33:18 GMT
I believe the clearance for the site is under way and that the building construction will go ahead with the eventually signalling systems being retro fitted into the 'shell' of the building
|
|